API change for {BinaryOperator|CmpInst|CastInst}::create*() --> Create. Legacy interfaces will be in place for some time. (Merge from use-diet branch.)
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@51200 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Reassociate.cpp b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Reassociate.cpp
index e2d133c..de1a3ba 100644
--- a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Reassociate.cpp
+++ b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Reassociate.cpp
@@ -194,7 +194,7 @@
static Instruction *LowerNegateToMultiply(Instruction *Neg) {
Constant *Cst = ConstantInt::getAllOnesValue(Neg->getType());
- Instruction *Res = BinaryOperator::createMul(Neg->getOperand(1), Cst, "",Neg);
+ Instruction *Res = BinaryOperator::CreateMul(Neg->getOperand(1), Cst, "",Neg);
Res->takeName(Neg);
Neg->replaceAllUsesWith(Res);
Neg->eraseFromParent();
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@
// Insert a 'neg' instruction that subtracts the value from zero to get the
// negation.
//
- return BinaryOperator::createNeg(V, V->getName() + ".neg", BI);
+ return BinaryOperator::CreateNeg(V, V->getName() + ".neg", BI);
}
/// ShouldBreakUpSubtract - Return true if we should break up this subtract of
@@ -427,7 +427,7 @@
//
Value *NegVal = NegateValue(Sub->getOperand(1), Sub);
Instruction *New =
- BinaryOperator::createAdd(Sub->getOperand(0), NegVal, "", Sub);
+ BinaryOperator::CreateAdd(Sub->getOperand(0), NegVal, "", Sub);
New->takeName(Sub);
// Everyone now refers to the add instruction.
@@ -451,7 +451,7 @@
Constant *MulCst = ConstantInt::get(Shl->getType(), 1);
MulCst = ConstantExpr::getShl(MulCst, cast<Constant>(Shl->getOperand(1)));
- Instruction *Mul = BinaryOperator::createMul(Shl->getOperand(0), MulCst,
+ Instruction *Mul = BinaryOperator::CreateMul(Shl->getOperand(0), MulCst,
"", Shl);
Mul->takeName(Shl);
Shl->replaceAllUsesWith(Mul);
@@ -485,7 +485,7 @@
Value *V1 = Ops.back();
Ops.pop_back();
Value *V2 = EmitAddTreeOfValues(I, Ops);
- return BinaryOperator::createAdd(V2, V1, "tmp", I);
+ return BinaryOperator::CreateAdd(V2, V1, "tmp", I);
}
/// RemoveFactorFromExpression - If V is an expression tree that is a
@@ -714,7 +714,7 @@
// this, we could otherwise run into situations where removing a factor
// from an expression will drop a use of maxocc, and this can cause
// RemoveFactorFromExpression on successive values to behave differently.
- Instruction *DummyInst = BinaryOperator::createAdd(MaxOccVal, MaxOccVal);
+ Instruction *DummyInst = BinaryOperator::CreateAdd(MaxOccVal, MaxOccVal);
std::vector<Value*> NewMulOps;
for (unsigned i = 0, e = Ops.size(); i != e; ++i) {
if (Value *V = RemoveFactorFromExpression(Ops[i].Op, MaxOccVal)) {
@@ -729,7 +729,7 @@
unsigned NumAddedValues = NewMulOps.size();
Value *V = EmitAddTreeOfValues(I, NewMulOps);
- Value *V2 = BinaryOperator::createMul(V, MaxOccVal, "tmp", I);
+ Value *V2 = BinaryOperator::CreateMul(V, MaxOccVal, "tmp", I);
// Now that we have inserted V and its sole use, optimize it. This allows
// us to handle cases that require multiple factoring steps, such as this: