blob: 957582817a4cacffda409c84d28e65be5fc77966 [file] [log] [blame]
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001//===- LoopStrengthReduce.cpp - Strength Reduce IVs in Loops --------------===//
Misha Brukmanfd939082005-04-21 23:48:37 +00002//
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +00003// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
4//
Chris Lattner4ee451d2007-12-29 20:36:04 +00005// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
6// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
Misha Brukmanfd939082005-04-21 23:48:37 +00007//
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +00008//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
9//
10// This pass performs a strength reduction on array references inside loops that
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +000011// have as one or more of their components the loop induction variable.
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +000012//
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +000013//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
14
Chris Lattnerbe3e5212005-08-03 23:30:08 +000015#define DEBUG_TYPE "loop-reduce"
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +000016#include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h"
17#include "llvm/Constants.h"
18#include "llvm/Instructions.h"
Dan Gohmane5b01be2007-05-04 14:59:09 +000019#include "llvm/IntrinsicInst.h"
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +000020#include "llvm/Type.h"
Jeff Cohen2f3c9b72005-03-04 04:04:26 +000021#include "llvm/DerivedTypes.h"
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +000022#include "llvm/Analysis/Dominators.h"
23#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopInfo.h"
Devang Patel0f54dcb2007-03-06 21:14:09 +000024#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopPass.h"
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +000025#include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.h"
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +000026#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/AddrModeMatcher.h"
Chris Lattnere0391be2005-08-12 22:06:11 +000027#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.h"
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +000028#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/Local.h"
Jeff Cohen2f3c9b72005-03-04 04:04:26 +000029#include "llvm/Target/TargetData.h"
Evan Cheng168a66b2007-10-26 23:08:19 +000030#include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h"
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +000031#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +000032#include "llvm/Support/CFG.h"
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +000033#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
Chris Lattnera4f0b3a2006-08-27 12:54:02 +000034#include "llvm/Support/Compiler.h"
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +000035#include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h"
Evan Chengd277f2c2006-03-13 23:14:23 +000036#include "llvm/Target/TargetLowering.h"
Jeff Cohencfb1d422005-07-30 18:22:27 +000037#include <algorithm>
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +000038using namespace llvm;
39
Dan Gohman13317bc2009-04-16 16:46:01 +000040STATISTIC(NumReduced , "Number of IV uses strength reduced");
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +000041STATISTIC(NumInserted, "Number of PHIs inserted");
42STATISTIC(NumVariable, "Number of PHIs with variable strides");
Devang Patel54153272008-08-27 17:50:18 +000043STATISTIC(NumEliminated, "Number of strides eliminated");
44STATISTIC(NumShadow, "Number of Shadow IVs optimized");
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +000045STATISTIC(NumImmSunk, "Number of common expr immediates sunk into uses");
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +000046
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +000047static cl::opt<bool> EnableFullLSRMode("enable-full-lsr",
48 cl::init(false),
49 cl::Hidden);
50
Chris Lattner0e5f4992006-12-19 21:40:18 +000051namespace {
Dale Johannesendc42f482007-03-20 00:47:50 +000052
Jeff Cohenc01a5302007-03-20 20:43:18 +000053 struct BasedUser;
Dale Johannesendc42f482007-03-20 00:47:50 +000054
Chris Lattnerec3fb632005-08-03 22:21:05 +000055 /// IVStrideUse - Keep track of one use of a strided induction variable, where
56 /// the stride is stored externally. The Offset member keeps track of the
Dan Gohman9330c3a2007-10-29 19:32:39 +000057 /// offset from the IV, User is the actual user of the operand, and
58 /// 'OperandValToReplace' is the operand of the User that is the use.
Reid Spencer9133fe22007-02-05 23:32:05 +000059 struct VISIBILITY_HIDDEN IVStrideUse {
Chris Lattnerec3fb632005-08-03 22:21:05 +000060 SCEVHandle Offset;
61 Instruction *User;
62 Value *OperandValToReplace;
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +000063
64 // isUseOfPostIncrementedValue - True if this should use the
65 // post-incremented version of this IV, not the preincremented version.
66 // This can only be set in special cases, such as the terminating setcc
Chris Lattnerc6bae652005-09-12 06:04:47 +000067 // instruction for a loop or uses dominated by the loop.
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +000068 bool isUseOfPostIncrementedValue;
Chris Lattnerec3fb632005-08-03 22:21:05 +000069
70 IVStrideUse(const SCEVHandle &Offs, Instruction *U, Value *O)
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +000071 : Offset(Offs), User(U), OperandValToReplace(O),
72 isUseOfPostIncrementedValue(false) {}
Chris Lattnerec3fb632005-08-03 22:21:05 +000073 };
74
75 /// IVUsersOfOneStride - This structure keeps track of all instructions that
76 /// have an operand that is based on the trip count multiplied by some stride.
77 /// The stride for all of these users is common and kept external to this
78 /// structure.
Reid Spencer9133fe22007-02-05 23:32:05 +000079 struct VISIBILITY_HIDDEN IVUsersOfOneStride {
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +000080 /// Users - Keep track of all of the users of this stride as well as the
Chris Lattnerec3fb632005-08-03 22:21:05 +000081 /// initial value and the operand that uses the IV.
82 std::vector<IVStrideUse> Users;
83
84 void addUser(const SCEVHandle &Offset,Instruction *User, Value *Operand) {
85 Users.push_back(IVStrideUse(Offset, User, Operand));
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +000086 }
87 };
88
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +000089 /// IVInfo - This structure keeps track of one IV expression inserted during
Evan Cheng21495772006-03-18 08:03:12 +000090 /// StrengthReduceStridedIVUsers. It contains the stride, the common base, as
91 /// well as the PHI node and increment value created for rewrite.
Reid Spencer9133fe22007-02-05 23:32:05 +000092 struct VISIBILITY_HIDDEN IVExpr {
Evan Cheng21495772006-03-18 08:03:12 +000093 SCEVHandle Stride;
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +000094 SCEVHandle Base;
95 PHINode *PHI;
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +000096
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +000097 IVExpr(const SCEVHandle &stride, const SCEVHandle &base, PHINode *phi)
98 : Stride(stride), Base(base), PHI(phi) {}
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +000099 };
100
101 /// IVsOfOneStride - This structure keeps track of all IV expression inserted
102 /// during StrengthReduceStridedIVUsers for a particular stride of the IV.
Reid Spencer9133fe22007-02-05 23:32:05 +0000103 struct VISIBILITY_HIDDEN IVsOfOneStride {
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +0000104 std::vector<IVExpr> IVs;
105
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +0000106 void addIV(const SCEVHandle &Stride, const SCEVHandle &Base, PHINode *PHI) {
107 IVs.push_back(IVExpr(Stride, Base, PHI));
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +0000108 }
109 };
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000110
Devang Patel0f54dcb2007-03-06 21:14:09 +0000111 class VISIBILITY_HIDDEN LoopStrengthReduce : public LoopPass {
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +0000112 LoopInfo *LI;
Devang Patelb7d9dfc2007-06-07 21:42:15 +0000113 DominatorTree *DT;
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000114 ScalarEvolution *SE;
115 const TargetData *TD;
116 const Type *UIntPtrTy;
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +0000117 bool Changed;
Chris Lattner7e608bb2005-08-02 02:52:02 +0000118
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000119 /// IVUsesByStride - Keep track of all uses of induction variables that we
120 /// are interested in. The key of the map is the stride of the access.
Chris Lattner50fad702005-08-10 00:45:21 +0000121 std::map<SCEVHandle, IVUsersOfOneStride> IVUsesByStride;
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000122
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +0000123 /// IVsByStride - Keep track of all IVs that have been inserted for a
124 /// particular stride.
125 std::map<SCEVHandle, IVsOfOneStride> IVsByStride;
126
Chris Lattner7305ae22005-10-09 06:20:55 +0000127 /// StrideOrder - An ordering of the keys in IVUsesByStride that is stable:
128 /// We use this to iterate over the IVUsesByStride collection without being
129 /// dependent on random ordering of pointers in the process.
Evan Cheng83927722007-10-30 22:27:26 +0000130 SmallVector<SCEVHandle, 16> StrideOrder;
Chris Lattner7305ae22005-10-09 06:20:55 +0000131
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000132 /// DeadInsts - Keep track of instructions we may have made dead, so that
133 /// we can remove them after we are done working.
Chris Lattner09fb7da2008-12-01 06:27:41 +0000134 SmallVector<Instruction*, 16> DeadInsts;
Evan Chengd277f2c2006-03-13 23:14:23 +0000135
136 /// TLI - Keep a pointer of a TargetLowering to consult for determining
137 /// transformation profitability.
138 const TargetLowering *TLI;
139
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +0000140 public:
Devang Patel19974732007-05-03 01:11:54 +0000141 static char ID; // Pass ID, replacement for typeid
Dan Gohmanc2bbfc12007-08-01 15:32:29 +0000142 explicit LoopStrengthReduce(const TargetLowering *tli = NULL) :
Dan Gohmanae73dc12008-09-04 17:05:41 +0000143 LoopPass(&ID), TLI(tli) {
Jeff Cohen2f3c9b72005-03-04 04:04:26 +0000144 }
145
Devang Patel0f54dcb2007-03-06 21:14:09 +0000146 bool runOnLoop(Loop *L, LPPassManager &LPM);
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +0000147
148 virtual void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
Chris Lattneraa96ae72005-08-17 06:35:16 +0000149 // We split critical edges, so we change the CFG. However, we do update
150 // many analyses if they are around.
151 AU.addPreservedID(LoopSimplifyID);
152 AU.addPreserved<LoopInfo>();
Chris Lattneraa96ae72005-08-17 06:35:16 +0000153 AU.addPreserved<DominanceFrontier>();
154 AU.addPreserved<DominatorTree>();
155
Jeff Cohenf465db62005-02-27 19:37:07 +0000156 AU.addRequiredID(LoopSimplifyID);
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +0000157 AU.addRequired<LoopInfo>();
Devang Patelb7d9dfc2007-06-07 21:42:15 +0000158 AU.addRequired<DominatorTree>();
Jeff Cohen2f3c9b72005-03-04 04:04:26 +0000159 AU.addRequired<TargetData>();
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000160 AU.addRequired<ScalarEvolution>();
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +0000161 AU.addPreserved<ScalarEvolution>();
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +0000162 }
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +0000163
Chris Lattner49f72e62005-08-04 01:19:13 +0000164private:
Chris Lattner3416e5f2005-08-04 17:40:30 +0000165 bool AddUsersIfInteresting(Instruction *I, Loop *L,
Evan Cheng168a66b2007-10-26 23:08:19 +0000166 SmallPtrSet<Instruction*,16> &Processed);
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +0000167 ICmpInst *ChangeCompareStride(Loop *L, ICmpInst *Cond,
168 IVStrideUse* &CondUse,
169 const SCEVHandle* &CondStride);
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +0000170 void OptimizeIndvars(Loop *L);
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +0000171
172 /// OptimizeShadowIV - If IV is used in a int-to-float cast
173 /// inside the loop then try to eliminate the cast opeation.
174 void OptimizeShadowIV(Loop *L);
175
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +0000176 /// OptimizeSMax - Rewrite the loop's terminating condition
177 /// if it uses an smax computation.
178 ICmpInst *OptimizeSMax(Loop *L, ICmpInst *Cond,
179 IVStrideUse* &CondUse);
180
Devang Patelc677de22008-08-13 20:31:11 +0000181 bool FindIVUserForCond(ICmpInst *Cond, IVStrideUse *&CondUse,
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +0000182 const SCEVHandle *&CondStride);
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +0000183 bool RequiresTypeConversion(const Type *Ty, const Type *NewTy);
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000184 SCEVHandle CheckForIVReuse(bool, bool, bool, const SCEVHandle&,
Dan Gohman02e4fa72007-10-22 20:40:42 +0000185 IVExpr&, const Type*,
Dale Johannesendc42f482007-03-20 00:47:50 +0000186 const std::vector<BasedUser>& UsersToProcess);
Dan Gohman02e4fa72007-10-22 20:40:42 +0000187 bool ValidStride(bool, int64_t,
188 const std::vector<BasedUser>& UsersToProcess);
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +0000189 SCEVHandle CollectIVUsers(const SCEVHandle &Stride,
190 IVUsersOfOneStride &Uses,
191 Loop *L,
192 bool &AllUsesAreAddresses,
Dale Johannesenb0390622008-12-16 22:16:28 +0000193 bool &AllUsesAreOutsideLoop,
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +0000194 std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess);
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +0000195 bool ShouldUseFullStrengthReductionMode(
196 const std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess,
197 const Loop *L,
198 bool AllUsesAreAddresses,
199 SCEVHandle Stride);
200 void PrepareToStrengthReduceFully(
201 std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess,
202 SCEVHandle Stride,
203 SCEVHandle CommonExprs,
204 const Loop *L,
205 SCEVExpander &PreheaderRewriter);
206 void PrepareToStrengthReduceFromSmallerStride(
207 std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess,
208 Value *CommonBaseV,
209 const IVExpr &ReuseIV,
210 Instruction *PreInsertPt);
211 void PrepareToStrengthReduceWithNewPhi(
212 std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess,
213 SCEVHandle Stride,
214 SCEVHandle CommonExprs,
215 Value *CommonBaseV,
216 const Loop *L,
217 SCEVExpander &PreheaderRewriter);
Chris Lattner50fad702005-08-10 00:45:21 +0000218 void StrengthReduceStridedIVUsers(const SCEVHandle &Stride,
219 IVUsersOfOneStride &Uses,
Dan Gohman9f4ac312009-03-09 20:41:15 +0000220 Loop *L);
Chris Lattnera68d4ca2008-12-01 06:14:28 +0000221 void DeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions();
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +0000222 };
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +0000223}
224
Dan Gohman844731a2008-05-13 00:00:25 +0000225char LoopStrengthReduce::ID = 0;
226static RegisterPass<LoopStrengthReduce>
227X("loop-reduce", "Loop Strength Reduction");
228
Daniel Dunbar394f0442008-10-22 23:32:42 +0000229Pass *llvm::createLoopStrengthReducePass(const TargetLowering *TLI) {
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +0000230 return new LoopStrengthReduce(TLI);
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +0000231}
232
233/// DeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions - If any of the instructions is the
234/// specified set are trivially dead, delete them and see if this makes any of
235/// their operands subsequently dead.
Chris Lattnera68d4ca2008-12-01 06:14:28 +0000236void LoopStrengthReduce::DeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions() {
Chris Lattner09fb7da2008-12-01 06:27:41 +0000237 if (DeadInsts.empty()) return;
238
239 // Sort the deadinsts list so that we can trivially eliminate duplicates as we
240 // go. The code below never adds a non-dead instruction to the worklist, but
241 // callers may not be so careful.
Chris Lattner99d00152008-12-01 06:49:59 +0000242 array_pod_sort(DeadInsts.begin(), DeadInsts.end());
Chris Lattner09fb7da2008-12-01 06:27:41 +0000243
244 // Drop duplicate instructions and those with uses.
245 for (unsigned i = 0, e = DeadInsts.size()-1; i < e; ++i) {
246 Instruction *I = DeadInsts[i];
247 if (!I->use_empty()) DeadInsts[i] = 0;
Chris Lattner46a879e2008-12-09 04:47:21 +0000248 while (i != e && DeadInsts[i+1] == I)
Chris Lattner09fb7da2008-12-01 06:27:41 +0000249 DeadInsts[++i] = 0;
250 }
251
Chris Lattnera68d4ca2008-12-01 06:14:28 +0000252 while (!DeadInsts.empty()) {
253 Instruction *I = DeadInsts.back();
254 DeadInsts.pop_back();
Chris Lattner09fb7da2008-12-01 06:27:41 +0000255
256 if (I == 0 || !isInstructionTriviallyDead(I))
Chris Lattnerbfcee362008-12-01 06:11:32 +0000257 continue;
258
259 SE->deleteValueFromRecords(I);
260
Chris Lattner09fb7da2008-12-01 06:27:41 +0000261 for (User::op_iterator OI = I->op_begin(), E = I->op_end(); OI != E; ++OI) {
262 if (Instruction *U = dyn_cast<Instruction>(*OI)) {
263 *OI = 0;
Chris Lattnerbfcee362008-12-01 06:11:32 +0000264 if (U->use_empty())
Chris Lattner09fb7da2008-12-01 06:27:41 +0000265 DeadInsts.push_back(U);
Bill Wendling411052b2008-11-29 03:43:04 +0000266 }
267 }
Chris Lattnerbfcee362008-12-01 06:11:32 +0000268
269 I->eraseFromParent();
270 Changed = true;
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +0000271 }
272}
273
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000274/// containsAddRecFromDifferentLoop - Determine whether expression S involves a
275/// subexpression that is an AddRec from a loop other than L. An outer loop
276/// of L is OK, but not an inner loop nor a disjoint loop.
277static bool containsAddRecFromDifferentLoop(SCEVHandle S, Loop *L) {
278 // This is very common, put it first.
279 if (isa<SCEVConstant>(S))
280 return false;
281 if (SCEVCommutativeExpr *AE = dyn_cast<SCEVCommutativeExpr>(S)) {
282 for (unsigned int i=0; i< AE->getNumOperands(); i++)
283 if (containsAddRecFromDifferentLoop(AE->getOperand(i), L))
284 return true;
285 return false;
286 }
287 if (SCEVAddRecExpr *AE = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(S)) {
288 if (const Loop *newLoop = AE->getLoop()) {
289 if (newLoop == L)
290 return false;
291 // if newLoop is an outer loop of L, this is OK.
292 if (!LoopInfoBase<BasicBlock>::isNotAlreadyContainedIn(L, newLoop))
293 return false;
294 }
295 return true;
296 }
297 if (SCEVUDivExpr *DE = dyn_cast<SCEVUDivExpr>(S))
298 return containsAddRecFromDifferentLoop(DE->getLHS(), L) ||
299 containsAddRecFromDifferentLoop(DE->getRHS(), L);
300#if 0
301 // SCEVSDivExpr has been backed out temporarily, but will be back; we'll
302 // need this when it is.
303 if (SCEVSDivExpr *DE = dyn_cast<SCEVSDivExpr>(S))
304 return containsAddRecFromDifferentLoop(DE->getLHS(), L) ||
305 containsAddRecFromDifferentLoop(DE->getRHS(), L);
306#endif
307 if (SCEVTruncateExpr *TE = dyn_cast<SCEVTruncateExpr>(S))
308 return containsAddRecFromDifferentLoop(TE->getOperand(), L);
309 if (SCEVZeroExtendExpr *ZE = dyn_cast<SCEVZeroExtendExpr>(S))
310 return containsAddRecFromDifferentLoop(ZE->getOperand(), L);
311 if (SCEVSignExtendExpr *SE = dyn_cast<SCEVSignExtendExpr>(S))
312 return containsAddRecFromDifferentLoop(SE->getOperand(), L);
313 return false;
314}
315
Chris Lattner7db543f2005-08-04 19:08:16 +0000316/// getSCEVStartAndStride - Compute the start and stride of this expression,
317/// returning false if the expression is not a start/stride pair, or true if it
318/// is. The stride must be a loop invariant expression, but the start may be
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000319/// a mix of loop invariant and loop variant expressions. The start cannot,
320/// however, contain an AddRec from a different loop, unless that loop is an
321/// outer loop of the current loop.
