Uniformize the names of type predicates: rather than having isFloatTy and
isInteger, we now have isFloatTy and isIntegerTy. Requested by Chris!
git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@96223 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Reassociate.cpp b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Reassociate.cpp
index bbd4b45..187216a 100644
--- a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Reassociate.cpp
+++ b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/Reassociate.cpp
@@ -182,7 +182,7 @@
// If this is a not or neg instruction, do not count it for rank. This
// assures us that X and ~X will have the same rank.
- if (!I->getType()->isInteger() ||
+ if (!I->getType()->isIntegerTy() ||
(!BinaryOperator::isNot(I) && !BinaryOperator::isNeg(I)))
++Rank;
@@ -929,7 +929,7 @@
}
// Reject cases where it is pointless to do this.
- if (!isa<BinaryOperator>(BI) || BI->getType()->isFloatingPoint() ||
+ if (!isa<BinaryOperator>(BI) || BI->getType()->isFloatingPointTy() ||
isa<VectorType>(BI->getType()))
continue; // Floating point ops are not associative.
@@ -939,7 +939,7 @@
// is not further optimized, it is likely to be transformed back to a
// short-circuited form for code gen, and the source order may have been
// optimized for the most likely conditions.
- if (BI->getType()->isInteger(1))
+ if (BI->getType()->isIntegerTy(1))
continue;
// If this is a subtract instruction which is not already in negate form,