Instead of passing in an unsigned value for the optimization level, use an enum,
which better identifies what the optimization is doing. And is more flexible for
future uses.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@70440 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/Target/ARM/AsmPrinter/ARMAsmPrinter.cpp b/lib/Target/ARM/AsmPrinter/ARMAsmPrinter.cpp
index 6559a9d..d5def37 100644
--- a/lib/Target/ARM/AsmPrinter/ARMAsmPrinter.cpp
+++ b/lib/Target/ARM/AsmPrinter/ARMAsmPrinter.cpp
@@ -81,7 +81,8 @@
bool InCPMode;
public:
explicit ARMAsmPrinter(raw_ostream &O, TargetMachine &TM,
- const TargetAsmInfo *T, unsigned OL, bool V)
+ const TargetAsmInfo *T, CodeGenOpt::Level OL,
+ bool V)
: AsmPrinter(O, TM, T, OL, V), DW(0), MMI(NULL), AFI(NULL), MCP(NULL),
InCPMode(false) {
Subtarget = &TM.getSubtarget<ARMSubtarget>();
@@ -1061,7 +1062,8 @@
///
FunctionPass *llvm::createARMCodePrinterPass(raw_ostream &o,
ARMTargetMachine &tm,
- unsigned OptLevel, bool verbose) {
+ CodeGenOpt::Level OptLevel,
+ bool verbose) {
return new ARMAsmPrinter(o, tm, tm.getTargetAsmInfo(), OptLevel, verbose);
}