blob: e55020027134212dcd9ff1a911f063436f7a0b93 [file] [log] [blame]
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001//===- LoopStrengthReduce.cpp - Strength Reduce IVs in Loops --------------===//
Misha Brukmanfd939082005-04-21 23:48:37 +00002//
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +00003// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
4//
Chris Lattner4ee451d2007-12-29 20:36:04 +00005// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
6// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
Misha Brukmanfd939082005-04-21 23:48:37 +00007//
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +00008//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
9//
10// This pass performs a strength reduction on array references inside loops that
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +000011// have as one or more of their components the loop induction variable.
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +000012//
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +000013//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
14
Chris Lattnerbe3e5212005-08-03 23:30:08 +000015#define DEBUG_TYPE "loop-reduce"
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +000016#include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h"
17#include "llvm/Constants.h"
18#include "llvm/Instructions.h"
Dan Gohmane5b01be2007-05-04 14:59:09 +000019#include "llvm/IntrinsicInst.h"
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +000020#include "llvm/Type.h"
Jeff Cohen2f3c9b72005-03-04 04:04:26 +000021#include "llvm/DerivedTypes.h"
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +000022#include "llvm/Analysis/Dominators.h"
23#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopInfo.h"
Devang Patel0f54dcb2007-03-06 21:14:09 +000024#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopPass.h"
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +000025#include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.h"
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +000026#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/AddrModeMatcher.h"
Chris Lattnere0391be2005-08-12 22:06:11 +000027#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.h"
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +000028#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/Local.h"
Evan Cheng168a66b2007-10-26 23:08:19 +000029#include "llvm/ADT/SmallPtrSet.h"
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +000030#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +000031#include "llvm/Support/CFG.h"
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +000032#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
Chris Lattnera4f0b3a2006-08-27 12:54:02 +000033#include "llvm/Support/Compiler.h"
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +000034#include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h"
Evan Chengd277f2c2006-03-13 23:14:23 +000035#include "llvm/Target/TargetLowering.h"
Jeff Cohencfb1d422005-07-30 18:22:27 +000036#include <algorithm>
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +000037using namespace llvm;
38
Dan Gohman13317bc2009-04-16 16:46:01 +000039STATISTIC(NumReduced , "Number of IV uses strength reduced");
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +000040STATISTIC(NumInserted, "Number of PHIs inserted");
41STATISTIC(NumVariable, "Number of PHIs with variable strides");
Devang Patel54153272008-08-27 17:50:18 +000042STATISTIC(NumEliminated, "Number of strides eliminated");
43STATISTIC(NumShadow, "Number of Shadow IVs optimized");
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +000044STATISTIC(NumImmSunk, "Number of common expr immediates sunk into uses");
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +000045
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +000046static cl::opt<bool> EnableFullLSRMode("enable-full-lsr",
47 cl::init(false),
48 cl::Hidden);
49
Chris Lattner0e5f4992006-12-19 21:40:18 +000050namespace {
Dale Johannesendc42f482007-03-20 00:47:50 +000051
Jeff Cohenc01a5302007-03-20 20:43:18 +000052 struct BasedUser;
Dale Johannesendc42f482007-03-20 00:47:50 +000053
Chris Lattnerec3fb632005-08-03 22:21:05 +000054 /// IVStrideUse - Keep track of one use of a strided induction variable, where
55 /// the stride is stored externally. The Offset member keeps track of the
Dan Gohman9330c3a2007-10-29 19:32:39 +000056 /// offset from the IV, User is the actual user of the operand, and
57 /// 'OperandValToReplace' is the operand of the User that is the use.
Reid Spencer9133fe22007-02-05 23:32:05 +000058 struct VISIBILITY_HIDDEN IVStrideUse {
Chris Lattnerec3fb632005-08-03 22:21:05 +000059 SCEVHandle Offset;
60 Instruction *User;
61 Value *OperandValToReplace;
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +000062
63 // isUseOfPostIncrementedValue - True if this should use the
64 // post-incremented version of this IV, not the preincremented version.
65 // This can only be set in special cases, such as the terminating setcc
Chris Lattnerc6bae652005-09-12 06:04:47 +000066 // instruction for a loop or uses dominated by the loop.
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +000067 bool isUseOfPostIncrementedValue;
Chris Lattnerec3fb632005-08-03 22:21:05 +000068
69 IVStrideUse(const SCEVHandle &Offs, Instruction *U, Value *O)
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +000070 : Offset(Offs), User(U), OperandValToReplace(O),
71 isUseOfPostIncrementedValue(false) {}
Chris Lattnerec3fb632005-08-03 22:21:05 +000072 };
73
74 /// IVUsersOfOneStride - This structure keeps track of all instructions that
75 /// have an operand that is based on the trip count multiplied by some stride.
76 /// The stride for all of these users is common and kept external to this
77 /// structure.
Reid Spencer9133fe22007-02-05 23:32:05 +000078 struct VISIBILITY_HIDDEN IVUsersOfOneStride {
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +000079 /// Users - Keep track of all of the users of this stride as well as the
Chris Lattnerec3fb632005-08-03 22:21:05 +000080 /// initial value and the operand that uses the IV.
81 std::vector<IVStrideUse> Users;
82
83 void addUser(const SCEVHandle &Offset,Instruction *User, Value *Operand) {
84 Users.push_back(IVStrideUse(Offset, User, Operand));
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +000085 }
86 };
87
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +000088 /// IVInfo - This structure keeps track of one IV expression inserted during
Evan Cheng21495772006-03-18 08:03:12 +000089 /// StrengthReduceStridedIVUsers. It contains the stride, the common base, as
90 /// well as the PHI node and increment value created for rewrite.
Reid Spencer9133fe22007-02-05 23:32:05 +000091 struct VISIBILITY_HIDDEN IVExpr {
Evan Cheng21495772006-03-18 08:03:12 +000092 SCEVHandle Stride;
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +000093 SCEVHandle Base;
94 PHINode *PHI;
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +000095
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +000096 IVExpr(const SCEVHandle &stride, const SCEVHandle &base, PHINode *phi)
97 : Stride(stride), Base(base), PHI(phi) {}
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +000098 };
99
100 /// IVsOfOneStride - This structure keeps track of all IV expression inserted
101 /// during StrengthReduceStridedIVUsers for a particular stride of the IV.
Reid Spencer9133fe22007-02-05 23:32:05 +0000102 struct VISIBILITY_HIDDEN IVsOfOneStride {
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +0000103 std::vector<IVExpr> IVs;
104
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +0000105 void addIV(const SCEVHandle &Stride, const SCEVHandle &Base, PHINode *PHI) {
106 IVs.push_back(IVExpr(Stride, Base, PHI));
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +0000107 }
108 };
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000109
Devang Patel0f54dcb2007-03-06 21:14:09 +0000110 class VISIBILITY_HIDDEN LoopStrengthReduce : public LoopPass {
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +0000111 LoopInfo *LI;
Devang Patelb7d9dfc2007-06-07 21:42:15 +0000112 DominatorTree *DT;
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000113 ScalarEvolution *SE;
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +0000114 bool Changed;
Chris Lattner7e608bb2005-08-02 02:52:02 +0000115
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000116 /// IVUsesByStride - Keep track of all uses of induction variables that we
117 /// are interested in. The key of the map is the stride of the access.
Chris Lattner50fad702005-08-10 00:45:21 +0000118 std::map<SCEVHandle, IVUsersOfOneStride> IVUsesByStride;
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000119
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +0000120 /// IVsByStride - Keep track of all IVs that have been inserted for a
121 /// particular stride.
122 std::map<SCEVHandle, IVsOfOneStride> IVsByStride;
123
Chris Lattner7305ae22005-10-09 06:20:55 +0000124 /// StrideOrder - An ordering of the keys in IVUsesByStride that is stable:
125 /// We use this to iterate over the IVUsesByStride collection without being
126 /// dependent on random ordering of pointers in the process.
Evan Cheng83927722007-10-30 22:27:26 +0000127 SmallVector<SCEVHandle, 16> StrideOrder;
Chris Lattner7305ae22005-10-09 06:20:55 +0000128
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000129 /// DeadInsts - Keep track of instructions we may have made dead, so that
130 /// we can remove them after we are done working.
Chris Lattner09fb7da2008-12-01 06:27:41 +0000131 SmallVector<Instruction*, 16> DeadInsts;
Evan Chengd277f2c2006-03-13 23:14:23 +0000132
133 /// TLI - Keep a pointer of a TargetLowering to consult for determining
134 /// transformation profitability.
135 const TargetLowering *TLI;
136
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +0000137 public:
Devang Patel19974732007-05-03 01:11:54 +0000138 static char ID; // Pass ID, replacement for typeid
Dan Gohmanc2bbfc12007-08-01 15:32:29 +0000139 explicit LoopStrengthReduce(const TargetLowering *tli = NULL) :
Dan Gohmanae73dc12008-09-04 17:05:41 +0000140 LoopPass(&ID), TLI(tli) {
Jeff Cohen2f3c9b72005-03-04 04:04:26 +0000141 }
142
Devang Patel0f54dcb2007-03-06 21:14:09 +0000143 bool runOnLoop(Loop *L, LPPassManager &LPM);
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +0000144
145 virtual void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
Chris Lattneraa96ae72005-08-17 06:35:16 +0000146 // We split critical edges, so we change the CFG. However, we do update
147 // many analyses if they are around.
148 AU.addPreservedID(LoopSimplifyID);
149 AU.addPreserved<LoopInfo>();
Chris Lattneraa96ae72005-08-17 06:35:16 +0000150 AU.addPreserved<DominanceFrontier>();
151 AU.addPreserved<DominatorTree>();
152
Jeff Cohenf465db62005-02-27 19:37:07 +0000153 AU.addRequiredID(LoopSimplifyID);
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +0000154 AU.addRequired<LoopInfo>();
Devang Patelb7d9dfc2007-06-07 21:42:15 +0000155 AU.addRequired<DominatorTree>();
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000156 AU.addRequired<ScalarEvolution>();
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +0000157 AU.addPreserved<ScalarEvolution>();
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +0000158 }
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +0000159
Dan Gohman3d81e312009-05-01 16:56:32 +0000160 private:
Chris Lattner3416e5f2005-08-04 17:40:30 +0000161 bool AddUsersIfInteresting(Instruction *I, Loop *L,
Evan Cheng168a66b2007-10-26 23:08:19 +0000162 SmallPtrSet<Instruction*,16> &Processed);
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +0000163 ICmpInst *ChangeCompareStride(Loop *L, ICmpInst *Cond,
164 IVStrideUse* &CondUse,
165 const SCEVHandle* &CondStride);
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +0000166 void OptimizeIndvars(Loop *L);
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +0000167
168 /// OptimizeShadowIV - If IV is used in a int-to-float cast
169 /// inside the loop then try to eliminate the cast opeation.
170 void OptimizeShadowIV(Loop *L);
171
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +0000172 /// OptimizeSMax - Rewrite the loop's terminating condition
173 /// if it uses an smax computation.
174 ICmpInst *OptimizeSMax(Loop *L, ICmpInst *Cond,
175 IVStrideUse* &CondUse);
176
Devang Patelc677de22008-08-13 20:31:11 +0000177 bool FindIVUserForCond(ICmpInst *Cond, IVStrideUse *&CondUse,
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +0000178 const SCEVHandle *&CondStride);
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +0000179 bool RequiresTypeConversion(const Type *Ty, const Type *NewTy);
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000180 SCEVHandle CheckForIVReuse(bool, bool, bool, const SCEVHandle&,
Dan Gohman02e4fa72007-10-22 20:40:42 +0000181 IVExpr&, const Type*,
Dale Johannesendc42f482007-03-20 00:47:50 +0000182 const std::vector<BasedUser>& UsersToProcess);
Dan Gohman02e4fa72007-10-22 20:40:42 +0000183 bool ValidStride(bool, int64_t,
184 const std::vector<BasedUser>& UsersToProcess);
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +0000185 SCEVHandle CollectIVUsers(const SCEVHandle &Stride,
186 IVUsersOfOneStride &Uses,
187 Loop *L,
188 bool &AllUsesAreAddresses,
Dale Johannesenb0390622008-12-16 22:16:28 +0000189 bool &AllUsesAreOutsideLoop,
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +0000190 std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess);
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +0000191 bool ShouldUseFullStrengthReductionMode(
192 const std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess,
193 const Loop *L,
194 bool AllUsesAreAddresses,
195 SCEVHandle Stride);
196 void PrepareToStrengthReduceFully(
197 std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess,
198 SCEVHandle Stride,
199 SCEVHandle CommonExprs,
200 const Loop *L,
201 SCEVExpander &PreheaderRewriter);
202 void PrepareToStrengthReduceFromSmallerStride(
203 std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess,
204 Value *CommonBaseV,
205 const IVExpr &ReuseIV,
206 Instruction *PreInsertPt);
207 void PrepareToStrengthReduceWithNewPhi(
208 std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess,
209 SCEVHandle Stride,
210 SCEVHandle CommonExprs,
211 Value *CommonBaseV,
212 const Loop *L,
213 SCEVExpander &PreheaderRewriter);
Chris Lattner50fad702005-08-10 00:45:21 +0000214 void StrengthReduceStridedIVUsers(const SCEVHandle &Stride,
215 IVUsersOfOneStride &Uses,
Dan Gohman9f4ac312009-03-09 20:41:15 +0000216 Loop *L);
Chris Lattnera68d4ca2008-12-01 06:14:28 +0000217 void DeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions();
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +0000218 };
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +0000219}
220
Dan Gohman844731a2008-05-13 00:00:25 +0000221char LoopStrengthReduce::ID = 0;
222static RegisterPass<LoopStrengthReduce>
223X("loop-reduce", "Loop Strength Reduction");
224
Daniel Dunbar394f0442008-10-22 23:32:42 +0000225Pass *llvm::createLoopStrengthReducePass(const TargetLowering *TLI) {
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +0000226 return new LoopStrengthReduce(TLI);
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +0000227}
228
229/// DeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions - If any of the instructions is the
230/// specified set are trivially dead, delete them and see if this makes any of
231/// their operands subsequently dead.
Chris Lattnera68d4ca2008-12-01 06:14:28 +0000232void LoopStrengthReduce::DeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions() {
Chris Lattner09fb7da2008-12-01 06:27:41 +0000233 if (DeadInsts.empty()) return;
234
235 // Sort the deadinsts list so that we can trivially eliminate duplicates as we
236 // go. The code below never adds a non-dead instruction to the worklist, but
237 // callers may not be so careful.
Chris Lattner99d00152008-12-01 06:49:59 +0000238 array_pod_sort(DeadInsts.begin(), DeadInsts.end());
Chris Lattner09fb7da2008-12-01 06:27:41 +0000239
240 // Drop duplicate instructions and those with uses.
241 for (unsigned i = 0, e = DeadInsts.size()-1; i < e; ++i) {
242 Instruction *I = DeadInsts[i];
243 if (!I->use_empty()) DeadInsts[i] = 0;
Chris Lattner46a879e2008-12-09 04:47:21 +0000244 while (i != e && DeadInsts[i+1] == I)
Chris Lattner09fb7da2008-12-01 06:27:41 +0000245 DeadInsts[++i] = 0;
246 }
247
Chris Lattnera68d4ca2008-12-01 06:14:28 +0000248 while (!DeadInsts.empty()) {
249 Instruction *I = DeadInsts.back();
250 DeadInsts.pop_back();
Chris Lattner09fb7da2008-12-01 06:27:41 +0000251
252 if (I == 0 || !isInstructionTriviallyDead(I))
Chris Lattnerbfcee362008-12-01 06:11:32 +0000253 continue;
254
255 SE->deleteValueFromRecords(I);
256
Chris Lattner09fb7da2008-12-01 06:27:41 +0000257 for (User::op_iterator OI = I->op_begin(), E = I->op_end(); OI != E; ++OI) {
258 if (Instruction *U = dyn_cast<Instruction>(*OI)) {
259 *OI = 0;
Chris Lattnerbfcee362008-12-01 06:11:32 +0000260 if (U->use_empty())
Chris Lattner09fb7da2008-12-01 06:27:41 +0000261 DeadInsts.push_back(U);
Bill Wendling411052b2008-11-29 03:43:04 +0000262 }
263 }
Chris Lattnerbfcee362008-12-01 06:11:32 +0000264
265 I->eraseFromParent();
266 Changed = true;
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +0000267 }
268}
269
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000270/// containsAddRecFromDifferentLoop - Determine whether expression S involves a
271/// subexpression that is an AddRec from a loop other than L. An outer loop
272/// of L is OK, but not an inner loop nor a disjoint loop.
273static bool containsAddRecFromDifferentLoop(SCEVHandle S, Loop *L) {
274 // This is very common, put it first.
275 if (isa<SCEVConstant>(S))
276 return false;
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +0000277 if (const SCEVCommutativeExpr *AE = dyn_cast<SCEVCommutativeExpr>(S)) {
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000278 for (unsigned int i=0; i< AE->getNumOperands(); i++)
279 if (containsAddRecFromDifferentLoop(AE->getOperand(i), L))
280 return true;
281 return false;
282 }
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +0000283 if (const SCEVAddRecExpr *AE = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(S)) {
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000284 if (const Loop *newLoop = AE->getLoop()) {
285 if (newLoop == L)
286 return false;
287 // if newLoop is an outer loop of L, this is OK.
288 if (!LoopInfoBase<BasicBlock>::isNotAlreadyContainedIn(L, newLoop))
289 return false;
290 }
291 return true;
292 }
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +0000293 if (const SCEVUDivExpr *DE = dyn_cast<SCEVUDivExpr>(S))
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000294 return containsAddRecFromDifferentLoop(DE->getLHS(), L) ||
295 containsAddRecFromDifferentLoop(DE->getRHS(), L);
296#if 0
297 // SCEVSDivExpr has been backed out temporarily, but will be back; we'll
298 // need this when it is.
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +0000299 if (const SCEVSDivExpr *DE = dyn_cast<SCEVSDivExpr>(S))
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000300 return containsAddRecFromDifferentLoop(DE->getLHS(), L) ||
301 containsAddRecFromDifferentLoop(DE->getRHS(), L);
302#endif
Dan Gohman84923602009-04-21 01:25:57 +0000303 if (const SCEVCastExpr *CE = dyn_cast<SCEVCastExpr>(S))
304 return containsAddRecFromDifferentLoop(CE->getOperand(), L);
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000305 return false;
306}
307
Chris Lattner7db543f2005-08-04 19:08:16 +0000308/// getSCEVStartAndStride - Compute the start and stride of this expression,
309/// returning false if the expression is not a start/stride pair, or true if it
310/// is. The stride must be a loop invariant expression, but the start may be
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000311/// a mix of loop invariant and loop variant expressions. The start cannot,
312/// however, contain an AddRec from a different loop, unless that loop is an
313/// outer loop of the current loop.
Chris Lattner7db543f2005-08-04 19:08:16 +0000314static bool getSCEVStartAndStride(const SCEVHandle &SH, Loop *L,
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000315 SCEVHandle &Start, SCEVHandle &Stride,
Evan Cheng8f40afe2009-02-15 06:06:15 +0000316 ScalarEvolution *SE, DominatorTree *DT) {
Chris Lattner7db543f2005-08-04 19:08:16 +0000317 SCEVHandle TheAddRec = Start; // Initialize to zero.
