blob: 6fcf55b581aa01312bf35cd875d550234fb0cc07 [file] [log] [blame]
Chris Lattner2240d2b2003-09-20 05:03:31 +00001//===- TailRecursionElimination.cpp - Eliminate Tail Calls ----------------===//
Misha Brukmanfd939082005-04-21 23:48:37 +00002//
John Criswellb576c942003-10-20 19:43:21 +00003// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
4//
Chris Lattner4ee451d2007-12-29 20:36:04 +00005// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
6// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
Misha Brukmanfd939082005-04-21 23:48:37 +00007//
John Criswellb576c942003-10-20 19:43:21 +00008//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
Chris Lattner2240d2b2003-09-20 05:03:31 +00009//
Chris Lattner7152da32003-12-08 05:34:54 +000010// This file transforms calls of the current function (self recursion) followed
11// by a return instruction with a branch to the entry of the function, creating
12// a loop. This pass also implements the following extensions to the basic
13// algorithm:
Chris Lattner2240d2b2003-09-20 05:03:31 +000014//
Chris Lattner7152da32003-12-08 05:34:54 +000015// 1. Trivial instructions between the call and return do not prevent the
16// transformation from taking place, though currently the analysis cannot
17// support moving any really useful instructions (only dead ones).
Chris Lattner543d6222003-12-08 23:19:26 +000018// 2. This pass transforms functions that are prevented from being tail
19// recursive by an associative expression to use an accumulator variable,
20// thus compiling the typical naive factorial or 'fib' implementation into
21// efficient code.
Chris Lattnerd64152a2003-12-14 23:57:39 +000022// 3. TRE is performed if the function returns void, if the return
23// returns the result returned by the call, or if the function returns a
24// run-time constant on all exits from the function. It is possible, though
25// unlikely, that the return returns something else (like constant 0), and
26// can still be TRE'd. It can be TRE'd if ALL OTHER return instructions in
27// the function return the exact same value.
Chris Lattner7f78f212005-05-09 23:51:13 +000028// 4. If it can prove that callees do not access theier caller stack frame,
29// they are marked as eligible for tail call elimination (by the code
30// generator).
Chris Lattner2240d2b2003-09-20 05:03:31 +000031//
Chris Lattner7152da32003-12-08 05:34:54 +000032// There are several improvements that could be made:
33//
34// 1. If the function has any alloca instructions, these instructions will be
35// moved out of the entry block of the function, causing them to be
36// evaluated each time through the tail recursion. Safely keeping allocas
37// in the entry block requires analysis to proves that the tail-called
38// function does not read or write the stack object.
Chris Lattner2240d2b2003-09-20 05:03:31 +000039// 2. Tail recursion is only performed if the call immediately preceeds the
Chris Lattner7152da32003-12-08 05:34:54 +000040// return instruction. It's possible that there could be a jump between
41// the call and the return.
Chris Lattnerd64152a2003-12-14 23:57:39 +000042// 3. There can be intervening operations between the call and the return that
Chris Lattner7152da32003-12-08 05:34:54 +000043// prevent the TRE from occurring. For example, there could be GEP's and
44// stores to memory that will not be read or written by the call. This
45// requires some substantial analysis (such as with DSA) to prove safe to
46// move ahead of the call, but doing so could allow many more TREs to be
47// performed, for example in TreeAdd/TreeAlloc from the treeadd benchmark.
Chris Lattner7f78f212005-05-09 23:51:13 +000048// 4. The algorithm we use to detect if callees access their caller stack
49// frames is very primitive.