Chris Lattner7db543f2005-08-04 19:08:16 +0000322static bool getSCEVStartAndStride(const SCEVHandle &SH, Loop *L,
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000323 SCEVHandle &Start, SCEVHandle &Stride,
Evan Cheng8f40afe2009-02-15 06:06:15 +0000324 ScalarEvolution *SE, DominatorTree *DT) {
Chris Lattner7db543f2005-08-04 19:08:16 +0000325 SCEVHandle TheAddRec = Start; // Initialize to zero.
326
327 // If the outer level is an AddExpr, the operands are all start values except
328 // for a nested AddRecExpr.
329 if (SCEVAddExpr *AE = dyn_cast<SCEVAddExpr>(SH)) {
330 for (unsigned i = 0, e = AE->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i)
331 if (SCEVAddRecExpr *AddRec =
332 dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(AE->getOperand(i))) {
333 if (AddRec->getLoop() == L)
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000334 TheAddRec = SE->getAddExpr(AddRec, TheAddRec);
Chris Lattner7db543f2005-08-04 19:08:16 +0000335 else
336 return false; // Nested IV of some sort?
337 } else {
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000338 Start = SE->getAddExpr(Start, AE->getOperand(i));
Chris Lattner7db543f2005-08-04 19:08:16 +0000339 }
340
Reid Spencer3ed469c2006-11-02 20:25:50 +0000341 } else if (isa<SCEVAddRecExpr>(SH)) {
Chris Lattner7db543f2005-08-04 19:08:16 +0000342 TheAddRec = SH;
343 } else {
344 return false; // not analyzable.
345 }
346
347 SCEVAddRecExpr *AddRec = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(TheAddRec);
348 if (!AddRec || AddRec->getLoop() != L) return false;
349
350 // FIXME: Generalize to non-affine IV's.
351 if (!AddRec->isAffine()) return false;
352
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000353 // If Start contains an SCEVAddRecExpr from a different loop, other than an
Dale Johannesen1de17d52009-02-09 22:14:15 +0000354 // outer loop of the current loop, reject it. SCEV has no concept of
Dan Gohmanfd033992009-03-04 20:50:23 +0000355 // operating on more than one loop at a time so don't confuse it with such
356 // expressions.
Dan Gohman9194e8b2009-02-13 03:58:31 +0000357 if (containsAddRecFromDifferentLoop(AddRec->getOperand(0), L))
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000358 return false;
359
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000360 Start = SE->getAddExpr(Start, AddRec->getOperand(0));
Chris Lattner7db543f2005-08-04 19:08:16 +0000361
Evan Cheng8f40afe2009-02-15 06:06:15 +0000362 if (!isa<SCEVConstant>(AddRec->getOperand(1))) {
Evan Cheng5a6c1a82009-02-17 00:13:06 +0000363 // If stride is an instruction, make sure it dominates the loop preheader.
Evan Cheng8f40afe2009-02-15 06:06:15 +0000364 // Otherwise we could end up with a use before def situation.
Evan Cheng5a6c1a82009-02-17 00:13:06 +0000365 BasicBlock *Preheader = L->getLoopPreheader();
366 if (!AddRec->getOperand(1)->dominates(Preheader, DT))
367 return false;
Evan Cheng8f40afe2009-02-15 06:06:15 +0000368
Bill Wendlingb7427032006-11-26 09:46:52 +0000369 DOUT << "[" << L->getHeader()->getName()
370 << "] Variable stride: " << *AddRec << "\n";
Evan Cheng8f40afe2009-02-15 06:06:15 +0000371 }
Chris Lattner7db543f2005-08-04 19:08:16 +0000372
Chris Lattner50fad702005-08-10 00:45:21 +0000373 Stride = AddRec->getOperand(1);
Chris Lattner7db543f2005-08-04 19:08:16 +0000374 return true;
375}
376
Chris Lattner0ae33eb2005-10-03 01:04:44 +0000377/// IVUseShouldUsePostIncValue - We have discovered a "User" of an IV expression
378/// and now we need to decide whether the user should use the preinc or post-inc
379/// value. If this user should use the post-inc version of the IV, return true.
380///
381/// Choosing wrong here can break dominance properties (if we choose to use the
382/// post-inc value when we cannot) or it can end up adding extra live-ranges to
383/// the loop, resulting in reg-reg copies (if we use the pre-inc value when we
384/// should use the post-inc value).
385static bool IVUseShouldUsePostIncValue(Instruction *User, Instruction *IV,
Evan Cheng0e0014d2007-10-30 23:45:15 +0000386 Loop *L, DominatorTree *DT, Pass *P,
Chris Lattner09fb7da2008-12-01 06:27:41 +0000387 SmallVectorImpl<Instruction*> &DeadInsts){
Chris Lattner0ae33eb2005-10-03 01:04:44 +0000388 // If the user is in the loop, use the preinc value.
389 if (L->contains(User->getParent())) return false;
390
Chris Lattner5e8ca662005-10-03 02:50:05 +0000391 BasicBlock *LatchBlock = L->getLoopLatch();
392
393 // Ok, the user is outside of the loop. If it is dominated by the latch
394 // block, use the post-inc value.
Devang Patelb7d9dfc2007-06-07 21:42:15 +0000395 if (DT->dominates(LatchBlock, User->getParent()))
Chris Lattner5e8ca662005-10-03 02:50:05 +0000396 return true;
397
398 // There is one case we have to be careful of: PHI nodes. These little guys
399 // can live in blocks that do not dominate the latch block, but (since their
400 // uses occur in the predecessor block, not the block the PHI lives in) should
401 // still use the post-inc value. Check for this case now.
402 PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(User);
403 if (!PN) return false; // not a phi, not dominated by latch block.
404
405 // Look at all of the uses of IV by the PHI node. If any use corresponds to
406 // a block that is not dominated by the latch block, give up and use the
407 // preincremented value.
408 unsigned NumUses = 0;
409 for (unsigned i = 0, e = PN->getNumIncomingValues(); i != e; ++i)
410 if (PN->getIncomingValue(i) == IV) {
411 ++NumUses;
Devang Patelb7d9dfc2007-06-07 21:42:15 +0000412 if (!DT->dominates(LatchBlock, PN->getIncomingBlock(i)))
Chris Lattner5e8ca662005-10-03 02:50:05 +0000413 return false;
414 }
415
416 // Okay, all uses of IV by PN are in predecessor blocks that really are
417 // dominated by the latch block. Split the critical edges and use the
418 // post-incremented value.
419 for (unsigned i = 0, e = PN->getNumIncomingValues(); i != e; ++i)
420 if (PN->getIncomingValue(i) == IV) {
Evan Cheng83927722007-10-30 22:27:26 +0000421 SplitCriticalEdge(PN->getIncomingBlock(i), PN->getParent(), P, false);
Chris Lattner1b9c8e72006-10-28 00:59:20 +0000422 // Splitting the critical edge can reduce the number of entries in this
423 // PHI.
424 e = PN->getNumIncomingValues();
Chris Lattner5e8ca662005-10-03 02:50:05 +0000425 if (--NumUses == 0) break;
426 }
Evan Cheng0e0014d2007-10-30 23:45:15 +0000427
428 // PHI node might have become a constant value after SplitCriticalEdge.
Chris Lattner09fb7da2008-12-01 06:27:41 +0000429 DeadInsts.push_back(User);
Chris Lattner5e8ca662005-10-03 02:50:05 +0000430
431 return true;
Chris Lattner0ae33eb2005-10-03 01:04:44 +0000432}
433
Dan Gohmanf284ce22009-02-18 00:08:39 +0000434/// isAddressUse - Returns true if the specified instruction is using the
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000435/// specified value as an address.
436static bool isAddressUse(Instruction *Inst, Value *OperandVal) {
437 bool isAddress = isa<LoadInst>(Inst);
438 if (StoreInst *SI = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(Inst)) {
439 if (SI->getOperand(1) == OperandVal)
440 isAddress = true;
441 } else if (IntrinsicInst *II = dyn_cast<IntrinsicInst>(Inst)) {
442 // Addressing modes can also be folded into prefetches and a variety
443 // of intrinsics.
444 switch (II->getIntrinsicID()) {
445 default: break;
446 case Intrinsic::prefetch:
447 case Intrinsic::x86_sse2_loadu_dq:
448 case Intrinsic::x86_sse2_loadu_pd:
449 case Intrinsic::x86_sse_loadu_ps:
450 case Intrinsic::x86_sse_storeu_ps:
451 case Intrinsic::x86_sse2_storeu_pd:
452 case Intrinsic::x86_sse2_storeu_dq:
453 case Intrinsic::x86_sse2_storel_dq:
454 if (II->getOperand(1) == OperandVal)
455 isAddress = true;
456 break;
457 }
458 }
459 return isAddress;
460}
Chris Lattner0ae33eb2005-10-03 01:04:44 +0000461
Dan Gohman21e77222009-03-09 21:01:17 +0000462/// getAccessType - Return the type of the memory being accessed.
463static const Type *getAccessType(const Instruction *Inst) {
464 const Type *UseTy = Inst->getType();
465 if (const StoreInst *SI = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(Inst))
466 UseTy = SI->getOperand(0)->getType();
467 else if (const IntrinsicInst *II = dyn_cast<IntrinsicInst>(Inst)) {
468 // Addressing modes can also be folded into prefetches and a variety
469 // of intrinsics.
470 switch (II->getIntrinsicID()) {
471 default: break;
472 case Intrinsic::x86_sse_storeu_ps:
473 case Intrinsic::x86_sse2_storeu_pd:
474 case Intrinsic::x86_sse2_storeu_dq:
475 case Intrinsic::x86_sse2_storel_dq:
476 UseTy = II->getOperand(1)->getType();
477 break;
478 }
479 }
480 return UseTy;
481}
482
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000483/// AddUsersIfInteresting - Inspect the specified instruction. If it is a
484/// reducible SCEV, recursively add its users to the IVUsesByStride set and
485/// return true. Otherwise, return false.
Chris Lattner3416e5f2005-08-04 17:40:30 +0000486bool LoopStrengthReduce::AddUsersIfInteresting(Instruction *I, Loop *L,
Evan Cheng168a66b2007-10-26 23:08:19 +0000487 SmallPtrSet<Instruction*,16> &Processed) {
Chris Lattner42a75512007-01-15 02:27:26 +0000488 if (!I->getType()->isInteger() && !isa<PointerType>(I->getType()))
Dan Gohman4a9a3e52008-04-14 18:26:16 +0000489 return false; // Void and FP expressions cannot be reduced.
Chris Lattnerb7e64ac2009-03-17 23:58:30 +0000490
491 // LSR is not APInt clean, do not touch integers bigger than 64-bits.
492 if (I->getType()->isInteger() &&
493 I->getType()->getPrimitiveSizeInBits() > 64)
494 return false;
495
Evan Cheng168a66b2007-10-26 23:08:19 +0000496 if (!Processed.insert(I))
Chris Lattner3416e5f2005-08-04 17:40:30 +0000497 return true; // Instruction already handled.
498
Chris Lattner7db543f2005-08-04 19:08:16 +0000499 // Get the symbolic expression for this instruction.
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +0000500 SCEVHandle ISE = SE->getSCEV(I);
Chris Lattner7db543f2005-08-04 19:08:16 +0000501 if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(ISE)) return false;
Chris Lattner3416e5f2005-08-04 17:40:30 +0000502
Chris Lattner7db543f2005-08-04 19:08:16 +0000503 // Get the start and stride for this expression.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000504 SCEVHandle Start = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, ISE->getType());
Chris Lattner50fad702005-08-10 00:45:21 +0000505 SCEVHandle Stride = Start;
Evan Cheng8f40afe2009-02-15 06:06:15 +0000506 if (!getSCEVStartAndStride(ISE, L, Start, Stride, SE, DT))
Chris Lattner7db543f2005-08-04 19:08:16 +0000507 return false; // Non-reducible symbolic expression, bail out.
Devang Patel4fe26582007-03-09 21:19:53 +0000508
Devang Patel2a5fa182007-04-23 22:42:03 +0000509 std::vector<Instruction *> IUsers;
510 // Collect all I uses now because IVUseShouldUsePostIncValue may
511 // invalidate use_iterator.
512 for (Value::use_iterator UI = I->use_begin(), E = I->use_end(); UI != E; ++UI)
513 IUsers.push_back(cast<Instruction>(*UI));
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000514
Devang Patel2a5fa182007-04-23 22:42:03 +0000515 for (unsigned iused_index = 0, iused_size = IUsers.size();
516 iused_index != iused_size; ++iused_index) {
517
518 Instruction *User = IUsers[iused_index];
Devang Patel4fe26582007-03-09 21:19:53 +0000519
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000520 // Do not infinitely recurse on PHI nodes.
Chris Lattner396b2ba2005-09-13 02:09:55 +0000521 if (isa<PHINode>(User) && Processed.count(User))
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000522 continue;
523
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000524 // Descend recursively, but not into PHI nodes outside the current loop.
525 // It's important to see the entire expression outside the loop to get
526 // choices that depend on addressing mode use right, although we won't
527 // consider references ouside the loop in all cases.
528 // If User is already in Processed, we don't want to recurse into it again,
529 // but do want to record a second reference in the same instruction.
Chris Lattner7db543f2005-08-04 19:08:16 +0000530 bool AddUserToIVUsers = false;
Chris Lattnerf9186592005-08-04 00:14:11 +0000531 if (LI->getLoopFor(User->getParent()) != L) {
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000532 if (isa<PHINode>(User) || Processed.count(User) ||
533 !AddUsersIfInteresting(User, L, Processed)) {
534 DOUT << "FOUND USER in other loop: " << *User
535 << " OF SCEV: " << *ISE << "\n";
536 AddUserToIVUsers = true;
537 }
538 } else if (Processed.count(User) ||
539 !AddUsersIfInteresting(User, L, Processed)) {
Bill Wendlingb7427032006-11-26 09:46:52 +0000540 DOUT << "FOUND USER: " << *User
541 << " OF SCEV: " << *ISE << "\n";
Chris Lattner7db543f2005-08-04 19:08:16 +0000542 AddUserToIVUsers = true;
543 }
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000544
Chris Lattner7db543f2005-08-04 19:08:16 +0000545 if (AddUserToIVUsers) {
Chris Lattner7305ae22005-10-09 06:20:55 +0000546 IVUsersOfOneStride &StrideUses = IVUsesByStride[Stride];
Dale Johannesenb0390622008-12-16 22:16:28 +0000547 if (StrideUses.Users.empty()) // First occurrence of this stride?
Chris Lattner7305ae22005-10-09 06:20:55 +0000548 StrideOrder.push_back(Stride);
549
Chris Lattnera4479ad2005-08-04 00:40:47 +0000550 // Okay, we found a user that we cannot reduce. Analyze the instruction
Chris Lattnerc6bae652005-09-12 06:04:47 +0000551 // and decide what to do with it. If we are a use inside of the loop, use
552 // the value before incrementation, otherwise use it after incrementation.
Evan Cheng0e0014d2007-10-30 23:45:15 +0000553 if (IVUseShouldUsePostIncValue(User, I, L, DT, this, DeadInsts)) {
Chris Lattnerc6bae652005-09-12 06:04:47 +0000554 // The value used will be incremented by the stride more than we are
555 // expecting, so subtract this off.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000556 SCEVHandle NewStart = SE->getMinusSCEV(Start, Stride);
Chris Lattner7305ae22005-10-09 06:20:55 +0000557 StrideUses.addUser(NewStart, User, I);
558 StrideUses.Users.back().isUseOfPostIncrementedValue = true;
Bill Wendlingb7427032006-11-26 09:46:52 +0000559 DOUT << " USING POSTINC SCEV, START=" << *NewStart<< "\n";
Chris Lattner0ae33eb2005-10-03 01:04:44 +0000560 } else {
Chris Lattner7305ae22005-10-09 06:20:55 +0000561 StrideUses.addUser(Start, User, I);
Chris Lattnerc6bae652005-09-12 06:04:47 +0000562 }
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000563 }
564 }
565 return true;
566}
567
568namespace {
569 /// BasedUser - For a particular base value, keep information about how we've
570 /// partitioned the expression so far.
571 struct BasedUser {
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000572 /// SE - The current ScalarEvolution object.
573 ScalarEvolution *SE;
574
Chris Lattnera553b0c2005-08-08 22:56:21 +0000575 /// Base - The Base value for the PHI node that needs to be inserted for
576 /// this use. As the use is processed, information gets moved from this
577 /// field to the Imm field (below). BasedUser values are sorted by this
578 /// field.
579 SCEVHandle Base;
580
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000581 /// Inst - The instruction using the induction variable.
582 Instruction *Inst;
583
Chris Lattnerec3fb632005-08-03 22:21:05 +0000584 /// OperandValToReplace - The operand value of Inst to replace with the
585 /// EmittedBase.
586 Value *OperandValToReplace;
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000587
588 /// Imm - The immediate value that should be added to the base immediately
589 /// before Inst, because it will be folded into the imm field of the
Dan Gohman33e3a362009-02-20 20:29:04 +0000590 /// instruction. This is also sometimes used for loop-variant values that
591 /// must be added inside the loop.
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000592 SCEVHandle Imm;
593
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +0000594 /// Phi - The induction variable that performs the striding that
595 /// should be used for this user.
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +0000596 PHINode *Phi;
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +0000597
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +0000598 // isUseOfPostIncrementedValue - True if this should use the
599 // post-incremented version of this IV, not the preincremented version.
600 // This can only be set in special cases, such as the terminating setcc
Chris Lattnerc6bae652005-09-12 06:04:47 +0000601 // instruction for a loop and uses outside the loop that are dominated by
602 // the loop.
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +0000603 bool isUseOfPostIncrementedValue;
Chris Lattnera553b0c2005-08-08 22:56:21 +0000604
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000605 BasedUser(IVStrideUse &IVSU, ScalarEvolution *se)
606 : SE(se), Base(IVSU.Offset), Inst(IVSU.User),
Chris Lattnera553b0c2005-08-08 22:56:21 +0000607 OperandValToReplace(IVSU.OperandValToReplace),
Dale Johannesen308f24d2008-12-03 22:43:56 +0000608 Imm(SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Base->getType())),
Chris Lattnera553b0c2005-08-08 22:56:21 +0000609 isUseOfPostIncrementedValue(IVSU.isUseOfPostIncrementedValue) {}
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000610
Chris Lattner2114b272005-08-04 20:03:32 +0000611 // Once we rewrite the code to insert the new IVs we want, update the
612 // operands of Inst to use the new expression 'NewBase', with 'Imm' added
613 // to it.
