Move getTrue() and getFalse() to 2.5-like APIs.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@77685 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp
index 91fcd20..7db39d5 100644
--- a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp
+++ b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/SCCP.cpp
@@ -442,7 +442,7 @@
Succs[0] = Succs[1] = true;
} else if (BCValue.isConstant()) {
// Constant condition variables mean the branch can only go a single way
- Succs[BCValue.getConstant() == Context->getFalse()] = true;
+ Succs[BCValue.getConstant() == ConstantInt::getFalse(*Context)] = true;
}
}
} else if (isa<InvokeInst>(&TI)) {
@@ -487,7 +487,7 @@
// Constant condition variables mean the branch can only go a single way
return BI->getSuccessor(BCValue.getConstant() ==
- Context->getFalse()) == To;
+ ConstantInt::getFalse(*Context)) == To;
}
return false;
}
@@ -1488,7 +1488,7 @@
// as undef, then further analysis could think the undef went another way
// leading to an inconsistent set of conclusions.
if (BranchInst *BI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(TI)) {
- BI->setCondition(Context->getFalse());
+ BI->setCondition(ConstantInt::getFalse(*Context));
} else {
SwitchInst *SI = cast<SwitchInst>(TI);
SI->setCondition(SI->getCaseValue(1));