Chris Lattner2240d2b2003-09-20 05:03:31 +000050//
51//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
52
Chris Lattner0e5f4992006-12-19 21:40:18 +000053#define DEBUG_TYPE "tailcallelim"
Chris Lattner3fc6ef12003-09-20 05:14:13 +000054#include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h"
Chris Lattnerce869ee2005-08-07 04:27:41 +000055#include "llvm/Constants.h"
Chris Lattner2240d2b2003-09-20 05:03:31 +000056#include "llvm/DerivedTypes.h"
57#include "llvm/Function.h"
58#include "llvm/Instructions.h"
59#include "llvm/Pass.h"
Chris Lattner543d6222003-12-08 23:19:26 +000060#include "llvm/Support/CFG.h"
Reid Spencer551ccae2004-09-01 22:55:40 +000061#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"
Reid Spencer9133fe22007-02-05 23:32:05 +000062#include "llvm/Support/Compiler.h"
Chris Lattnerf8485c62003-11-20 18:25:24 +000063using namespace llvm;
Brian Gaeked0fde302003-11-11 22:41:34 +000064
Chris Lattner0e5f4992006-12-19 21:40:18 +000065STATISTIC(NumEliminated, "Number of tail calls removed");
66STATISTIC(NumAccumAdded, "Number of accumulators introduced");
Chris Lattner2240d2b2003-09-20 05:03:31 +000067
Chris Lattner0e5f4992006-12-19 21:40:18 +000068namespace {
Reid Spencer9133fe22007-02-05 23:32:05 +000069 struct VISIBILITY_HIDDEN TailCallElim : public FunctionPass {
Nick Lewyckyecd94c82007-05-06 13:37:16 +000070 static char ID; // Pass identification, replacement for typeid
Devang Patel794fd752007-05-01 21:15:47 +000071 TailCallElim() : FunctionPass((intptr_t)&ID) {}
72
Chris Lattner2240d2b2003-09-20 05:03:31 +000073 virtual bool runOnFunction(Function &F);
Chris Lattner7152da32003-12-08 05:34:54 +000074
75 private:
76 bool ProcessReturningBlock(ReturnInst *RI, BasicBlock *&OldEntry,
Chris Lattnerce869ee2005-08-07 04:27:41 +000077 bool &TailCallsAreMarkedTail,
78 std::vector<PHINode*> &ArgumentPHIs,
79 bool CannotTailCallElimCallsMarkedTail);
Chris Lattner7152da32003-12-08 05:34:54 +000080 bool CanMoveAboveCall(Instruction *I, CallInst *CI);
Chris Lattner543d6222003-12-08 23:19:26 +000081 Value *CanTransformAccumulatorRecursion(Instruction *I, CallInst *CI);
Chris Lattner2240d2b2003-09-20 05:03:31 +000082 };
Chris Lattner2240d2b2003-09-20 05:03:31 +000083}
84
Dan Gohman844731a2008-05-13 00:00:25 +000085char TailCallElim::ID = 0;
86static RegisterPass<TailCallElim> X("tailcallelim", "Tail Call Elimination");
87
Brian Gaeked0fde302003-11-11 22:41:34 +000088// Public interface to the TailCallElimination pass
Chris Lattnerf8485c62003-11-20 18:25:24 +000089FunctionPass *llvm::createTailCallEliminationPass() {
90 return new TailCallElim();
91}
Chris Lattner3fc6ef12003-09-20 05:14:13 +000092
Chris Lattner2240d2b2003-09-20 05:03:31 +000093
Chris Lattner7f78f212005-05-09 23:51:13 +000094/// AllocaMightEscapeToCalls - Return true if this alloca may be accessed by
95/// callees of this function. We only do very simple analysis right now, this
96/// could be expanded in the future to use mod/ref information for particular
97/// call sites if desired.
98static bool AllocaMightEscapeToCalls(AllocaInst *AI) {
99 // FIXME: do simple 'address taken' analysis.
100 return true;
101}
102
103/// FunctionContainsAllocas - Scan the specified basic block for alloca
104/// instructions. If it contains any that might be accessed by calls, return
105/// true.
Chris Lattnerce869ee2005-08-07 04:27:41 +0000106static bool CheckForEscapingAllocas(BasicBlock *BB,
107 bool &CannotTCETailMarkedCall) {
108 bool RetVal = false;
Chris Lattner7f78f212005-05-09 23:51:13 +0000109 for (BasicBlock::iterator I = BB->begin(), E = BB->end(); I != E; ++I)
Chris Lattnerce869ee2005-08-07 04:27:41 +0000110 if (AllocaInst *AI = dyn_cast<AllocaInst>(I)) {
111 RetVal |= AllocaMightEscapeToCalls(AI);
112
113 // If this alloca is in the body of the function, or if it is a variable
114 // sized allocation, we cannot tail call eliminate calls marked 'tail'
115 // with this mechanism.