318
319 // If the outer level is an AddExpr, the operands are all start values except
320 // for a nested AddRecExpr.
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +0000321 if (const SCEVAddExpr *AE = dyn_cast<SCEVAddExpr>(SH)) {
Chris Lattner7db543f2005-08-04 19:08:16 +0000322 for (unsigned i = 0, e = AE->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i)
323 if (SCEVAddRecExpr *AddRec =
324 dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(AE->getOperand(i))) {
325 if (AddRec->getLoop() == L)
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000326 TheAddRec = SE->getAddExpr(AddRec, TheAddRec);
Chris Lattner7db543f2005-08-04 19:08:16 +0000327 else
328 return false; // Nested IV of some sort?
329 } else {
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000330 Start = SE->getAddExpr(Start, AE->getOperand(i));
Chris Lattner7db543f2005-08-04 19:08:16 +0000331 }
332
Reid Spencer3ed469c2006-11-02 20:25:50 +0000333 } else if (isa<SCEVAddRecExpr>(SH)) {
Chris Lattner7db543f2005-08-04 19:08:16 +0000334 TheAddRec = SH;
335 } else {
336 return false; // not analyzable.
337 }
338
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +0000339 const SCEVAddRecExpr *AddRec = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(TheAddRec);
Chris Lattner7db543f2005-08-04 19:08:16 +0000340 if (!AddRec || AddRec->getLoop() != L) return false;
341
342 // FIXME: Generalize to non-affine IV's.
343 if (!AddRec->isAffine()) return false;
344
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000345 // If Start contains an SCEVAddRecExpr from a different loop, other than an
Dale Johannesen1de17d52009-02-09 22:14:15 +0000346 // outer loop of the current loop, reject it. SCEV has no concept of
Dan Gohmanfd033992009-03-04 20:50:23 +0000347 // operating on more than one loop at a time so don't confuse it with such
348 // expressions.
Dan Gohman9194e8b2009-02-13 03:58:31 +0000349 if (containsAddRecFromDifferentLoop(AddRec->getOperand(0), L))
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000350 return false;
351
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000352 Start = SE->getAddExpr(Start, AddRec->getOperand(0));
Chris Lattner7db543f2005-08-04 19:08:16 +0000353
Evan Cheng8f40afe2009-02-15 06:06:15 +0000354 if (!isa<SCEVConstant>(AddRec->getOperand(1))) {
Evan Cheng5a6c1a82009-02-17 00:13:06 +0000355 // If stride is an instruction, make sure it dominates the loop preheader.
Evan Cheng8f40afe2009-02-15 06:06:15 +0000356 // Otherwise we could end up with a use before def situation.
Evan Cheng5a6c1a82009-02-17 00:13:06 +0000357 BasicBlock *Preheader = L->getLoopPreheader();
358 if (!AddRec->getOperand(1)->dominates(Preheader, DT))
359 return false;
Evan Cheng8f40afe2009-02-15 06:06:15 +0000360
Bill Wendlingb7427032006-11-26 09:46:52 +0000361 DOUT << "[" << L->getHeader()->getName()
362 << "] Variable stride: " << *AddRec << "\n";
Evan Cheng8f40afe2009-02-15 06:06:15 +0000363 }
Chris Lattner7db543f2005-08-04 19:08:16 +0000364
Chris Lattner50fad702005-08-10 00:45:21 +0000365 Stride = AddRec->getOperand(1);
Chris Lattner7db543f2005-08-04 19:08:16 +0000366 return true;
367}
368
Chris Lattner0ae33eb2005-10-03 01:04:44 +0000369/// IVUseShouldUsePostIncValue - We have discovered a "User" of an IV expression
370/// and now we need to decide whether the user should use the preinc or post-inc
371/// value. If this user should use the post-inc version of the IV, return true.
372///
373/// Choosing wrong here can break dominance properties (if we choose to use the
374/// post-inc value when we cannot) or it can end up adding extra live-ranges to
375/// the loop, resulting in reg-reg copies (if we use the pre-inc value when we
376/// should use the post-inc value).
377static bool IVUseShouldUsePostIncValue(Instruction *User, Instruction *IV,
Evan Cheng0e0014d2007-10-30 23:45:15 +0000378 Loop *L, DominatorTree *DT, Pass *P,
Chris Lattner09fb7da2008-12-01 06:27:41 +0000379 SmallVectorImpl<Instruction*> &DeadInsts){
Chris Lattner0ae33eb2005-10-03 01:04:44 +0000380 // If the user is in the loop, use the preinc value.
381 if (L->contains(User->getParent())) return false;
382
Chris Lattner5e8ca662005-10-03 02:50:05 +0000383 BasicBlock *LatchBlock = L->getLoopLatch();
384
385 // Ok, the user is outside of the loop. If it is dominated by the latch
386 // block, use the post-inc value.
Devang Patelb7d9dfc2007-06-07 21:42:15 +0000387 if (DT->dominates(LatchBlock, User->getParent()))
Chris Lattner5e8ca662005-10-03 02:50:05 +0000388 return true;
389
390 // There is one case we have to be careful of: PHI nodes. These little guys
391 // can live in blocks that do not dominate the latch block, but (since their
392 // uses occur in the predecessor block, not the block the PHI lives in) should
393 // still use the post-inc value. Check for this case now.
394 PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(User);
395 if (!PN) return false; // not a phi, not dominated by latch block.
396
397 // Look at all of the uses of IV by the PHI node. If any use corresponds to
398 // a block that is not dominated by the latch block, give up and use the
399 // preincremented value.
400 unsigned NumUses = 0;
401 for (unsigned i = 0, e = PN->getNumIncomingValues(); i != e; ++i)
402 if (PN->getIncomingValue(i) == IV) {
403 ++NumUses;
Devang Patelb7d9dfc2007-06-07 21:42:15 +0000404 if (!DT->dominates(LatchBlock, PN->getIncomingBlock(i)))
Chris Lattner5e8ca662005-10-03 02:50:05 +0000405 return false;
406 }
407
408 // Okay, all uses of IV by PN are in predecessor blocks that really are
Dan Gohman1dcad962009-05-02 05:36:01 +0000409 // dominated by the latch block. Use the post-incremented value.
Chris Lattner5e8ca662005-10-03 02:50:05 +0000410 return true;
Chris Lattner0ae33eb2005-10-03 01:04:44 +0000411}
412
Dan Gohmanf284ce22009-02-18 00:08:39 +0000413/// isAddressUse - Returns true if the specified instruction is using the
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000414/// specified value as an address.
415static bool isAddressUse(Instruction *Inst, Value *OperandVal) {
416 bool isAddress = isa<LoadInst>(Inst);
417 if (StoreInst *SI = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(Inst)) {
418 if (SI->getOperand(1) == OperandVal)
419 isAddress = true;
420 } else if (IntrinsicInst *II = dyn_cast<IntrinsicInst>(Inst)) {
421 // Addressing modes can also be folded into prefetches and a variety
422 // of intrinsics.
423 switch (II->getIntrinsicID()) {
424 default: break;
425 case Intrinsic::prefetch:
426 case Intrinsic::x86_sse2_loadu_dq:
427 case Intrinsic::x86_sse2_loadu_pd:
428 case Intrinsic::x86_sse_loadu_ps:
429 case Intrinsic::x86_sse_storeu_ps:
430 case Intrinsic::x86_sse2_storeu_pd:
431 case Intrinsic::x86_sse2_storeu_dq:
432 case Intrinsic::x86_sse2_storel_dq:
433 if (II->getOperand(1) == OperandVal)
434 isAddress = true;
435 break;
436 }
437 }
438 return isAddress;
439}
Chris Lattner0ae33eb2005-10-03 01:04:44 +0000440
Dan Gohman21e77222009-03-09 21:01:17 +0000441/// getAccessType - Return the type of the memory being accessed.
442static const Type *getAccessType(const Instruction *Inst) {
443 const Type *UseTy = Inst->getType();
444 if (const StoreInst *SI = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(Inst))
445 UseTy = SI->getOperand(0)->getType();
446 else if (const IntrinsicInst *II = dyn_cast<IntrinsicInst>(Inst)) {
447 // Addressing modes can also be folded into prefetches and a variety
448 // of intrinsics.
449 switch (II->getIntrinsicID()) {
450 default: break;
451 case Intrinsic::x86_sse_storeu_ps:
452 case Intrinsic::x86_sse2_storeu_pd:
453 case Intrinsic::x86_sse2_storeu_dq:
454 case Intrinsic::x86_sse2_storel_dq:
455 UseTy = II->getOperand(1)->getType();
456 break;
457 }
458 }
459 return UseTy;
460}
461
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000462/// AddUsersIfInteresting - Inspect the specified instruction. If it is a
463/// reducible SCEV, recursively add its users to the IVUsesByStride set and
464/// return true. Otherwise, return false.
Chris Lattner3416e5f2005-08-04 17:40:30 +0000465bool LoopStrengthReduce::AddUsersIfInteresting(Instruction *I, Loop *L,
Evan Cheng168a66b2007-10-26 23:08:19 +0000466 SmallPtrSet<Instruction*,16> &Processed) {
Dan Gohmanaf79fb52009-04-21 01:07:12 +0000467 if (!SE->isSCEVable(I->getType()))
Dan Gohman4a9a3e52008-04-14 18:26:16 +0000468 return false; // Void and FP expressions cannot be reduced.
Chris Lattnerb7e64ac2009-03-17 23:58:30 +0000469
470 // LSR is not APInt clean, do not touch integers bigger than 64-bits.
Dan Gohmanaf79fb52009-04-21 01:07:12 +0000471 if (SE->getTypeSizeInBits(I->getType()) > 64)
Chris Lattnerb7e64ac2009-03-17 23:58:30 +0000472 return false;
473
Evan Cheng168a66b2007-10-26 23:08:19 +0000474 if (!Processed.insert(I))
Chris Lattner3416e5f2005-08-04 17:40:30 +0000475 return true; // Instruction already handled.
476
Chris Lattner7db543f2005-08-04 19:08:16 +0000477 // Get the symbolic expression for this instruction.
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +0000478 SCEVHandle ISE = SE->getSCEV(I);
Chris Lattner7db543f2005-08-04 19:08:16 +0000479 if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(ISE)) return false;
Chris Lattner3416e5f2005-08-04 17:40:30 +0000480
Chris Lattner7db543f2005-08-04 19:08:16 +0000481 // Get the start and stride for this expression.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000482 SCEVHandle Start = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, ISE->getType());
Chris Lattner50fad702005-08-10 00:45:21 +0000483 SCEVHandle Stride = Start;
Evan Cheng8f40afe2009-02-15 06:06:15 +0000484 if (!getSCEVStartAndStride(ISE, L, Start, Stride, SE, DT))
Chris Lattner7db543f2005-08-04 19:08:16 +0000485 return false; // Non-reducible symbolic expression, bail out.
Devang Patel4fe26582007-03-09 21:19:53 +0000486
Devang Patel2a5fa182007-04-23 22:42:03 +0000487 std::vector<Instruction *> IUsers;
488 // Collect all I uses now because IVUseShouldUsePostIncValue may
489 // invalidate use_iterator.
490 for (Value::use_iterator UI = I->use_begin(), E = I->use_end(); UI != E; ++UI)
491 IUsers.push_back(cast<Instruction>(*UI));
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000492
Devang Patel2a5fa182007-04-23 22:42:03 +0000493 for (unsigned iused_index = 0, iused_size = IUsers.size();
494 iused_index != iused_size; ++iused_index) {
495
496 Instruction *User = IUsers[iused_index];
Devang Patel4fe26582007-03-09 21:19:53 +0000497
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000498 // Do not infinitely recurse on PHI nodes.
Chris Lattner396b2ba2005-09-13 02:09:55 +0000499 if (isa<PHINode>(User) && Processed.count(User))
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000500 continue;
501
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000502 // Descend recursively, but not into PHI nodes outside the current loop.
503 // It's important to see the entire expression outside the loop to get
504 // choices that depend on addressing mode use right, although we won't
505 // consider references ouside the loop in all cases.
506 // If User is already in Processed, we don't want to recurse into it again,
507 // but do want to record a second reference in the same instruction.
Chris Lattner7db543f2005-08-04 19:08:16 +0000508 bool AddUserToIVUsers = false;
Chris Lattnerf9186592005-08-04 00:14:11 +0000509 if (LI->getLoopFor(User->getParent()) != L) {
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000510 if (isa<PHINode>(User) || Processed.count(User) ||
511 !AddUsersIfInteresting(User, L, Processed)) {
512 DOUT << "FOUND USER in other loop: " << *User
513 << " OF SCEV: " << *ISE << "\n";
514 AddUserToIVUsers = true;
515 }
516 } else if (Processed.count(User) ||
517 !AddUsersIfInteresting(User, L, Processed)) {
Bill Wendlingb7427032006-11-26 09:46:52 +0000518 DOUT << "FOUND USER: " << *User
519 << " OF SCEV: " << *ISE << "\n";
Chris Lattner7db543f2005-08-04 19:08:16 +0000520 AddUserToIVUsers = true;
521 }
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000522
Chris Lattner7db543f2005-08-04 19:08:16 +0000523 if (AddUserToIVUsers) {
Chris Lattner7305ae22005-10-09 06:20:55 +0000524 IVUsersOfOneStride &StrideUses = IVUsesByStride[Stride];
Dale Johannesenb0390622008-12-16 22:16:28 +0000525 if (StrideUses.Users.empty()) // First occurrence of this stride?
Chris Lattner7305ae22005-10-09 06:20:55 +0000526 StrideOrder.push_back(Stride);
527
Chris Lattnera4479ad2005-08-04 00:40:47 +0000528 // Okay, we found a user that we cannot reduce. Analyze the instruction
Chris Lattnerc6bae652005-09-12 06:04:47 +0000529 // and decide what to do with it. If we are a use inside of the loop, use
530 // the value before incrementation, otherwise use it after incrementation.
Evan Cheng0e0014d2007-10-30 23:45:15 +0000531 if (IVUseShouldUsePostIncValue(User, I, L, DT, this, DeadInsts)) {
Chris Lattnerc6bae652005-09-12 06:04:47 +0000532 // The value used will be incremented by the stride more than we are
533 // expecting, so subtract this off.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000534 SCEVHandle NewStart = SE->getMinusSCEV(Start, Stride);
Chris Lattner7305ae22005-10-09 06:20:55 +0000535 StrideUses.addUser(NewStart, User, I);
536 StrideUses.Users.back().isUseOfPostIncrementedValue = true;
Bill Wendlingb7427032006-11-26 09:46:52 +0000537 DOUT << " USING POSTINC SCEV, START=" << *NewStart<< "\n";
Chris Lattner0ae33eb2005-10-03 01:04:44 +0000538 } else {
Chris Lattner7305ae22005-10-09 06:20:55 +0000539 StrideUses.addUser(Start, User, I);
Chris Lattnerc6bae652005-09-12 06:04:47 +0000540 }
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000541 }
542 }
543 return true;
544}
545
546namespace {
547 /// BasedUser - For a particular base value, keep information about how we've
548 /// partitioned the expression so far.
549 struct BasedUser {
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000550 /// SE - The current ScalarEvolution object.
551 ScalarEvolution *SE;
552
Chris Lattnera553b0c2005-08-08 22:56:21 +0000553 /// Base - The Base value for the PHI node that needs to be inserted for
554 /// this use. As the use is processed, information gets moved from this
555 /// field to the Imm field (below). BasedUser values are sorted by this
556 /// field.
557 SCEVHandle Base;
558
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000559 /// Inst - The instruction using the induction variable.
560 Instruction *Inst;
561
Chris Lattnerec3fb632005-08-03 22:21:05 +0000562 /// OperandValToReplace - The operand value of Inst to replace with the
563 /// EmittedBase.
564 Value *OperandValToReplace;
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000565
566 /// Imm - The immediate value that should be added to the base immediately
567 /// before Inst, because it will be folded into the imm field of the
Dan Gohman33e3a362009-02-20 20:29:04 +0000568 /// instruction. This is also sometimes used for loop-variant values that
569 /// must be added inside the loop.
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000570 SCEVHandle Imm;
571
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +0000572 /// Phi - The induction variable that performs the striding that
573 /// should be used for this user.
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +0000574 PHINode *Phi;
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +0000575
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +0000576 // isUseOfPostIncrementedValue - True if this should use the
577 // post-incremented version of this IV, not the preincremented version.
578 // This can only be set in special cases, such as the terminating setcc
Chris Lattnerc6bae652005-09-12 06:04:47 +0000579 // instruction for a loop and uses outside the loop that are dominated by
580 // the loop.
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +0000581 bool isUseOfPostIncrementedValue;
Chris Lattnera553b0c2005-08-08 22:56:21 +0000582
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000583 BasedUser(IVStrideUse &IVSU, ScalarEvolution *se)
584 : SE(se), Base(IVSU.Offset), Inst(IVSU.User),
Chris Lattnera553b0c2005-08-08 22:56:21 +0000585 OperandValToReplace(IVSU.OperandValToReplace),
Dale Johannesen308f24d2008-12-03 22:43:56 +0000586 Imm(SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Base->getType())),
Chris Lattnera553b0c2005-08-08 22:56:21 +0000587 isUseOfPostIncrementedValue(IVSU.isUseOfPostIncrementedValue) {}
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000588
Chris Lattner2114b272005-08-04 20:03:32 +0000589 // Once we rewrite the code to insert the new IVs we want, update the
590 // operands of Inst to use the new expression 'NewBase', with 'Imm' added
591 // to it.
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +0000592 void RewriteInstructionToUseNewBase(const SCEVHandle &NewBase,
Dan Gohmanf20d70d2008-05-15 23:26:57 +0000593 Instruction *InsertPt,
Evan Cheng0e0014d2007-10-30 23:45:15 +0000594 SCEVExpander &Rewriter, Loop *L, Pass *P,
Chris Lattner09fb7da2008-12-01 06:27:41 +0000595 SmallVectorImpl<Instruction*> &DeadInsts);
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000596
597 Value *InsertCodeForBaseAtPosition(const SCEVHandle &NewBase,
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +0000598 const Type *Ty,
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000599 SCEVExpander &Rewriter,
600 Instruction *IP, Loop *L);
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000601 void dump() const;
602 };
603}
604
605void BasedUser::dump() const {
Bill Wendlinge8156192006-12-07 01:30:32 +0000606 cerr << " Base=" << *Base;
607 cerr << " Imm=" << *Imm;
Bill Wendlinge8156192006-12-07 01:30:32 +0000608 cerr << " Inst: " << *Inst;
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000609}
610
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000611Value *BasedUser::InsertCodeForBaseAtPosition(const SCEVHandle &NewBase,
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +0000612 const Type *Ty,
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000613 SCEVExpander &Rewriter,
614 Instruction *IP, Loop *L) {
615 // Figure out where we *really* want to insert this code. In particular, if
616 // the user is inside of a loop that is nested inside of L, we really don't
617 // want to insert this expression before the user, we'd rather pull it out as
618 // many loops as possible.
619 LoopInfo &LI = Rewriter.getLoopInfo();
620 Instruction *BaseInsertPt = IP;
621
622 // Figure out the most-nested loop that IP is in.
