Second attempt:
Massive check in. This changes the "-fast" flag to "-O#" in llc. If you want to
use the old behavior, the flag is -O0. This change allows for finer-grained
control over which optimizations are run at different -O levels.
Most of this work was pretty mechanical. The majority of the fixes came from
verifying that a "fast" variable wasn't used anymore. The JIT still uses a
"Fast" flag. I'll change the JIT with a follow-up patch.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@70343 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/Target/ARM/AsmPrinter/ARMAsmPrinter.cpp b/lib/Target/ARM/AsmPrinter/ARMAsmPrinter.cpp
index b3fa88e..6559a9d 100644
--- a/lib/Target/ARM/AsmPrinter/ARMAsmPrinter.cpp
+++ b/lib/Target/ARM/AsmPrinter/ARMAsmPrinter.cpp
@@ -80,9 +80,9 @@
/// True if asm printer is printing a series of CONSTPOOL_ENTRY.
bool InCPMode;
public:
- ARMAsmPrinter(raw_ostream &O, TargetMachine &TM,
- const TargetAsmInfo *T, bool F, bool V)
- : AsmPrinter(O, TM, T, F, V), DW(0), MMI(NULL), AFI(NULL), MCP(NULL),
+ explicit ARMAsmPrinter(raw_ostream &O, TargetMachine &TM,
+ const TargetAsmInfo *T, unsigned OL, bool V)
+ : AsmPrinter(O, TM, T, OL, V), DW(0), MMI(NULL), AFI(NULL), MCP(NULL),
InCPMode(false) {
Subtarget = &TM.getSubtarget<ARMSubtarget>();
}
@@ -1061,8 +1061,8 @@
///
FunctionPass *llvm::createARMCodePrinterPass(raw_ostream &o,
ARMTargetMachine &tm,
- bool fast, bool verbose) {
- return new ARMAsmPrinter(o, tm, tm.getTargetAsmInfo(), fast, verbose);
+ unsigned OptLevel, bool verbose) {
+ return new ARMAsmPrinter(o, tm, tm.getTargetAsmInfo(), OptLevel, verbose);
}
namespace {