Dan Gohmanecb7a772007-03-22 16:38:57 +0000116 if (BB != &BB->getParent()->getEntryBlock() ||
Chris Lattnerce869ee2005-08-07 04:27:41 +0000117 !isa<ConstantInt>(AI->getArraySize()))
118 CannotTCETailMarkedCall = true;
119 }
120 return RetVal;
Chris Lattner7f78f212005-05-09 23:51:13 +0000121}
122
Chris Lattner2240d2b2003-09-20 05:03:31 +0000123bool TailCallElim::runOnFunction(Function &F) {
124 // If this function is a varargs function, we won't be able to PHI the args
125 // right, so don't even try to convert it...
126 if (F.getFunctionType()->isVarArg()) return false;
127
128 BasicBlock *OldEntry = 0;
Chris Lattnerce869ee2005-08-07 04:27:41 +0000129 bool TailCallsAreMarkedTail = false;
Chris Lattner2240d2b2003-09-20 05:03:31 +0000130 std::vector<PHINode*> ArgumentPHIs;
131 bool MadeChange = false;
132
Chris Lattner7f78f212005-05-09 23:51:13 +0000133 bool FunctionContainsEscapingAllocas = false;
134
Chris Lattnerce869ee2005-08-07 04:27:41 +0000135 // CannotTCETailMarkedCall - If true, we cannot perform TCE on tail calls
136 // marked with the 'tail' attribute, because doing so would cause the stack
137 // size to increase (real TCE would deallocate variable sized allocas, TCE
138 // doesn't).
139 bool CannotTCETailMarkedCall = false;
140
Chris Lattner7f78f212005-05-09 23:51:13 +0000141 // Loop over the function, looking for any returning blocks, and keeping track
142 // of whether this function has any non-trivially used allocas.
143 for (Function::iterator BB = F.begin(), E = F.end(); BB != E; ++BB) {
Chris Lattnerce869ee2005-08-07 04:27:41 +0000144 if (FunctionContainsEscapingAllocas && CannotTCETailMarkedCall)
145 break;
Jeff Cohen00b168892005-07-27 06:12:32 +0000146
Chris Lattner4c0e4cd2005-08-07 07:00:52 +0000147 FunctionContainsEscapingAllocas |=
Chris Lattnerce869ee2005-08-07 04:27:41 +0000148 CheckForEscapingAllocas(BB, CannotTCETailMarkedCall);
Chris Lattner7f78f212005-05-09 23:51:13 +0000149 }
Chris Lattner32b1e872006-10-22 18:42:26 +0000150
151 /// FIXME: The code generator produces really bad code when an 'escaping
152 /// alloca' is changed from being a static alloca to being a dynamic alloca.
153 /// Until this is resolved, disable this transformation if that would ever
154 /// happen. This bug is PR962.
155 if (FunctionContainsEscapingAllocas)
156 return false;
157
Misha Brukmanfd939082005-04-21 23:48:37 +0000158
Chris Lattnerce869ee2005-08-07 04:27:41 +0000159 // Second pass, change any tail calls to loops.
160 for (Function::iterator BB = F.begin(), E = F.end(); BB != E; ++BB)
161 if (ReturnInst *Ret = dyn_cast<ReturnInst>(BB->getTerminator()))
162 MadeChange |= ProcessReturningBlock(Ret, OldEntry, TailCallsAreMarkedTail,
163 ArgumentPHIs,CannotTCETailMarkedCall);
164
Chris Lattnercf2f8922003-12-08 23:37:35 +0000165 // If we eliminated any tail recursions, it's possible that we inserted some
166 // silly PHI nodes which just merge an initial value (the incoming operand)
167 // with themselves. Check to see if we did and clean up our mess if so. This
168 // occurs when a function passes an argument straight through to its tail
169 // call.