623 Loop *InsertLoop = LI.getLoopFor(IP->getParent());
624
625 // If InsertLoop is not L, and InsertLoop is nested inside of L, figure out
626 // the preheader of the outer-most loop where NewBase is not loop invariant.
Dale Johanneseneccdd082008-12-02 18:40:09 +0000627 if (L->contains(IP->getParent()))
628 while (InsertLoop && NewBase->isLoopInvariant(InsertLoop)) {
629 BaseInsertPt = InsertLoop->getLoopPreheader()->getTerminator();
630 InsertLoop = InsertLoop->getParentLoop();
631 }
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000632
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +0000633 Value *Base = Rewriter.expandCodeFor(NewBase, Ty, BaseInsertPt);
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +0000634
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000635 // If there is no immediate value, skip the next part.
Dan Gohmancfeb6a42008-06-18 16:23:07 +0000636 if (Imm->isZero())
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +0000637 return Base;
Chris Lattnerb47f6122007-06-06 01:23:55 +0000638
639 // If we are inserting the base and imm values in the same block, make sure to
640 // adjust the IP position if insertion reused a result.
641 if (IP == BaseInsertPt)
642 IP = Rewriter.getInsertionPoint();
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000643
644 // Always emit the immediate (if non-zero) into the same block as the user.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000645 SCEVHandle NewValSCEV = SE->getAddExpr(SE->getUnknown(Base), Imm);
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +0000646 return Rewriter.expandCodeFor(NewValSCEV, Ty, IP);
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000647}
648
649
Chris Lattner2114b272005-08-04 20:03:32 +0000650// Once we rewrite the code to insert the new IVs we want, update the
651// operands of Inst to use the new expression 'NewBase', with 'Imm' added
Dan Gohmanf20d70d2008-05-15 23:26:57 +0000652// to it. NewBasePt is the last instruction which contributes to the
653// value of NewBase in the case that it's a diffferent instruction from
654// the PHI that NewBase is computed from, or null otherwise.
655//
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +0000656void BasedUser::RewriteInstructionToUseNewBase(const SCEVHandle &NewBase,
Dan Gohmanf20d70d2008-05-15 23:26:57 +0000657 Instruction *NewBasePt,
Evan Cheng0e0014d2007-10-30 23:45:15 +0000658 SCEVExpander &Rewriter, Loop *L, Pass *P,
Chris Lattner09fb7da2008-12-01 06:27:41 +0000659 SmallVectorImpl<Instruction*> &DeadInsts){
Chris Lattner2114b272005-08-04 20:03:32 +0000660 if (!isa<PHINode>(Inst)) {
Chris Lattnerc5494af2007-04-13 20:42:26 +0000661 // By default, insert code at the user instruction.
662 BasicBlock::iterator InsertPt = Inst;
663
664 // However, if the Operand is itself an instruction, the (potentially
665 // complex) inserted code may be shared by many users. Because of this, we
666 // want to emit code for the computation of the operand right before its old
667 // computation. This is usually safe, because we obviously used to use the
668 // computation when it was computed in its current block. However, in some
669 // cases (e.g. use of a post-incremented induction variable) the NewBase
670 // value will be pinned to live somewhere after the original computation.
671 // In this case, we have to back off.
Chris Lattnerf8828eb2008-12-02 04:52:26 +0000672 //
673 // If this is a use outside the loop (which means after, since it is based
674 // on a loop indvar) we use the post-incremented value, so that we don't
675 // artificially make the preinc value live out the bottom of the loop.
Dale Johannesen589bf082008-12-01 22:00:01 +0000676 if (!isUseOfPostIncrementedValue && L->contains(Inst->getParent())) {
Dan Gohmanca756ae2008-05-20 03:01:48 +0000677 if (NewBasePt && isa<PHINode>(OperandValToReplace)) {
Dan Gohmanf20d70d2008-05-15 23:26:57 +0000678 InsertPt = NewBasePt;
679 ++InsertPt;
Gabor Greif6725cb52008-06-11 21:38:51 +0000680 } else if (Instruction *OpInst
681 = dyn_cast<Instruction>(OperandValToReplace)) {
Chris Lattnerc5494af2007-04-13 20:42:26 +0000682 InsertPt = OpInst;
683 while (isa<PHINode>(InsertPt)) ++InsertPt;
684 }
685 }
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +0000686 Value *NewVal = InsertCodeForBaseAtPosition(NewBase,
687 OperandValToReplace->getType(),
688 Rewriter, InsertPt, L);
Chris Lattner2114b272005-08-04 20:03:32 +0000689 // Replace the use of the operand Value with the new Phi we just created.
690 Inst->replaceUsesOfWith(OperandValToReplace, NewVal);
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +0000691
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +0000692 DOUT << " Replacing with ";
Dan Gohman4a359ea2009-02-19 19:32:06 +0000693 DEBUG(WriteAsOperand(*DOUT, NewVal, /*PrintType=*/false));
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +0000694 DOUT << ", which has value " << *NewBase << " plus IMM " << *Imm << "\n";
Chris Lattner2114b272005-08-04 20:03:32 +0000695 return;
696 }
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +0000697
Chris Lattner2114b272005-08-04 20:03:32 +0000698 // PHI nodes are more complex. We have to insert one copy of the NewBase+Imm
Chris Lattnerc41e3452005-08-10 00:35:32 +0000699 // expression into each operand block that uses it. Note that PHI nodes can
700 // have multiple entries for the same predecessor. We use a map to make sure
701 // that a PHI node only has a single Value* for each predecessor (which also
702 // prevents us from inserting duplicate code in some blocks).
Evan Cheng83927722007-10-30 22:27:26 +0000703 DenseMap<BasicBlock*, Value*> InsertedCode;
Chris Lattner2114b272005-08-04 20:03:32 +0000704 PHINode *PN = cast<PHINode>(Inst);
705 for (unsigned i = 0, e = PN->getNumIncomingValues(); i != e; ++i) {
706 if (PN->getIncomingValue(i) == OperandValToReplace) {
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000707 // If the original expression is outside the loop, put the replacement
708 // code in the same place as the original expression,
709 // which need not be an immediate predecessor of this PHI. This way we
710 // need only one copy of it even if it is referenced multiple times in
711 // the PHI. We don't do this when the original expression is inside the
Dale Johannesen1de17d52009-02-09 22:14:15 +0000712 // loop because multiple copies sometimes do useful sinking of code in
713 // that case(?).
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000714 Instruction *OldLoc = dyn_cast<Instruction>(OperandValToReplace);
715 if (L->contains(OldLoc->getParent())) {
Dale Johannesen1de17d52009-02-09 22:14:15 +0000716 // If this is a critical edge, split the edge so that we do not insert
717 // the code on all predecessor/successor paths. We do this unless this
718 // is the canonical backedge for this loop, as this can make some
719 // inserted code be in an illegal position.
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000720 BasicBlock *PHIPred = PN->getIncomingBlock(i);
721 if (e != 1 && PHIPred->getTerminator()->getNumSuccessors() > 1 &&
722 (PN->getParent() != L->getHeader() || !L->contains(PHIPred))) {
Dale Johannesenf6727b02008-12-23 23:21:35 +0000723
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000724 // First step, split the critical edge.
725 SplitCriticalEdge(PHIPred, PN->getParent(), P, false);
726
727 // Next step: move the basic block. In particular, if the PHI node
728 // is outside of the loop, and PredTI is in the loop, we want to
729 // move the block to be immediately before the PHI block, not
730 // immediately after PredTI.
731 if (L->contains(PHIPred) && !L->contains(PN->getParent())) {
732 BasicBlock *NewBB = PN->getIncomingBlock(i);
733 NewBB->moveBefore(PN->getParent());
734 }
735
736 // Splitting the edge can reduce the number of PHI entries we have.
737 e = PN->getNumIncomingValues();
738 }
739 }
Chris Lattnerc41e3452005-08-10 00:35:32 +0000740 Value *&Code = InsertedCode[PN->getIncomingBlock(i)];
741 if (!Code) {
742 // Insert the code into the end of the predecessor block.
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000743 Instruction *InsertPt = (L->contains(OldLoc->getParent())) ?
744 PN->getIncomingBlock(i)->getTerminator() :
745 OldLoc->getParent()->getTerminator();
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +0000746 Code = InsertCodeForBaseAtPosition(NewBase, PN->getType(),
747 Rewriter, InsertPt, L);
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +0000748
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +0000749 DOUT << " Changing PHI use to ";
Dan Gohman4a359ea2009-02-19 19:32:06 +0000750 DEBUG(WriteAsOperand(*DOUT, Code, /*PrintType=*/false));
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +0000751 DOUT << ", which has value " << *NewBase << " plus IMM " << *Imm << "\n";
Chris Lattnerc41e3452005-08-10 00:35:32 +0000752 }
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +0000753
Chris Lattner2114b272005-08-04 20:03:32 +0000754 // Replace the use of the operand Value with the new Phi we just created.
Chris Lattnerc41e3452005-08-10 00:35:32 +0000755 PN->setIncomingValue(i, Code);
Chris Lattner2114b272005-08-04 20:03:32 +0000756 Rewriter.clear();
757 }
758 }
Evan Cheng0e0014d2007-10-30 23:45:15 +0000759
760 // PHI node might have become a constant value after SplitCriticalEdge.
Chris Lattner09fb7da2008-12-01 06:27:41 +0000761 DeadInsts.push_back(Inst);
Chris Lattner2114b272005-08-04 20:03:32 +0000762}
763
764
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000765/// fitsInAddressMode - Return true if V can be subsumed within an addressing
766/// mode, and does not need to be put in a register first.
767static bool fitsInAddressMode(const SCEVHandle &V, const Type *UseTy,
768 const TargetLowering *TLI, bool HasBaseReg) {
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +0000769 if (const SCEVConstant *SC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(V)) {
Evan Cheng5eef2d22007-03-12 23:27:37 +0000770 int64_t VC = SC->getValue()->getSExtValue();
Chris Lattner579633c2007-04-09 22:20:14 +0000771 if (TLI) {
772 TargetLowering::AddrMode AM;
773 AM.BaseOffs = VC;
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000774 AM.HasBaseReg = HasBaseReg;
Chris Lattner579633c2007-04-09 22:20:14 +0000775 return TLI->isLegalAddressingMode(AM, UseTy);
776 } else {
Evan Chengd277f2c2006-03-13 23:14:23 +0000777 // Defaults to PPC. PPC allows a sign-extended 16-bit immediate field.
Evan Cheng5eef2d22007-03-12 23:27:37 +0000778 return (VC > -(1 << 16) && VC < (1 << 16)-1);
Chris Lattner579633c2007-04-09 22:20:14 +0000779 }
Chris Lattner3821e472005-08-08 06:25:50 +0000780 }
Jeff Cohend29b6aa2005-07-30 18:33:25 +0000781
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +0000782 if (const SCEVUnknown *SU = dyn_cast<SCEVUnknown>(V))
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +0000783 if (GlobalValue *GV = dyn_cast<GlobalValue>(SU->getValue())) {
Dan Gohmancc2ad052009-05-01 16:29:14 +0000784 if (TLI) {
785 TargetLowering::AddrMode AM;
786 AM.BaseGV = GV;
787 AM.HasBaseReg = HasBaseReg;
788 return TLI->isLegalAddressingMode(AM, UseTy);
789 } else {
790 // Default: assume global addresses are not legal.
791 }
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +0000792 }
793
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000794 return false;
795}
796
Dale Johannesen544e0d02008-12-03 20:56:12 +0000797/// MoveLoopVariantsToImmediateField - Move any subexpressions from Val that are
Chris Lattner44b807e2005-08-08 22:32:34 +0000798/// loop varying to the Imm operand.
Dale Johannesen544e0d02008-12-03 20:56:12 +0000799static void MoveLoopVariantsToImmediateField(SCEVHandle &Val, SCEVHandle &Imm,
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000800 Loop *L, ScalarEvolution *SE) {
Chris Lattner44b807e2005-08-08 22:32:34 +0000801 if (Val->isLoopInvariant(L)) return; // Nothing to do.
802
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +0000803 if (const SCEVAddExpr *SAE = dyn_cast<SCEVAddExpr>(Val)) {
Chris Lattner44b807e2005-08-08 22:32:34 +0000804 std::vector<SCEVHandle> NewOps;
805 NewOps.reserve(SAE->getNumOperands());
806
807 for (unsigned i = 0; i != SAE->getNumOperands(); ++i)
808 if (!SAE->getOperand(i)->isLoopInvariant(L)) {
809 // If this is a loop-variant expression, it must stay in the immediate
810 // field of the expression.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000811 Imm = SE->getAddExpr(Imm, SAE->getOperand(i));
Chris Lattner44b807e2005-08-08 22:32:34 +0000812 } else {
813 NewOps.push_back(SAE->getOperand(i));
814 }
815
816 if (NewOps.empty())
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000817 Val = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Val->getType());
Chris Lattner44b807e2005-08-08 22:32:34 +0000818 else
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000819 Val = SE->getAddExpr(NewOps);
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +0000820 } else if (const SCEVAddRecExpr *SARE = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Val)) {
Chris Lattner44b807e2005-08-08 22:32:34 +0000821 // Try to pull immediates out of the start value of nested addrec's.
822 SCEVHandle Start = SARE->getStart();
Dale Johannesen544e0d02008-12-03 20:56:12 +0000823 MoveLoopVariantsToImmediateField(Start, Imm, L, SE);
Chris Lattner44b807e2005-08-08 22:32:34 +0000824
825 std::vector<SCEVHandle> Ops(SARE->op_begin(), SARE->op_end());
826 Ops[0] = Start;
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000827 Val = SE->getAddRecExpr(Ops, SARE->getLoop());
Chris Lattner44b807e2005-08-08 22:32:34 +0000828 } else {
829 // Otherwise, all of Val is variant, move the whole thing over.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000830 Imm = SE->getAddExpr(Imm, Val);
831 Val = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Val->getType());
Chris Lattner44b807e2005-08-08 22:32:34 +0000832 }
833}
834
835
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000836/// MoveImmediateValues - Look at Val, and pull out any additions of constants
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000837/// that can fit into the immediate field of instructions in the target.
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000838/// Accumulate these immediate values into the Imm value.
Evan Chengd277f2c2006-03-13 23:14:23 +0000839static void MoveImmediateValues(const TargetLowering *TLI,
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +0000840 const Type *UseTy,
Evan Chengd277f2c2006-03-13 23:14:23 +0000841 SCEVHandle &Val, SCEVHandle &Imm,
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000842 bool isAddress, Loop *L,
843 ScalarEvolution *SE) {
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +0000844 if (const SCEVAddExpr *SAE = dyn_cast<SCEVAddExpr>(Val)) {
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000845 std::vector<SCEVHandle> NewOps;
846 NewOps.reserve(SAE->getNumOperands());
847
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000848 for (unsigned i = 0; i != SAE->getNumOperands(); ++i) {
849 SCEVHandle NewOp = SAE->getOperand(i);
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +0000850 MoveImmediateValues(TLI, UseTy, NewOp, Imm, isAddress, L, SE);
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000851
852 if (!NewOp->isLoopInvariant(L)) {
Chris Lattner7db543f2005-08-04 19:08:16 +0000853 // If this is a loop-variant expression, it must stay in the immediate
854 // field of the expression.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000855 Imm = SE->getAddExpr(Imm, NewOp);
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000856 } else {
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000857 NewOps.push_back(NewOp);
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000858 }
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000859 }
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000860
861 if (NewOps.empty())
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000862 Val = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Val->getType());
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000863 else
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000864 Val = SE->getAddExpr(NewOps);
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000865 return;
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +0000866 } else if (const SCEVAddRecExpr *SARE = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Val)) {
Chris Lattner7a658392005-08-03 23:44:42 +0000867 // Try to pull immediates out of the start value of nested addrec's.
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000868 SCEVHandle Start = SARE->getStart();
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +0000869 MoveImmediateValues(TLI, UseTy, Start, Imm, isAddress, L, SE);
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000870
871 if (Start != SARE->getStart()) {
872 std::vector<SCEVHandle> Ops(SARE->op_begin(), SARE->op_end());
873 Ops[0] = Start;
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000874 Val = SE->getAddRecExpr(Ops, SARE->getLoop());
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000875 }
876 return;
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +0000877 } else if (const SCEVMulExpr *SME = dyn_cast<SCEVMulExpr>(Val)) {
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000878 // Transform "8 * (4 + v)" -> "32 + 8*V" if "32" fits in the immed field.
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000879 if (isAddress && fitsInAddressMode(SME->getOperand(0), UseTy, TLI, false) &&
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000880 SME->getNumOperands() == 2 && SME->isLoopInvariant(L)) {
881
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000882 SCEVHandle SubImm = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Val->getType());
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000883 SCEVHandle NewOp = SME->getOperand(1);
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +0000884 MoveImmediateValues(TLI, UseTy, NewOp, SubImm, isAddress, L, SE);
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000885
886 // If we extracted something out of the subexpressions, see if we can
887 // simplify this!
888 if (NewOp != SME->getOperand(1)) {
889 // Scale SubImm up by "8". If the result is a target constant, we are
890 // good.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000891 SubImm = SE->getMulExpr(SubImm, SME->getOperand(0));
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000892 if (fitsInAddressMode(SubImm, UseTy, TLI, false)) {
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000893 // Accumulate the immediate.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000894 Imm = SE->getAddExpr(Imm, SubImm);
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000895
896 // Update what is left of 'Val'.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000897 Val = SE->getMulExpr(SME->getOperand(0), NewOp);
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000898 return;
899 }
900 }
901 }
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000902 }
903
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000904 // Loop-variant expressions must stay in the immediate field of the
905 // expression.
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000906 if ((isAddress && fitsInAddressMode(Val, UseTy, TLI, false)) ||
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000907 !Val->isLoopInvariant(L)) {
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000908 Imm = SE->getAddExpr(Imm, Val);
909 Val = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Val->getType());
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000910 return;
Chris Lattner7a2ca562005-08-04 19:26:19 +0000911 }
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000912
913 // Otherwise, no immediates to move.
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000914}
915
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +0000916static void MoveImmediateValues(const TargetLowering *TLI,
917 Instruction *User,
918 SCEVHandle &Val, SCEVHandle &Imm,
919 bool isAddress, Loop *L,
920 ScalarEvolution *SE) {
Dan Gohman21e77222009-03-09 21:01:17 +0000921 const Type *UseTy = getAccessType(User);
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +0000922 MoveImmediateValues(TLI, UseTy, Val, Imm, isAddress, L, SE);
923}
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000924
Chris Lattner7e79b382006-08-03 06:34:50 +0000925/// SeparateSubExprs - Decompose Expr into all of the subexpressions that are
926/// added together. This is used to reassociate common addition subexprs
927/// together for maximal sharing when rewriting bases.
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000928static void SeparateSubExprs(std::vector<SCEVHandle> &SubExprs,
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000929 SCEVHandle Expr,
930 ScalarEvolution *SE) {
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +0000931 if (const SCEVAddExpr *AE = dyn_cast<SCEVAddExpr>(Expr)) {
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000932 for (unsigned j = 0, e = AE->getNumOperands(); j != e; ++j)
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000933 SeparateSubExprs(SubExprs, AE->getOperand(j), SE);
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +0000934 } else if (const SCEVAddRecExpr *SARE = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Expr)) {
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000935 SCEVHandle Zero = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Expr->getType());
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000936 if (SARE->getOperand(0) == Zero) {
937 SubExprs.push_back(Expr);
938 } else {
939 // Compute the addrec with zero as its base.
