update the comment above llvm::SplitCriticalEdge, and make
it abort on IndirectBrInst as describe in the comment.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@85688 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/Transforms/Utils/BreakCriticalEdges.cpp b/lib/Transforms/Utils/BreakCriticalEdges.cpp
index d683a2c..813119d 100644
--- a/lib/Transforms/Utils/BreakCriticalEdges.cpp
+++ b/lib/Transforms/Utils/BreakCriticalEdges.cpp
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@
bool Changed = false;
for (Function::iterator I = F.begin(), E = F.end(); I != E; ++I) {
TerminatorInst *TI = I->getTerminator();
- if (TI->getNumSuccessors() > 1)
+ if (TI->getNumSuccessors() > 1 && !isa<IndirectBrInst>(TI))
for (unsigned i = 0, e = TI->getNumSuccessors(); i != e; ++i)
if (SplitCriticalEdge(TI, i, this)) {
++NumBroken;
@@ -150,14 +150,29 @@
/// SplitCriticalEdge - If this edge is a critical edge, insert a new node to
/// split the critical edge. This will update DominatorTree and
-/// DominatorFrontier information if it is available, thus calling this pass
-/// will not invalidate any of them. This returns true if the edge was split,
-/// false otherwise. This ensures that all edges to that dest go to one block
-/// instead of each going to a different block.
-//
+/// DominatorFrontier information if it is available, thus calling this pass
+/// will not invalidate either of them. This returns the new block if the edge
+/// was split, null otherwise.
+///
+/// If MergeIdenticalEdges is true (not the default), *all* edges from TI to the
+/// specified successor will be merged into the same critical edge block.
+/// This is most commonly interesting with switch instructions, which may
+/// have many edges to any one destination. This ensures that all edges to that
+/// dest go to one block instead of each going to a different block, but isn't
+/// the standard definition of a "critical edge".
+///
+/// It is invalid to call this function on a critical edge that starts at an
+/// IndirectBrInst. Splitting these edges will almost always create an invalid
+/// program because the addr of the new block won't be the one that is jumped
+/// to.
+///
BasicBlock *llvm::SplitCriticalEdge(TerminatorInst *TI, unsigned SuccNum,
Pass *P, bool MergeIdenticalEdges) {
if (!isCriticalEdge(TI, SuccNum, MergeIdenticalEdges)) return 0;
+
+ assert(!isa<IndirectBrInst>(TI) &&
+ "Cannot split critical edge from IndirectBrInst");
+
BasicBlock *TIBB = TI->getParent();
BasicBlock *DestBB = TI->getSuccessor(SuccNum);