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +0000614 void RewriteInstructionToUseNewBase(const SCEVHandle &NewBase,
Dan Gohmanf20d70d2008-05-15 23:26:57 +0000615 Instruction *InsertPt,
Evan Cheng0e0014d2007-10-30 23:45:15 +0000616 SCEVExpander &Rewriter, Loop *L, Pass *P,
Chris Lattner09fb7da2008-12-01 06:27:41 +0000617 SmallVectorImpl<Instruction*> &DeadInsts);
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000618
619 Value *InsertCodeForBaseAtPosition(const SCEVHandle &NewBase,
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +0000620 const Type *Ty,
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000621 SCEVExpander &Rewriter,
622 Instruction *IP, Loop *L);
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000623 void dump() const;
624 };
625}
626
627void BasedUser::dump() const {
Bill Wendlinge8156192006-12-07 01:30:32 +0000628 cerr << " Base=" << *Base;
629 cerr << " Imm=" << *Imm;
Bill Wendlinge8156192006-12-07 01:30:32 +0000630 cerr << " Inst: " << *Inst;
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000631}
632
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000633Value *BasedUser::InsertCodeForBaseAtPosition(const SCEVHandle &NewBase,
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +0000634 const Type *Ty,
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000635 SCEVExpander &Rewriter,
636 Instruction *IP, Loop *L) {
637 // Figure out where we *really* want to insert this code. In particular, if
638 // the user is inside of a loop that is nested inside of L, we really don't
639 // want to insert this expression before the user, we'd rather pull it out as
640 // many loops as possible.
641 LoopInfo &LI = Rewriter.getLoopInfo();
642 Instruction *BaseInsertPt = IP;
643
644 // Figure out the most-nested loop that IP is in.
645 Loop *InsertLoop = LI.getLoopFor(IP->getParent());
646
647 // If InsertLoop is not L, and InsertLoop is nested inside of L, figure out
648 // the preheader of the outer-most loop where NewBase is not loop invariant.
Dale Johanneseneccdd082008-12-02 18:40:09 +0000649 if (L->contains(IP->getParent()))
650 while (InsertLoop && NewBase->isLoopInvariant(InsertLoop)) {
651 BaseInsertPt = InsertLoop->getLoopPreheader()->getTerminator();
652 InsertLoop = InsertLoop->getParentLoop();
653 }
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000654
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +0000655 Value *Base = Rewriter.expandCodeFor(NewBase, Ty, BaseInsertPt);
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +0000656
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000657 // If there is no immediate value, skip the next part.
Dan Gohmancfeb6a42008-06-18 16:23:07 +0000658 if (Imm->isZero())
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +0000659 return Base;
Chris Lattnerb47f6122007-06-06 01:23:55 +0000660
661 // If we are inserting the base and imm values in the same block, make sure to
662 // adjust the IP position if insertion reused a result.
663 if (IP == BaseInsertPt)
664 IP = Rewriter.getInsertionPoint();
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000665
666 // Always emit the immediate (if non-zero) into the same block as the user.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000667 SCEVHandle NewValSCEV = SE->getAddExpr(SE->getUnknown(Base), Imm);
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +0000668 return Rewriter.expandCodeFor(NewValSCEV, Ty, IP);
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000669}
670
671
Chris Lattner2114b272005-08-04 20:03:32 +0000672// Once we rewrite the code to insert the new IVs we want, update the
673// operands of Inst to use the new expression 'NewBase', with 'Imm' added
Dan Gohmanf20d70d2008-05-15 23:26:57 +0000674// to it. NewBasePt is the last instruction which contributes to the
675// value of NewBase in the case that it's a diffferent instruction from
676// the PHI that NewBase is computed from, or null otherwise.
677//
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +0000678void BasedUser::RewriteInstructionToUseNewBase(const SCEVHandle &NewBase,
Dan Gohmanf20d70d2008-05-15 23:26:57 +0000679 Instruction *NewBasePt,
Evan Cheng0e0014d2007-10-30 23:45:15 +0000680 SCEVExpander &Rewriter, Loop *L, Pass *P,
Chris Lattner09fb7da2008-12-01 06:27:41 +0000681 SmallVectorImpl<Instruction*> &DeadInsts){
Chris Lattner2114b272005-08-04 20:03:32 +0000682 if (!isa<PHINode>(Inst)) {
Chris Lattnerc5494af2007-04-13 20:42:26 +0000683 // By default, insert code at the user instruction.
684 BasicBlock::iterator InsertPt = Inst;
685
686 // However, if the Operand is itself an instruction, the (potentially
687 // complex) inserted code may be shared by many users. Because of this, we
688 // want to emit code for the computation of the operand right before its old
689 // computation. This is usually safe, because we obviously used to use the
690 // computation when it was computed in its current block. However, in some
691 // cases (e.g. use of a post-incremented induction variable) the NewBase
692 // value will be pinned to live somewhere after the original computation.
693 // In this case, we have to back off.
Chris Lattnerf8828eb2008-12-02 04:52:26 +0000694 //
695 // If this is a use outside the loop (which means after, since it is based
696 // on a loop indvar) we use the post-incremented value, so that we don't
697 // artificially make the preinc value live out the bottom of the loop.
Dale Johannesen589bf082008-12-01 22:00:01 +0000698 if (!isUseOfPostIncrementedValue && L->contains(Inst->getParent())) {
Dan Gohmanca756ae2008-05-20 03:01:48 +0000699 if (NewBasePt && isa<PHINode>(OperandValToReplace)) {
Dan Gohmanf20d70d2008-05-15 23:26:57 +0000700 InsertPt = NewBasePt;
701 ++InsertPt;
Gabor Greif6725cb52008-06-11 21:38:51 +0000702 } else if (Instruction *OpInst
703 = dyn_cast<Instruction>(OperandValToReplace)) {
Chris Lattnerc5494af2007-04-13 20:42:26 +0000704 InsertPt = OpInst;
705 while (isa<PHINode>(InsertPt)) ++InsertPt;
706 }
707 }
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +0000708 Value *NewVal = InsertCodeForBaseAtPosition(NewBase,
709 OperandValToReplace->getType(),
710 Rewriter, InsertPt, L);
Chris Lattner2114b272005-08-04 20:03:32 +0000711 // Replace the use of the operand Value with the new Phi we just created.
712 Inst->replaceUsesOfWith(OperandValToReplace, NewVal);
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +0000713
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +0000714 DOUT << " Replacing with ";
Dan Gohman4a359ea2009-02-19 19:32:06 +0000715 DEBUG(WriteAsOperand(*DOUT, NewVal, /*PrintType=*/false));
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +0000716 DOUT << ", which has value " << *NewBase << " plus IMM " << *Imm << "\n";
Chris Lattner2114b272005-08-04 20:03:32 +0000717 return;
718 }
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +0000719
Chris Lattner2114b272005-08-04 20:03:32 +0000720 // PHI nodes are more complex. We have to insert one copy of the NewBase+Imm
Chris Lattnerc41e3452005-08-10 00:35:32 +0000721 // expression into each operand block that uses it. Note that PHI nodes can
722 // have multiple entries for the same predecessor. We use a map to make sure
723 // that a PHI node only has a single Value* for each predecessor (which also
724 // prevents us from inserting duplicate code in some blocks).
Evan Cheng83927722007-10-30 22:27:26 +0000725 DenseMap<BasicBlock*, Value*> InsertedCode;
Chris Lattner2114b272005-08-04 20:03:32 +0000726 PHINode *PN = cast<PHINode>(Inst);
727 for (unsigned i = 0, e = PN->getNumIncomingValues(); i != e; ++i) {
728 if (PN->getIncomingValue(i) == OperandValToReplace) {
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000729 // If the original expression is outside the loop, put the replacement
730 // code in the same place as the original expression,
731 // which need not be an immediate predecessor of this PHI. This way we
732 // need only one copy of it even if it is referenced multiple times in
733 // the PHI. We don't do this when the original expression is inside the
Dale Johannesen1de17d52009-02-09 22:14:15 +0000734 // loop because multiple copies sometimes do useful sinking of code in
735 // that case(?).
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000736 Instruction *OldLoc = dyn_cast<Instruction>(OperandValToReplace);
737 if (L->contains(OldLoc->getParent())) {
Dale Johannesen1de17d52009-02-09 22:14:15 +0000738 // If this is a critical edge, split the edge so that we do not insert
739 // the code on all predecessor/successor paths. We do this unless this
740 // is the canonical backedge for this loop, as this can make some
741 // inserted code be in an illegal position.
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000742 BasicBlock *PHIPred = PN->getIncomingBlock(i);
743 if (e != 1 && PHIPred->getTerminator()->getNumSuccessors() > 1 &&
744 (PN->getParent() != L->getHeader() || !L->contains(PHIPred))) {
Dale Johannesenf6727b02008-12-23 23:21:35 +0000745
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000746 // First step, split the critical edge.
747 SplitCriticalEdge(PHIPred, PN->getParent(), P, false);
748
749 // Next step: move the basic block. In particular, if the PHI node
750 // is outside of the loop, and PredTI is in the loop, we want to
751 // move the block to be immediately before the PHI block, not
752 // immediately after PredTI.
753 if (L->contains(PHIPred) && !L->contains(PN->getParent())) {
754 BasicBlock *NewBB = PN->getIncomingBlock(i);
755 NewBB->moveBefore(PN->getParent());
756 }
757
758 // Splitting the edge can reduce the number of PHI entries we have.
759 e = PN->getNumIncomingValues();
760 }
761 }
Chris Lattnerc41e3452005-08-10 00:35:32 +0000762 Value *&Code = InsertedCode[PN->getIncomingBlock(i)];
763 if (!Code) {
764 // Insert the code into the end of the predecessor block.
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000765 Instruction *InsertPt = (L->contains(OldLoc->getParent())) ?
766 PN->getIncomingBlock(i)->getTerminator() :
767 OldLoc->getParent()->getTerminator();
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +0000768 Code = InsertCodeForBaseAtPosition(NewBase, PN->getType(),
769 Rewriter, InsertPt, L);
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +0000770
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +0000771 DOUT << " Changing PHI use to ";
Dan Gohman4a359ea2009-02-19 19:32:06 +0000772 DEBUG(WriteAsOperand(*DOUT, Code, /*PrintType=*/false));
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +0000773 DOUT << ", which has value " << *NewBase << " plus IMM " << *Imm << "\n";
Chris Lattnerc41e3452005-08-10 00:35:32 +0000774 }
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +0000775
Chris Lattner2114b272005-08-04 20:03:32 +0000776 // Replace the use of the operand Value with the new Phi we just created.
Chris Lattnerc41e3452005-08-10 00:35:32 +0000777 PN->setIncomingValue(i, Code);
Chris Lattner2114b272005-08-04 20:03:32 +0000778 Rewriter.clear();
779 }
780 }
Evan Cheng0e0014d2007-10-30 23:45:15 +0000781
782 // PHI node might have become a constant value after SplitCriticalEdge.
Chris Lattner09fb7da2008-12-01 06:27:41 +0000783 DeadInsts.push_back(Inst);
Chris Lattner2114b272005-08-04 20:03:32 +0000784}
785
786
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000787/// fitsInAddressMode - Return true if V can be subsumed within an addressing
788/// mode, and does not need to be put in a register first.
789static bool fitsInAddressMode(const SCEVHandle &V, const Type *UseTy,
790 const TargetLowering *TLI, bool HasBaseReg) {
Chris Lattner3821e472005-08-08 06:25:50 +0000791 if (SCEVConstant *SC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(V)) {
Evan Cheng5eef2d22007-03-12 23:27:37 +0000792 int64_t VC = SC->getValue()->getSExtValue();
Chris Lattner579633c2007-04-09 22:20:14 +0000793 if (TLI) {
794 TargetLowering::AddrMode AM;
795 AM.BaseOffs = VC;
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000796 AM.HasBaseReg = HasBaseReg;
Chris Lattner579633c2007-04-09 22:20:14 +0000797 return TLI->isLegalAddressingMode(AM, UseTy);
798 } else {
Evan Chengd277f2c2006-03-13 23:14:23 +0000799 // Defaults to PPC. PPC allows a sign-extended 16-bit immediate field.
Evan Cheng5eef2d22007-03-12 23:27:37 +0000800 return (VC > -(1 << 16) && VC < (1 << 16)-1);
Chris Lattner579633c2007-04-09 22:20:14 +0000801 }
Chris Lattner3821e472005-08-08 06:25:50 +0000802 }
Jeff Cohend29b6aa2005-07-30 18:33:25 +0000803
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000804 if (SCEVUnknown *SU = dyn_cast<SCEVUnknown>(V))
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +0000805 if (GlobalValue *GV = dyn_cast<GlobalValue>(SU->getValue())) {
806 TargetLowering::AddrMode AM;
807 AM.BaseGV = GV;
808 AM.HasBaseReg = HasBaseReg;
809 return TLI->isLegalAddressingMode(AM, UseTy);
810 }
811
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000812 return false;
813}
814
Dale Johannesen544e0d02008-12-03 20:56:12 +0000815/// MoveLoopVariantsToImmediateField - Move any subexpressions from Val that are
Chris Lattner44b807e2005-08-08 22:32:34 +0000816/// loop varying to the Imm operand.
Dale Johannesen544e0d02008-12-03 20:56:12 +0000817static void MoveLoopVariantsToImmediateField(SCEVHandle &Val, SCEVHandle &Imm,
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000818 Loop *L, ScalarEvolution *SE) {
Chris Lattner44b807e2005-08-08 22:32:34 +0000819 if (Val->isLoopInvariant(L)) return; // Nothing to do.
820
821 if (SCEVAddExpr *SAE = dyn_cast<SCEVAddExpr>(Val)) {
822 std::vector<SCEVHandle> NewOps;
823 NewOps.reserve(SAE->getNumOperands());
824
825 for (unsigned i = 0; i != SAE->getNumOperands(); ++i)
826 if (!SAE->getOperand(i)->isLoopInvariant(L)) {
827 // If this is a loop-variant expression, it must stay in the immediate
828 // field of the expression.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000829 Imm = SE->getAddExpr(Imm, SAE->getOperand(i));
Chris Lattner44b807e2005-08-08 22:32:34 +0000830 } else {
831 NewOps.push_back(SAE->getOperand(i));
832 }
833
834 if (NewOps.empty())
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000835 Val = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Val->getType());
Chris Lattner44b807e2005-08-08 22:32:34 +0000836 else
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000837 Val = SE->getAddExpr(NewOps);
Chris Lattner44b807e2005-08-08 22:32:34 +0000838 } else if (SCEVAddRecExpr *SARE = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Val)) {
839 // Try to pull immediates out of the start value of nested addrec's.
840 SCEVHandle Start = SARE->getStart();
Dale Johannesen544e0d02008-12-03 20:56:12 +0000841 MoveLoopVariantsToImmediateField(Start, Imm, L, SE);
Chris Lattner44b807e2005-08-08 22:32:34 +0000842
843 std::vector<SCEVHandle> Ops(SARE->op_begin(), SARE->op_end());
844 Ops[0] = Start;
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000845 Val = SE->getAddRecExpr(Ops, SARE->getLoop());
Chris Lattner44b807e2005-08-08 22:32:34 +0000846 } else {
847 // Otherwise, all of Val is variant, move the whole thing over.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000848 Imm = SE->getAddExpr(Imm, Val);
849 Val = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Val->getType());
Chris Lattner44b807e2005-08-08 22:32:34 +0000850 }
851}
852
853
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000854/// MoveImmediateValues - Look at Val, and pull out any additions of constants
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000855/// that can fit into the immediate field of instructions in the target.
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000856/// Accumulate these immediate values into the Imm value.
Evan Chengd277f2c2006-03-13 23:14:23 +0000857static void MoveImmediateValues(const TargetLowering *TLI,
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +0000858 const Type *UseTy,
Evan Chengd277f2c2006-03-13 23:14:23 +0000859 SCEVHandle &Val, SCEVHandle &Imm,
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000860 bool isAddress, Loop *L,
861 ScalarEvolution *SE) {
Chris Lattner7a658392005-08-03 23:44:42 +0000862 if (SCEVAddExpr *SAE = dyn_cast<SCEVAddExpr>(Val)) {
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000863 std::vector<SCEVHandle> NewOps;
864 NewOps.reserve(SAE->getNumOperands());
865
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000866 for (unsigned i = 0; i != SAE->getNumOperands(); ++i) {
867 SCEVHandle NewOp = SAE->getOperand(i);
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +0000868 MoveImmediateValues(TLI, UseTy, NewOp, Imm, isAddress, L, SE);
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000869
870 if (!NewOp->isLoopInvariant(L)) {
Chris Lattner7db543f2005-08-04 19:08:16 +0000871 // If this is a loop-variant expression, it must stay in the immediate
872 // field of the expression.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000873 Imm = SE->getAddExpr(Imm, NewOp);
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000874 } else {
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000875 NewOps.push_back(NewOp);
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000876 }
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000877 }
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000878
879 if (NewOps.empty())
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000880 Val = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Val->getType());
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000881 else
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000882 Val = SE->getAddExpr(NewOps);
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000883 return;
Chris Lattner7a658392005-08-03 23:44:42 +0000884 } else if (SCEVAddRecExpr *SARE = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Val)) {
885 // Try to pull immediates out of the start value of nested addrec's.
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000886 SCEVHandle Start = SARE->getStart();
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +0000887 MoveImmediateValues(TLI, UseTy, Start, Imm, isAddress, L, SE);
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000888
889 if (Start != SARE->getStart()) {
890 std::vector<SCEVHandle> Ops(SARE->op_begin(), SARE->op_end());
891 Ops[0] = Start;
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000892 Val = SE->getAddRecExpr(Ops, SARE->getLoop());
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000893 }
894 return;
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000895 } else if (SCEVMulExpr *SME = dyn_cast<SCEVMulExpr>(Val)) {
896 // Transform "8 * (4 + v)" -> "32 + 8*V" if "32" fits in the immed field.
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000897 if (isAddress && fitsInAddressMode(SME->getOperand(0), UseTy, TLI, false) &&
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000898 SME->getNumOperands() == 2 && SME->isLoopInvariant(L)) {
899
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000900 SCEVHandle SubImm = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Val->getType());
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000901 SCEVHandle NewOp = SME->getOperand(1);
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +0000902 MoveImmediateValues(TLI, UseTy, NewOp, SubImm, isAddress, L, SE);
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000903
904 // If we extracted something out of the subexpressions, see if we can
905 // simplify this!
906 if (NewOp != SME->getOperand(1)) {
907 // Scale SubImm up by "8". If the result is a target constant, we are
908 // good.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000909 SubImm = SE->getMulExpr(SubImm, SME->getOperand(0));
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000910 if (fitsInAddressMode(SubImm, UseTy, TLI, false)) {
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000911 // Accumulate the immediate.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000912 Imm = SE->getAddExpr(Imm, SubImm);
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000913
914 // Update what is left of 'Val'.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000915 Val = SE->getMulExpr(SME->getOperand(0), NewOp);
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000916 return;
917 }
918 }
919 }
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000920 }
921
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000922 // Loop-variant expressions must stay in the immediate field of the
923 // expression.
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000924 if ((isAddress && fitsInAddressMode(Val, UseTy, TLI, false)) ||
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000925 !Val->isLoopInvariant(L)) {
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000926 Imm = SE->getAddExpr(Imm, Val);
927 Val = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Val->getType());
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000928 return;
Chris Lattner7a2ca562005-08-04 19:26:19 +0000929 }
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000930
931 // Otherwise, no immediates to move.