940 std::vector<SCEVHandle> Ops(SARE->op_begin(), SARE->op_end());
941 Ops[0] = Zero; // Start with zero base.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000942 SubExprs.push_back(SE->getAddRecExpr(Ops, SARE->getLoop()));
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000943
944
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000945 SeparateSubExprs(SubExprs, SARE->getOperand(0), SE);
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000946 }
Dan Gohmancfeb6a42008-06-18 16:23:07 +0000947 } else if (!Expr->isZero()) {
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000948 // Do not add zero.
949 SubExprs.push_back(Expr);
950 }
951}
952
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000953// This is logically local to the following function, but C++ says we have
954// to make it file scope.
955struct SubExprUseData { unsigned Count; bool notAllUsesAreFree; };
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000956
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000957/// RemoveCommonExpressionsFromUseBases - Look through all of the Bases of all
958/// the Uses, removing any common subexpressions, except that if all such
959/// subexpressions can be folded into an addressing mode for all uses inside
960/// the loop (this case is referred to as "free" in comments herein) we do
961/// not remove anything. This looks for things like (a+b+c) and
Chris Lattnerf8828eb2008-12-02 04:52:26 +0000962/// (a+c+d) and computes the common (a+c) subexpression. The common expression
963/// is *removed* from the Bases and returned.
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +0000964static SCEVHandle
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000965RemoveCommonExpressionsFromUseBases(std::vector<BasedUser> &Uses,
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000966 ScalarEvolution *SE, Loop *L,
967 const TargetLowering *TLI) {
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +0000968 unsigned NumUses = Uses.size();
969
Chris Lattnerf8828eb2008-12-02 04:52:26 +0000970 // Only one use? This is a very common case, so we handle it specially and
971 // cheaply.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000972 SCEVHandle Zero = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Uses[0].Base->getType());
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +0000973 SCEVHandle Result = Zero;
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000974 SCEVHandle FreeResult = Zero;
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +0000975 if (NumUses == 1) {
Chris Lattnerf8828eb2008-12-02 04:52:26 +0000976 // If the use is inside the loop, use its base, regardless of what it is:
977 // it is clearly shared across all the IV's. If the use is outside the loop
978 // (which means after it) we don't want to factor anything *into* the loop,
979 // so just use 0 as the base.
Dale Johannesen589bf082008-12-01 22:00:01 +0000980 if (L->contains(Uses[0].Inst->getParent()))
981 std::swap(Result, Uses[0].Base);
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +0000982 return Result;
983 }
984
985 // To find common subexpressions, count how many of Uses use each expression.
986 // If any subexpressions are used Uses.size() times, they are common.
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000987 // Also track whether all uses of each expression can be moved into an
988 // an addressing mode "for free"; such expressions are left within the loop.
989 // struct SubExprUseData { unsigned Count; bool notAllUsesAreFree; };
990 std::map<SCEVHandle, SubExprUseData> SubExpressionUseData;
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +0000991
Chris Lattnerd6155e92005-10-11 18:41:04 +0000992 // UniqueSubExprs - Keep track of all of the subexpressions we see in the
993 // order we see them.
994 std::vector<SCEVHandle> UniqueSubExprs;
995
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000996 std::vector<SCEVHandle> SubExprs;
Chris Lattnerf8828eb2008-12-02 04:52:26 +0000997 unsigned NumUsesInsideLoop = 0;
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000998 for (unsigned i = 0; i != NumUses; ++i) {
Chris Lattnerf8828eb2008-12-02 04:52:26 +0000999 // If the user is outside the loop, just ignore it for base computation.
1000 // Since the user is outside the loop, it must be *after* the loop (if it
1001 // were before, it could not be based on the loop IV). We don't want users
1002 // after the loop to affect base computation of values *inside* the loop,
1003 // because we can always add their offsets to the result IV after the loop
1004 // is done, ensuring we get good code inside the loop.
Dale Johannesen589bf082008-12-01 22:00:01 +00001005 if (!L->contains(Uses[i].Inst->getParent()))
1006 continue;
1007 NumUsesInsideLoop++;
1008
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +00001009 // If the base is zero (which is common), return zero now, there are no
1010 // CSEs we can find.
1011 if (Uses[i].Base == Zero) return Zero;
1012
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +00001013 // If this use is as an address we may be able to put CSEs in the addressing
1014 // mode rather than hoisting them.
1015 bool isAddrUse = isAddressUse(Uses[i].Inst, Uses[i].OperandValToReplace);
1016 // We may need the UseTy below, but only when isAddrUse, so compute it
1017 // only in that case.
1018 const Type *UseTy = 0;
Dan Gohman21e77222009-03-09 21:01:17 +00001019 if (isAddrUse)
1020 UseTy = getAccessType(Uses[i].Inst);
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +00001021
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +00001022 // Split the expression into subexprs.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +00001023 SeparateSubExprs(SubExprs, Uses[i].Base, SE);
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +00001024 // Add one to SubExpressionUseData.Count for each subexpr present, and
1025 // if the subexpr is not a valid immediate within an addressing mode use,
1026 // set SubExpressionUseData.notAllUsesAreFree. We definitely want to
1027 // hoist these out of the loop (if they are common to all uses).
1028 for (unsigned j = 0, e = SubExprs.size(); j != e; ++j) {
1029 if (++SubExpressionUseData[SubExprs[j]].Count == 1)
Chris Lattnerd6155e92005-10-11 18:41:04 +00001030 UniqueSubExprs.push_back(SubExprs[j]);
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +00001031 if (!isAddrUse || !fitsInAddressMode(SubExprs[j], UseTy, TLI, false))
1032 SubExpressionUseData[SubExprs[j]].notAllUsesAreFree = true;
1033 }
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +00001034 SubExprs.clear();
1035 }
1036
Chris Lattnerd6155e92005-10-11 18:41:04 +00001037 // Now that we know how many times each is used, build Result. Iterate over
1038 // UniqueSubexprs so that we have a stable ordering.
1039 for (unsigned i = 0, e = UniqueSubExprs.size(); i != e; ++i) {
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +00001040 std::map<SCEVHandle, SubExprUseData>::iterator I =
1041 SubExpressionUseData.find(UniqueSubExprs[i]);
1042 assert(I != SubExpressionUseData.end() && "Entry not found?");
1043 if (I->second.Count == NumUsesInsideLoop) { // Found CSE!
1044 if (I->second.notAllUsesAreFree)
1045 Result = SE->getAddExpr(Result, I->first);
1046 else
1047 FreeResult = SE->getAddExpr(FreeResult, I->first);
1048 } else
1049 // Remove non-cse's from SubExpressionUseData.
1050 SubExpressionUseData.erase(I);
Chris Lattnerd6155e92005-10-11 18:41:04 +00001051 }
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +00001052
1053 if (FreeResult != Zero) {
1054 // We have some subexpressions that can be subsumed into addressing
1055 // modes in every use inside the loop. However, it's possible that
1056 // there are so many of them that the combined FreeResult cannot
1057 // be subsumed, or that the target cannot handle both a FreeResult
1058 // and a Result in the same instruction (for example because it would
1059 // require too many registers). Check this.
1060 for (unsigned i=0; i<NumUses; ++i) {
1061 if (!L->contains(Uses[i].Inst->getParent()))
1062 continue;
1063 // We know this is an addressing mode use; if there are any uses that
1064 // are not, FreeResult would be Zero.
Dan Gohman21e77222009-03-09 21:01:17 +00001065 const Type *UseTy = getAccessType(Uses[i].Inst);
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +00001066 if (!fitsInAddressMode(FreeResult, UseTy, TLI, Result!=Zero)) {
1067 // FIXME: could split up FreeResult into pieces here, some hoisted
Dale Johannesenb0390622008-12-16 22:16:28 +00001068 // and some not. There is no obvious advantage to this.
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +00001069 Result = SE->getAddExpr(Result, FreeResult);
1070 FreeResult = Zero;
1071 break;
1072 }
1073 }
1074 }
1075
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001076 // If we found no CSE's, return now.
1077 if (Result == Zero) return Result;
1078
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +00001079 // If we still have a FreeResult, remove its subexpressions from
1080 // SubExpressionUseData. This means they will remain in the use Bases.
1081 if (FreeResult != Zero) {
1082 SeparateSubExprs(SubExprs, FreeResult, SE);
1083 for (unsigned j = 0, e = SubExprs.size(); j != e; ++j) {
1084 std::map<SCEVHandle, SubExprUseData>::iterator I =
1085 SubExpressionUseData.find(SubExprs[j]);
1086 SubExpressionUseData.erase(I);
1087 }
1088 SubExprs.clear();
1089 }
1090
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001091 // Otherwise, remove all of the CSE's we found from each of the base values.
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +00001092 for (unsigned i = 0; i != NumUses; ++i) {
Dale Johannesenfb10cd42008-12-02 21:17:11 +00001093 // Uses outside the loop don't necessarily include the common base, but
1094 // the final IV value coming into those uses does. Instead of trying to
1095 // remove the pieces of the common base, which might not be there,
1096 // subtract off the base to compensate for this.
1097 if (!L->contains(Uses[i].Inst->getParent())) {
1098 Uses[i].Base = SE->getMinusSCEV(Uses[i].Base, Result);
Dale Johannesen589bf082008-12-01 22:00:01 +00001099 continue;
Dale Johannesenfb10cd42008-12-02 21:17:11 +00001100 }
Dale Johannesen589bf082008-12-01 22:00:01 +00001101
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +00001102 // Split the expression into subexprs.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +00001103 SeparateSubExprs(SubExprs, Uses[i].Base, SE);
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +00001104
1105 // Remove any common subexpressions.
1106 for (unsigned j = 0, e = SubExprs.size(); j != e; ++j)
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +00001107 if (SubExpressionUseData.count(SubExprs[j])) {
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +00001108 SubExprs.erase(SubExprs.begin()+j);
1109 --j; --e;
1110 }
1111
Chris Lattnerf8828eb2008-12-02 04:52:26 +00001112 // Finally, add the non-shared expressions together.
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +00001113 if (SubExprs.empty())
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001114 Uses[i].Base = Zero;
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +00001115 else
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +00001116 Uses[i].Base = SE->getAddExpr(SubExprs);
Chris Lattner27e51422005-08-13 07:42:01 +00001117 SubExprs.clear();
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +00001118 }
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001119
1120 return Result;
1121}
1122
Dale Johannesendc42f482007-03-20 00:47:50 +00001123/// ValidStride - Check whether the given Scale is valid for all loads and
Chris Lattner579633c2007-04-09 22:20:14 +00001124/// stores in UsersToProcess.
Dale Johannesendc42f482007-03-20 00:47:50 +00001125///
Dan Gohman02e4fa72007-10-22 20:40:42 +00001126bool LoopStrengthReduce::ValidStride(bool HasBaseReg,
1127 int64_t Scale,
Dale Johannesendc42f482007-03-20 00:47:50 +00001128 const std::vector<BasedUser>& UsersToProcess) {
Evan Chengd6b62a52007-12-19 23:33:23 +00001129 if (!TLI)
1130 return true;
1131
Dale Johannesen8e59e162007-03-20 21:54:54 +00001132 for (unsigned i=0, e = UsersToProcess.size(); i!=e; ++i) {
Chris Lattner1ebd89e2007-04-02 06:34:44 +00001133 // If this is a load or other access, pass the type of the access in.
1134 const Type *AccessTy = Type::VoidTy;
Dan Gohman21e77222009-03-09 21:01:17 +00001135 if (isAddressUse(UsersToProcess[i].Inst,
1136 UsersToProcess[i].OperandValToReplace))
1137 AccessTy = getAccessType(UsersToProcess[i].Inst);
Evan Cheng55e641b2008-03-19 22:02:26 +00001138 else if (isa<PHINode>(UsersToProcess[i].Inst))
1139 continue;
Chris Lattner1ebd89e2007-04-02 06:34:44 +00001140
Chris Lattner579633c2007-04-09 22:20:14 +00001141 TargetLowering::AddrMode AM;
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +00001142 if (const SCEVConstant *SC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(UsersToProcess[i].Imm))
Chris Lattner579633c2007-04-09 22:20:14 +00001143 AM.BaseOffs = SC->getValue()->getSExtValue();
Dan Gohmancfeb6a42008-06-18 16:23:07 +00001144 AM.HasBaseReg = HasBaseReg || !UsersToProcess[i].Base->isZero();
Chris Lattner579633c2007-04-09 22:20:14 +00001145 AM.Scale = Scale;
1146
1147 // If load[imm+r*scale] is illegal, bail out.
Evan Chengd6b62a52007-12-19 23:33:23 +00001148 if (!TLI->isLegalAddressingMode(AM, AccessTy))
Dale Johannesendc42f482007-03-20 00:47:50 +00001149 return false;
Dale Johannesen8e59e162007-03-20 21:54:54 +00001150 }
Dale Johannesendc42f482007-03-20 00:47:50 +00001151 return true;
1152}
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001153
Dale Johannesen1de17d52009-02-09 22:14:15 +00001154/// RequiresTypeConversion - Returns true if converting Ty1 to Ty2 is not
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001155/// a nop.
Evan Cheng2bd122c2007-10-26 01:56:11 +00001156bool LoopStrengthReduce::RequiresTypeConversion(const Type *Ty1,
1157 const Type *Ty2) {
1158 if (Ty1 == Ty2)
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001159 return false;
Dan Gohman9f2d6712009-05-01 17:07:43 +00001160 Ty1 = SE->getEffectiveSCEVType(Ty1);
1161 Ty2 = SE->getEffectiveSCEVType(Ty2);
1162 if (Ty1 == Ty2)
Dan Gohmanaf79fb52009-04-21 01:07:12 +00001163 return false;
Dale Johannesen1de17d52009-02-09 22:14:15 +00001164 if (Ty1->canLosslesslyBitCastTo(Ty2))
1165 return false;
Evan Cheng2bd122c2007-10-26 01:56:11 +00001166 if (TLI && TLI->isTruncateFree(Ty1, Ty2))
1167 return false;
Dale Johannesen1de17d52009-02-09 22:14:15 +00001168 return true;
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001169}
1170
Evan Chengeb8f9e22006-03-17 19:52:23 +00001171/// CheckForIVReuse - Returns the multiple if the stride is the multiple
1172/// of a previous stride and it is a legal value for the target addressing
Dan Gohman02e4fa72007-10-22 20:40:42 +00001173/// mode scale component and optional base reg. This allows the users of
1174/// this stride to be rewritten as prev iv * factor. It returns 0 if no
Dale Johannesenb0390622008-12-16 22:16:28 +00001175/// reuse is possible. Factors can be negative on same targets, e.g. ARM.
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +00001176///
1177/// If all uses are outside the loop, we don't require that all multiplies
1178/// be folded into the addressing mode, nor even that the factor be constant;
1179/// a multiply (executed once) outside the loop is better than another IV
1180/// within. Well, usually.
1181SCEVHandle LoopStrengthReduce::CheckForIVReuse(bool HasBaseReg,
Evan Cheng2bd122c2007-10-26 01:56:11 +00001182 bool AllUsesAreAddresses,
Dale Johannesenb0390622008-12-16 22:16:28 +00001183 bool AllUsesAreOutsideLoop,
Dan Gohman02e4fa72007-10-22 20:40:42 +00001184 const SCEVHandle &Stride,
Dale Johannesendc42f482007-03-20 00:47:50 +00001185 IVExpr &IV, const Type *Ty,
1186 const std::vector<BasedUser>& UsersToProcess) {
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +00001187 if (const SCEVConstant *SC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(Stride)) {
Reid Spencer502db932007-03-02 23:37:53 +00001188 int64_t SInt = SC->getValue()->getSExtValue();
Dale Johannesenb51b4b52007-11-17 02:48:01 +00001189 for (unsigned NewStride = 0, e = StrideOrder.size(); NewStride != e;
1190 ++NewStride) {
1191 std::map<SCEVHandle, IVsOfOneStride>::iterator SI =
1192 IVsByStride.find(StrideOrder[NewStride]);
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +00001193 if (SI == IVsByStride.end() || !isa<SCEVConstant>(SI->first))
Dale Johannesenb51b4b52007-11-17 02:48:01 +00001194 continue;
Evan Cheng5eef2d22007-03-12 23:27:37 +00001195 int64_t SSInt = cast<SCEVConstant>(SI->first)->getValue()->getSExtValue();
Evan Cheng2bd122c2007-10-26 01:56:11 +00001196 if (SI->first != Stride &&
Chris Lattner1d312902007-04-02 22:51:58 +00001197 (unsigned(abs(SInt)) < SSInt || (SInt % SSInt) != 0))
Evan Chengeb8f9e22006-03-17 19:52:23 +00001198 continue;
Evan Cheng5eef2d22007-03-12 23:27:37 +00001199 int64_t Scale = SInt / SSInt;
Dale Johannesendc42f482007-03-20 00:47:50 +00001200 // Check that this stride is valid for all the types used for loads and
1201 // stores; if it can be used for some and not others, we might as well use
1202 // the original stride everywhere, since we have to create the IV for it
Dan Gohmanaa343312007-10-29 19:23:53 +00001203 // anyway. If the scale is 1, then we don't need to worry about folding
1204 // multiplications.
1205 if (Scale == 1 ||
1206 (AllUsesAreAddresses &&
1207 ValidStride(HasBaseReg, Scale, UsersToProcess)))
Evan Cheng5eef2d22007-03-12 23:27:37 +00001208 for (std::vector<IVExpr>::iterator II = SI->second.IVs.begin(),
1209 IE = SI->second.IVs.end(); II != IE; ++II)
1210 // FIXME: Only handle base == 0 for now.
1211 // Only reuse previous IV if it would not require a type conversion.
Dan Gohmancfeb6a42008-06-18 16:23:07 +00001212 if (II->Base->isZero() &&
Evan Cheng2bd122c2007-10-26 01:56:11 +00001213 !RequiresTypeConversion(II->Base->getType(), Ty)) {
Evan Cheng5eef2d22007-03-12 23:27:37 +00001214 IV = *II;
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +00001215 return SE->getIntegerSCEV(Scale, Stride->getType());
Evan Cheng5eef2d22007-03-12 23:27:37 +00001216 }
Evan Chengeb8f9e22006-03-17 19:52:23 +00001217 }
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +00001218 } else if (AllUsesAreOutsideLoop) {
1219 // Accept nonconstant strides here; it is really really right to substitute
1220 // an existing IV if we can.
1221 for (unsigned NewStride = 0, e = StrideOrder.size(); NewStride != e;
1222 ++NewStride) {
1223 std::map<SCEVHandle, IVsOfOneStride>::iterator SI =
1224 IVsByStride.find(StrideOrder[NewStride]);
1225 if (SI == IVsByStride.end() || !isa<SCEVConstant>(SI->first))
1226 continue;
1227 int64_t SSInt = cast<SCEVConstant>(SI->first)->getValue()->getSExtValue();
1228 if (SI->first != Stride && SSInt != 1)
1229 continue;
1230 for (std::vector<IVExpr>::iterator II = SI->second.IVs.begin(),
1231 IE = SI->second.IVs.end(); II != IE; ++II)
1232 // Accept nonzero base here.