170 if (!ArgumentPHIs.empty()) {
Chris Lattnercf2f8922003-12-08 23:37:35 +0000171 for (unsigned i = 0, e = ArgumentPHIs.size(); i != e; ++i) {
172 PHINode *PN = ArgumentPHIs[i];
Chris Lattnercf2f8922003-12-08 23:37:35 +0000173
174 // If the PHI Node is a dynamic constant, replace it with the value it is.
Chris Lattnerce869ee2005-08-07 04:27:41 +0000175 if (Value *PNV = PN->hasConstantValue()) {
176 PN->replaceAllUsesWith(PNV);
177 PN->eraseFromParent();
Chris Lattnercf2f8922003-12-08 23:37:35 +0000178 }
179 }
180 }
181
Chris Lattner7f78f212005-05-09 23:51:13 +0000182 // Finally, if this function contains no non-escaping allocas, mark all calls
183 // in the function as eligible for tail calls (there is no stack memory for
184 // them to access).
185 if (!FunctionContainsEscapingAllocas)
186 for (Function::iterator BB = F.begin(), E = F.end(); BB != E; ++BB)
187 for (BasicBlock::iterator I = BB->begin(), E = BB->end(); I != E; ++I)
Chris Lattnerc5dc6602008-06-14 00:49:48 +0000188 if (CallInst *CI = dyn_cast<CallInst>(I)) {
Chris Lattner7f78f212005-05-09 23:51:13 +0000189 CI->setTailCall();
Chris Lattnerc5dc6602008-06-14 00:49:48 +0000190 MadeChange = true;
191 }
Chris Lattner7f78f212005-05-09 23:51:13 +0000192
Chris Lattner2240d2b2003-09-20 05:03:31 +0000193 return MadeChange;
194}
Chris Lattner7152da32003-12-08 05:34:54 +0000195
196
Chris Lattner543d6222003-12-08 23:19:26 +0000197/// CanMoveAboveCall - Return true if it is safe to move the specified
198/// instruction from after the call to before the call, assuming that all
199/// instructions between the call and this instruction are movable.
200///
Chris Lattner7152da32003-12-08 05:34:54 +0000201bool TailCallElim::CanMoveAboveCall(Instruction *I, CallInst *CI) {
202 // FIXME: We can move load/store/call/free instructions above the call if the
203 // call does not mod/ref the memory location being processed.
204 if (I->mayWriteToMemory() || isa<LoadInst>(I))
205 return false;
206
207 // Otherwise, if this is a side-effect free instruction, check to make sure
208 // that it does not use the return value of the call. If it doesn't use the
209 // return value of the call, it must only use things that are defined before
210 // the call, or movable instructions between the call and the instruction
211 // itself.
212 for (unsigned i = 0, e = I->getNumOperands(); i != e; ++i)
213 if (I->getOperand(i) == CI)
214 return false;
215 return true;
216}
217
Chris Lattnerd64152a2003-12-14 23:57:39 +0000218// isDynamicConstant - Return true if the specified value is the same when the
219// return would exit as it was when the initial iteration of the recursive
220// function was executed.
221//
222// We currently handle static constants and arguments that are not modified as
223// part of the recursion.
224//
225static bool isDynamicConstant(Value *V, CallInst *CI) {
226 if (isa<Constant>(V)) return true; // Static constants are always dyn consts
227
228 // Check to see if this is an immutable argument, if so, the value
229 // will be available to initialize the accumulator.
230 if (Argument *Arg = dyn_cast<Argument>(V)) {
231 // Figure out which argument number this is...
232 unsigned ArgNo = 0;
233 Function *F = CI->getParent()->getParent();
Chris Lattnere4d5c442005-03-15 04:54:21 +0000234 for (Function::arg_iterator AI = F->arg_begin(); &*AI != Arg; ++AI)
Chris Lattnerd64152a2003-12-14 23:57:39 +0000235 ++ArgNo;
Misha Brukmanfd939082005-04-21 23:48:37 +0000236
Chris Lattnerd64152a2003-12-14 23:57:39 +0000237 // If we are passing this argument into call as the corresponding
238 // argument operand, then the argument is dynamically constant.