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000932}
933
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +0000934static void MoveImmediateValues(const TargetLowering *TLI,
935 Instruction *User,
936 SCEVHandle &Val, SCEVHandle &Imm,
937 bool isAddress, Loop *L,
938 ScalarEvolution *SE) {
Dan Gohman21e77222009-03-09 21:01:17 +0000939 const Type *UseTy = getAccessType(User);
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +0000940 MoveImmediateValues(TLI, UseTy, Val, Imm, isAddress, L, SE);
941}
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000942
Chris Lattner7e79b382006-08-03 06:34:50 +0000943/// SeparateSubExprs - Decompose Expr into all of the subexpressions that are
944/// added together. This is used to reassociate common addition subexprs
945/// together for maximal sharing when rewriting bases.
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000946static void SeparateSubExprs(std::vector<SCEVHandle> &SubExprs,
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000947 SCEVHandle Expr,
948 ScalarEvolution *SE) {
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000949 if (SCEVAddExpr *AE = dyn_cast<SCEVAddExpr>(Expr)) {
950 for (unsigned j = 0, e = AE->getNumOperands(); j != e; ++j)
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000951 SeparateSubExprs(SubExprs, AE->getOperand(j), SE);
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000952 } else if (SCEVAddRecExpr *SARE = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Expr)) {
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000953 SCEVHandle Zero = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Expr->getType());
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000954 if (SARE->getOperand(0) == Zero) {
955 SubExprs.push_back(Expr);
956 } else {
957 // Compute the addrec with zero as its base.
958 std::vector<SCEVHandle> Ops(SARE->op_begin(), SARE->op_end());
959 Ops[0] = Zero; // Start with zero base.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000960 SubExprs.push_back(SE->getAddRecExpr(Ops, SARE->getLoop()));
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000961
962
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000963 SeparateSubExprs(SubExprs, SARE->getOperand(0), SE);
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000964 }
Dan Gohmancfeb6a42008-06-18 16:23:07 +0000965 } else if (!Expr->isZero()) {
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000966 // Do not add zero.
967 SubExprs.push_back(Expr);
968 }
969}
970
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000971// This is logically local to the following function, but C++ says we have
972// to make it file scope.
973struct SubExprUseData { unsigned Count; bool notAllUsesAreFree; };
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000974
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000975/// RemoveCommonExpressionsFromUseBases - Look through all of the Bases of all
976/// the Uses, removing any common subexpressions, except that if all such
977/// subexpressions can be folded into an addressing mode for all uses inside
978/// the loop (this case is referred to as "free" in comments herein) we do
979/// not remove anything. This looks for things like (a+b+c) and
Chris Lattnerf8828eb2008-12-02 04:52:26 +0000980/// (a+c+d) and computes the common (a+c) subexpression. The common expression
981/// is *removed* from the Bases and returned.
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +0000982static SCEVHandle
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000983RemoveCommonExpressionsFromUseBases(std::vector<BasedUser> &Uses,
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000984 ScalarEvolution *SE, Loop *L,
985 const TargetLowering *TLI) {
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +0000986 unsigned NumUses = Uses.size();
987
Chris Lattnerf8828eb2008-12-02 04:52:26 +0000988 // Only one use? This is a very common case, so we handle it specially and
989 // cheaply.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000990 SCEVHandle Zero = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Uses[0].Base->getType());
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +0000991 SCEVHandle Result = Zero;
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000992 SCEVHandle FreeResult = Zero;
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +0000993 if (NumUses == 1) {
Chris Lattnerf8828eb2008-12-02 04:52:26 +0000994 // If the use is inside the loop, use its base, regardless of what it is:
995 // it is clearly shared across all the IV's. If the use is outside the loop
996 // (which means after it) we don't want to factor anything *into* the loop,
997 // so just use 0 as the base.
Dale Johannesen589bf082008-12-01 22:00:01 +0000998 if (L->contains(Uses[0].Inst->getParent()))
999 std::swap(Result, Uses[0].Base);
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001000 return Result;
1001 }
1002
1003 // To find common subexpressions, count how many of Uses use each expression.
1004 // If any subexpressions are used Uses.size() times, they are common.
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +00001005 // Also track whether all uses of each expression can be moved into an
1006 // an addressing mode "for free"; such expressions are left within the loop.
1007 // struct SubExprUseData { unsigned Count; bool notAllUsesAreFree; };
1008 std::map<SCEVHandle, SubExprUseData> SubExpressionUseData;
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001009
Chris Lattnerd6155e92005-10-11 18:41:04 +00001010 // UniqueSubExprs - Keep track of all of the subexpressions we see in the
1011 // order we see them.
1012 std::vector<SCEVHandle> UniqueSubExprs;
1013
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +00001014 std::vector<SCEVHandle> SubExprs;
Chris Lattnerf8828eb2008-12-02 04:52:26 +00001015 unsigned NumUsesInsideLoop = 0;
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +00001016 for (unsigned i = 0; i != NumUses; ++i) {
Chris Lattnerf8828eb2008-12-02 04:52:26 +00001017 // If the user is outside the loop, just ignore it for base computation.
1018 // Since the user is outside the loop, it must be *after* the loop (if it
1019 // were before, it could not be based on the loop IV). We don't want users
1020 // after the loop to affect base computation of values *inside* the loop,
1021 // because we can always add their offsets to the result IV after the loop
1022 // is done, ensuring we get good code inside the loop.
Dale Johannesen589bf082008-12-01 22:00:01 +00001023 if (!L->contains(Uses[i].Inst->getParent()))
1024 continue;
1025 NumUsesInsideLoop++;
1026
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +00001027 // If the base is zero (which is common), return zero now, there are no
1028 // CSEs we can find.
1029 if (Uses[i].Base == Zero) return Zero;
1030
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +00001031 // If this use is as an address we may be able to put CSEs in the addressing
1032 // mode rather than hoisting them.
1033 bool isAddrUse = isAddressUse(Uses[i].Inst, Uses[i].OperandValToReplace);
1034 // We may need the UseTy below, but only when isAddrUse, so compute it
1035 // only in that case.
1036 const Type *UseTy = 0;
Dan Gohman21e77222009-03-09 21:01:17 +00001037 if (isAddrUse)
1038 UseTy = getAccessType(Uses[i].Inst);
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +00001039
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +00001040 // Split the expression into subexprs.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +00001041 SeparateSubExprs(SubExprs, Uses[i].Base, SE);
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +00001042 // Add one to SubExpressionUseData.Count for each subexpr present, and
1043 // if the subexpr is not a valid immediate within an addressing mode use,
1044 // set SubExpressionUseData.notAllUsesAreFree. We definitely want to
1045 // hoist these out of the loop (if they are common to all uses).
1046 for (unsigned j = 0, e = SubExprs.size(); j != e; ++j) {
1047 if (++SubExpressionUseData[SubExprs[j]].Count == 1)
Chris Lattnerd6155e92005-10-11 18:41:04 +00001048 UniqueSubExprs.push_back(SubExprs[j]);
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +00001049 if (!isAddrUse || !fitsInAddressMode(SubExprs[j], UseTy, TLI, false))
1050 SubExpressionUseData[SubExprs[j]].notAllUsesAreFree = true;
1051 }
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +00001052 SubExprs.clear();
1053 }
1054
Chris Lattnerd6155e92005-10-11 18:41:04 +00001055 // Now that we know how many times each is used, build Result. Iterate over
1056 // UniqueSubexprs so that we have a stable ordering.
1057 for (unsigned i = 0, e = UniqueSubExprs.size(); i != e; ++i) {
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +00001058 std::map<SCEVHandle, SubExprUseData>::iterator I =
1059 SubExpressionUseData.find(UniqueSubExprs[i]);
1060 assert(I != SubExpressionUseData.end() && "Entry not found?");
1061 if (I->second.Count == NumUsesInsideLoop) { // Found CSE!
1062 if (I->second.notAllUsesAreFree)
1063 Result = SE->getAddExpr(Result, I->first);
1064 else
1065 FreeResult = SE->getAddExpr(FreeResult, I->first);
1066 } else
1067 // Remove non-cse's from SubExpressionUseData.
1068 SubExpressionUseData.erase(I);
Chris Lattnerd6155e92005-10-11 18:41:04 +00001069 }
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +00001070
1071 if (FreeResult != Zero) {
1072 // We have some subexpressions that can be subsumed into addressing
1073 // modes in every use inside the loop. However, it's possible that
1074 // there are so many of them that the combined FreeResult cannot
1075 // be subsumed, or that the target cannot handle both a FreeResult
1076 // and a Result in the same instruction (for example because it would
1077 // require too many registers). Check this.
1078 for (unsigned i=0; i<NumUses; ++i) {
1079 if (!L->contains(Uses[i].Inst->getParent()))
1080 continue;
1081 // We know this is an addressing mode use; if there are any uses that
1082 // are not, FreeResult would be Zero.
Dan Gohman21e77222009-03-09 21:01:17 +00001083 const Type *UseTy = getAccessType(Uses[i].Inst);
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +00001084 if (!fitsInAddressMode(FreeResult, UseTy, TLI, Result!=Zero)) {
1085 // FIXME: could split up FreeResult into pieces here, some hoisted
Dale Johannesenb0390622008-12-16 22:16:28 +00001086 // and some not. There is no obvious advantage to this.
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +00001087 Result = SE->getAddExpr(Result, FreeResult);
1088 FreeResult = Zero;
1089 break;
1090 }
1091 }
1092 }
1093
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001094 // If we found no CSE's, return now.
1095 if (Result == Zero) return Result;
1096
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +00001097 // If we still have a FreeResult, remove its subexpressions from
1098 // SubExpressionUseData. This means they will remain in the use Bases.
1099 if (FreeResult != Zero) {
1100 SeparateSubExprs(SubExprs, FreeResult, SE);
1101 for (unsigned j = 0, e = SubExprs.size(); j != e; ++j) {
1102 std::map<SCEVHandle, SubExprUseData>::iterator I =
1103 SubExpressionUseData.find(SubExprs[j]);
1104 SubExpressionUseData.erase(I);
1105 }
1106 SubExprs.clear();
1107 }
1108
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001109 // Otherwise, remove all of the CSE's we found from each of the base values.
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +00001110 for (unsigned i = 0; i != NumUses; ++i) {
Dale Johannesenfb10cd42008-12-02 21:17:11 +00001111 // Uses outside the loop don't necessarily include the common base, but
1112 // the final IV value coming into those uses does. Instead of trying to
1113 // remove the pieces of the common base, which might not be there,
1114 // subtract off the base to compensate for this.
1115 if (!L->contains(Uses[i].Inst->getParent())) {
1116 Uses[i].Base = SE->getMinusSCEV(Uses[i].Base, Result);
Dale Johannesen589bf082008-12-01 22:00:01 +00001117 continue;
Dale Johannesenfb10cd42008-12-02 21:17:11 +00001118 }
Dale Johannesen589bf082008-12-01 22:00:01 +00001119
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +00001120 // Split the expression into subexprs.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +00001121 SeparateSubExprs(SubExprs, Uses[i].Base, SE);
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +00001122
1123 // Remove any common subexpressions.
1124 for (unsigned j = 0, e = SubExprs.size(); j != e; ++j)
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +00001125 if (SubExpressionUseData.count(SubExprs[j])) {
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +00001126 SubExprs.erase(SubExprs.begin()+j);
1127 --j; --e;
1128 }
1129
Chris Lattnerf8828eb2008-12-02 04:52:26 +00001130 // Finally, add the non-shared expressions together.
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +00001131 if (SubExprs.empty())
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001132 Uses[i].Base = Zero;
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +00001133 else
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +00001134 Uses[i].Base = SE->getAddExpr(SubExprs);
Chris Lattner27e51422005-08-13 07:42:01 +00001135 SubExprs.clear();
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +00001136 }
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001137
1138 return Result;
1139}
1140
Dale Johannesendc42f482007-03-20 00:47:50 +00001141/// ValidStride - Check whether the given Scale is valid for all loads and
Chris Lattner579633c2007-04-09 22:20:14 +00001142/// stores in UsersToProcess.
Dale Johannesendc42f482007-03-20 00:47:50 +00001143///
Dan Gohman02e4fa72007-10-22 20:40:42 +00001144bool LoopStrengthReduce::ValidStride(bool HasBaseReg,
1145 int64_t Scale,
Dale Johannesendc42f482007-03-20 00:47:50 +00001146 const std::vector<BasedUser>& UsersToProcess) {
Evan Chengd6b62a52007-12-19 23:33:23 +00001147 if (!TLI)
1148 return true;
1149
Dale Johannesen8e59e162007-03-20 21:54:54 +00001150 for (unsigned i=0, e = UsersToProcess.size(); i!=e; ++i) {
Chris Lattner1ebd89e2007-04-02 06:34:44 +00001151 // If this is a load or other access, pass the type of the access in.
1152 const Type *AccessTy = Type::VoidTy;
Dan Gohman21e77222009-03-09 21:01:17 +00001153 if (isAddressUse(UsersToProcess[i].Inst,
1154 UsersToProcess[i].OperandValToReplace))
1155 AccessTy = getAccessType(UsersToProcess[i].Inst);
Evan Cheng55e641b2008-03-19 22:02:26 +00001156 else if (isa<PHINode>(UsersToProcess[i].Inst))
1157 continue;
Chris Lattner1ebd89e2007-04-02 06:34:44 +00001158
Chris Lattner579633c2007-04-09 22:20:14 +00001159 TargetLowering::AddrMode AM;
1160 if (SCEVConstant *SC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(UsersToProcess[i].Imm))
1161 AM.BaseOffs = SC->getValue()->getSExtValue();
Dan Gohmancfeb6a42008-06-18 16:23:07 +00001162 AM.HasBaseReg = HasBaseReg || !UsersToProcess[i].Base->isZero();
Chris Lattner579633c2007-04-09 22:20:14 +00001163 AM.Scale = Scale;
1164
1165 // If load[imm+r*scale] is illegal, bail out.
Evan Chengd6b62a52007-12-19 23:33:23 +00001166 if (!TLI->isLegalAddressingMode(AM, AccessTy))
Dale Johannesendc42f482007-03-20 00:47:50 +00001167 return false;
Dale Johannesen8e59e162007-03-20 21:54:54 +00001168 }
Dale Johannesendc42f482007-03-20 00:47:50 +00001169 return true;
1170}
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001171
Dale Johannesen1de17d52009-02-09 22:14:15 +00001172/// RequiresTypeConversion - Returns true if converting Ty1 to Ty2 is not
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001173/// a nop.
Evan Cheng2bd122c2007-10-26 01:56:11 +00001174bool LoopStrengthReduce::RequiresTypeConversion(const Type *Ty1,
1175 const Type *Ty2) {
1176 if (Ty1 == Ty2)
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001177 return false;
Dale Johannesen1de17d52009-02-09 22:14:15 +00001178 if (Ty1->canLosslesslyBitCastTo(Ty2))
1179 return false;
Evan Cheng2bd122c2007-10-26 01:56:11 +00001180 if (TLI && TLI->isTruncateFree(Ty1, Ty2))
1181 return false;
Dale Johannesen1de17d52009-02-09 22:14:15 +00001182 if (isa<PointerType>(Ty2) && Ty1->canLosslesslyBitCastTo(UIntPtrTy))
1183 return false;
1184 if (isa<PointerType>(Ty1) && Ty2->canLosslesslyBitCastTo(UIntPtrTy))
1185 return false;
1186 return true;
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001187}
1188
Evan Chengeb8f9e22006-03-17 19:52:23 +00001189/// CheckForIVReuse - Returns the multiple if the stride is the multiple
1190/// of a previous stride and it is a legal value for the target addressing
Dan Gohman02e4fa72007-10-22 20:40:42 +00001191/// mode scale component and optional base reg. This allows the users of
1192/// this stride to be rewritten as prev iv * factor. It returns 0 if no
Dale Johannesenb0390622008-12-16 22:16:28 +00001193/// reuse is possible. Factors can be negative on same targets, e.g. ARM.
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +00001194///
1195/// If all uses are outside the loop, we don't require that all multiplies
1196/// be folded into the addressing mode, nor even that the factor be constant;
1197/// a multiply (executed once) outside the loop is better than another IV
1198/// within. Well, usually.
1199SCEVHandle LoopStrengthReduce::CheckForIVReuse(bool HasBaseReg,
Evan Cheng2bd122c2007-10-26 01:56:11 +00001200 bool AllUsesAreAddresses,
Dale Johannesenb0390622008-12-16 22:16:28 +00001201 bool AllUsesAreOutsideLoop,
Dan Gohman02e4fa72007-10-22 20:40:42 +00001202 const SCEVHandle &Stride,
Dale Johannesendc42f482007-03-20 00:47:50 +00001203 IVExpr &IV, const Type *Ty,
1204 const std::vector<BasedUser>& UsersToProcess) {
Evan Chengeb8f9e22006-03-17 19:52:23 +00001205 if (SCEVConstant *SC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(Stride)) {
Reid Spencer502db932007-03-02 23:37:53 +00001206 int64_t SInt = SC->getValue()->getSExtValue();
Dale Johannesenb51b4b52007-11-17 02:48:01 +00001207 for (unsigned NewStride = 0, e = StrideOrder.size(); NewStride != e;
1208 ++NewStride) {
1209 std::map<SCEVHandle, IVsOfOneStride>::iterator SI =
1210 IVsByStride.find(StrideOrder[NewStride]);
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +00001211 if (SI == IVsByStride.end() || !isa<SCEVConstant>(SI->first))
Dale Johannesenb51b4b52007-11-17 02:48:01 +00001212 continue;
Evan Cheng5eef2d22007-03-12 23:27:37 +00001213 int64_t SSInt = cast<SCEVConstant>(SI->first)->getValue()->getSExtValue();
Evan Cheng2bd122c2007-10-26 01:56:11 +00001214 if (SI->first != Stride &&
Chris Lattner1d312902007-04-02 22:51:58 +00001215 (unsigned(abs(SInt)) < SSInt || (SInt % SSInt) != 0))
Evan Chengeb8f9e22006-03-17 19:52:23 +00001216 continue;
Evan Cheng5eef2d22007-03-12 23:27:37 +00001217 int64_t Scale = SInt / SSInt;
Dale Johannesendc42f482007-03-20 00:47:50 +00001218 // Check that this stride is valid for all the types used for loads and
1219 // stores; if it can be used for some and not others, we might as well use
1220 // the original stride everywhere, since we have to create the IV for it
Dan Gohmanaa343312007-10-29 19:23:53 +00001221 // anyway. If the scale is 1, then we don't need to worry about folding
1222 // multiplications.
1223 if (Scale == 1 ||
1224 (AllUsesAreAddresses &&
1225 ValidStride(HasBaseReg, Scale, UsersToProcess)))
Evan Cheng5eef2d22007-03-12 23:27:37 +00001226 for (std::vector<IVExpr>::iterator II = SI->second.IVs.begin(),
1227 IE = SI->second.IVs.end(); II != IE; ++II)
1228 // FIXME: Only handle base == 0 for now.
1229 // Only reuse previous IV if it would not require a type conversion.