1233 // Only reuse previous IV if it would not require a type conversion.
1234 if (!RequiresTypeConversion(II->Base->getType(), Ty)) {
1235 IV = *II;
1236 return Stride;
1237 }
1238 }
1239 // Special case, old IV is -1*x and this one is x. Can treat this one as
1240 // -1*old.
1241 for (unsigned NewStride = 0, e = StrideOrder.size(); NewStride != e;
1242 ++NewStride) {
1243 std::map<SCEVHandle, IVsOfOneStride>::iterator SI =
1244 IVsByStride.find(StrideOrder[NewStride]);
1245 if (SI == IVsByStride.end())
1246 continue;
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +00001247 if (const SCEVMulExpr *ME = dyn_cast<SCEVMulExpr>(SI->first))
1248 if (const SCEVConstant *SC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(ME->getOperand(0)))
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +00001249 if (Stride == ME->getOperand(1) &&
1250 SC->getValue()->getSExtValue() == -1LL)
1251 for (std::vector<IVExpr>::iterator II = SI->second.IVs.begin(),
1252 IE = SI->second.IVs.end(); II != IE; ++II)
1253 // Accept nonzero base here.
1254 // Only reuse previous IV if it would not require type conversion.
1255 if (!RequiresTypeConversion(II->Base->getType(), Ty)) {
1256 IV = *II;
1257 return SE->getIntegerSCEV(-1LL, Stride->getType());
1258 }
1259 }
Evan Chengeb8f9e22006-03-17 19:52:23 +00001260 }
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +00001261 return SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Stride->getType());
Evan Chengeb8f9e22006-03-17 19:52:23 +00001262}
1263
Chris Lattner7e79b382006-08-03 06:34:50 +00001264/// PartitionByIsUseOfPostIncrementedValue - Simple boolean predicate that
1265/// returns true if Val's isUseOfPostIncrementedValue is true.
1266static bool PartitionByIsUseOfPostIncrementedValue(const BasedUser &Val) {
1267 return Val.isUseOfPostIncrementedValue;
1268}
Evan Chengeb8f9e22006-03-17 19:52:23 +00001269
Dan Gohman4a9a3e52008-04-14 18:26:16 +00001270/// isNonConstantNegative - Return true if the specified scev is negated, but
Chris Lattnerfb3e1192007-05-19 01:22:21 +00001271/// not a constant.
1272static bool isNonConstantNegative(const SCEVHandle &Expr) {
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +00001273 const SCEVMulExpr *Mul = dyn_cast<SCEVMulExpr>(Expr);
Chris Lattnerfb3e1192007-05-19 01:22:21 +00001274 if (!Mul) return false;
1275
1276 // If there is a constant factor, it will be first.
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +00001277 const SCEVConstant *SC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(Mul->getOperand(0));
Chris Lattnerfb3e1192007-05-19 01:22:21 +00001278 if (!SC) return false;
1279
1280 // Return true if the value is negative, this matches things like (-42 * V).
1281 return SC->getValue()->getValue().isNegative();
1282}
1283
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001284// CollectIVUsers - Transform our list of users and offsets to a bit more
Dan Gohman73b43b92008-06-23 22:11:52 +00001285// complex table. In this new vector, each 'BasedUser' contains 'Base', the base
1286// of the strided accesses, as well as the old information from Uses. We
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001287// progressively move information from the Base field to the Imm field, until
1288// we eventually have the full access expression to rewrite the use.
1289SCEVHandle LoopStrengthReduce::CollectIVUsers(const SCEVHandle &Stride,
1290 IVUsersOfOneStride &Uses,
1291 Loop *L,
1292 bool &AllUsesAreAddresses,
Dale Johannesenb0390622008-12-16 22:16:28 +00001293 bool &AllUsesAreOutsideLoop,
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001294 std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess) {
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +00001295 UsersToProcess.reserve(Uses.Users.size());
Chris Lattnera553b0c2005-08-08 22:56:21 +00001296 for (unsigned i = 0, e = Uses.Users.size(); i != e; ++i) {
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +00001297 UsersToProcess.push_back(BasedUser(Uses.Users[i], SE));
Chris Lattnera553b0c2005-08-08 22:56:21 +00001298
Dale Johannesen67c79892008-12-03 19:25:46 +00001299 // Move any loop variant operands from the offset field to the immediate
Chris Lattnera553b0c2005-08-08 22:56:21 +00001300 // field of the use, so that we don't try to use something before it is
1301 // computed.
Dale Johannesen544e0d02008-12-03 20:56:12 +00001302 MoveLoopVariantsToImmediateField(UsersToProcess.back().Base,
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +00001303 UsersToProcess.back().Imm, L, SE);
Chris Lattnera553b0c2005-08-08 22:56:21 +00001304 assert(UsersToProcess.back().Base->isLoopInvariant(L) &&
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +00001305 "Base value is not loop invariant!");
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +00001306 }
Evan Chengeb8f9e22006-03-17 19:52:23 +00001307
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001308 // We now have a whole bunch of uses of like-strided induction variables, but
1309 // they might all have different bases. We want to emit one PHI node for this
1310 // stride which we fold as many common expressions (between the IVs) into as
1311 // possible. Start by identifying the common expressions in the base values
1312 // for the strides (e.g. if we have "A+C+B" and "A+B+D" as our bases, find
1313 // "A+B"), emit it to the preheader, then remove the expression from the
1314 // UsersToProcess base values.
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +00001315 SCEVHandle CommonExprs =
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +00001316 RemoveCommonExpressionsFromUseBases(UsersToProcess, SE, L, TLI);
Dan Gohman02e4fa72007-10-22 20:40:42 +00001317
Chris Lattner44b807e2005-08-08 22:32:34 +00001318 // Next, figure out what we can represent in the immediate fields of
1319 // instructions. If we can represent anything there, move it to the imm
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001320 // fields of the BasedUsers. We do this so that it increases the commonality
1321 // of the remaining uses.
Evan Cheng32e4c7c2007-12-20 02:20:53 +00001322 unsigned NumPHI = 0;
Evan Chengd33cec12009-02-20 22:16:49 +00001323 bool HasAddress = false;
Chris Lattner44b807e2005-08-08 22:32:34 +00001324 for (unsigned i = 0, e = UsersToProcess.size(); i != e; ++i) {
Chris Lattner80b32b32005-08-16 00:38:11 +00001325 // If the user is not in the current loop, this means it is using the exit
1326 // value of the IV. Do not put anything in the base, make sure it's all in
1327 // the immediate field to allow as much factoring as possible.
1328 if (!L->contains(UsersToProcess[i].Inst->getParent())) {
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +00001329 UsersToProcess[i].Imm = SE->getAddExpr(UsersToProcess[i].Imm,
1330 UsersToProcess[i].Base);
Chris Lattner8385e512005-08-17 21:22:41 +00001331 UsersToProcess[i].Base =
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +00001332 SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, UsersToProcess[i].Base->getType());
Chris Lattner80b32b32005-08-16 00:38:11 +00001333 } else {
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +00001334 // Not all uses are outside the loop.
1335 AllUsesAreOutsideLoop = false;
1336
Chris Lattner80b32b32005-08-16 00:38:11 +00001337 // Addressing modes can be folded into loads and stores. Be careful that
1338 // the store is through the expression, not of the expression though.
Evan Cheng32e4c7c2007-12-20 02:20:53 +00001339 bool isPHI = false;
Evan Chengd6b62a52007-12-19 23:33:23 +00001340 bool isAddress = isAddressUse(UsersToProcess[i].Inst,
1341 UsersToProcess[i].OperandValToReplace);
1342 if (isa<PHINode>(UsersToProcess[i].Inst)) {
Evan Cheng32e4c7c2007-12-20 02:20:53 +00001343 isPHI = true;
1344 ++NumPHI;
Dan Gohman2acc7602007-05-03 23:20:33 +00001345 }
Dan Gohman02e4fa72007-10-22 20:40:42 +00001346
Evan Chengd33cec12009-02-20 22:16:49 +00001347 if (isAddress)
1348 HasAddress = true;
Dale Johannesenb0390622008-12-16 22:16:28 +00001349
Dan Gohman02e4fa72007-10-22 20:40:42 +00001350 // If this use isn't an address, then not all uses are addresses.
Evan Cheng55e641b2008-03-19 22:02:26 +00001351 if (!isAddress && !isPHI)
Dan Gohman02e4fa72007-10-22 20:40:42 +00001352 AllUsesAreAddresses = false;
Chris Lattner80b32b32005-08-16 00:38:11 +00001353
Evan Cheng1d958162007-03-13 20:34:37 +00001354 MoveImmediateValues(TLI, UsersToProcess[i].Inst, UsersToProcess[i].Base,
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +00001355 UsersToProcess[i].Imm, isAddress, L, SE);
Chris Lattner80b32b32005-08-16 00:38:11 +00001356 }
Chris Lattner44b807e2005-08-08 22:32:34 +00001357 }
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +00001358
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +00001359 // If one of the use is a PHI node and all other uses are addresses, still
Evan Cheng32e4c7c2007-12-20 02:20:53 +00001360 // allow iv reuse. Essentially we are trading one constant multiplication
1361 // for one fewer iv.
1362 if (NumPHI > 1)
1363 AllUsesAreAddresses = false;
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +00001364
Evan Chengd33cec12009-02-20 22:16:49 +00001365 // There are no in-loop address uses.
1366 if (AllUsesAreAddresses && (!HasAddress && !AllUsesAreOutsideLoop))
1367 AllUsesAreAddresses = false;
1368
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001369 return CommonExprs;
1370}
1371
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001372/// ShouldUseFullStrengthReductionMode - Test whether full strength-reduction
1373/// is valid and profitable for the given set of users of a stride. In
1374/// full strength-reduction mode, all addresses at the current stride are
1375/// strength-reduced all the way down to pointer arithmetic.
1376///
1377bool LoopStrengthReduce::ShouldUseFullStrengthReductionMode(
1378 const std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess,
1379 const Loop *L,
1380 bool AllUsesAreAddresses,
1381 SCEVHandle Stride) {
1382 if (!EnableFullLSRMode)
1383 return false;
1384
1385 // The heuristics below aim to avoid increasing register pressure, but
1386 // fully strength-reducing all the addresses increases the number of
1387 // add instructions, so don't do this when optimizing for size.
1388 // TODO: If the loop is large, the savings due to simpler addresses
1389 // may oughtweight the costs of the extra increment instructions.
1390 if (L->getHeader()->getParent()->hasFnAttr(Attribute::OptimizeForSize))
1391 return false;
1392
1393 // TODO: For now, don't do full strength reduction if there could
1394 // potentially be greater-stride multiples of the current stride
1395 // which could reuse the current stride IV.
1396 if (StrideOrder.back() != Stride)
1397 return false;
1398
1399 // Iterate through the uses to find conditions that automatically rule out
1400 // full-lsr mode.
1401 for (unsigned i = 0, e = UsersToProcess.size(); i != e; ) {
1402 SCEV *Base = UsersToProcess[i].Base;
1403 SCEV *Imm = UsersToProcess[i].Imm;
1404 // If any users have a loop-variant component, they can't be fully
1405 // strength-reduced.
1406 if (Imm && !Imm->isLoopInvariant(L))
1407 return false;
1408 // If there are to users with the same base and the difference between
1409 // the two Imm values can't be folded into the address, full
1410 // strength reduction would increase register pressure.
1411 do {
1412 SCEV *CurImm = UsersToProcess[i].Imm;
Dan Gohmana04af432009-02-22 16:40:52 +00001413 if ((CurImm || Imm) && CurImm != Imm) {
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001414 if (!CurImm) CurImm = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Stride->getType());
1415 if (!Imm) Imm = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Stride->getType());
1416 const Instruction *Inst = UsersToProcess[i].Inst;
Dan Gohman21e77222009-03-09 21:01:17 +00001417 const Type *UseTy = getAccessType(Inst);
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001418 SCEVHandle Diff = SE->getMinusSCEV(UsersToProcess[i].Imm, Imm);
1419 if (!Diff->isZero() &&
1420 (!AllUsesAreAddresses ||
1421 !fitsInAddressMode(Diff, UseTy, TLI, /*HasBaseReg=*/true)))
1422 return false;
1423 }
1424 } while (++i != e && Base == UsersToProcess[i].Base);
1425 }
1426
1427 // If there's exactly one user in this stride, fully strength-reducing it
1428 // won't increase register pressure. If it's starting from a non-zero base,
1429 // it'll be simpler this way.
1430 if (UsersToProcess.size() == 1 && !UsersToProcess[0].Base->isZero())
1431 return true;
1432
1433 // Otherwise, if there are any users in this stride that don't require
1434 // a register for their base, full strength-reduction will increase
1435 // register pressure.
1436 for (unsigned i = 0, e = UsersToProcess.size(); i != e; ++i)
Dan Gohmanf0baa6e2009-02-20 21:05:23 +00001437 if (UsersToProcess[i].Base->isZero())
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001438 return false;
1439
1440 // Otherwise, go for it.
1441 return true;
1442}
1443
1444/// InsertAffinePhi Create and insert a PHI node for an induction variable
1445/// with the specified start and step values in the specified loop.
1446///
1447/// If NegateStride is true, the stride should be negated by using a
1448/// subtract instead of an add.
1449///
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +00001450/// Return the created phi node.
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001451///
1452static PHINode *InsertAffinePhi(SCEVHandle Start, SCEVHandle Step,
1453 const Loop *L,
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +00001454 SCEVExpander &Rewriter) {
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001455 assert(Start->isLoopInvariant(L) && "New PHI start is not loop invariant!");
1456 assert(Step->isLoopInvariant(L) && "New PHI stride is not loop invariant!");
1457
1458 BasicBlock *Header = L->getHeader();
1459 BasicBlock *Preheader = L->getLoopPreheader();
Dan Gohman0daeed22009-03-09 21:14:16 +00001460 BasicBlock *LatchBlock = L->getLoopLatch();
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001461 const Type *Ty = Start->getType();
Dan Gohmanaf79fb52009-04-21 01:07:12 +00001462 Ty = Rewriter.SE.getEffectiveSCEVType(Ty);
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001463
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001464 PHINode *PN = PHINode::Create(Ty, "lsr.iv", Header->begin());
1465 PN->addIncoming(Rewriter.expandCodeFor(Start, Ty, Preheader->getTerminator()),
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001466 Preheader);
1467
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001468 // If the stride is negative, insert a sub instead of an add for the
1469 // increment.
1470 bool isNegative = isNonConstantNegative(Step);
1471 SCEVHandle IncAmount = Step;
1472 if (isNegative)
1473 IncAmount = Rewriter.SE.getNegativeSCEV(Step);
1474
1475 // Insert an add instruction right before the terminator corresponding
1476 // to the back-edge.
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001477 Value *StepV = Rewriter.expandCodeFor(IncAmount, Ty,
1478 Preheader->getTerminator());
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +00001479 Instruction *IncV;
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001480 if (isNegative) {
1481 IncV = BinaryOperator::CreateSub(PN, StepV, "lsr.iv.next",
Dan Gohman0daeed22009-03-09 21:14:16 +00001482 LatchBlock->getTerminator());
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001483 } else {
1484 IncV = BinaryOperator::CreateAdd(PN, StepV, "lsr.iv.next",
Dan Gohman0daeed22009-03-09 21:14:16 +00001485 LatchBlock->getTerminator());
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001486 }
1487 if (!isa<ConstantInt>(StepV)) ++NumVariable;
1488
Dan Gohman0daeed22009-03-09 21:14:16 +00001489 PN->addIncoming(IncV, LatchBlock);
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001490
1491 ++NumInserted;
1492 return PN;
1493}
1494
1495static void SortUsersToProcess(std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess) {
1496 // We want to emit code for users inside the loop first. To do this, we
1497 // rearrange BasedUser so that the entries at the end have
1498 // isUseOfPostIncrementedValue = false, because we pop off the end of the
1499 // vector (so we handle them first).
1500 std::partition(UsersToProcess.begin(), UsersToProcess.end(),
1501 PartitionByIsUseOfPostIncrementedValue);
1502
1503 // Sort this by base, so that things with the same base are handled
1504 // together. By partitioning first and stable-sorting later, we are
1505 // guaranteed that within each base we will pop off users from within the
1506 // loop before users outside of the loop with a particular base.
1507 //
1508 // We would like to use stable_sort here, but we can't. The problem is that
1509 // SCEVHandle's don't have a deterministic ordering w.r.t to each other, so
1510 // we don't have anything to do a '<' comparison on. Because we think the
1511 // number of uses is small, do a horrible bubble sort which just relies on
1512 // ==.
1513 for (unsigned i = 0, e = UsersToProcess.size(); i != e; ++i) {
1514 // Get a base value.
1515 SCEVHandle Base = UsersToProcess[i].Base;
1516
1517 // Compact everything with this base to be consecutive with this one.
1518 for (unsigned j = i+1; j != e; ++j) {
1519 if (UsersToProcess[j].Base == Base) {
1520 std::swap(UsersToProcess[i+1], UsersToProcess[j]);
1521 ++i;
1522 }
1523 }
1524 }
1525}
1526
Dan Gohman6b38e292009-02-20 21:06:57 +00001527/// PrepareToStrengthReduceFully - Prepare to fully strength-reduce
1528/// UsersToProcess, meaning lowering addresses all the way down to direct
1529/// pointer arithmetic.
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001530///
1531void
1532LoopStrengthReduce::PrepareToStrengthReduceFully(
1533 std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess,
1534 SCEVHandle Stride,
1535 SCEVHandle CommonExprs,
1536 const Loop *L,
1537 SCEVExpander &PreheaderRewriter) {
1538 DOUT << " Fully reducing all users\n";
1539
1540 // Rewrite the UsersToProcess records, creating a separate PHI for each
1541 // unique Base value.
1542 for (unsigned i = 0, e = UsersToProcess.size(); i != e; ) {
1543 // TODO: The uses are grouped by base, but not sorted. We arbitrarily
1544 // pick the first Imm value here to start with, and adjust it for the
1545 // other uses.
1546 SCEVHandle Imm = UsersToProcess[i].Imm;
1547 SCEVHandle Base = UsersToProcess[i].Base;
1548 SCEVHandle Start = SE->getAddExpr(CommonExprs, Base, Imm);
Dan Gohmanaf79fb52009-04-21 01:07:12 +00001549 PHINode *Phi = InsertAffinePhi(Start, Stride, L,
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +00001550 PreheaderRewriter);
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001551 // Loop over all the users with the same base.
1552 do {
1553 UsersToProcess[i].Base = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Stride->getType());
1554 UsersToProcess[i].Imm = SE->getMinusSCEV(UsersToProcess[i].Imm, Imm);
1555 UsersToProcess[i].Phi = Phi;
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001556 assert(UsersToProcess[i].Imm->isLoopInvariant(L) &&
1557 "ShouldUseFullStrengthReductionMode should reject this!");
1558 } while (++i != e && Base == UsersToProcess[i].Base);
1559 }
1560}
1561
1562/// PrepareToStrengthReduceWithNewPhi - Insert a new induction variable for the
1563/// given users to share.
