It's not necessary to do rounding for alloca operations when the requested
alignment is equal to the stack alignment.


git-svn-id: https://llvm.org/svn/llvm-project/llvm/trunk@40004 91177308-0d34-0410-b5e6-96231b3b80d8
diff --git a/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GCSE.cpp b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GCSE.cpp
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..93ed8c4
--- /dev/null
+++ b/lib/Transforms/Scalar/GCSE.cpp
@@ -0,0 +1,201 @@
+//===-- GCSE.cpp - SSA-based Global Common Subexpression Elimination ------===//
+//
+//                     The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
+//
+// This file was developed by the LLVM research group and is distributed under
+// the University of Illinois Open Source License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+//
+// This pass is designed to be a very quick global transformation that
+// eliminates global common subexpressions from a function.  It does this by
+// using an existing value numbering implementation to identify the common
+// subexpressions, eliminating them when possible.
+//
+//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
+
+#define DEBUG_TYPE "gcse"
+#include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h"
+#include "llvm/Instructions.h"
+#include "llvm/Function.h"
+#include "llvm/Type.h"
+#include "llvm/Analysis/ConstantFolding.h"
+#include "llvm/Analysis/Dominators.h"
+#include "llvm/Analysis/ValueNumbering.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/DepthFirstIterator.h"
+#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"
+#include "llvm/Support/Compiler.h"
+#include <algorithm>
+using namespace llvm;
+
+STATISTIC(NumInstRemoved, "Number of instructions removed");
+STATISTIC(NumLoadRemoved, "Number of loads removed");
+STATISTIC(NumCallRemoved, "Number of calls removed");
+STATISTIC(NumNonInsts   , "Number of instructions removed due "
+                          "to non-instruction values");
+STATISTIC(NumArgsRepl   , "Number of function arguments replaced "
+                          "with constant values");
+namespace {
+  struct VISIBILITY_HIDDEN GCSE : public FunctionPass {
+    static char ID; // Pass identification, replacement for typeid
+    GCSE() : FunctionPass((intptr_t)&ID) {}
+
+    virtual bool runOnFunction(Function &F);
+
+  private:
+    void ReplaceInstructionWith(Instruction *I, Value *V);
+
+    // This transformation requires dominator and immediate dominator info
+    virtual void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
+      AU.setPreservesCFG();
+      AU.addRequired<DominatorTree>();
+      AU.addRequired<ValueNumbering>();
+    }
+  };
+
+  char GCSE::ID = 0;
+  RegisterPass<GCSE> X("gcse", "Global Common Subexpression Elimination");
+}
+
+// createGCSEPass - The public interface to this file...
+FunctionPass *llvm::createGCSEPass() { return new GCSE(); }
+
+// GCSE::runOnFunction - This is the main transformation entry point for a
+// function.
+//
+bool GCSE::runOnFunction(Function &F) {
+  bool Changed = false;
+
+  // Get pointers to the analysis results that we will be using...
+  DominatorTree &DT = getAnalysis<DominatorTree>();
+  ValueNumbering &VN = getAnalysis<ValueNumbering>();
+
+  std::vector<Value*> EqualValues;
+
+  // Check for value numbers of arguments.  If the value numbering
+  // implementation can prove that an incoming argument is a constant or global
+  // value address, substitute it, making the argument dead.
+  for (Function::arg_iterator AI = F.arg_begin(), E = F.arg_end(); AI != E;++AI)
+    if (!AI->use_empty()) {
+      VN.getEqualNumberNodes(AI, EqualValues);
+      if (!EqualValues.empty()) {
+        for (unsigned i = 0, e = EqualValues.size(); i != e; ++i)
+          if (isa<Constant>(EqualValues[i])) {
+            AI->replaceAllUsesWith(EqualValues[i]);
+            ++NumArgsRepl;
+            Changed = true;
+            break;
+          }
+        EqualValues.clear();
+      }
+    }
+
+  // Traverse the CFG of the function in dominator order, so that we see each
+  // instruction after we see its operands.