Dan Gohmancfeb6a42008-06-18 16:23:07 +00001230 if (II->Base->isZero() &&
Evan Cheng2bd122c2007-10-26 01:56:11 +00001231 !RequiresTypeConversion(II->Base->getType(), Ty)) {
Evan Cheng5eef2d22007-03-12 23:27:37 +00001232 IV = *II;
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +00001233 return SE->getIntegerSCEV(Scale, Stride->getType());
Evan Cheng5eef2d22007-03-12 23:27:37 +00001234 }
Evan Chengeb8f9e22006-03-17 19:52:23 +00001235 }
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +00001236 } else if (AllUsesAreOutsideLoop) {
1237 // Accept nonconstant strides here; it is really really right to substitute
1238 // an existing IV if we can.
1239 for (unsigned NewStride = 0, e = StrideOrder.size(); NewStride != e;
1240 ++NewStride) {
1241 std::map<SCEVHandle, IVsOfOneStride>::iterator SI =
1242 IVsByStride.find(StrideOrder[NewStride]);
1243 if (SI == IVsByStride.end() || !isa<SCEVConstant>(SI->first))
1244 continue;
1245 int64_t SSInt = cast<SCEVConstant>(SI->first)->getValue()->getSExtValue();
1246 if (SI->first != Stride && SSInt != 1)
1247 continue;
1248 for (std::vector<IVExpr>::iterator II = SI->second.IVs.begin(),
1249 IE = SI->second.IVs.end(); II != IE; ++II)
1250 // Accept nonzero base here.
1251 // Only reuse previous IV if it would not require a type conversion.
1252 if (!RequiresTypeConversion(II->Base->getType(), Ty)) {
1253 IV = *II;
1254 return Stride;
1255 }
1256 }
1257 // Special case, old IV is -1*x and this one is x. Can treat this one as
1258 // -1*old.
1259 for (unsigned NewStride = 0, e = StrideOrder.size(); NewStride != e;
1260 ++NewStride) {
1261 std::map<SCEVHandle, IVsOfOneStride>::iterator SI =
1262 IVsByStride.find(StrideOrder[NewStride]);
1263 if (SI == IVsByStride.end())
1264 continue;
1265 if (SCEVMulExpr *ME = dyn_cast<SCEVMulExpr>(SI->first))
1266 if (SCEVConstant *SC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(ME->getOperand(0)))
1267 if (Stride == ME->getOperand(1) &&
1268 SC->getValue()->getSExtValue() == -1LL)
1269 for (std::vector<IVExpr>::iterator II = SI->second.IVs.begin(),
1270 IE = SI->second.IVs.end(); II != IE; ++II)
1271 // Accept nonzero base here.
1272 // Only reuse previous IV if it would not require type conversion.
1273 if (!RequiresTypeConversion(II->Base->getType(), Ty)) {
1274 IV = *II;
1275 return SE->getIntegerSCEV(-1LL, Stride->getType());
1276 }
1277 }
Evan Chengeb8f9e22006-03-17 19:52:23 +00001278 }
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +00001279 return SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Stride->getType());
Evan Chengeb8f9e22006-03-17 19:52:23 +00001280}
1281
Chris Lattner7e79b382006-08-03 06:34:50 +00001282/// PartitionByIsUseOfPostIncrementedValue - Simple boolean predicate that
1283/// returns true if Val's isUseOfPostIncrementedValue is true.
1284static bool PartitionByIsUseOfPostIncrementedValue(const BasedUser &Val) {
1285 return Val.isUseOfPostIncrementedValue;
1286}
Evan Chengeb8f9e22006-03-17 19:52:23 +00001287
Dan Gohman4a9a3e52008-04-14 18:26:16 +00001288/// isNonConstantNegative - Return true if the specified scev is negated, but
Chris Lattnerfb3e1192007-05-19 01:22:21 +00001289/// not a constant.
1290static bool isNonConstantNegative(const SCEVHandle &Expr) {
1291 SCEVMulExpr *Mul = dyn_cast<SCEVMulExpr>(Expr);
1292 if (!Mul) return false;
1293
1294 // If there is a constant factor, it will be first.
1295 SCEVConstant *SC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(Mul->getOperand(0));
1296 if (!SC) return false;
1297
1298 // Return true if the value is negative, this matches things like (-42 * V).
1299 return SC->getValue()->getValue().isNegative();
1300}
1301
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001302// CollectIVUsers - Transform our list of users and offsets to a bit more
Dan Gohman73b43b92008-06-23 22:11:52 +00001303// complex table. In this new vector, each 'BasedUser' contains 'Base', the base
1304// of the strided accesses, as well as the old information from Uses. We
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001305// progressively move information from the Base field to the Imm field, until
1306// we eventually have the full access expression to rewrite the use.
1307SCEVHandle LoopStrengthReduce::CollectIVUsers(const SCEVHandle &Stride,
1308 IVUsersOfOneStride &Uses,
1309 Loop *L,
1310 bool &AllUsesAreAddresses,
Dale Johannesenb0390622008-12-16 22:16:28 +00001311 bool &AllUsesAreOutsideLoop,
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001312 std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess) {
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +00001313 UsersToProcess.reserve(Uses.Users.size());
Chris Lattnera553b0c2005-08-08 22:56:21 +00001314 for (unsigned i = 0, e = Uses.Users.size(); i != e; ++i) {
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +00001315 UsersToProcess.push_back(BasedUser(Uses.Users[i], SE));
Chris Lattnera553b0c2005-08-08 22:56:21 +00001316
Dale Johannesen67c79892008-12-03 19:25:46 +00001317 // Move any loop variant operands from the offset field to the immediate
Chris Lattnera553b0c2005-08-08 22:56:21 +00001318 // field of the use, so that we don't try to use something before it is
1319 // computed.
Dale Johannesen544e0d02008-12-03 20:56:12 +00001320 MoveLoopVariantsToImmediateField(UsersToProcess.back().Base,
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +00001321 UsersToProcess.back().Imm, L, SE);
Chris Lattnera553b0c2005-08-08 22:56:21 +00001322 assert(UsersToProcess.back().Base->isLoopInvariant(L) &&
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +00001323 "Base value is not loop invariant!");
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +00001324 }
Evan Chengeb8f9e22006-03-17 19:52:23 +00001325
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001326 // We now have a whole bunch of uses of like-strided induction variables, but
1327 // they might all have different bases. We want to emit one PHI node for this
1328 // stride which we fold as many common expressions (between the IVs) into as
1329 // possible. Start by identifying the common expressions in the base values
1330 // for the strides (e.g. if we have "A+C+B" and "A+B+D" as our bases, find
1331 // "A+B"), emit it to the preheader, then remove the expression from the
1332 // UsersToProcess base values.
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +00001333 SCEVHandle CommonExprs =
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +00001334 RemoveCommonExpressionsFromUseBases(UsersToProcess, SE, L, TLI);
Dan Gohman02e4fa72007-10-22 20:40:42 +00001335
Chris Lattner44b807e2005-08-08 22:32:34 +00001336 // Next, figure out what we can represent in the immediate fields of
1337 // instructions. If we can represent anything there, move it to the imm
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001338 // fields of the BasedUsers. We do this so that it increases the commonality
1339 // of the remaining uses.
Evan Cheng32e4c7c2007-12-20 02:20:53 +00001340 unsigned NumPHI = 0;
Evan Chengd33cec12009-02-20 22:16:49 +00001341 bool HasAddress = false;
Chris Lattner44b807e2005-08-08 22:32:34 +00001342 for (unsigned i = 0, e = UsersToProcess.size(); i != e; ++i) {
Chris Lattner80b32b32005-08-16 00:38:11 +00001343 // If the user is not in the current loop, this means it is using the exit
1344 // value of the IV. Do not put anything in the base, make sure it's all in
1345 // the immediate field to allow as much factoring as possible.
1346 if (!L->contains(UsersToProcess[i].Inst->getParent())) {
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +00001347 UsersToProcess[i].Imm = SE->getAddExpr(UsersToProcess[i].Imm,
1348 UsersToProcess[i].Base);
Chris Lattner8385e512005-08-17 21:22:41 +00001349 UsersToProcess[i].Base =
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +00001350 SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, UsersToProcess[i].Base->getType());
Chris Lattner80b32b32005-08-16 00:38:11 +00001351 } else {
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +00001352 // Not all uses are outside the loop.
1353 AllUsesAreOutsideLoop = false;
1354
Chris Lattner80b32b32005-08-16 00:38:11 +00001355 // Addressing modes can be folded into loads and stores. Be careful that
1356 // the store is through the expression, not of the expression though.
Evan Cheng32e4c7c2007-12-20 02:20:53 +00001357 bool isPHI = false;
Evan Chengd6b62a52007-12-19 23:33:23 +00001358 bool isAddress = isAddressUse(UsersToProcess[i].Inst,
1359 UsersToProcess[i].OperandValToReplace);
1360 if (isa<PHINode>(UsersToProcess[i].Inst)) {
Evan Cheng32e4c7c2007-12-20 02:20:53 +00001361 isPHI = true;
1362 ++NumPHI;
Dan Gohman2acc7602007-05-03 23:20:33 +00001363 }
Dan Gohman02e4fa72007-10-22 20:40:42 +00001364
Evan Chengd33cec12009-02-20 22:16:49 +00001365 if (isAddress)
1366 HasAddress = true;
Dale Johannesenb0390622008-12-16 22:16:28 +00001367
Dan Gohman02e4fa72007-10-22 20:40:42 +00001368 // If this use isn't an address, then not all uses are addresses.
Evan Cheng55e641b2008-03-19 22:02:26 +00001369 if (!isAddress && !isPHI)
Dan Gohman02e4fa72007-10-22 20:40:42 +00001370 AllUsesAreAddresses = false;
Chris Lattner80b32b32005-08-16 00:38:11 +00001371
Evan Cheng1d958162007-03-13 20:34:37 +00001372 MoveImmediateValues(TLI, UsersToProcess[i].Inst, UsersToProcess[i].Base,
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +00001373 UsersToProcess[i].Imm, isAddress, L, SE);
Chris Lattner80b32b32005-08-16 00:38:11 +00001374 }
Chris Lattner44b807e2005-08-08 22:32:34 +00001375 }
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +00001376
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +00001377 // If one of the use is a PHI node and all other uses are addresses, still
Evan Cheng32e4c7c2007-12-20 02:20:53 +00001378 // allow iv reuse. Essentially we are trading one constant multiplication
1379 // for one fewer iv.
1380 if (NumPHI > 1)
1381 AllUsesAreAddresses = false;
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +00001382
Evan Chengd33cec12009-02-20 22:16:49 +00001383 // There are no in-loop address uses.
1384 if (AllUsesAreAddresses && (!HasAddress && !AllUsesAreOutsideLoop))
1385 AllUsesAreAddresses = false;
1386
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001387 return CommonExprs;
1388}
1389
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001390/// ShouldUseFullStrengthReductionMode - Test whether full strength-reduction
1391/// is valid and profitable for the given set of users of a stride. In
1392/// full strength-reduction mode, all addresses at the current stride are
1393/// strength-reduced all the way down to pointer arithmetic.
1394///
1395bool LoopStrengthReduce::ShouldUseFullStrengthReductionMode(
1396 const std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess,
1397 const Loop *L,
1398 bool AllUsesAreAddresses,
1399 SCEVHandle Stride) {
1400 if (!EnableFullLSRMode)
1401 return false;
1402
1403 // The heuristics below aim to avoid increasing register pressure, but
1404 // fully strength-reducing all the addresses increases the number of
1405 // add instructions, so don't do this when optimizing for size.
1406 // TODO: If the loop is large, the savings due to simpler addresses
1407 // may oughtweight the costs of the extra increment instructions.
1408 if (L->getHeader()->getParent()->hasFnAttr(Attribute::OptimizeForSize))
1409 return false;
1410
1411 // TODO: For now, don't do full strength reduction if there could
1412 // potentially be greater-stride multiples of the current stride
1413 // which could reuse the current stride IV.
1414 if (StrideOrder.back() != Stride)
1415 return false;
1416
1417 // Iterate through the uses to find conditions that automatically rule out
1418 // full-lsr mode.
1419 for (unsigned i = 0, e = UsersToProcess.size(); i != e; ) {
1420 SCEV *Base = UsersToProcess[i].Base;
1421 SCEV *Imm = UsersToProcess[i].Imm;
1422 // If any users have a loop-variant component, they can't be fully
1423 // strength-reduced.
1424 if (Imm && !Imm->isLoopInvariant(L))
1425 return false;
1426 // If there are to users with the same base and the difference between
1427 // the two Imm values can't be folded into the address, full
1428 // strength reduction would increase register pressure.
1429 do {
1430 SCEV *CurImm = UsersToProcess[i].Imm;
Dan Gohmana04af432009-02-22 16:40:52 +00001431 if ((CurImm || Imm) && CurImm != Imm) {
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001432 if (!CurImm) CurImm = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Stride->getType());
1433 if (!Imm) Imm = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Stride->getType());
1434 const Instruction *Inst = UsersToProcess[i].Inst;
Dan Gohman21e77222009-03-09 21:01:17 +00001435 const Type *UseTy = getAccessType(Inst);
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001436 SCEVHandle Diff = SE->getMinusSCEV(UsersToProcess[i].Imm, Imm);
1437 if (!Diff->isZero() &&
1438 (!AllUsesAreAddresses ||
1439 !fitsInAddressMode(Diff, UseTy, TLI, /*HasBaseReg=*/true)))
1440 return false;
1441 }
1442 } while (++i != e && Base == UsersToProcess[i].Base);
1443 }
1444
1445 // If there's exactly one user in this stride, fully strength-reducing it
1446 // won't increase register pressure. If it's starting from a non-zero base,
1447 // it'll be simpler this way.
1448 if (UsersToProcess.size() == 1 && !UsersToProcess[0].Base->isZero())
1449 return true;
1450
1451 // Otherwise, if there are any users in this stride that don't require
1452 // a register for their base, full strength-reduction will increase
1453 // register pressure.
1454 for (unsigned i = 0, e = UsersToProcess.size(); i != e; ++i)
Dan Gohmanf0baa6e2009-02-20 21:05:23 +00001455 if (UsersToProcess[i].Base->isZero())
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001456 return false;
1457
1458 // Otherwise, go for it.
1459 return true;
1460}
1461
1462/// InsertAffinePhi Create and insert a PHI node for an induction variable
1463/// with the specified start and step values in the specified loop.
1464///
1465/// If NegateStride is true, the stride should be negated by using a
1466/// subtract instead of an add.
1467///
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +00001468/// Return the created phi node.
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001469///
1470static PHINode *InsertAffinePhi(SCEVHandle Start, SCEVHandle Step,
1471 const Loop *L,
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001472 const TargetData *TD,
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +00001473 SCEVExpander &Rewriter) {
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001474 assert(Start->isLoopInvariant(L) && "New PHI start is not loop invariant!");
1475 assert(Step->isLoopInvariant(L) && "New PHI stride is not loop invariant!");
1476
1477 BasicBlock *Header = L->getHeader();
1478 BasicBlock *Preheader = L->getLoopPreheader();
Dan Gohman0daeed22009-03-09 21:14:16 +00001479 BasicBlock *LatchBlock = L->getLoopLatch();
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001480 const Type *Ty = Start->getType();
1481 if (isa<PointerType>(Ty)) Ty = TD->getIntPtrType();
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001482
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001483 PHINode *PN = PHINode::Create(Ty, "lsr.iv", Header->begin());
1484 PN->addIncoming(Rewriter.expandCodeFor(Start, Ty, Preheader->getTerminator()),
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001485 Preheader);
1486
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001487 // If the stride is negative, insert a sub instead of an add for the
1488 // increment.
1489 bool isNegative = isNonConstantNegative(Step);
1490 SCEVHandle IncAmount = Step;
1491 if (isNegative)
1492 IncAmount = Rewriter.SE.getNegativeSCEV(Step);
1493
1494 // Insert an add instruction right before the terminator corresponding
1495 // to the back-edge.
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001496 Value *StepV = Rewriter.expandCodeFor(IncAmount, Ty,
1497 Preheader->getTerminator());
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +00001498 Instruction *IncV;
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001499 if (isNegative) {
1500 IncV = BinaryOperator::CreateSub(PN, StepV, "lsr.iv.next",
Dan Gohman0daeed22009-03-09 21:14:16 +00001501 LatchBlock->getTerminator());
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001502 } else {
1503 IncV = BinaryOperator::CreateAdd(PN, StepV, "lsr.iv.next",
Dan Gohman0daeed22009-03-09 21:14:16 +00001504 LatchBlock->getTerminator());
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001505 }
1506 if (!isa<ConstantInt>(StepV)) ++NumVariable;
1507
Dan Gohman0daeed22009-03-09 21:14:16 +00001508 PN->addIncoming(IncV, LatchBlock);
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001509
1510 ++NumInserted;
1511 return PN;
1512}
1513
1514static void SortUsersToProcess(std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess) {
1515 // We want to emit code for users inside the loop first. To do this, we
1516 // rearrange BasedUser so that the entries at the end have
1517 // isUseOfPostIncrementedValue = false, because we pop off the end of the
1518 // vector (so we handle them first).
1519 std::partition(UsersToProcess.begin(), UsersToProcess.end(),
1520 PartitionByIsUseOfPostIncrementedValue);
1521
1522 // Sort this by base, so that things with the same base are handled
1523 // together. By partitioning first and stable-sorting later, we are
1524 // guaranteed that within each base we will pop off users from within the
1525 // loop before users outside of the loop with a particular base.
1526 //
1527 // We would like to use stable_sort here, but we can't. The problem is that
1528 // SCEVHandle's don't have a deterministic ordering w.r.t to each other, so
1529 // we don't have anything to do a '<' comparison on. Because we think the
1530 // number of uses is small, do a horrible bubble sort which just relies on
1531 // ==.
1532 for (unsigned i = 0, e = UsersToProcess.size(); i != e; ++i) {
1533 // Get a base value.
1534 SCEVHandle Base = UsersToProcess[i].Base;
1535
1536 // Compact everything with this base to be consecutive with this one.
1537 for (unsigned j = i+1; j != e; ++j) {
1538 if (UsersToProcess[j].Base == Base) {
1539 std::swap(UsersToProcess[i+1], UsersToProcess[j]);
1540 ++i;
1541 }
1542 }
1543 }
1544}
1545
Dan Gohman6b38e292009-02-20 21:06:57 +00001546/// PrepareToStrengthReduceFully - Prepare to fully strength-reduce
1547/// UsersToProcess, meaning lowering addresses all the way down to direct
1548/// pointer arithmetic.
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001549///
1550void
1551LoopStrengthReduce::PrepareToStrengthReduceFully(
1552 std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess,
1553 SCEVHandle Stride,
1554 SCEVHandle CommonExprs,
1555 const Loop *L,
1556 SCEVExpander &PreheaderRewriter) {
1557 DOUT << " Fully reducing all users\n";
1558
1559 // Rewrite the UsersToProcess records, creating a separate PHI for each
1560 // unique Base value.
1561 for (unsigned i = 0, e = UsersToProcess.size(); i != e; ) {
1562 // TODO: The uses are grouped by base, but not sorted. We arbitrarily
1563 // pick the first Imm value here to start with, and adjust it for the
1564 // other uses.