1564///
1565void
1566LoopStrengthReduce::PrepareToStrengthReduceWithNewPhi(
1567 std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess,
1568 SCEVHandle Stride,
1569 SCEVHandle CommonExprs,
1570 Value *CommonBaseV,
1571 const Loop *L,
1572 SCEVExpander &PreheaderRewriter) {
1573 DOUT << " Inserting new PHI:\n";
1574
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001575 PHINode *Phi = InsertAffinePhi(SE->getUnknown(CommonBaseV),
Dan Gohmanaf79fb52009-04-21 01:07:12 +00001576 Stride, L,
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +00001577 PreheaderRewriter);
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001578
1579 // Remember this in case a later stride is multiple of this.
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +00001580 IVsByStride[Stride].addIV(Stride, CommonExprs, Phi);
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001581
1582 // All the users will share this new IV.
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +00001583 for (unsigned i = 0, e = UsersToProcess.size(); i != e; ++i)
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001584 UsersToProcess[i].Phi = Phi;
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001585
1586 DOUT << " IV=";
1587 DEBUG(WriteAsOperand(*DOUT, Phi, /*PrintType=*/false));
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001588 DOUT << "\n";
1589}
1590
1591/// PrepareToStrengthReduceWithNewPhi - Prepare for the given users to reuse
1592/// an induction variable with a stride that is a factor of the current
1593/// induction variable.
1594///
1595void
1596LoopStrengthReduce::PrepareToStrengthReduceFromSmallerStride(
1597 std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess,
1598 Value *CommonBaseV,
1599 const IVExpr &ReuseIV,
1600 Instruction *PreInsertPt) {
1601 DOUT << " Rewriting in terms of existing IV of STRIDE " << *ReuseIV.Stride
1602 << " and BASE " << *ReuseIV.Base << "\n";
1603
1604 // All the users will share the reused IV.
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +00001605 for (unsigned i = 0, e = UsersToProcess.size(); i != e; ++i)
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001606 UsersToProcess[i].Phi = ReuseIV.PHI;
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001607
1608 Constant *C = dyn_cast<Constant>(CommonBaseV);
1609 if (C &&
1610 (!C->isNullValue() &&
1611 !fitsInAddressMode(SE->getUnknown(CommonBaseV), CommonBaseV->getType(),
1612 TLI, false)))
1613 // We want the common base emitted into the preheader! This is just
1614 // using cast as a copy so BitCast (no-op cast) is appropriate
1615 CommonBaseV = new BitCastInst(CommonBaseV, CommonBaseV->getType(),
1616 "commonbase", PreInsertPt);
1617}
1618
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +00001619static bool IsImmFoldedIntoAddrMode(GlobalValue *GV, int64_t Offset,
Dan Gohman53f2ae22009-03-09 21:04:19 +00001620 const Type *AccessTy,
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +00001621 std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess,
1622 const TargetLowering *TLI) {
1623 SmallVector<Instruction*, 16> AddrModeInsts;
1624 for (unsigned i = 0, e = UsersToProcess.size(); i != e; ++i) {
1625 if (UsersToProcess[i].isUseOfPostIncrementedValue)
1626 continue;
1627 ExtAddrMode AddrMode =
1628 AddressingModeMatcher::Match(UsersToProcess[i].OperandValToReplace,
Dan Gohman53f2ae22009-03-09 21:04:19 +00001629 AccessTy, UsersToProcess[i].Inst,
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +00001630 AddrModeInsts, *TLI);
1631 if (GV && GV != AddrMode.BaseGV)
1632 return false;
1633 if (Offset && !AddrMode.BaseOffs)
1634 // FIXME: How to accurate check it's immediate offset is folded.
1635 return false;
1636 AddrModeInsts.clear();
1637 }
1638 return true;
1639}
1640
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001641/// StrengthReduceStridedIVUsers - Strength reduce all of the users of a single
1642/// stride of IV. All of the users may have different starting values, and this
Dan Gohman9f4ac312009-03-09 20:41:15 +00001643/// may not be the only stride.
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001644void LoopStrengthReduce::StrengthReduceStridedIVUsers(const SCEVHandle &Stride,
1645 IVUsersOfOneStride &Uses,
Dan Gohman9f4ac312009-03-09 20:41:15 +00001646 Loop *L) {
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001647 // If all the users are moved to another stride, then there is nothing to do.
Dan Gohman30359592008-01-29 13:02:09 +00001648 if (Uses.Users.empty())
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001649 return;
1650
1651 // Keep track if every use in UsersToProcess is an address. If they all are,
1652 // we may be able to rewrite the entire collection of them in terms of a
1653 // smaller-stride IV.
1654 bool AllUsesAreAddresses = true;
1655
Dale Johannesenb0390622008-12-16 22:16:28 +00001656 // Keep track if every use of a single stride is outside the loop. If so,
1657 // we want to be more aggressive about reusing a smaller-stride IV; a
1658 // multiply outside the loop is better than another IV inside. Well, usually.
1659 bool AllUsesAreOutsideLoop = true;
1660
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001661 // Transform our list of users and offsets to a bit more complex table. In
1662 // this new vector, each 'BasedUser' contains 'Base' the base of the
1663 // strided accessas well as the old information from Uses. We progressively
1664 // move information from the Base field to the Imm field, until we eventually
1665 // have the full access expression to rewrite the use.
1666 std::vector<BasedUser> UsersToProcess;
1667 SCEVHandle CommonExprs = CollectIVUsers(Stride, Uses, L, AllUsesAreAddresses,
Dale Johannesenb0390622008-12-16 22:16:28 +00001668 AllUsesAreOutsideLoop,
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001669 UsersToProcess);
1670
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001671 // Sort the UsersToProcess array so that users with common bases are
1672 // next to each other.
1673 SortUsersToProcess(UsersToProcess);
1674
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001675 // If we managed to find some expressions in common, we'll need to carry
1676 // their value in a register and add it in for each use. This will take up
1677 // a register operand, which potentially restricts what stride values are
1678 // valid.
Dan Gohmancfeb6a42008-06-18 16:23:07 +00001679 bool HaveCommonExprs = !CommonExprs->isZero();
Chris Lattnerfe355552007-04-01 22:21:39 +00001680 const Type *ReplacedTy = CommonExprs->getType();
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001681
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +00001682 // If all uses are addresses, consider sinking the immediate part of the
1683 // common expression back into uses if they can fit in the immediate fields.
Evan Cheng3cd389d2009-02-22 07:31:19 +00001684 if (TLI && HaveCommonExprs && AllUsesAreAddresses) {
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +00001685 SCEVHandle NewCommon = CommonExprs;
1686 SCEVHandle Imm = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, ReplacedTy);
Dan Gohman3cfe6a42009-03-09 21:22:12 +00001687 MoveImmediateValues(TLI, Type::VoidTy, NewCommon, Imm, true, L, SE);
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +00001688 if (!Imm->isZero()) {
1689 bool DoSink = true;
1690
1691 // If the immediate part of the common expression is a GV, check if it's
1692 // possible to fold it into the target addressing mode.
1693 GlobalValue *GV = 0;
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +00001694 if (const SCEVUnknown *SU = dyn_cast<SCEVUnknown>(Imm))
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001695 GV = dyn_cast<GlobalValue>(SU->getValue());
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +00001696 int64_t Offset = 0;
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +00001697 if (const SCEVConstant *SC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(Imm))
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +00001698 Offset = SC->getValue()->getSExtValue();
1699 if (GV || Offset)
Dan Gohman53f2ae22009-03-09 21:04:19 +00001700 // Pass VoidTy as the AccessTy to be conservative, because
1701 // there could be multiple access types among all the uses.
1702 DoSink = IsImmFoldedIntoAddrMode(GV, Offset, Type::VoidTy,
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +00001703 UsersToProcess, TLI);
1704
1705 if (DoSink) {
1706 DOUT << " Sinking " << *Imm << " back down into uses\n";
1707 for (unsigned i = 0, e = UsersToProcess.size(); i != e; ++i)
1708 UsersToProcess[i].Imm = SE->getAddExpr(UsersToProcess[i].Imm, Imm);
1709 CommonExprs = NewCommon;
1710 HaveCommonExprs = !CommonExprs->isZero();
1711 ++NumImmSunk;
1712 }
1713 }
1714 }
1715
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001716 // Now that we know what we need to do, insert the PHI node itself.
1717 //
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +00001718 DOUT << "LSR: Examining IVs of TYPE " << *ReplacedTy << " of STRIDE "
1719 << *Stride << ":\n"
1720 << " Common base: " << *CommonExprs << "\n";
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +00001721
Dan Gohmanaf79fb52009-04-21 01:07:12 +00001722 SCEVExpander Rewriter(*SE, *LI);
1723 SCEVExpander PreheaderRewriter(*SE, *LI);
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001724
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001725 BasicBlock *Preheader = L->getLoopPreheader();
1726 Instruction *PreInsertPt = Preheader->getTerminator();
Chris Lattner12b50412005-09-12 17:11:27 +00001727 BasicBlock *LatchBlock = L->getLoopLatch();
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +00001728
Dan Gohmanaf79fb52009-04-21 01:07:12 +00001729 Value *CommonBaseV = Constant::getNullValue(ReplacedTy);
Evan Chengeb8f9e22006-03-17 19:52:23 +00001730
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001731 SCEVHandle RewriteFactor = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, ReplacedTy);
1732 IVExpr ReuseIV(SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Type::Int32Ty),
1733 SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Type::Int32Ty),
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +00001734 0);
Evan Chengeb8f9e22006-03-17 19:52:23 +00001735
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001736 /// Choose a strength-reduction strategy and prepare for it by creating
1737 /// the necessary PHIs and adjusting the bookkeeping.
1738 if (ShouldUseFullStrengthReductionMode(UsersToProcess, L,
1739 AllUsesAreAddresses, Stride)) {
1740 PrepareToStrengthReduceFully(UsersToProcess, Stride, CommonExprs, L,
1741 PreheaderRewriter);
Evan Chengeb8f9e22006-03-17 19:52:23 +00001742 } else {
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001743 // Emit the initial base value into the loop preheader.
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001744 CommonBaseV = PreheaderRewriter.expandCodeFor(CommonExprs, ReplacedTy,
1745 PreInsertPt);
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +00001746
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001747 // If all uses are addresses, check if it is possible to reuse an IV with a
1748 // stride that is a factor of this stride. And that the multiple is a number
1749 // that can be encoded in the scale field of the target addressing mode. And
Dan Gohman6b38e292009-02-20 21:06:57 +00001750 // that we will have a valid instruction after this substition, including
1751 // the immediate field, if any.
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001752 RewriteFactor = CheckForIVReuse(HaveCommonExprs, AllUsesAreAddresses,
1753 AllUsesAreOutsideLoop,
Dan Gohmanbb5b49c2009-03-09 21:19:58 +00001754 Stride, ReuseIV, ReplacedTy,
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001755 UsersToProcess);
1756 if (isa<SCEVConstant>(RewriteFactor) &&
1757 cast<SCEVConstant>(RewriteFactor)->isZero())
1758 PrepareToStrengthReduceWithNewPhi(UsersToProcess, Stride, CommonExprs,
1759 CommonBaseV, L, PreheaderRewriter);
1760 else
1761 PrepareToStrengthReduceFromSmallerStride(UsersToProcess, CommonBaseV,
1762 ReuseIV, PreInsertPt);
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +00001763 }
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001764
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001765 // Process all the users now, replacing their strided uses with
1766 // strength-reduced forms. This outer loop handles all bases, the inner
Chris Lattner7e79b382006-08-03 06:34:50 +00001767 // loop handles all users of a particular base.
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +00001768 while (!UsersToProcess.empty()) {
Chris Lattner7b445c52005-10-11 18:30:57 +00001769 SCEVHandle Base = UsersToProcess.back().Base;
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +00001770 Instruction *Inst = UsersToProcess.back().Inst;
Chris Lattnerbe3e5212005-08-03 23:30:08 +00001771
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001772 // Emit the code for Base into the preheader.
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001773 Value *BaseV = 0;
1774 if (!Base->isZero()) {
1775 BaseV = PreheaderRewriter.expandCodeFor(Base, Base->getType(),
1776 PreInsertPt);
Chris Lattner7d8ed8a2007-05-11 22:40:34 +00001777
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001778 DOUT << " INSERTING code for BASE = " << *Base << ":";
1779 if (BaseV->hasName())
1780 DOUT << " Result value name = %" << BaseV->getNameStr();
1781 DOUT << "\n";
Chris Lattner7d8ed8a2007-05-11 22:40:34 +00001782
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001783 // If BaseV is a non-zero constant, make sure that it gets inserted into
1784 // the preheader, instead of being forward substituted into the uses. We
1785 // do this by forcing a BitCast (noop cast) to be inserted into the
1786 // preheader in this case.
1787 if (!fitsInAddressMode(Base, getAccessType(Inst), TLI, false)) {
Reid Spencer3da59db2006-11-27 01:05:10 +00001788 // We want this constant emitted into the preheader! This is just
1789 // using cast as a copy so BitCast (no-op cast) is appropriate
1790 BaseV = new BitCastInst(BaseV, BaseV->getType(), "preheaderinsert",
Dan Gohman4a9a3e52008-04-14 18:26:16 +00001791 PreInsertPt);
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001792 }
Chris Lattner7e79b382006-08-03 06:34:50 +00001793 }
1794
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +00001795 // Emit the code to add the immediate offset to the Phi value, just before
Chris Lattner2351aba2005-08-03 22:51:21 +00001796 // the instructions that we identified as using this stride and base.
Chris Lattner7b445c52005-10-11 18:30:57 +00001797 do {
Chris Lattner7e79b382006-08-03 06:34:50 +00001798 // FIXME: Use emitted users to emit other users.
Chris Lattner7b445c52005-10-11 18:30:57 +00001799 BasedUser &User = UsersToProcess.back();
Jeff Cohend29b6aa2005-07-30 18:33:25 +00001800
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +00001801 DOUT << " Examining use ";
Dan Gohman4a359ea2009-02-19 19:32:06 +00001802 DEBUG(WriteAsOperand(*DOUT, UsersToProcess.back().OperandValToReplace,
1803 /*PrintType=*/false));
Dale Johannesen22523ad2009-04-29 22:57:20 +00001804 DOUT << " in Inst: " << *(User.Inst);
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +00001805
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001806 // If this instruction wants to use the post-incremented value, move it
1807 // after the post-inc and use its value instead of the PHI.
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001808 Value *RewriteOp = User.Phi;
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001809 if (User.isUseOfPostIncrementedValue) {
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +00001810 RewriteOp = User.Phi->getIncomingValueForBlock(LatchBlock);
Chris Lattnerc6bae652005-09-12 06:04:47 +00001811
1812 // If this user is in the loop, make sure it is the last thing in the
1813 // loop to ensure it is dominated by the increment.
1814 if (L->contains(User.Inst->getParent()))
1815 User.Inst->moveBefore(LatchBlock->getTerminator());
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001816 }
Evan Cheng86c75d32006-06-09 00:12:42 +00001817
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +00001818 SCEVHandle RewriteExpr = SE->getUnknown(RewriteOp);
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001819
Dan Gohmanaf79fb52009-04-21 01:07:12 +00001820 if (SE->getTypeSizeInBits(RewriteOp->getType()) !=
1821 SE->getTypeSizeInBits(ReplacedTy)) {
1822 assert(SE->getTypeSizeInBits(RewriteOp->getType()) >
1823 SE->getTypeSizeInBits(ReplacedTy) &&
Dan Gohmane616bf32009-04-16 15:47:35 +00001824 "Unexpected widening cast!");
1825 RewriteExpr = SE->getTruncateExpr(RewriteExpr, ReplacedTy);
1826 }
1827
Dale Johannesenb0390622008-12-16 22:16:28 +00001828 // If we had to insert new instructions for RewriteOp, we have to
Dan Gohmanf20d70d2008-05-15 23:26:57 +00001829 // consider that they may not have been able to end up immediately
1830 // next to RewriteOp, because non-PHI instructions may never precede
1831 // PHI instructions in a block. In this case, remember where the last
Dan Gohmanca756ae2008-05-20 03:01:48 +00001832 // instruction was inserted so that if we're replacing a different
1833 // PHI node, we can use the later point to expand the final
1834 // RewriteExpr.
Dan Gohmanf20d70d2008-05-15 23:26:57 +00001835 Instruction *NewBasePt = dyn_cast<Instruction>(RewriteOp);
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001836 if (RewriteOp == User.Phi) NewBasePt = 0;
Dan Gohmanf20d70d2008-05-15 23:26:57 +00001837
Chris Lattner2351aba2005-08-03 22:51:21 +00001838 // Clear the SCEVExpander's expression map so that we are guaranteed
1839 // to have the code emitted where we expect it.
1840 Rewriter.clear();
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +00001841
1842 // If we are reusing the iv, then it must be multiplied by a constant
Dale Johannesen1de17d52009-02-09 22:14:15 +00001843 // factor to take advantage of the addressing mode scale component.
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001844 if (!RewriteFactor->isZero()) {
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +00001845 // If we're reusing an IV with a nonzero base (currently this happens
1846 // only when all reuses are outside the loop) subtract that base here.
1847 // The base has been used to initialize the PHI node but we don't want
1848 // it here.
Dale Johannesen1de17d52009-02-09 22:14:15 +00001849 if (!ReuseIV.Base->isZero()) {
1850 SCEVHandle typedBase = ReuseIV.Base;
Dan Gohmanaf79fb52009-04-21 01:07:12 +00001851 if (SE->getTypeSizeInBits(RewriteExpr->getType()) !=
1852 SE->getTypeSizeInBits(ReuseIV.Base->getType())) {
Dale Johannesen1de17d52009-02-09 22:14:15 +00001853 // It's possible the original IV is a larger type than the new IV,
1854 // in which case we have to truncate the Base. We checked in
1855 // RequiresTypeConversion that this is valid.
Dan Gohmanaf79fb52009-04-21 01:07:12 +00001856 assert(SE->getTypeSizeInBits(RewriteExpr->getType()) <
1857 SE->getTypeSizeInBits(ReuseIV.Base->getType()) &&
Dan Gohman84fc33e2009-04-16 22:35:57 +00001858 "Unexpected lengthening conversion!");
Dale Johannesen1de17d52009-02-09 22:14:15 +00001859 typedBase = SE->getTruncateExpr(ReuseIV.Base,
1860 RewriteExpr->getType());
1861 }
1862 RewriteExpr = SE->getMinusSCEV(RewriteExpr, typedBase);
1863 }
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +00001864
1865 // Multiply old variable, with base removed, by new scale factor.
1866 RewriteExpr = SE->getMulExpr(RewriteFactor,
Evan Cheng83927722007-10-30 22:27:26 +00001867 RewriteExpr);
Evan Chengeb8f9e22006-03-17 19:52:23 +00001868
1869 // The common base is emitted in the loop preheader. But since we
1870 // are reusing an IV, it has not been used to initialize the PHI node.
1871 // Add it to the expression used to rewrite the uses.
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +00001872 // When this use is outside the loop, we earlier subtracted the
1873 // common base, and are adding it back here. Use the same expression
1874 // as before, rather than CommonBaseV, so DAGCombiner will zap it.
