Let StructRetPromotion check if it's users are really calling it and not
passing its pointer. Fixes test with added testcase.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@51991 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/test/Transforms/SRETPromotion/2008-06-04-function-pointer-passing.ll b/test/Transforms/SRETPromotion/2008-06-04-function-pointer-passing.ll
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..21701dd
--- /dev/null
+++ b/test/Transforms/SRETPromotion/2008-06-04-function-pointer-passing.ll
@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+; This test lures sretpromotion into promoting the sret argument of foo, even
+; when the function is used as an argument to bar. It used to not check for
+; this, assuming that all users of foo were direct calls, resulting in an
+; assertion failure later on.
+
+; We're mainly testing for opt not to crash, but we'll check to see if the sret
+; attribute is still there for good measure.
+; RUN: llvm-as < %s | opt -sretpromotion | llvm-dis | grep sret
+
+%struct.S = type <{ i32, i32 }>
+
+define i32 @main() {
+entry:
+ %tmp = alloca %struct.S ; <%struct.S*> [#uses=1]
+ call void @bar( %struct.S* sret %tmp, void (%struct.S*, ...)* @foo )
+ ret i32 undef
+}
+
+declare void @bar(%struct.S* sret , void (%struct.S*, ...)*)
+
+define internal void @foo(%struct.S* sret %agg.result, ...) {
+entry:
+ ret void
+}