Factor code for testing whether replacing one value with another
preserves LCSSA form out of ScalarEvolution and into the LoopInfo
class. Use it to check that SimplifyInstruction simplifications
are not breaking LCSSA form. Fixes PR8622.
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@119727 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopUnswitch.cpp b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopUnswitch.cpp
index 009ee7b..2eaeb43 100644
--- a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopUnswitch.cpp
+++ b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/LoopUnswitch.cpp
@@ -990,15 +990,16 @@
++NumSimplify;
continue;
}
-
+
// See if instruction simplification can hack this up. This is common for
// things like "select false, X, Y" after unswitching made the condition be
// 'false'.
- if (Value *V = SimplifyInstruction(I, 0, DT)) {
- ReplaceUsesOfWith(I, V, Worklist, L, LPM);
- continue;
- }
-
+ if (Value *V = SimplifyInstruction(I, 0, DT))
+ if (LI->replacementPreservesLCSSAForm(I, V)) {
+ ReplaceUsesOfWith(I, V, Worklist, L, LPM);
+ continue;
+ }
+
// Special case hacks that appear commonly in unswitched code.
if (BranchInst *BI = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(I)) {
if (BI->isUnconditional()) {
diff --git a/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopSimplify.cpp b/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopSimplify.cpp
index 320223c..f77a583 100644
--- a/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopSimplify.cpp
+++ b/lib/Transforms/Utils/LoopSimplify.cpp
@@ -269,11 +269,12 @@
PHINode *PN;
for (BasicBlock::iterator I = L->getHeader()->begin();
(PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(I++)); )
- if (Value *V = SimplifyInstruction(PN, 0, DT)) {
- if (AA) AA->deleteValue(PN);
- PN->replaceAllUsesWith(V);
- PN->eraseFromParent();
- }
+ if (Value *V = SimplifyInstruction(PN, 0, DT))
+ if (LI->replacementPreservesLCSSAForm(PN, V)) {
+ if (AA) AA->deleteValue(PN);
+ PN->replaceAllUsesWith(V);
+ PN->eraseFromParent();
+ }
// If this loop has multiple exits and the exits all go to the same
// block, attempt to merge the exits. This helps several passes, such
@@ -445,17 +446,18 @@
/// FindPHIToPartitionLoops - The first part of loop-nestification is to find a
/// PHI node that tells us how to partition the loops.
static PHINode *FindPHIToPartitionLoops(Loop *L, DominatorTree *DT,
- AliasAnalysis *AA) {
+ AliasAnalysis *AA, LoopInfo *LI) {
for (BasicBlock::iterator I = L->getHeader()->begin(); isa<PHINode>(I); ) {
PHINode *PN = cast<PHINode>(I);
++I;
- if (Value *V = SimplifyInstruction(PN, 0, DT)) {
- // This is a degenerate PHI already, don't modify it!
- PN->replaceAllUsesWith(V);
- if (AA) AA->deleteValue(PN);
- PN->eraseFromParent();
- continue;
- }
+ if (Value *V = SimplifyInstruction(PN, 0, DT))
+ if (LI->replacementPreservesLCSSAForm(PN, V)) {
+ // This is a degenerate PHI already, don't modify it!
+ PN->replaceAllUsesWith(V);
+ if (AA) AA->deleteValue(PN);
+ PN->eraseFromParent();
+ continue;
+ }
// Scan this PHI node looking for a use of the PHI node by itself.
for (unsigned i = 0, e = PN->getNumIncomingValues(); i != e; ++i)
@@ -523,7 +525,7 @@
/// created.
///
Loop *LoopSimplify::SeparateNestedLoop(Loop *L, LPPassManager &LPM) {
- PHINode *PN = FindPHIToPartitionLoops(L, DT, AA);
+ PHINode *PN = FindPHIToPartitionLoops(L, DT, AA, LI);
if (PN == 0) return 0; // No known way to partition.
// Pull out all predecessors that have varying values in the loop. This