1565 SCEVHandle Imm = UsersToProcess[i].Imm;
1566 SCEVHandle Base = UsersToProcess[i].Base;
1567 SCEVHandle Start = SE->getAddExpr(CommonExprs, Base, Imm);
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001568 PHINode *Phi = InsertAffinePhi(Start, Stride, L, TD,
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +00001569 PreheaderRewriter);
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001570 // Loop over all the users with the same base.
1571 do {
1572 UsersToProcess[i].Base = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Stride->getType());
1573 UsersToProcess[i].Imm = SE->getMinusSCEV(UsersToProcess[i].Imm, Imm);
1574 UsersToProcess[i].Phi = Phi;
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001575 assert(UsersToProcess[i].Imm->isLoopInvariant(L) &&
1576 "ShouldUseFullStrengthReductionMode should reject this!");
1577 } while (++i != e && Base == UsersToProcess[i].Base);
1578 }
1579}
1580
1581/// PrepareToStrengthReduceWithNewPhi - Insert a new induction variable for the
1582/// given users to share.
1583///
1584void
1585LoopStrengthReduce::PrepareToStrengthReduceWithNewPhi(
1586 std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess,
1587 SCEVHandle Stride,
1588 SCEVHandle CommonExprs,
1589 Value *CommonBaseV,
1590 const Loop *L,
1591 SCEVExpander &PreheaderRewriter) {
1592 DOUT << " Inserting new PHI:\n";
1593
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001594 PHINode *Phi = InsertAffinePhi(SE->getUnknown(CommonBaseV),
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001595 Stride, L, TD,
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +00001596 PreheaderRewriter);
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001597
1598 // Remember this in case a later stride is multiple of this.
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +00001599 IVsByStride[Stride].addIV(Stride, CommonExprs, Phi);
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001600
1601 // All the users will share this new IV.
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +00001602 for (unsigned i = 0, e = UsersToProcess.size(); i != e; ++i)
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001603 UsersToProcess[i].Phi = Phi;
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001604
1605 DOUT << " IV=";
1606 DEBUG(WriteAsOperand(*DOUT, Phi, /*PrintType=*/false));
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001607 DOUT << "\n";
1608}
1609
1610/// PrepareToStrengthReduceWithNewPhi - Prepare for the given users to reuse
1611/// an induction variable with a stride that is a factor of the current
1612/// induction variable.
1613///
1614void
1615LoopStrengthReduce::PrepareToStrengthReduceFromSmallerStride(
1616 std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess,
1617 Value *CommonBaseV,
1618 const IVExpr &ReuseIV,
1619 Instruction *PreInsertPt) {
1620 DOUT << " Rewriting in terms of existing IV of STRIDE " << *ReuseIV.Stride
1621 << " and BASE " << *ReuseIV.Base << "\n";
1622
1623 // All the users will share the reused IV.
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +00001624 for (unsigned i = 0, e = UsersToProcess.size(); i != e; ++i)
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001625 UsersToProcess[i].Phi = ReuseIV.PHI;
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001626
1627 Constant *C = dyn_cast<Constant>(CommonBaseV);
1628 if (C &&
1629 (!C->isNullValue() &&
1630 !fitsInAddressMode(SE->getUnknown(CommonBaseV), CommonBaseV->getType(),
1631 TLI, false)))
1632 // We want the common base emitted into the preheader! This is just
1633 // using cast as a copy so BitCast (no-op cast) is appropriate
1634 CommonBaseV = new BitCastInst(CommonBaseV, CommonBaseV->getType(),
1635 "commonbase", PreInsertPt);
1636}
1637
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +00001638static bool IsImmFoldedIntoAddrMode(GlobalValue *GV, int64_t Offset,
Dan Gohman53f2ae22009-03-09 21:04:19 +00001639 const Type *AccessTy,
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +00001640 std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess,
1641 const TargetLowering *TLI) {
1642 SmallVector<Instruction*, 16> AddrModeInsts;
1643 for (unsigned i = 0, e = UsersToProcess.size(); i != e; ++i) {
1644 if (UsersToProcess[i].isUseOfPostIncrementedValue)
1645 continue;
1646 ExtAddrMode AddrMode =
1647 AddressingModeMatcher::Match(UsersToProcess[i].OperandValToReplace,
Dan Gohman53f2ae22009-03-09 21:04:19 +00001648 AccessTy, UsersToProcess[i].Inst,
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +00001649 AddrModeInsts, *TLI);
1650 if (GV && GV != AddrMode.BaseGV)
1651 return false;
1652 if (Offset && !AddrMode.BaseOffs)
1653 // FIXME: How to accurate check it's immediate offset is folded.
1654 return false;
1655 AddrModeInsts.clear();
1656 }
1657 return true;
1658}
1659
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001660/// StrengthReduceStridedIVUsers - Strength reduce all of the users of a single
1661/// stride of IV. All of the users may have different starting values, and this
Dan Gohman9f4ac312009-03-09 20:41:15 +00001662/// may not be the only stride.
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001663void LoopStrengthReduce::StrengthReduceStridedIVUsers(const SCEVHandle &Stride,
1664 IVUsersOfOneStride &Uses,
Dan Gohman9f4ac312009-03-09 20:41:15 +00001665 Loop *L) {
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001666 // If all the users are moved to another stride, then there is nothing to do.
Dan Gohman30359592008-01-29 13:02:09 +00001667 if (Uses.Users.empty())
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001668 return;
1669
1670 // Keep track if every use in UsersToProcess is an address. If they all are,
1671 // we may be able to rewrite the entire collection of them in terms of a
1672 // smaller-stride IV.
1673 bool AllUsesAreAddresses = true;
1674
Dale Johannesenb0390622008-12-16 22:16:28 +00001675 // Keep track if every use of a single stride is outside the loop. If so,
1676 // we want to be more aggressive about reusing a smaller-stride IV; a
1677 // multiply outside the loop is better than another IV inside. Well, usually.
1678 bool AllUsesAreOutsideLoop = true;
1679
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001680 // Transform our list of users and offsets to a bit more complex table. In
1681 // this new vector, each 'BasedUser' contains 'Base' the base of the
1682 // strided accessas well as the old information from Uses. We progressively
1683 // move information from the Base field to the Imm field, until we eventually
1684 // have the full access expression to rewrite the use.
1685 std::vector<BasedUser> UsersToProcess;
1686 SCEVHandle CommonExprs = CollectIVUsers(Stride, Uses, L, AllUsesAreAddresses,
Dale Johannesenb0390622008-12-16 22:16:28 +00001687 AllUsesAreOutsideLoop,
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001688 UsersToProcess);
1689
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001690 // Sort the UsersToProcess array so that users with common bases are
1691 // next to each other.
1692 SortUsersToProcess(UsersToProcess);
1693
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001694 // If we managed to find some expressions in common, we'll need to carry
1695 // their value in a register and add it in for each use. This will take up
1696 // a register operand, which potentially restricts what stride values are
1697 // valid.
Dan Gohmancfeb6a42008-06-18 16:23:07 +00001698 bool HaveCommonExprs = !CommonExprs->isZero();
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001699
Chris Lattnerfe355552007-04-01 22:21:39 +00001700 const Type *ReplacedTy = CommonExprs->getType();
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001701 if (isa<PointerType>(ReplacedTy)) ReplacedTy = TD->getIntPtrType();
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001702
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +00001703 // If all uses are addresses, consider sinking the immediate part of the
1704 // common expression back into uses if they can fit in the immediate fields.
Evan Cheng3cd389d2009-02-22 07:31:19 +00001705 if (TLI && HaveCommonExprs && AllUsesAreAddresses) {
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +00001706 SCEVHandle NewCommon = CommonExprs;
1707 SCEVHandle Imm = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, ReplacedTy);
Dan Gohman3cfe6a42009-03-09 21:22:12 +00001708 MoveImmediateValues(TLI, Type::VoidTy, NewCommon, Imm, true, L, SE);
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +00001709 if (!Imm->isZero()) {
1710 bool DoSink = true;
1711
1712 // If the immediate part of the common expression is a GV, check if it's
1713 // possible to fold it into the target addressing mode.
1714 GlobalValue *GV = 0;
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001715 if (SCEVUnknown *SU = dyn_cast<SCEVUnknown>(Imm))
1716 GV = dyn_cast<GlobalValue>(SU->getValue());
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +00001717 int64_t Offset = 0;
1718 if (SCEVConstant *SC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(Imm))
1719 Offset = SC->getValue()->getSExtValue();
1720 if (GV || Offset)
Dan Gohman53f2ae22009-03-09 21:04:19 +00001721 // Pass VoidTy as the AccessTy to be conservative, because
1722 // there could be multiple access types among all the uses.
1723 DoSink = IsImmFoldedIntoAddrMode(GV, Offset, Type::VoidTy,
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +00001724 UsersToProcess, TLI);
1725
1726 if (DoSink) {
1727 DOUT << " Sinking " << *Imm << " back down into uses\n";
1728 for (unsigned i = 0, e = UsersToProcess.size(); i != e; ++i)
1729 UsersToProcess[i].Imm = SE->getAddExpr(UsersToProcess[i].Imm, Imm);
1730 CommonExprs = NewCommon;
1731 HaveCommonExprs = !CommonExprs->isZero();
1732 ++NumImmSunk;
1733 }
1734 }
1735 }
1736
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001737 // Now that we know what we need to do, insert the PHI node itself.
1738 //
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +00001739 DOUT << "LSR: Examining IVs of TYPE " << *ReplacedTy << " of STRIDE "
1740 << *Stride << ":\n"
1741 << " Common base: " << *CommonExprs << "\n";
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +00001742
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001743 SCEVExpander Rewriter(*SE, *LI, *TD);
1744 SCEVExpander PreheaderRewriter(*SE, *LI, *TD);
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001745
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001746 BasicBlock *Preheader = L->getLoopPreheader();
1747 Instruction *PreInsertPt = Preheader->getTerminator();
Chris Lattner12b50412005-09-12 17:11:27 +00001748 BasicBlock *LatchBlock = L->getLoopLatch();
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +00001749
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001750 Value *CommonBaseV = ConstantInt::get(ReplacedTy, 0);
Evan Chengeb8f9e22006-03-17 19:52:23 +00001751
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001752 SCEVHandle RewriteFactor = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, ReplacedTy);
1753 IVExpr ReuseIV(SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Type::Int32Ty),
1754 SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Type::Int32Ty),
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +00001755 0);
Evan Chengeb8f9e22006-03-17 19:52:23 +00001756
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001757 /// Choose a strength-reduction strategy and prepare for it by creating
1758 /// the necessary PHIs and adjusting the bookkeeping.
1759 if (ShouldUseFullStrengthReductionMode(UsersToProcess, L,
1760 AllUsesAreAddresses, Stride)) {
1761 PrepareToStrengthReduceFully(UsersToProcess, Stride, CommonExprs, L,
1762 PreheaderRewriter);
Evan Chengeb8f9e22006-03-17 19:52:23 +00001763 } else {
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001764 // Emit the initial base value into the loop preheader.
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001765 CommonBaseV = PreheaderRewriter.expandCodeFor(CommonExprs, ReplacedTy,
1766 PreInsertPt);
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +00001767
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001768 // If all uses are addresses, check if it is possible to reuse an IV with a
1769 // stride that is a factor of this stride. And that the multiple is a number
1770 // that can be encoded in the scale field of the target addressing mode. And
Dan Gohman6b38e292009-02-20 21:06:57 +00001771 // that we will have a valid instruction after this substition, including
1772 // the immediate field, if any.
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001773 RewriteFactor = CheckForIVReuse(HaveCommonExprs, AllUsesAreAddresses,
1774 AllUsesAreOutsideLoop,
Dan Gohmanbb5b49c2009-03-09 21:19:58 +00001775 Stride, ReuseIV, ReplacedTy,
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001776 UsersToProcess);
1777 if (isa<SCEVConstant>(RewriteFactor) &&
1778 cast<SCEVConstant>(RewriteFactor)->isZero())
1779 PrepareToStrengthReduceWithNewPhi(UsersToProcess, Stride, CommonExprs,
1780 CommonBaseV, L, PreheaderRewriter);
1781 else
1782 PrepareToStrengthReduceFromSmallerStride(UsersToProcess, CommonBaseV,
1783 ReuseIV, PreInsertPt);
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +00001784 }
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001785
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001786 // Process all the users now, replacing their strided uses with
1787 // strength-reduced forms. This outer loop handles all bases, the inner
Chris Lattner7e79b382006-08-03 06:34:50 +00001788 // loop handles all users of a particular base.
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +00001789 while (!UsersToProcess.empty()) {
Chris Lattner7b445c52005-10-11 18:30:57 +00001790 SCEVHandle Base = UsersToProcess.back().Base;
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +00001791 Instruction *Inst = UsersToProcess.back().Inst;
Chris Lattnerbe3e5212005-08-03 23:30:08 +00001792
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001793 // Emit the code for Base into the preheader.
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001794 Value *BaseV = 0;
1795 if (!Base->isZero()) {
1796 BaseV = PreheaderRewriter.expandCodeFor(Base, Base->getType(),
1797 PreInsertPt);
Chris Lattner7d8ed8a2007-05-11 22:40:34 +00001798
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001799 DOUT << " INSERTING code for BASE = " << *Base << ":";
1800 if (BaseV->hasName())
1801 DOUT << " Result value name = %" << BaseV->getNameStr();
1802 DOUT << "\n";
Chris Lattner7d8ed8a2007-05-11 22:40:34 +00001803
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001804 // If BaseV is a non-zero constant, make sure that it gets inserted into
1805 // the preheader, instead of being forward substituted into the uses. We
1806 // do this by forcing a BitCast (noop cast) to be inserted into the
1807 // preheader in this case.
1808 if (!fitsInAddressMode(Base, getAccessType(Inst), TLI, false)) {
Reid Spencer3da59db2006-11-27 01:05:10 +00001809 // We want this constant emitted into the preheader! This is just
1810 // using cast as a copy so BitCast (no-op cast) is appropriate
1811 BaseV = new BitCastInst(BaseV, BaseV->getType(), "preheaderinsert",
Dan Gohman4a9a3e52008-04-14 18:26:16 +00001812 PreInsertPt);
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001813 }
Chris Lattner7e79b382006-08-03 06:34:50 +00001814 }
1815
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +00001816 // Emit the code to add the immediate offset to the Phi value, just before
Chris Lattner2351aba2005-08-03 22:51:21 +00001817 // the instructions that we identified as using this stride and base.
Chris Lattner7b445c52005-10-11 18:30:57 +00001818 do {
Chris Lattner7e79b382006-08-03 06:34:50 +00001819 // FIXME: Use emitted users to emit other users.
Chris Lattner7b445c52005-10-11 18:30:57 +00001820 BasedUser &User = UsersToProcess.back();
Jeff Cohend29b6aa2005-07-30 18:33:25 +00001821
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +00001822 DOUT << " Examining use ";
Dan Gohman4a359ea2009-02-19 19:32:06 +00001823 DEBUG(WriteAsOperand(*DOUT, UsersToProcess.back().OperandValToReplace,
1824 /*PrintType=*/false));
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +00001825 DOUT << " in Inst: " << *Inst;
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +00001826
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001827 // If this instruction wants to use the post-incremented value, move it
1828 // after the post-inc and use its value instead of the PHI.
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001829 Value *RewriteOp = User.Phi;
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001830 if (User.isUseOfPostIncrementedValue) {
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +00001831 RewriteOp = User.Phi->getIncomingValueForBlock(LatchBlock);
Chris Lattnerc6bae652005-09-12 06:04:47 +00001832
1833 // If this user is in the loop, make sure it is the last thing in the
1834 // loop to ensure it is dominated by the increment.
1835 if (L->contains(User.Inst->getParent()))
1836 User.Inst->moveBefore(LatchBlock->getTerminator());
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001837 }
Evan Cheng86c75d32006-06-09 00:12:42 +00001838
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +00001839 SCEVHandle RewriteExpr = SE->getUnknown(RewriteOp);
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001840
Dan Gohmane616bf32009-04-16 15:47:35 +00001841 if (TD->getTypeSizeInBits(RewriteOp->getType()) !=
1842 TD->getTypeSizeInBits(ReplacedTy)) {
1843 assert(TD->getTypeSizeInBits(RewriteOp->getType()) >
1844 TD->getTypeSizeInBits(ReplacedTy) &&
1845 "Unexpected widening cast!");
1846 RewriteExpr = SE->getTruncateExpr(RewriteExpr, ReplacedTy);
1847 }
1848
Dale Johannesenb0390622008-12-16 22:16:28 +00001849 // If we had to insert new instructions for RewriteOp, we have to
Dan Gohmanf20d70d2008-05-15 23:26:57 +00001850 // consider that they may not have been able to end up immediately
1851 // next to RewriteOp, because non-PHI instructions may never precede
1852 // PHI instructions in a block. In this case, remember where the last
Dan Gohmanca756ae2008-05-20 03:01:48 +00001853 // instruction was inserted so that if we're replacing a different
1854 // PHI node, we can use the later point to expand the final
1855 // RewriteExpr.
Dan Gohmanf20d70d2008-05-15 23:26:57 +00001856 Instruction *NewBasePt = dyn_cast<Instruction>(RewriteOp);
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001857 if (RewriteOp == User.Phi) NewBasePt = 0;
Dan Gohmanf20d70d2008-05-15 23:26:57 +00001858
Chris Lattner2351aba2005-08-03 22:51:21 +00001859 // Clear the SCEVExpander's expression map so that we are guaranteed
1860 // to have the code emitted where we expect it.
1861 Rewriter.clear();
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +00001862
1863 // If we are reusing the iv, then it must be multiplied by a constant
Dale Johannesen1de17d52009-02-09 22:14:15 +00001864 // factor to take advantage of the addressing mode scale component.
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001865 if (!RewriteFactor->isZero()) {
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +00001866 // If we're reusing an IV with a nonzero base (currently this happens
1867 // only when all reuses are outside the loop) subtract that base here.
1868 // The base has been used to initialize the PHI node but we don't want
1869 // it here.
Dale Johannesen1de17d52009-02-09 22:14:15 +00001870 if (!ReuseIV.Base->isZero()) {
1871 SCEVHandle typedBase = ReuseIV.Base;
1872 if (RewriteExpr->getType()->getPrimitiveSizeInBits() !=
1873 ReuseIV.Base->getType()->getPrimitiveSizeInBits()) {
1874 // It's possible the original IV is a larger type than the new IV,
1875 // in which case we have to truncate the Base. We checked in
1876 // RequiresTypeConversion that this is valid.
1877 assert (RewriteExpr->getType()->getPrimitiveSizeInBits() <
1878 ReuseIV.Base->getType()->getPrimitiveSizeInBits() &&
1879 "Unexpected lengthening conversion!");
1880 typedBase = SE->getTruncateExpr(ReuseIV.Base,
1881 RewriteExpr->getType());
1882 }
1883 RewriteExpr = SE->getMinusSCEV(RewriteExpr, typedBase);
1884 }
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +00001885
1886 // Multiply old variable, with base removed, by new scale factor.
1887 RewriteExpr = SE->getMulExpr(RewriteFactor,
Evan Cheng83927722007-10-30 22:27:26 +00001888 RewriteExpr);
Evan Chengeb8f9e22006-03-17 19:52:23 +00001889
1890 // The common base is emitted in the loop preheader. But since we
1891 // are reusing an IV, it has not been used to initialize the PHI node.