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001875 if (!CommonExprs->isZero()) {
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +00001876 if (L->contains(User.Inst->getParent()))
1877 RewriteExpr = SE->getAddExpr(RewriteExpr,
Dale Johannesenb0390622008-12-16 22:16:28 +00001878 SE->getUnknown(CommonBaseV));
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +00001879 else
1880 RewriteExpr = SE->getAddExpr(RewriteExpr, CommonExprs);
1881 }
Evan Chengeb8f9e22006-03-17 19:52:23 +00001882 }
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +00001883
Chris Lattner2114b272005-08-04 20:03:32 +00001884 // Now that we know what we need to do, insert code before User for the
1885 // immediate and any loop-variant expressions.
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001886 if (BaseV)
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001887 // Add BaseV to the PHI value if needed.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +00001888 RewriteExpr = SE->getAddExpr(RewriteExpr, SE->getUnknown(BaseV));
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +00001889
Dan Gohmanf20d70d2008-05-15 23:26:57 +00001890 User.RewriteInstructionToUseNewBase(RewriteExpr, NewBasePt,
1891 Rewriter, L, this,
Evan Cheng0e0014d2007-10-30 23:45:15 +00001892 DeadInsts);
Jeff Cohend29b6aa2005-07-30 18:33:25 +00001893
Chris Lattnera68d4ca2008-12-01 06:14:28 +00001894 // Mark old value we replaced as possibly dead, so that it is eliminated
Chris Lattner2351aba2005-08-03 22:51:21 +00001895 // if we just replaced the last use of that value.
Chris Lattner09fb7da2008-12-01 06:27:41 +00001896 DeadInsts.push_back(cast<Instruction>(User.OperandValToReplace));
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +00001897
Chris Lattner7b445c52005-10-11 18:30:57 +00001898 UsersToProcess.pop_back();
Chris Lattner2351aba2005-08-03 22:51:21 +00001899 ++NumReduced;
Chris Lattner7b445c52005-10-11 18:30:57 +00001900
Chris Lattner7e79b382006-08-03 06:34:50 +00001901 // If there are any more users to process with the same base, process them
1902 // now. We sorted by base above, so we just have to check the last elt.
Chris Lattner7b445c52005-10-11 18:30:57 +00001903 } while (!UsersToProcess.empty() && UsersToProcess.back().Base == Base);
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +00001904 // TODO: Next, find out which base index is the most common, pull it out.
1905 }
1906
1907 // IMPORTANT TODO: Figure out how to partition the IV's with this stride, but
1908 // different starting values, into different PHIs.
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +00001909}
1910
Devang Patelc677de22008-08-13 20:31:11 +00001911/// FindIVUserForCond - If Cond has an operand that is an expression of an IV,
Chris Lattneraed01d12007-04-03 05:11:24 +00001912/// set the IV user and stride information and return true, otherwise return
1913/// false.
Devang Patelc677de22008-08-13 20:31:11 +00001914bool LoopStrengthReduce::FindIVUserForCond(ICmpInst *Cond, IVStrideUse *&CondUse,
Chris Lattneraed01d12007-04-03 05:11:24 +00001915 const SCEVHandle *&CondStride) {
1916 for (unsigned Stride = 0, e = StrideOrder.size(); Stride != e && !CondUse;
1917 ++Stride) {
1918 std::map<SCEVHandle, IVUsersOfOneStride>::iterator SI =
1919 IVUsesByStride.find(StrideOrder[Stride]);
1920 assert(SI != IVUsesByStride.end() && "Stride doesn't exist!");
1921
1922 for (std::vector<IVStrideUse>::iterator UI = SI->second.Users.begin(),
1923 E = SI->second.Users.end(); UI != E; ++UI)
1924 if (UI->User == Cond) {
1925 // NOTE: we could handle setcc instructions with multiple uses here, but
1926 // InstCombine does it as well for simple uses, it's not clear that it
1927 // occurs enough in real life to handle.
1928 CondUse = &*UI;
1929 CondStride = &SI->first;
1930 return true;
1931 }
1932 }
1933 return false;
1934}
1935
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00001936namespace {
1937 // Constant strides come first which in turns are sorted by their absolute
1938 // values. If absolute values are the same, then positive strides comes first.
1939 // e.g.
1940 // 4, -1, X, 1, 2 ==> 1, -1, 2, 4, X
1941 struct StrideCompare {
Dan Gohmanaf79fb52009-04-21 01:07:12 +00001942 const ScalarEvolution *SE;
1943 explicit StrideCompare(const ScalarEvolution *se) : SE(se) {}
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001944
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00001945 bool operator()(const SCEVHandle &LHS, const SCEVHandle &RHS) {
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +00001946 const SCEVConstant *LHSC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(LHS);
1947 const SCEVConstant *RHSC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(RHS);
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00001948 if (LHSC && RHSC) {
1949 int64_t LV = LHSC->getValue()->getSExtValue();
1950 int64_t RV = RHSC->getValue()->getSExtValue();
1951 uint64_t ALV = (LV < 0) ? -LV : LV;
1952 uint64_t ARV = (RV < 0) ? -RV : RV;
Dan Gohmanbc511722009-02-13 00:26:43 +00001953 if (ALV == ARV) {
1954 if (LV != RV)
1955 return LV > RV;
1956 } else {
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00001957 return ALV < ARV;
Dan Gohmanbc511722009-02-13 00:26:43 +00001958 }
1959
1960 // If it's the same value but different type, sort by bit width so
1961 // that we emit larger induction variables before smaller
1962 // ones, letting the smaller be re-written in terms of larger ones.
Dan Gohmanaf79fb52009-04-21 01:07:12 +00001963 return SE->getTypeSizeInBits(RHS->getType()) <
1964 SE->getTypeSizeInBits(LHS->getType());
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00001965 }
Dan Gohmanbc511722009-02-13 00:26:43 +00001966 return LHSC && !RHSC;
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00001967 }
1968 };
1969}
1970
1971/// ChangeCompareStride - If a loop termination compare instruction is the
1972/// only use of its stride, and the compaison is against a constant value,
1973/// try eliminate the stride by moving the compare instruction to another
1974/// stride and change its constant operand accordingly. e.g.
1975///
1976/// loop:
1977/// ...
1978/// v1 = v1 + 3
1979/// v2 = v2 + 1
1980/// if (v2 < 10) goto loop
1981/// =>
1982/// loop:
1983/// ...
1984/// v1 = v1 + 3
1985/// if (v1 < 30) goto loop
1986ICmpInst *LoopStrengthReduce::ChangeCompareStride(Loop *L, ICmpInst *Cond,
Evan Cheng0e0014d2007-10-30 23:45:15 +00001987 IVStrideUse* &CondUse,
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00001988 const SCEVHandle* &CondStride) {
1989 if (StrideOrder.size() < 2 ||
1990 IVUsesByStride[*CondStride].Users.size() != 1)
1991 return Cond;
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00001992 const SCEVConstant *SC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(*CondStride);
1993 if (!SC) return Cond;
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00001994
1995 ICmpInst::Predicate Predicate = Cond->getPredicate();
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00001996 int64_t CmpSSInt = SC->getValue()->getSExtValue();
Dan Gohmanaf79fb52009-04-21 01:07:12 +00001997 unsigned BitWidth = SE->getTypeSizeInBits((*CondStride)->getType());
Evan Cheng168a66b2007-10-26 23:08:19 +00001998 uint64_t SignBit = 1ULL << (BitWidth-1);
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00001999 const Type *CmpTy = Cond->getOperand(0)->getType();
Evan Cheng168a66b2007-10-26 23:08:19 +00002000 const Type *NewCmpTy = NULL;
Dan Gohmanaf79fb52009-04-21 01:07:12 +00002001 unsigned TyBits = SE->getTypeSizeInBits(CmpTy);
Evan Chengaf62c092007-10-29 22:07:18 +00002002 unsigned NewTyBits = 0;
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00002003 SCEVHandle *NewStride = NULL;
Dan Gohmanff518c82009-02-20 21:27:23 +00002004 Value *NewCmpLHS = NULL;
2005 Value *NewCmpRHS = NULL;
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00002006 int64_t Scale = 1;
Dan Gohmanaf79fb52009-04-21 01:07:12 +00002007 SCEVHandle NewOffset = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, CmpTy);
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00002008
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00002009 if (ConstantInt *C = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Cond->getOperand(1))) {
2010 int64_t CmpVal = C->getValue().getSExtValue();
Evan Cheng168a66b2007-10-26 23:08:19 +00002011
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00002012 // Check stride constant and the comparision constant signs to detect
2013 // overflow.
2014 if ((CmpVal & SignBit) != (CmpSSInt & SignBit))
2015 return Cond;
Evan Cheng168a66b2007-10-26 23:08:19 +00002016
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00002017 // Look for a suitable stride / iv as replacement.
2018 for (unsigned i = 0, e = StrideOrder.size(); i != e; ++i) {
2019 std::map<SCEVHandle, IVUsersOfOneStride>::iterator SI =
2020 IVUsesByStride.find(StrideOrder[i]);
2021 if (!isa<SCEVConstant>(SI->first))
Dan Gohmanff518c82009-02-20 21:27:23 +00002022 continue;
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00002023 int64_t SSInt = cast<SCEVConstant>(SI->first)->getValue()->getSExtValue();
Dan Gohmanc7749b72009-04-27 20:35:32 +00002024 if (SSInt == CmpSSInt ||
2025 abs(SSInt) < abs(CmpSSInt) ||
2026 (SSInt % CmpSSInt) != 0)
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00002027 continue;
2028
2029 Scale = SSInt / CmpSSInt;
2030 int64_t NewCmpVal = CmpVal * Scale;
2031 APInt Mul = APInt(BitWidth, NewCmpVal);
2032 // Check for overflow.
2033 if (Mul.getSExtValue() != NewCmpVal)
2034 continue;
2035
2036 // Watch out for overflow.
2037 if (ICmpInst::isSignedPredicate(Predicate) &&
2038 (CmpVal & SignBit) != (NewCmpVal & SignBit))
2039 continue;
2040
2041 if (NewCmpVal == CmpVal)
2042 continue;
2043 // Pick the best iv to use trying to avoid a cast.
2044 NewCmpLHS = NULL;
2045 for (std::vector<IVStrideUse>::iterator UI = SI->second.Users.begin(),
2046 E = SI->second.Users.end(); UI != E; ++UI) {
2047 NewCmpLHS = UI->OperandValToReplace;
2048 if (NewCmpLHS->getType() == CmpTy)
2049 break;
2050 }
2051 if (!NewCmpLHS)
2052 continue;
2053
2054 NewCmpTy = NewCmpLHS->getType();
Dan Gohmanaf79fb52009-04-21 01:07:12 +00002055 NewTyBits = SE->getTypeSizeInBits(NewCmpTy);
2056 const Type *NewCmpIntTy = IntegerType::get(NewTyBits);
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00002057 if (RequiresTypeConversion(NewCmpTy, CmpTy)) {
2058 // Check if it is possible to rewrite it using
2059 // an iv / stride of a smaller integer type.
Dan Gohman65e05b62009-04-16 16:49:48 +00002060 unsigned Bits = NewTyBits;
2061 if (ICmpInst::isSignedPredicate(Predicate))
2062 --Bits;
2063 uint64_t Mask = (1ULL << Bits) - 1;
2064 if (((uint64_t)NewCmpVal & Mask) != (uint64_t)NewCmpVal)
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00002065 continue;
2066 }
2067
2068 // Don't rewrite if use offset is non-constant and the new type is
2069 // of a different type.
2070 // FIXME: too conservative?
2071 if (NewTyBits != TyBits && !isa<SCEVConstant>(CondUse->Offset))
2072 continue;
2073
2074 bool AllUsesAreAddresses = true;
2075 bool AllUsesAreOutsideLoop = true;
2076 std::vector<BasedUser> UsersToProcess;
2077 SCEVHandle CommonExprs = CollectIVUsers(SI->first, SI->second, L,
2078 AllUsesAreAddresses,
2079 AllUsesAreOutsideLoop,
2080 UsersToProcess);
2081 // Avoid rewriting the compare instruction with an iv of new stride
2082 // if it's likely the new stride uses will be rewritten using the
2083 // stride of the compare instruction.
2084 if (AllUsesAreAddresses &&
2085 ValidStride(!CommonExprs->isZero(), Scale, UsersToProcess))
2086 continue;
2087
2088 // If scale is negative, use swapped predicate unless it's testing
2089 // for equality.
2090 if (Scale < 0 && !Cond->isEquality())
2091 Predicate = ICmpInst::getSwappedPredicate(Predicate);
2092
2093 NewStride = &StrideOrder[i];
2094 if (!isa<PointerType>(NewCmpTy))
2095 NewCmpRHS = ConstantInt::get(NewCmpTy, NewCmpVal);
2096 else {
Dan Gohmanaf79fb52009-04-21 01:07:12 +00002097 ConstantInt *CI = ConstantInt::get(NewCmpIntTy, NewCmpVal);
Dan Gohman798d3922009-04-16 15:48:38 +00002098 NewCmpRHS = ConstantExpr::getIntToPtr(CI, NewCmpTy);
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00002099 }
2100 NewOffset = TyBits == NewTyBits
2101 ? SE->getMulExpr(CondUse->Offset,
2102 SE->getConstant(ConstantInt::get(CmpTy, Scale)))
Dan Gohmanaf79fb52009-04-21 01:07:12 +00002103 : SE->getConstant(ConstantInt::get(NewCmpIntTy,
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00002104 cast<SCEVConstant>(CondUse->Offset)->getValue()->getSExtValue()*Scale));
2105 break;
Dan Gohmanff518c82009-02-20 21:27:23 +00002106 }
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00002107 }
2108
Dan Gohman9b93dd12008-06-16 22:34:15 +00002109 // Forgo this transformation if it the increment happens to be
2110 // unfortunately positioned after the condition, and the condition
2111 // has multiple uses which prevent it from being moved immediately
2112 // before the branch. See
2113 // test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/change-compare-stride-trickiness-*.ll
2114 // for an example of this situation.
Devang Pateld16aba22008-08-13 02:05:14 +00002115 if (!Cond->hasOneUse()) {
Dan Gohman9b93dd12008-06-16 22:34:15 +00002116 for (BasicBlock::iterator I = Cond, E = Cond->getParent()->end();
2117 I != E; ++I)
Dan Gohmanff518c82009-02-20 21:27:23 +00002118 if (I == NewCmpLHS)
Dan Gohman9b93dd12008-06-16 22:34:15 +00002119 return Cond;
Devang Pateld16aba22008-08-13 02:05:14 +00002120 }
Dan Gohman9b93dd12008-06-16 22:34:15 +00002121
Dan Gohmanff518c82009-02-20 21:27:23 +00002122 if (NewCmpRHS) {
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00002123 // Create a new compare instruction using new stride / iv.
2124 ICmpInst *OldCond = Cond;
Evan Cheng168a66b2007-10-26 23:08:19 +00002125 // Insert new compare instruction.
Dan Gohmanff518c82009-02-20 21:27:23 +00002126 Cond = new ICmpInst(Predicate, NewCmpLHS, NewCmpRHS,
Dan Gohmane562b172008-06-13 21:43:41 +00002127 L->getHeader()->getName() + ".termcond",
2128 OldCond);
Evan Cheng168a66b2007-10-26 23:08:19 +00002129
2130 // Remove the old compare instruction. The old indvar is probably dead too.
Chris Lattner09fb7da2008-12-01 06:27:41 +00002131 DeadInsts.push_back(cast<Instruction>(CondUse->OperandValToReplace));
Evan Cheng168a66b2007-10-26 23:08:19 +00002132 SE->deleteValueFromRecords(OldCond);
Dan Gohman010ee2d2008-05-21 00:54:12 +00002133 OldCond->replaceAllUsesWith(Cond);
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00002134 OldCond->eraseFromParent();
Evan Cheng168a66b2007-10-26 23:08:19 +00002135
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00002136 IVUsesByStride[*CondStride].Users.pop_back();
Dan Gohmanff518c82009-02-20 21:27:23 +00002137 IVUsesByStride[*NewStride].addUser(NewOffset, Cond, NewCmpLHS);
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00002138 CondUse = &IVUsesByStride[*NewStride].Users.back();
2139 CondStride = NewStride;
2140 ++NumEliminated;
2141 }
2142
2143 return Cond;
2144}
2145
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +00002146/// OptimizeSMax - Rewrite the loop's terminating condition if it uses
2147/// an smax computation.
2148///
2149/// This is a narrow solution to a specific, but acute, problem. For loops
2150/// like this:
2151///
2152/// i = 0;
2153/// do {
2154/// p[i] = 0.0;
2155/// } while (++i < n);
2156///
2157/// where the comparison is signed, the trip count isn't just 'n', because
2158/// 'n' could be negative. And unfortunately this can come up even for loops
2159/// where the user didn't use a C do-while loop. For example, seemingly
2160/// well-behaved top-test loops will commonly be lowered like this:
2161//
2162/// if (n > 0) {
2163/// i = 0;
2164/// do {
2165/// p[i] = 0.0;
2166/// } while (++i < n);
2167/// }
2168///
2169/// and then it's possible for subsequent optimization to obscure the if
2170/// test in such a way that indvars can't find it.
2171///
2172/// When indvars can't find the if test in loops like this, it creates a
2173/// signed-max expression, which allows it to give the loop a canonical
2174/// induction variable:
2175///
2176/// i = 0;
2177/// smax = n < 1 ? 1 : n;
2178/// do {
2179/// p[i] = 0.0;
2180/// } while (++i != smax);
2181///
2182/// Canonical induction variables are necessary because the loop passes
2183/// are designed around them. The most obvious example of this is the
2184/// LoopInfo analysis, which doesn't remember trip count values. It
2185/// expects to be able to rediscover the trip count each time it is
2186/// needed, and it does this using a simple analyis that only succeeds if
2187/// the loop has a canonical induction variable.
2188///
2189/// However, when it comes time to generate code, the maximum operation
2190/// can be quite costly, especially if it's inside of an outer loop.
2191///
2192/// This function solves this problem by detecting this type of loop and
2193/// rewriting their conditions from ICMP_NE back to ICMP_SLT, and deleting
2194/// the instructions for the maximum computation.
2195///
2196ICmpInst *LoopStrengthReduce::OptimizeSMax(Loop *L, ICmpInst *Cond,
2197 IVStrideUse* &CondUse) {
2198 // Check that the loop matches the pattern we're looking for.
2199 if (Cond->getPredicate() != CmpInst::ICMP_EQ &&
2200 Cond->getPredicate() != CmpInst::ICMP_NE)
2201 return Cond;
2202
2203 SelectInst *Sel = dyn_cast<SelectInst>(Cond->getOperand(1));
2204 if (!Sel || !Sel->hasOneUse()) return Cond;
2205
Dan Gohman46bdfb02009-02-24 18:55:53 +00002206 SCEVHandle BackedgeTakenCount = SE->getBackedgeTakenCount(L);
2207 if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(BackedgeTakenCount))
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +00002208 return Cond;
Dan Gohman46bdfb02009-02-24 18:55:53 +00002209 SCEVHandle One = SE->getIntegerSCEV(1, BackedgeTakenCount->getType());
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +00002210
Dan Gohman46bdfb02009-02-24 18:55:53 +00002211 // Add one to the backedge-taken count to get the trip count.
2212 SCEVHandle IterationCount = SE->getAddExpr(BackedgeTakenCount, One);
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +00002213
2214 // Check for a max calculation that matches the pattern.