+  for (df_iterator<DomTreeNode*> DI = df_begin(DT.getRootNode()),
+         E = df_end(DT.getRootNode()); DI != E; ++DI) {
+    BasicBlock *BB = DI->getBlock();
+
+    // Remember which instructions we've seen in this basic block as we scan.
+    std::set<Instruction*> BlockInsts;
+
+    for (BasicBlock::iterator I = BB->begin(), E = BB->end(); I != E; ) {
+      Instruction *Inst = I++;
+
+      if (Constant *C = ConstantFoldInstruction(Inst)) {
+        ReplaceInstructionWith(Inst, C);
+      } else if (Inst->getType() != Type::VoidTy) {
+        // If this instruction computes a value, try to fold together common
+        // instructions that compute it.
+        //
+        VN.getEqualNumberNodes(Inst, EqualValues);
+
+        // If this instruction computes a value that is already computed
+        // elsewhere, try to recycle the old value.
+        if (!EqualValues.empty()) {
+          if (Inst == &*BB->begin())
+            I = BB->end();
+          else {
+            I = Inst; --I;
+          }
+
+          // First check to see if we were able to value number this instruction
+          // to a non-instruction value.  If so, prefer that value over other
+          // instructions which may compute the same thing.
+          for (unsigned i = 0, e = EqualValues.size(); i != e; ++i)
+            if (!isa<Instruction>(EqualValues[i])) {
+              ++NumNonInsts;      // Keep track of # of insts repl with values
+
+              // Change all users of Inst to use the replacement and remove it
+              // from the program.
+              ReplaceInstructionWith(Inst, EqualValues[i]);
+              Inst = 0;
+              EqualValues.clear();  // don't enter the next loop
+              break;
+            }
+
+          // If there were no non-instruction values that this instruction
+          // produces, find a dominating instruction that produces the same
+          // value.  If we find one, use it's value instead of ours.
+          for (unsigned i = 0, e = EqualValues.size(); i != e; ++i) {
+            Instruction *OtherI = cast<Instruction>(EqualValues[i]);
+            bool Dominates = false;
+            if (OtherI->getParent() == BB)
+              Dominates = BlockInsts.count(OtherI);
+            else
+              Dominates = DT.dominates(OtherI->getParent(), BB);
+
+            if (Dominates) {
+              // Okay, we found an instruction with the same value as this one
+              // and that dominates this one.  Replace this instruction with the
+              // specified one.
+              ReplaceInstructionWith(Inst, OtherI);
+              Inst = 0;
+              break;
+            }
+          }
+
+          EqualValues.clear();
+
+          if (Inst) {
+            I = Inst; ++I;             // Deleted no instructions
+          } else if (I == BB->end()) { // Deleted first instruction
+            I = BB->begin();
+          } else {                     // Deleted inst in middle of block.
+            ++I;
+          }
+        }
+
+        if (Inst)
+          BlockInsts.insert(Inst);
+      }
+    }
+  }
+
+  // When the worklist is empty, return whether or not we changed anything...
+  return Changed;
+}
+
+
+void GCSE::ReplaceInstructionWith(Instruction *I, Value *V) {
+  if (isa<LoadInst>(I))
+    ++NumLoadRemoved; // Keep track of loads eliminated
+  if (isa<CallInst>(I))
+    ++NumCallRemoved; // Keep track of calls eliminated
+  ++NumInstRemoved;   // Keep track of number of insts eliminated
+
+  // Update value numbering
+  getAnalysis<ValueNumbering>().deleteValue(I);
+
+  I->replaceAllUsesWith(V);
+
+  if (InvokeInst *II = dyn_cast<InvokeInst>(I)) {
+    // Removing an invoke instruction requires adding a branch to the normal
+    // destination and removing PHI node entries in the exception destination.
+    new BranchInst(II->getNormalDest(), II);
+    II->getUnwindDest()->removePredecessor(II->getParent());
+  }
+
+  // Erase the instruction from the program.
+  I->getParent()->getInstList().erase(I);
+}