1892 // Add it to the expression used to rewrite the uses.
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +00001893 // When this use is outside the loop, we earlier subtracted the
1894 // common base, and are adding it back here. Use the same expression
1895 // as before, rather than CommonBaseV, so DAGCombiner will zap it.
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001896 if (!CommonExprs->isZero()) {
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +00001897 if (L->contains(User.Inst->getParent()))
1898 RewriteExpr = SE->getAddExpr(RewriteExpr,
Dale Johannesenb0390622008-12-16 22:16:28 +00001899 SE->getUnknown(CommonBaseV));
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +00001900 else
1901 RewriteExpr = SE->getAddExpr(RewriteExpr, CommonExprs);
1902 }
Evan Chengeb8f9e22006-03-17 19:52:23 +00001903 }
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +00001904
Chris Lattner2114b272005-08-04 20:03:32 +00001905 // Now that we know what we need to do, insert code before User for the
1906 // immediate and any loop-variant expressions.
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001907 if (BaseV)
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001908 // Add BaseV to the PHI value if needed.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +00001909 RewriteExpr = SE->getAddExpr(RewriteExpr, SE->getUnknown(BaseV));
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +00001910
Dan Gohmanf20d70d2008-05-15 23:26:57 +00001911 User.RewriteInstructionToUseNewBase(RewriteExpr, NewBasePt,
1912 Rewriter, L, this,
Evan Cheng0e0014d2007-10-30 23:45:15 +00001913 DeadInsts);
Jeff Cohend29b6aa2005-07-30 18:33:25 +00001914
Chris Lattnera68d4ca2008-12-01 06:14:28 +00001915 // Mark old value we replaced as possibly dead, so that it is eliminated
Chris Lattner2351aba2005-08-03 22:51:21 +00001916 // if we just replaced the last use of that value.
Chris Lattner09fb7da2008-12-01 06:27:41 +00001917 DeadInsts.push_back(cast<Instruction>(User.OperandValToReplace));
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +00001918
Chris Lattner7b445c52005-10-11 18:30:57 +00001919 UsersToProcess.pop_back();
Chris Lattner2351aba2005-08-03 22:51:21 +00001920 ++NumReduced;
Chris Lattner7b445c52005-10-11 18:30:57 +00001921
Chris Lattner7e79b382006-08-03 06:34:50 +00001922 // If there are any more users to process with the same base, process them
1923 // now. We sorted by base above, so we just have to check the last elt.
Chris Lattner7b445c52005-10-11 18:30:57 +00001924 } while (!UsersToProcess.empty() && UsersToProcess.back().Base == Base);
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +00001925 // TODO: Next, find out which base index is the most common, pull it out.
1926 }
1927
1928 // IMPORTANT TODO: Figure out how to partition the IV's with this stride, but
1929 // different starting values, into different PHIs.
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +00001930}
1931
Devang Patelc677de22008-08-13 20:31:11 +00001932/// FindIVUserForCond - If Cond has an operand that is an expression of an IV,
Chris Lattneraed01d12007-04-03 05:11:24 +00001933/// set the IV user and stride information and return true, otherwise return
1934/// false.
Devang Patelc677de22008-08-13 20:31:11 +00001935bool LoopStrengthReduce::FindIVUserForCond(ICmpInst *Cond, IVStrideUse *&CondUse,
Chris Lattneraed01d12007-04-03 05:11:24 +00001936 const SCEVHandle *&CondStride) {
1937 for (unsigned Stride = 0, e = StrideOrder.size(); Stride != e && !CondUse;
1938 ++Stride) {
1939 std::map<SCEVHandle, IVUsersOfOneStride>::iterator SI =
1940 IVUsesByStride.find(StrideOrder[Stride]);
1941 assert(SI != IVUsesByStride.end() && "Stride doesn't exist!");
1942
1943 for (std::vector<IVStrideUse>::iterator UI = SI->second.Users.begin(),
1944 E = SI->second.Users.end(); UI != E; ++UI)
1945 if (UI->User == Cond) {
1946 // NOTE: we could handle setcc instructions with multiple uses here, but
1947 // InstCombine does it as well for simple uses, it's not clear that it
1948 // occurs enough in real life to handle.
1949 CondUse = &*UI;
1950 CondStride = &SI->first;
1951 return true;
1952 }
1953 }
1954 return false;
1955}
1956
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00001957namespace {
1958 // Constant strides come first which in turns are sorted by their absolute
1959 // values. If absolute values are the same, then positive strides comes first.
1960 // e.g.
1961 // 4, -1, X, 1, 2 ==> 1, -1, 2, 4, X
1962 struct StrideCompare {
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001963 const TargetData *TD;
1964 explicit StrideCompare(const TargetData *td) : TD(td) {}
1965
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00001966 bool operator()(const SCEVHandle &LHS, const SCEVHandle &RHS) {
1967 SCEVConstant *LHSC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(LHS);
1968 SCEVConstant *RHSC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(RHS);
1969 if (LHSC && RHSC) {
1970 int64_t LV = LHSC->getValue()->getSExtValue();
1971 int64_t RV = RHSC->getValue()->getSExtValue();
1972 uint64_t ALV = (LV < 0) ? -LV : LV;
1973 uint64_t ARV = (RV < 0) ? -RV : RV;
Dan Gohmanbc511722009-02-13 00:26:43 +00001974 if (ALV == ARV) {
1975 if (LV != RV)
1976 return LV > RV;
1977 } else {
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00001978 return ALV < ARV;
Dan Gohmanbc511722009-02-13 00:26:43 +00001979 }
1980
1981 // If it's the same value but different type, sort by bit width so
1982 // that we emit larger induction variables before smaller
1983 // ones, letting the smaller be re-written in terms of larger ones.
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001984 return TD->getTypeSizeInBits(RHS->getType()) <
1985 TD->getTypeSizeInBits(LHS->getType());
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00001986 }
Dan Gohmanbc511722009-02-13 00:26:43 +00001987 return LHSC && !RHSC;
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00001988 }
1989 };
1990}
1991
1992/// ChangeCompareStride - If a loop termination compare instruction is the
1993/// only use of its stride, and the compaison is against a constant value,
1994/// try eliminate the stride by moving the compare instruction to another
1995/// stride and change its constant operand accordingly. e.g.
1996///
1997/// loop:
1998/// ...
1999/// v1 = v1 + 3
2000/// v2 = v2 + 1
2001/// if (v2 < 10) goto loop
2002/// =>
2003/// loop:
2004/// ...
2005/// v1 = v1 + 3
2006/// if (v1 < 30) goto loop
2007ICmpInst *LoopStrengthReduce::ChangeCompareStride(Loop *L, ICmpInst *Cond,
Evan Cheng0e0014d2007-10-30 23:45:15 +00002008 IVStrideUse* &CondUse,
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00002009 const SCEVHandle* &CondStride) {
2010 if (StrideOrder.size() < 2 ||
2011 IVUsesByStride[*CondStride].Users.size() != 1)
2012 return Cond;
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00002013 const SCEVConstant *SC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(*CondStride);
2014 if (!SC) return Cond;
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00002015
2016 ICmpInst::Predicate Predicate = Cond->getPredicate();
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00002017 int64_t CmpSSInt = SC->getValue()->getSExtValue();
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00002018 unsigned BitWidth = TD->getTypeSizeInBits((*CondStride)->getType());
Evan Cheng168a66b2007-10-26 23:08:19 +00002019 uint64_t SignBit = 1ULL << (BitWidth-1);
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00002020 const Type *CmpTy = Cond->getOperand(0)->getType();
Evan Cheng168a66b2007-10-26 23:08:19 +00002021 const Type *NewCmpTy = NULL;
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00002022 unsigned TyBits = TD->getTypeSizeInBits(CmpTy);
Evan Chengaf62c092007-10-29 22:07:18 +00002023 unsigned NewTyBits = 0;
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00002024 SCEVHandle *NewStride = NULL;
Dan Gohmanff518c82009-02-20 21:27:23 +00002025 Value *NewCmpLHS = NULL;
2026 Value *NewCmpRHS = NULL;
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00002027 int64_t Scale = 1;
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00002028 SCEVHandle NewOffset = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, UIntPtrTy);
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00002029
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00002030 if (ConstantInt *C = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Cond->getOperand(1))) {
2031 int64_t CmpVal = C->getValue().getSExtValue();
Evan Cheng168a66b2007-10-26 23:08:19 +00002032
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00002033 // Check stride constant and the comparision constant signs to detect
2034 // overflow.
2035 if ((CmpVal & SignBit) != (CmpSSInt & SignBit))
2036 return Cond;
Evan Cheng168a66b2007-10-26 23:08:19 +00002037
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00002038 // Look for a suitable stride / iv as replacement.
2039 for (unsigned i = 0, e = StrideOrder.size(); i != e; ++i) {
2040 std::map<SCEVHandle, IVUsersOfOneStride>::iterator SI =
2041 IVUsesByStride.find(StrideOrder[i]);
2042 if (!isa<SCEVConstant>(SI->first))
Dan Gohmanff518c82009-02-20 21:27:23 +00002043 continue;
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00002044 int64_t SSInt = cast<SCEVConstant>(SI->first)->getValue()->getSExtValue();
2045 if (abs(SSInt) <= abs(CmpSSInt) || (SSInt % CmpSSInt) != 0)
2046 continue;
2047
2048 Scale = SSInt / CmpSSInt;
2049 int64_t NewCmpVal = CmpVal * Scale;
2050 APInt Mul = APInt(BitWidth, NewCmpVal);
2051 // Check for overflow.
2052 if (Mul.getSExtValue() != NewCmpVal)
2053 continue;
2054
2055 // Watch out for overflow.
2056 if (ICmpInst::isSignedPredicate(Predicate) &&
2057 (CmpVal & SignBit) != (NewCmpVal & SignBit))
2058 continue;
2059
2060 if (NewCmpVal == CmpVal)
2061 continue;
2062 // Pick the best iv to use trying to avoid a cast.
2063 NewCmpLHS = NULL;
2064 for (std::vector<IVStrideUse>::iterator UI = SI->second.Users.begin(),
2065 E = SI->second.Users.end(); UI != E; ++UI) {
2066 NewCmpLHS = UI->OperandValToReplace;
2067 if (NewCmpLHS->getType() == CmpTy)
2068 break;
2069 }
2070 if (!NewCmpLHS)
2071 continue;
2072
2073 NewCmpTy = NewCmpLHS->getType();
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00002074 NewTyBits = TD->getTypeSizeInBits(NewCmpTy);
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00002075 if (RequiresTypeConversion(NewCmpTy, CmpTy)) {
2076 // Check if it is possible to rewrite it using
2077 // an iv / stride of a smaller integer type.
2078 bool TruncOk = false;
2079 if (NewCmpTy->isInteger()) {
2080 unsigned Bits = NewTyBits;
2081 if (ICmpInst::isSignedPredicate(Predicate))
2082 --Bits;
2083 uint64_t Mask = (1ULL << Bits) - 1;
2084 if (((uint64_t)NewCmpVal & Mask) == (uint64_t)NewCmpVal)
2085 TruncOk = true;
2086 }
2087 if (!TruncOk)
2088 continue;
2089 }
2090
2091 // Don't rewrite if use offset is non-constant and the new type is
2092 // of a different type.
2093 // FIXME: too conservative?
2094 if (NewTyBits != TyBits && !isa<SCEVConstant>(CondUse->Offset))
2095 continue;
2096
2097 bool AllUsesAreAddresses = true;
2098 bool AllUsesAreOutsideLoop = true;
2099 std::vector<BasedUser> UsersToProcess;
2100 SCEVHandle CommonExprs = CollectIVUsers(SI->first, SI->second, L,
2101 AllUsesAreAddresses,
2102 AllUsesAreOutsideLoop,
2103 UsersToProcess);
2104 // Avoid rewriting the compare instruction with an iv of new stride
2105 // if it's likely the new stride uses will be rewritten using the
2106 // stride of the compare instruction.
2107 if (AllUsesAreAddresses &&
2108 ValidStride(!CommonExprs->isZero(), Scale, UsersToProcess))
2109 continue;
2110
2111 // If scale is negative, use swapped predicate unless it's testing
2112 // for equality.
2113 if (Scale < 0 && !Cond->isEquality())
2114 Predicate = ICmpInst::getSwappedPredicate(Predicate);
2115
2116 NewStride = &StrideOrder[i];
2117 if (!isa<PointerType>(NewCmpTy))
2118 NewCmpRHS = ConstantInt::get(NewCmpTy, NewCmpVal);
2119 else {
Dan Gohman798d3922009-04-16 15:48:38 +00002120 ConstantInt *CI = ConstantInt::get(UIntPtrTy, NewCmpVal);
2121 NewCmpRHS = ConstantExpr::getIntToPtr(CI, NewCmpTy);
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00002122 }
2123 NewOffset = TyBits == NewTyBits
2124 ? SE->getMulExpr(CondUse->Offset,
2125 SE->getConstant(ConstantInt::get(CmpTy, Scale)))
2126 : SE->getConstant(ConstantInt::get(NewCmpTy,
2127 cast<SCEVConstant>(CondUse->Offset)->getValue()->getSExtValue()*Scale));
2128 break;
Dan Gohmanff518c82009-02-20 21:27:23 +00002129 }
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00002130 }
2131
Dan Gohman9b93dd12008-06-16 22:34:15 +00002132 // Forgo this transformation if it the increment happens to be
2133 // unfortunately positioned after the condition, and the condition
2134 // has multiple uses which prevent it from being moved immediately
2135 // before the branch. See
2136 // test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/change-compare-stride-trickiness-*.ll
2137 // for an example of this situation.
Devang Pateld16aba22008-08-13 02:05:14 +00002138 if (!Cond->hasOneUse()) {
Dan Gohman9b93dd12008-06-16 22:34:15 +00002139 for (BasicBlock::iterator I = Cond, E = Cond->getParent()->end();
2140 I != E; ++I)
Dan Gohmanff518c82009-02-20 21:27:23 +00002141 if (I == NewCmpLHS)
Dan Gohman9b93dd12008-06-16 22:34:15 +00002142 return Cond;
Devang Pateld16aba22008-08-13 02:05:14 +00002143 }
Dan Gohman9b93dd12008-06-16 22:34:15 +00002144
Dan Gohmanff518c82009-02-20 21:27:23 +00002145 if (NewCmpRHS) {
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00002146 // Create a new compare instruction using new stride / iv.
2147 ICmpInst *OldCond = Cond;
Evan Cheng168a66b2007-10-26 23:08:19 +00002148 // Insert new compare instruction.
Dan Gohmanff518c82009-02-20 21:27:23 +00002149 Cond = new ICmpInst(Predicate, NewCmpLHS, NewCmpRHS,
Dan Gohmane562b172008-06-13 21:43:41 +00002150 L->getHeader()->getName() + ".termcond",
2151 OldCond);
Evan Cheng168a66b2007-10-26 23:08:19 +00002152
2153 // Remove the old compare instruction. The old indvar is probably dead too.
Chris Lattner09fb7da2008-12-01 06:27:41 +00002154 DeadInsts.push_back(cast<Instruction>(CondUse->OperandValToReplace));
Evan Cheng168a66b2007-10-26 23:08:19 +00002155 SE->deleteValueFromRecords(OldCond);
Dan Gohman010ee2d2008-05-21 00:54:12 +00002156 OldCond->replaceAllUsesWith(Cond);
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00002157 OldCond->eraseFromParent();
Evan Cheng168a66b2007-10-26 23:08:19 +00002158
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00002159 IVUsesByStride[*CondStride].Users.pop_back();
Dan Gohmanff518c82009-02-20 21:27:23 +00002160 IVUsesByStride[*NewStride].addUser(NewOffset, Cond, NewCmpLHS);
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00002161 CondUse = &IVUsesByStride[*NewStride].Users.back();
2162 CondStride = NewStride;
2163 ++NumEliminated;
2164 }
2165
2166 return Cond;
2167}
2168
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +00002169/// OptimizeSMax - Rewrite the loop's terminating condition if it uses
2170/// an smax computation.
2171///
2172/// This is a narrow solution to a specific, but acute, problem. For loops
2173/// like this:
2174///
2175/// i = 0;
2176/// do {
2177/// p[i] = 0.0;
2178/// } while (++i < n);
2179///
2180/// where the comparison is signed, the trip count isn't just 'n', because
2181/// 'n' could be negative. And unfortunately this can come up even for loops
2182/// where the user didn't use a C do-while loop. For example, seemingly
2183/// well-behaved top-test loops will commonly be lowered like this:
2184//
2185/// if (n > 0) {
2186/// i = 0;
2187/// do {
2188/// p[i] = 0.0;
2189/// } while (++i < n);
2190/// }
2191///
2192/// and then it's possible for subsequent optimization to obscure the if
2193/// test in such a way that indvars can't find it.
2194///
2195/// When indvars can't find the if test in loops like this, it creates a
2196/// signed-max expression, which allows it to give the loop a canonical
2197/// induction variable:
2198///
2199/// i = 0;
2200/// smax = n < 1 ? 1 : n;
2201/// do {
2202/// p[i] = 0.0;
2203/// } while (++i != smax);
2204///
2205/// Canonical induction variables are necessary because the loop passes
2206/// are designed around them. The most obvious example of this is the
2207/// LoopInfo analysis, which doesn't remember trip count values. It
2208/// expects to be able to rediscover the trip count each time it is
2209/// needed, and it does this using a simple analyis that only succeeds if
2210/// the loop has a canonical induction variable.
2211///
2212/// However, when it comes time to generate code, the maximum operation
2213/// can be quite costly, especially if it's inside of an outer loop.
2214///
2215/// This function solves this problem by detecting this type of loop and
2216/// rewriting their conditions from ICMP_NE back to ICMP_SLT, and deleting
2217/// the instructions for the maximum computation.
2218///
2219ICmpInst *LoopStrengthReduce::OptimizeSMax(Loop *L, ICmpInst *Cond,
2220 IVStrideUse* &CondUse) {
2221 // Check that the loop matches the pattern we're looking for.
2222 if (Cond->getPredicate() != CmpInst::ICMP_EQ &&
2223 Cond->getPredicate() != CmpInst::ICMP_NE)
2224 return Cond;
2225
2226 SelectInst *Sel = dyn_cast<SelectInst>(Cond->getOperand(1));
2227 if (!Sel || !Sel->hasOneUse()) return Cond;
2228
Dan Gohman46bdfb02009-02-24 18:55:53 +00002229 SCEVHandle BackedgeTakenCount = SE->getBackedgeTakenCount(L);
2230 if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(BackedgeTakenCount))
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +00002231 return Cond;
Dan Gohman46bdfb02009-02-24 18:55:53 +00002232 SCEVHandle One = SE->getIntegerSCEV(1, BackedgeTakenCount->getType());
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +00002233
Dan Gohman46bdfb02009-02-24 18:55:53 +00002234 // Add one to the backedge-taken count to get the trip count.
2235 SCEVHandle IterationCount = SE->getAddExpr(BackedgeTakenCount, One);
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +00002236
2237 // Check for a max calculation that matches the pattern.