2215 SCEVSMaxExpr *SMax = dyn_cast<SCEVSMaxExpr>(IterationCount);
2216 if (!SMax || SMax != SE->getSCEV(Sel)) return Cond;
2217
2218 SCEVHandle SMaxLHS = SMax->getOperand(0);
2219 SCEVHandle SMaxRHS = SMax->getOperand(1);
2220 if (!SMaxLHS || SMaxLHS != One) return Cond;
2221
2222 // Check the relevant induction variable for conformance to
2223 // the pattern.
2224 SCEVHandle IV = SE->getSCEV(Cond->getOperand(0));
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +00002225 const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(IV);
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +00002226 if (!AR || !AR->isAffine() ||
2227 AR->getStart() != One ||
2228 AR->getStepRecurrence(*SE) != One)
2229 return Cond;
2230
Dan Gohmanbc10b8c2009-03-04 20:49:01 +00002231 assert(AR->getLoop() == L &&
2232 "Loop condition operand is an addrec in a different loop!");
2233
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +00002234 // Check the right operand of the select, and remember it, as it will
2235 // be used in the new comparison instruction.
2236 Value *NewRHS = 0;
2237 if (SE->getSCEV(Sel->getOperand(1)) == SMaxRHS)
2238 NewRHS = Sel->getOperand(1);
2239 else if (SE->getSCEV(Sel->getOperand(2)) == SMaxRHS)
2240 NewRHS = Sel->getOperand(2);
2241 if (!NewRHS) return Cond;
2242
2243 // Ok, everything looks ok to change the condition into an SLT or SGE and
2244 // delete the max calculation.
2245 ICmpInst *NewCond =
2246 new ICmpInst(Cond->getPredicate() == CmpInst::ICMP_NE ?
2247 CmpInst::ICMP_SLT :
2248 CmpInst::ICMP_SGE,
2249 Cond->getOperand(0), NewRHS, "scmp", Cond);
2250
2251 // Delete the max calculation instructions.
Dan Gohman586b7b72008-10-01 02:02:03 +00002252 SE->deleteValueFromRecords(Cond);
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +00002253 Cond->replaceAllUsesWith(NewCond);
2254 Cond->eraseFromParent();
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +00002255 Instruction *Cmp = cast<Instruction>(Sel->getOperand(0));
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +00002256 SE->deleteValueFromRecords(Sel);
Dan Gohman586b7b72008-10-01 02:02:03 +00002257 Sel->eraseFromParent();
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +00002258 if (Cmp->use_empty()) {
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +00002259 SE->deleteValueFromRecords(Cmp);
Dan Gohman586b7b72008-10-01 02:02:03 +00002260 Cmp->eraseFromParent();
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +00002261 }
2262 CondUse->User = NewCond;
2263 return NewCond;
2264}
2265
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +00002266/// OptimizeShadowIV - If IV is used in a int-to-float cast
2267/// inside the loop then try to eliminate the cast opeation.
2268void LoopStrengthReduce::OptimizeShadowIV(Loop *L) {
2269
Dan Gohman46bdfb02009-02-24 18:55:53 +00002270 SCEVHandle BackedgeTakenCount = SE->getBackedgeTakenCount(L);
2271 if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(BackedgeTakenCount))
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +00002272 return;
2273
2274 for (unsigned Stride = 0, e = StrideOrder.size(); Stride != e;
2275 ++Stride) {
2276 std::map<SCEVHandle, IVUsersOfOneStride>::iterator SI =
2277 IVUsesByStride.find(StrideOrder[Stride]);
2278 assert(SI != IVUsesByStride.end() && "Stride doesn't exist!");
2279 if (!isa<SCEVConstant>(SI->first))
2280 continue;
2281
2282 for (std::vector<IVStrideUse>::iterator UI = SI->second.Users.begin(),
2283 E = SI->second.Users.end(); UI != E; /* empty */) {
2284 std::vector<IVStrideUse>::iterator CandidateUI = UI;
Devang Patel54153272008-08-27 17:50:18 +00002285 ++UI;
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +00002286 Instruction *ShadowUse = CandidateUI->User;
2287 const Type *DestTy = NULL;
2288
2289 /* If shadow use is a int->float cast then insert a second IV
Devang Patel54153272008-08-27 17:50:18 +00002290 to eliminate this cast.
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +00002291
2292 for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; ++i)
2293 foo((double)i);
2294
Devang Patel54153272008-08-27 17:50:18 +00002295 is transformed into
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +00002296
2297 double d = 0.0;
2298 for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; ++i, ++d)
2299 foo(d);
2300 */
Devang Patel54153272008-08-27 17:50:18 +00002301 if (UIToFPInst *UCast = dyn_cast<UIToFPInst>(CandidateUI->User))
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +00002302 DestTy = UCast->getDestTy();
Devang Patel54153272008-08-27 17:50:18 +00002303 else if (SIToFPInst *SCast = dyn_cast<SIToFPInst>(CandidateUI->User))
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +00002304 DestTy = SCast->getDestTy();
Devang Patel18bb2782008-08-27 20:55:23 +00002305 if (!DestTy) continue;
2306
2307 if (TLI) {
2308 /* If target does not support DestTy natively then do not apply
2309 this transformation. */
2310 MVT DVT = TLI->getValueType(DestTy);
2311 if (!TLI->isTypeLegal(DVT)) continue;
2312 }
2313
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +00002314 PHINode *PH = dyn_cast<PHINode>(ShadowUse->getOperand(0));
2315 if (!PH) continue;
2316 if (PH->getNumIncomingValues() != 2) continue;
2317
2318 const Type *SrcTy = PH->getType();
2319 int Mantissa = DestTy->getFPMantissaWidth();
2320 if (Mantissa == -1) continue;
Dan Gohmanaf79fb52009-04-21 01:07:12 +00002321 if ((int)SE->getTypeSizeInBits(SrcTy) > Mantissa)
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +00002322 continue;
2323
2324 unsigned Entry, Latch;
2325 if (PH->getIncomingBlock(0) == L->getLoopPreheader()) {
2326 Entry = 0;
2327 Latch = 1;
2328 } else {
2329 Entry = 1;
2330 Latch = 0;
2331 }
2332
2333 ConstantInt *Init = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(PH->getIncomingValue(Entry));
2334 if (!Init) continue;
2335 ConstantFP *NewInit = ConstantFP::get(DestTy, Init->getZExtValue());
2336
2337 BinaryOperator *Incr =
2338 dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(PH->getIncomingValue(Latch));
2339 if (!Incr) continue;
2340 if (Incr->getOpcode() != Instruction::Add
2341 && Incr->getOpcode() != Instruction::Sub)
2342 continue;
2343
2344 /* Initialize new IV, double d = 0.0 in above example. */
2345 ConstantInt *C = NULL;
2346 if (Incr->getOperand(0) == PH)
2347 C = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Incr->getOperand(1));
2348 else if (Incr->getOperand(1) == PH)
2349 C = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Incr->getOperand(0));
2350 else
2351 continue;
2352
2353 if (!C) continue;
2354
2355 /* Add new PHINode. */
2356 PHINode *NewPH = PHINode::Create(DestTy, "IV.S.", PH);
2357
Devang Patel54153272008-08-27 17:50:18 +00002358 /* create new increment. '++d' in above example. */
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +00002359 ConstantFP *CFP = ConstantFP::get(DestTy, C->getZExtValue());
2360 BinaryOperator *NewIncr =
2361 BinaryOperator::Create(Incr->getOpcode(),
2362 NewPH, CFP, "IV.S.next.", Incr);
2363
2364 NewPH->addIncoming(NewInit, PH->getIncomingBlock(Entry));
2365 NewPH->addIncoming(NewIncr, PH->getIncomingBlock(Latch));
2366
2367 /* Remove cast operation */
2368 SE->deleteValueFromRecords(ShadowUse);
2369 ShadowUse->replaceAllUsesWith(NewPH);
2370 ShadowUse->eraseFromParent();
2371 SI->second.Users.erase(CandidateUI);
2372 NumShadow++;
2373 break;
2374 }
2375 }
2376}
2377
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002378// OptimizeIndvars - Now that IVUsesByStride is set up with all of the indvar
2379// uses in the loop, look to see if we can eliminate some, in favor of using
2380// common indvars for the different uses.
2381void LoopStrengthReduce::OptimizeIndvars(Loop *L) {
2382 // TODO: implement optzns here.
2383
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +00002384 OptimizeShadowIV(L);
2385
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002386 // Finally, get the terminating condition for the loop if possible. If we
2387 // can, we want to change it to use a post-incremented version of its
Chris Lattner98d98112006-03-24 07:14:34 +00002388 // induction variable, to allow coalescing the live ranges for the IV into
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002389 // one register value.
2390 PHINode *SomePHI = cast<PHINode>(L->getHeader()->begin());
2391 BasicBlock *Preheader = L->getLoopPreheader();
2392 BasicBlock *LatchBlock =
2393 SomePHI->getIncomingBlock(SomePHI->getIncomingBlock(0) == Preheader);
2394 BranchInst *TermBr = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(LatchBlock->getTerminator());
Reid Spencere4d87aa2006-12-23 06:05:41 +00002395 if (!TermBr || TermBr->isUnconditional() ||
2396 !isa<ICmpInst>(TermBr->getCondition()))
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002397 return;
Reid Spencere4d87aa2006-12-23 06:05:41 +00002398 ICmpInst *Cond = cast<ICmpInst>(TermBr->getCondition());
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002399
2400 // Search IVUsesByStride to find Cond's IVUse if there is one.
2401 IVStrideUse *CondUse = 0;
Chris Lattner50fad702005-08-10 00:45:21 +00002402 const SCEVHandle *CondStride = 0;
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002403
Devang Patelc677de22008-08-13 20:31:11 +00002404 if (!FindIVUserForCond(Cond, CondUse, CondStride))
Chris Lattneraed01d12007-04-03 05:11:24 +00002405 return; // setcc doesn't use the IV.
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00002406
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +00002407 // If the trip count is computed in terms of an smax (due to ScalarEvolution
2408 // being unable to find a sufficient guard, for example), change the loop
2409 // comparison to use SLT instead of NE.
2410 Cond = OptimizeSMax(L, Cond, CondUse);
2411
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00002412 // If possible, change stride and operands of the compare instruction to
2413 // eliminate one stride.
2414 Cond = ChangeCompareStride(L, Cond, CondUse, CondStride);
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002415
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002416 // It's possible for the setcc instruction to be anywhere in the loop, and
2417 // possible for it to have multiple users. If it is not immediately before
2418 // the latch block branch, move it.
2419 if (&*++BasicBlock::iterator(Cond) != (Instruction*)TermBr) {
2420 if (Cond->hasOneUse()) { // Condition has a single use, just move it.
2421 Cond->moveBefore(TermBr);
2422 } else {
2423 // Otherwise, clone the terminating condition and insert into the loopend.
Reid Spencere4d87aa2006-12-23 06:05:41 +00002424 Cond = cast<ICmpInst>(Cond->clone());
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002425 Cond->setName(L->getHeader()->getName() + ".termcond");
2426 LatchBlock->getInstList().insert(TermBr, Cond);
2427
2428 // Clone the IVUse, as the old use still exists!
Chris Lattner50fad702005-08-10 00:45:21 +00002429 IVUsesByStride[*CondStride].addUser(CondUse->Offset, Cond,
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002430 CondUse->OperandValToReplace);
Chris Lattner50fad702005-08-10 00:45:21 +00002431 CondUse = &IVUsesByStride[*CondStride].Users.back();
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002432 }
2433 }
2434
2435 // If we get to here, we know that we can transform the setcc instruction to
Chris Lattner98d98112006-03-24 07:14:34 +00002436 // use the post-incremented version of the IV, allowing us to coalesce the
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002437 // live ranges for the IV correctly.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +00002438 CondUse->Offset = SE->getMinusSCEV(CondUse->Offset, *CondStride);
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002439 CondUse->isUseOfPostIncrementedValue = true;
Evan Cheng1ce75dc2008-07-07 19:51:32 +00002440 Changed = true;
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002441}
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +00002442
Devang Patel0f54dcb2007-03-06 21:14:09 +00002443bool LoopStrengthReduce::runOnLoop(Loop *L, LPPassManager &LPM) {
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +00002444
Devang Patel0f54dcb2007-03-06 21:14:09 +00002445 LI = &getAnalysis<LoopInfo>();
Devang Patelb7d9dfc2007-06-07 21:42:15 +00002446 DT = &getAnalysis<DominatorTree>();
Devang Patel0f54dcb2007-03-06 21:14:09 +00002447 SE = &getAnalysis<ScalarEvolution>();
Dan Gohman3fea6432008-07-14 17:55:01 +00002448 Changed = false;
Devang Patel0f54dcb2007-03-06 21:14:09 +00002449
Dale Johannesenb0390622008-12-16 22:16:28 +00002450 // Find all uses of induction variables in this loop, and categorize
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +00002451 // them by stride. Start by finding all of the PHI nodes in the header for
2452 // this loop. If they are induction variables, inspect their uses.
Evan Cheng168a66b2007-10-26 23:08:19 +00002453 SmallPtrSet<Instruction*,16> Processed; // Don't reprocess instructions.
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +00002454 for (BasicBlock::iterator I = L->getHeader()->begin(); isa<PHINode>(I); ++I)
Chris Lattner3416e5f2005-08-04 17:40:30 +00002455 AddUsersIfInteresting(I, L, Processed);
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +00002456
Evan Cheng1ce75dc2008-07-07 19:51:32 +00002457 if (!IVUsesByStride.empty()) {
Dan Gohman80b0f8c2009-03-09 20:34:59 +00002458#ifndef NDEBUG
2459 DOUT << "\nLSR on \"" << L->getHeader()->getParent()->getNameStart()
2460 << "\" ";
2461 DEBUG(L->dump());
2462#endif
2463
Dan Gohmanf7912df2009-03-09 20:46:50 +00002464 // Sort the StrideOrder so we process larger strides first.
Dan Gohmanaf79fb52009-04-21 01:07:12 +00002465 std::stable_sort(StrideOrder.begin(), StrideOrder.end(), StrideCompare(SE));
Dan Gohmanf7912df2009-03-09 20:46:50 +00002466
Evan Cheng1ce75dc2008-07-07 19:51:32 +00002467 // Optimize induction variables. Some indvar uses can be transformed to use
2468 // strides that will be needed for other purposes. A common example of this
2469 // is the exit test for the loop, which can often be rewritten to use the
2470 // computation of some other indvar to decide when to terminate the loop.
2471 OptimizeIndvars(L);
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002472
Evan Cheng1ce75dc2008-07-07 19:51:32 +00002473 // FIXME: We can widen subreg IV's here for RISC targets. e.g. instead of
2474 // doing computation in byte values, promote to 32-bit values if safe.
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002475
Evan Cheng1ce75dc2008-07-07 19:51:32 +00002476 // FIXME: Attempt to reuse values across multiple IV's. In particular, we
2477 // could have something like "for(i) { foo(i*8); bar(i*16) }", which should
2478 // be codegened as "for (j = 0;; j+=8) { foo(j); bar(j+j); }" on X86/PPC.
2479 // Need to be careful that IV's are all the same type. Only works for
2480 // intptr_t indvars.
Misha Brukmanfd939082005-04-21 23:48:37 +00002481
Evan Cheng1ce75dc2008-07-07 19:51:32 +00002482 // IVsByStride keeps IVs for one particular loop.
2483 assert(IVsByStride.empty() && "Stale entries in IVsByStride?");
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +00002484
Evan Cheng1ce75dc2008-07-07 19:51:32 +00002485 // Note: this processes each stride/type pair individually. All users
2486 // passed into StrengthReduceStridedIVUsers have the same type AND stride.
2487 // Also, note that we iterate over IVUsesByStride indirectly by using
2488 // StrideOrder. This extra layer of indirection makes the ordering of
2489 // strides deterministic - not dependent on map order.
2490 for (unsigned Stride = 0, e = StrideOrder.size(); Stride != e; ++Stride) {
2491 std::map<SCEVHandle, IVUsersOfOneStride>::iterator SI =
2492 IVUsesByStride.find(StrideOrder[Stride]);
2493 assert(SI != IVUsesByStride.end() && "Stride doesn't exist!");
Dan Gohman9f4ac312009-03-09 20:41:15 +00002494 StrengthReduceStridedIVUsers(SI->first, SI->second, L);
Evan Cheng1ce75dc2008-07-07 19:51:32 +00002495 }
Chris Lattner7305ae22005-10-09 06:20:55 +00002496 }
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +00002497
Dan Gohman010ee2d2008-05-21 00:54:12 +00002498 // We're done analyzing this loop; release all the state we built up for it.
Dan Gohman010ee2d2008-05-21 00:54:12 +00002499 IVUsesByStride.clear();
2500 IVsByStride.clear();
2501 StrideOrder.clear();
2502
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +00002503 // Clean up after ourselves
2504 if (!DeadInsts.empty()) {
Chris Lattnera68d4ca2008-12-01 06:14:28 +00002505 DeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions();
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +00002506
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +00002507 BasicBlock::iterator I = L->getHeader()->begin();
Dan Gohmancbfe5bb2008-06-22 20:44:02 +00002508 while (PHINode *PN = dyn_cast<PHINode>(I++)) {
2509 // At this point, we know that we have killed one or more IV users.
Chris Lattnerbfcee362008-12-01 06:11:32 +00002510 // It is worth checking to see if the cannonical indvar is also
Dan Gohmancbfe5bb2008-06-22 20:44:02 +00002511 // dead, so that we can remove it as well.
2512 //
2513 // We can remove a PHI if it is on a cycle in the def-use graph
2514 // where each node in the cycle has degree one, i.e. only one use,
2515 // and is an instruction with no side effects.
2516 //
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +00002517 // FIXME: this needs to eliminate an induction variable even if it's being
2518 // compared against some value to decide loop termination.
Chris Lattnera0d44862008-11-27 23:00:20 +00002519 if (!PN->hasOneUse())
2520 continue;
2521
2522 SmallPtrSet<PHINode *, 4> PHIs;
2523 for (Instruction *J = dyn_cast<Instruction>(*PN->use_begin());
2524 J && J->hasOneUse() && !J->mayWriteToMemory();
2525 J = dyn_cast<Instruction>(*J->use_begin())) {
2526 // If we find the original PHI, we've discovered a cycle.
2527 if (J == PN) {
2528 // Break the cycle and mark the PHI for deletion.
2529 SE->deleteValueFromRecords(PN);
2530 PN->replaceAllUsesWith(UndefValue::get(PN->getType()));
Chris Lattner09fb7da2008-12-01 06:27:41 +00002531 DeadInsts.push_back(PN);
Chris Lattnera0d44862008-11-27 23:00:20 +00002532 Changed = true;
2533 break;
Chris Lattner7e608bb2005-08-02 02:52:02 +00002534 }
Chris Lattnera0d44862008-11-27 23:00:20 +00002535 // If we find a PHI more than once, we're on a cycle that
2536 // won't prove fruitful.
2537 if (isa<PHINode>(J) && !PHIs.insert(cast<PHINode>(J)))
2538 break;
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +00002539 }
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +00002540 }
Chris Lattnera68d4ca2008-12-01 06:14:28 +00002541 DeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions();
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +00002542 }
Evan Cheng1ce75dc2008-07-07 19:51:32 +00002543 return Changed;
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +00002544}