Second attempt:
Massive check in. This changes the "-fast" flag to "-O#" in llc. If you want to
use the old behavior, the flag is -O0. This change allows for finer-grained
control over which optimizations are run at different -O levels.
Most of this work was pretty mechanical. The majority of the fixes came from
verifying that a "fast" variable wasn't used anymore. The JIT still uses a
"Fast" flag. I'll change the JIT with a follow-up patch.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@70343 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/Target/X86/AsmPrinter/X86AsmPrinter.cpp b/lib/Target/X86/AsmPrinter/X86AsmPrinter.cpp
index d64aaa6..85c5471 100644
--- a/lib/Target/X86/AsmPrinter/X86AsmPrinter.cpp
+++ b/lib/Target/X86/AsmPrinter/X86AsmPrinter.cpp
@@ -25,13 +25,15 @@
///
FunctionPass *llvm::createX86CodePrinterPass(raw_ostream &o,
X86TargetMachine &tm,
- bool fast, bool verbose) {
+ unsigned OptLevel, bool verbose) {
const X86Subtarget *Subtarget = &tm.getSubtarget<X86Subtarget>();
if (Subtarget->isFlavorIntel()) {
- return new X86IntelAsmPrinter(o, tm, tm.getTargetAsmInfo(), fast, verbose);
+ return new X86IntelAsmPrinter(o, tm, tm.getTargetAsmInfo(),
+ OptLevel, verbose);
} else {
- return new X86ATTAsmPrinter(o, tm, tm.getTargetAsmInfo(), fast, verbose);
+ return new X86ATTAsmPrinter(o, tm, tm.getTargetAsmInfo(),
+ OptLevel, verbose);
}
}