2238 SCEVSMaxExpr *SMax = dyn_cast<SCEVSMaxExpr>(IterationCount);
2239 if (!SMax || SMax != SE->getSCEV(Sel)) return Cond;
2240
2241 SCEVHandle SMaxLHS = SMax->getOperand(0);
2242 SCEVHandle SMaxRHS = SMax->getOperand(1);
2243 if (!SMaxLHS || SMaxLHS != One) return Cond;
2244
2245 // Check the relevant induction variable for conformance to
2246 // the pattern.
2247 SCEVHandle IV = SE->getSCEV(Cond->getOperand(0));
2248 SCEVAddRecExpr *AR = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(IV);
2249 if (!AR || !AR->isAffine() ||
2250 AR->getStart() != One ||
2251 AR->getStepRecurrence(*SE) != One)
2252 return Cond;
2253
Dan Gohmanbc10b8c2009-03-04 20:49:01 +00002254 assert(AR->getLoop() == L &&
2255 "Loop condition operand is an addrec in a different loop!");
2256
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +00002257 // Check the right operand of the select, and remember it, as it will
2258 // be used in the new comparison instruction.
2259 Value *NewRHS = 0;
2260 if (SE->getSCEV(Sel->getOperand(1)) == SMaxRHS)
2261 NewRHS = Sel->getOperand(1);
2262 else if (SE->getSCEV(Sel->getOperand(2)) == SMaxRHS)
2263 NewRHS = Sel->getOperand(2);
2264 if (!NewRHS) return Cond;
2265
2266 // Ok, everything looks ok to change the condition into an SLT or SGE and
2267 // delete the max calculation.
2268 ICmpInst *NewCond =
2269 new ICmpInst(Cond->getPredicate() == CmpInst::ICMP_NE ?
2270 CmpInst::ICMP_SLT :
2271 CmpInst::ICMP_SGE,
2272 Cond->getOperand(0), NewRHS, "scmp", Cond);
2273
2274 // Delete the max calculation instructions.
Dan Gohman586b7b72008-10-01 02:02:03 +00002275 SE->deleteValueFromRecords(Cond);
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +00002276 Cond->replaceAllUsesWith(NewCond);
2277 Cond->eraseFromParent();
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +00002278 Instruction *Cmp = cast<Instruction>(Sel->getOperand(0));
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +00002279 SE->deleteValueFromRecords(Sel);
Dan Gohman586b7b72008-10-01 02:02:03 +00002280 Sel->eraseFromParent();
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +00002281 if (Cmp->use_empty()) {
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +00002282 SE->deleteValueFromRecords(Cmp);
Dan Gohman586b7b72008-10-01 02:02:03 +00002283 Cmp->eraseFromParent();
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +00002284 }
2285 CondUse->User = NewCond;
2286 return NewCond;
2287}
2288
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +00002289/// OptimizeShadowIV - If IV is used in a int-to-float cast
2290/// inside the loop then try to eliminate the cast opeation.
2291void LoopStrengthReduce::OptimizeShadowIV(Loop *L) {
2292
Dan Gohman46bdfb02009-02-24 18:55:53 +00002293 SCEVHandle BackedgeTakenCount = SE->getBackedgeTakenCount(L);
2294 if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(BackedgeTakenCount))
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +00002295 return;
2296
2297 for (unsigned Stride = 0, e = StrideOrder.size(); Stride != e;
2298 ++Stride) {
2299 std::map<SCEVHandle, IVUsersOfOneStride>::iterator SI =
2300 IVUsesByStride.find(StrideOrder[Stride]);
2301 assert(SI != IVUsesByStride.end() && "Stride doesn't exist!");
2302 if (!isa<SCEVConstant>(SI->first))
2303 continue;
2304
2305 for (std::vector<IVStrideUse>::iterator UI = SI->second.Users.begin(),
2306 E = SI->second.Users.end(); UI != E; /* empty */) {
2307 std::vector<IVStrideUse>::iterator CandidateUI = UI;
Devang Patel54153272008-08-27 17:50:18 +00002308 ++UI;
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +00002309 Instruction *ShadowUse = CandidateUI->User;
2310 const Type *DestTy = NULL;
2311
2312 /* If shadow use is a int->float cast then insert a second IV
Devang Patel54153272008-08-27 17:50:18 +00002313 to eliminate this cast.
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +00002314
2315 for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; ++i)
2316 foo((double)i);
2317
Devang Patel54153272008-08-27 17:50:18 +00002318 is transformed into
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +00002319
2320 double d = 0.0;
2321 for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; ++i, ++d)
2322 foo(d);
2323 */
Devang Patel54153272008-08-27 17:50:18 +00002324 if (UIToFPInst *UCast = dyn_cast<UIToFPInst>(CandidateUI->User))
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +00002325 DestTy = UCast->getDestTy();
Devang Patel54153272008-08-27 17:50:18 +00002326 else if (SIToFPInst *SCast = dyn_cast<SIToFPInst>(CandidateUI->User))
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +00002327 DestTy = SCast->getDestTy();
Devang Patel18bb2782008-08-27 20:55:23 +00002328 if (!DestTy) continue;
2329
2330 if (TLI) {
2331 /* If target does not support DestTy natively then do not apply
2332 this transformation. */
2333 MVT DVT = TLI->getValueType(DestTy);
2334 if (!TLI->isTypeLegal(DVT)) continue;
2335 }
2336
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +00002337 PHINode *PH = dyn_cast<PHINode>(ShadowUse->getOperand(0));
2338 if (!PH) continue;
2339 if (PH->getNumIncomingValues() != 2) continue;
2340
2341 const Type *SrcTy = PH->getType();
2342 int Mantissa = DestTy->getFPMantissaWidth();
2343 if (Mantissa == -1) continue;
2344 if ((int)TD->getTypeSizeInBits(SrcTy) > Mantissa)
2345 continue;
2346
2347 unsigned Entry, Latch;
2348 if (PH->getIncomingBlock(0) == L->getLoopPreheader()) {
2349 Entry = 0;
2350 Latch = 1;
2351 } else {
2352 Entry = 1;
2353 Latch = 0;
2354 }
2355
2356 ConstantInt *Init = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(PH->getIncomingValue(Entry));
2357 if (!Init) continue;
2358 ConstantFP *NewInit = ConstantFP::get(DestTy, Init->getZExtValue());
2359
2360 BinaryOperator *Incr =
2361 dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(PH->getIncomingValue(Latch));
2362 if (!Incr) continue;
2363 if (Incr->getOpcode() != Instruction::Add
2364 && Incr->getOpcode() != Instruction::Sub)
2365 continue;
2366
2367 /* Initialize new IV, double d = 0.0 in above example. */
2368 ConstantInt *C = NULL;
2369 if (Incr->getOperand(0) == PH)
2370 C = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Incr->getOperand(1));
2371 else if (Incr->getOperand(1) == PH)
2372 C = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Incr->getOperand(0));
2373 else
2374 continue;
2375
2376 if (!C) continue;
2377
2378 /* Add new PHINode. */
2379 PHINode *NewPH = PHINode::Create(DestTy, "IV.S.", PH);
2380
Devang Patel54153272008-08-27 17:50:18 +00002381 /* create new increment. '++d' in above example. */
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +00002382 ConstantFP *CFP = ConstantFP::get(DestTy, C->getZExtValue());
2383 BinaryOperator *NewIncr =
2384 BinaryOperator::Create(Incr->getOpcode(),
2385 NewPH, CFP, "IV.S.next.", Incr);
2386
2387 NewPH->addIncoming(NewInit, PH->getIncomingBlock(Entry));
2388 NewPH->addIncoming(NewIncr, PH->getIncomingBlock(Latch));
2389
2390 /* Remove cast operation */
2391 SE->deleteValueFromRecords(ShadowUse);
2392 ShadowUse->replaceAllUsesWith(NewPH);
2393 ShadowUse->eraseFromParent();
2394 SI->second.Users.erase(CandidateUI);
2395 NumShadow++;
2396 break;
2397 }
2398 }
2399}
2400
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002401// OptimizeIndvars - Now that IVUsesByStride is set up with all of the indvar
2402// uses in the loop, look to see if we can eliminate some, in favor of using
2403// common indvars for the different uses.
2404void LoopStrengthReduce::OptimizeIndvars(Loop *L) {
2405 // TODO: implement optzns here.
2406
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +00002407 OptimizeShadowIV(L);
2408
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002409 // Finally, get the terminating condition for the loop if possible. If we
2410 // can, we want to change it to use a post-incremented version of its
Chris Lattner98d98112006-03-24 07:14:34 +00002411 // induction variable, to allow coalescing the live ranges for the IV into
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002412 // one register value.
2413 PHINode *SomePHI = cast<PHINode>(L->getHeader()->begin());
2414 BasicBlock *Preheader = L->getLoopPreheader();
2415 BasicBlock *LatchBlock =
2416 SomePHI->getIncomingBlock(SomePHI->getIncomingBlock(0) == Preheader);
2417 BranchInst *TermBr = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(LatchBlock->getTerminator());
Reid Spencere4d87aa2006-12-23 06:05:41 +00002418 if (!TermBr || TermBr->isUnconditional() ||
2419 !isa<ICmpInst>(TermBr->getCondition()))
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002420 return;
Reid Spencere4d87aa2006-12-23 06:05:41 +00002421 ICmpInst *Cond = cast<ICmpInst>(TermBr->getCondition());
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002422
2423 // Search IVUsesByStride to find Cond's IVUse if there is one.
2424 IVStrideUse *CondUse = 0;
Chris Lattner50fad702005-08-10 00:45:21 +00002425 const SCEVHandle *CondStride = 0;
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002426
Devang Patelc677de22008-08-13 20:31:11 +00002427 if (!FindIVUserForCond(Cond, CondUse, CondStride))
Chris Lattneraed01d12007-04-03 05:11:24 +00002428 return; // setcc doesn't use the IV.
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00002429
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +00002430 // If the trip count is computed in terms of an smax (due to ScalarEvolution
2431 // being unable to find a sufficient guard, for example), change the loop
2432 // comparison to use SLT instead of NE.
2433 Cond = OptimizeSMax(L, Cond, CondUse);
2434
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00002435 // If possible, change stride and operands of the compare instruction to
2436 // eliminate one stride.
2437 Cond = ChangeCompareStride(L, Cond, CondUse, CondStride);
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002438
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002439 // It's possible for the setcc instruction to be anywhere in the loop, and
2440 // possible for it to have multiple users. If it is not immediately before
2441 // the latch block branch, move it.
2442 if (&*++BasicBlock::iterator(Cond) != (Instruction*)TermBr) {
2443 if (Cond->hasOneUse()) { // Condition has a single use, just move it.
2444 Cond->moveBefore(TermBr);
2445 } else {
2446 // Otherwise, clone the terminating condition and insert into the loopend.
Reid Spencere4d87aa2006-12-23 06:05:41 +00002447 Cond = cast<ICmpInst>(Cond->clone());
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002448 Cond->setName(L->getHeader()->getName() + ".termcond");
2449 LatchBlock->getInstList().insert(TermBr, Cond);
2450
2451 // Clone the IVUse, as the old use still exists!
Chris Lattner50fad702005-08-10 00:45:21 +00002452 IVUsesByStride[*CondStride].addUser(CondUse->Offset, Cond,
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002453 CondUse->OperandValToReplace);
Chris Lattner50fad702005-08-10 00:45:21 +00002454 CondUse = &IVUsesByStride[*CondStride].Users.back();
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002455 }
2456 }
2457
2458 // If we get to here, we know that we can transform the setcc instruction to
Chris Lattner98d98112006-03-24 07:14:34 +00002459 // use the post-incremented version of the IV, allowing us to coalesce the
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002460 // live ranges for the IV correctly.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +00002461 CondUse->Offset = SE->getMinusSCEV(CondUse->Offset, *CondStride);
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002462 CondUse->isUseOfPostIncrementedValue = true;
Evan Cheng1ce75dc2008-07-07 19:51:32 +00002463 Changed = true;
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002464}
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +00002465
Devang Patel0f54dcb2007-03-06 21:14:09 +00002466bool LoopStrengthReduce::runOnLoop(Loop *L, LPPassManager &LPM) {
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +00002467
Devang Patel0f54dcb2007-03-06 21:14:09 +00002468 LI = &getAnalysis<LoopInfo>();
Devang Patelb7d9dfc2007-06-07 21:42:15 +00002469 DT = &getAnalysis<DominatorTree>();
Devang Patel0f54dcb2007-03-06 21:14:09 +00002470 SE = &getAnalysis<ScalarEvolution>();
2471 TD = &getAnalysis<TargetData>();
2472 UIntPtrTy = TD->getIntPtrType();
Dan Gohman3fea6432008-07-14 17:55:01 +00002473 Changed = false;
Devang Patel0f54dcb2007-03-06 21:14:09 +00002474
Dale Johannesenb0390622008-12-16 22:16:28 +00002475 // Find all uses of induction variables in this loop, and categorize
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +00002476 // them by stride. Start by finding all of the PHI nodes in the header for
2477 // this loop. If they are induction variables, inspect their uses.
Evan Cheng168a66b2007-10-26 23:08:19 +00002478 SmallPtrSet<Instruction*,16> Processed; // Don't reprocess instructions.
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +00002479 for (BasicBlock::iterator I = L->getHeader()->begin(); isa<PHINode>(I); ++I)
Chris Lattner3416e5f2005-08-04 17:40:30 +00002480 AddUsersIfInteresting(I, L, Processed);
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +00002481
Evan Cheng1ce75dc2008-07-07 19:51:32 +00002482 if (!IVUsesByStride.empty()) {
Dan Gohman80b0f8c2009-03-09 20:34:59 +00002483#ifndef NDEBUG
2484 DOUT << "\nLSR on \"" << L->getHeader()->getParent()->getNameStart()
2485 << "\" ";
2486 DEBUG(L->dump());
2487#endif
2488
Dan Gohmanf7912df2009-03-09 20:46:50 +00002489 // Sort the StrideOrder so we process larger strides first.
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00002490 std::stable_sort(StrideOrder.begin(), StrideOrder.end(), StrideCompare(TD));
Dan Gohmanf7912df2009-03-09 20:46:50 +00002491
Evan Cheng1ce75dc2008-07-07 19:51:32 +00002492 // Optimize induction variables. Some indvar uses can be transformed to use
2493 // strides that will be needed for other purposes. A common example of this
2494 // is the exit test for the loop, which can often be rewritten to use the
2495 // computation of some other indvar to decide when to terminate the loop.
2496 OptimizeIndvars(L);
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002497
Evan Cheng1ce75dc2008-07-07 19:51:32 +00002498 // FIXME: We can widen subreg IV's here for RISC targets. e.g. instead of
2499 // doing computation in byte values, promote to 32-bit values if safe.
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002500
Evan Cheng1ce75dc2008-07-07 19:51:32 +00002501 // FIXME: Attempt to reuse values across multiple IV's. In particular, we
2502 // could have something like "for(i) { foo(i*8); bar(i*16) }", which should
2503 // be codegened as "for (j = 0;; j+=8) { foo(j); bar(j+j); }" on X86/PPC.
2504 // Need to be careful that IV's are all the same type. Only works for
2505 // intptr_t indvars.
Misha Brukmanfd939082005-04-21 23:48:37 +00002506
Evan Cheng1ce75dc2008-07-07 19:51:32 +00002507 // IVsByStride keeps IVs for one particular loop.
2508 assert(IVsByStride.empty() && "Stale entries in IVsByStride?");
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +00002509
Evan Cheng1ce75dc2008-07-07 19:51:32 +00002510 // Note: this processes each stride/type pair individually. All users
2511 // passed into StrengthReduceStridedIVUsers have the same type AND stride.
2512 // Also, note that we iterate over IVUsesByStride indirectly by using
2513 // StrideOrder. This extra layer of indirection makes the ordering of
2514 // strides deterministic - not dependent on map order.
2515 for (unsigned Stride = 0, e = StrideOrder.size(); Stride != e; ++Stride) {
2516 std::map<SCEVHandle, IVUsersOfOneStride>::iterator SI =
2517 IVUsesByStride.find(StrideOrder[Stride]);
2518 assert(SI != IVUsesByStride.end() && "Stride doesn't exist!");
Dan Gohman9f4ac312009-03-09 20:41:15 +00002519 StrengthReduceStridedIVUsers(SI->first, SI->second, L);
Evan Cheng1ce75dc2008-07-07 19:51:32 +00002520 }
Chris Lattner7305ae22005-10-09 06:20:55 +00002521 }
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +00002522
Dan Gohman010ee2d2008-05-21 00:54:12 +00002523 // We're done analyzing this loop; release all the state we built up for it.
Dan Gohman010ee2d2008-05-21 00:54:12 +00002524 IVUsesByStride.clear();
2525 IVsByStride.clear();
2526 StrideOrder.clear();
2527
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +00002528 // Clean up after ourselves
2529 if (!DeadInsts.empty()) {
Chris Lattnera68d4ca2008-12-01 06:14:28 +00002530 DeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions();
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +00002531
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +00002532 BasicBlock::iterator I = L->getHeader()->begin();
Dan Gohmancbfe5bb2008-06-22 20:44:02 +00002533 while (PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(I++)) {
2534 // At this point, we know that we have killed one or more IV users.
Chris Lattnerbfcee362008-12-01 06:11:32 +00002535 // It is worth checking to see if the cannonical indvar is also
Dan Gohmancbfe5bb2008-06-22 20:44:02 +00002536 // dead, so that we can remove it as well.
2537 //
2538 // We can remove a PHI if it is on a cycle in the def-use graph
2539 // where each node in the cycle has degree one, i.e. only one use,
2540 // and is an instruction with no side effects.
2541 //
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +00002542 // FIXME: this needs to eliminate an induction variable even if it's being
2543 // compared against some value to decide loop termination.
Chris Lattnera0d44862008-11-27 23:00:20 +00002544 if (!PN->hasOneUse())
2545 continue;
2546
2547 SmallPtrSet<PHINode *, 4> PHIs;
2548 for (Instruction *J = dyn_cast<Instruction>(*PN->use_begin());
2549 J && J->hasOneUse() && !J->mayWriteToMemory();
2550 J = dyn_cast<Instruction>(*J->use_begin())) {
2551 // If we find the original PHI, we've discovered a cycle.
2552 if (J == PN) {
2553 // Break the cycle and mark the PHI for deletion.
2554 SE->deleteValueFromRecords(PN);
2555 PN->replaceAllUsesWith(UndefValue::get(PN->getType()));
Chris Lattner09fb7da2008-12-01 06:27:41 +00002556 DeadInsts.push_back(PN);
Chris Lattnera0d44862008-11-27 23:00:20 +00002557 Changed = true;
2558 break;
Chris Lattner7e608bb2005-08-02 02:52:02 +00002559 }
Chris Lattnera0d44862008-11-27 23:00:20 +00002560 // If we find a PHI more than once, we're on a cycle that
2561 // won't prove fruitful.
2562 if (isa<PHINode>(J) && !PHIs.insert(cast<PHINode>(J)))
2563 break;
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +00002564 }
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +00002565 }
Chris Lattnera68d4ca2008-12-01 06:14:28 +00002566 DeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions();
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +00002567 }
Evan Cheng1ce75dc2008-07-07 19:51:32 +00002568 return Changed;
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +00002569}