239 // Otherwise, we cannot transform this function safely.
240 if (CI->getOperand(ArgNo+1) == Arg)
241 return true;
242 }
243 // Not a constant or immutable argument, we can't safely transform.
244 return false;
245}
246
247// getCommonReturnValue - Check to see if the function containing the specified
248// return instruction and tail call consistently returns the same
249// runtime-constant value at all exit points. If so, return the returned value.
250//
251static Value *getCommonReturnValue(ReturnInst *TheRI, CallInst *CI) {
252 Function *F = TheRI->getParent()->getParent();
253 Value *ReturnedValue = 0;
254
Devang Patel826c4912008-03-11 17:33:32 +0000255 // TODO: Handle multiple value ret instructions;
256 if (isa<StructType>(F->getReturnType()))
257 return 0;
258
Chris Lattnerd64152a2003-12-14 23:57:39 +0000259 for (Function::iterator BBI = F->begin(), E = F->end(); BBI != E; ++BBI)
260 if (ReturnInst *RI = dyn_cast<ReturnInst>(BBI->getTerminator()))
261 if (RI != TheRI) {
262 Value *RetOp = RI->getOperand(0);
263
264 // We can only perform this transformation if the value returned is
265 // evaluatable at the start of the initial invocation of the function,
266 // instead of at the end of the evaluation.
267 //
268 if (!isDynamicConstant(RetOp, CI))
269 return 0;
270
271 if (ReturnedValue && RetOp != ReturnedValue)
272 return 0; // Cannot transform if differing values are returned.
273 ReturnedValue = RetOp;
274 }
275 return ReturnedValue;
276}
Chris Lattner7152da32003-12-08 05:34:54 +0000277
Chris Lattner543d6222003-12-08 23:19:26 +0000278/// CanTransformAccumulatorRecursion - If the specified instruction can be
279/// transformed using accumulator recursion elimination, return the constant
280/// which is the start of the accumulator value. Otherwise return null.
281///
282Value *TailCallElim::CanTransformAccumulatorRecursion(Instruction *I,
283 CallInst *CI) {
284 if (!I->isAssociative()) return 0;
285 assert(I->getNumOperands() == 2 &&
286 "Associative operations should have 2 args!");
287
288 // Exactly one operand should be the result of the call instruction...
Anton Korobeynikov07e6e562008-02-20 11:26:25 +0000289 if ((I->getOperand(0) == CI && I->getOperand(1) == CI) ||
290 (I->getOperand(0) != CI && I->getOperand(1) != CI))
Chris Lattner543d6222003-12-08 23:19:26 +0000291 return 0;
292
293 // The only user of this instruction we allow is a single return instruction.
294 if (!I->hasOneUse() || !isa<ReturnInst>(I->use_back()))
295 return 0;
296
297 // Ok, now we have to check all of the other return instructions in this
298 // function. If they return non-constants or differing values, then we cannot
299 // transform the function safely.
Chris Lattnerd64152a2003-12-14 23:57:39 +0000300 return getCommonReturnValue(cast<ReturnInst>(I->use_back()), CI);
Chris Lattner543d6222003-12-08 23:19:26 +0000301}
302
Chris Lattner7152da32003-12-08 05:34:54 +0000303bool TailCallElim::ProcessReturningBlock(ReturnInst *Ret, BasicBlock *&OldEntry,
Chris Lattnerce869ee2005-08-07 04:27:41 +0000304 bool &TailCallsAreMarkedTail,
305 std::vector<PHINode*> &ArgumentPHIs,
306 bool CannotTailCallElimCallsMarkedTail) {
Chris Lattner7152da32003-12-08 05:34:54 +0000307 BasicBlock *BB = Ret->getParent();
308 Function *F = BB->getParent();
309
310 if (&BB->front() == Ret) // Make sure there is something before the ret...
311 return false;
Chris Lattner8d9455d2007-09-10 20:58:55 +0000312
313 // If the return is in the entry block, then making this transformation would
314 // turn infinite recursion into an infinite loop. This transformation is ok
315 // in theory, but breaks some code like:
316 // double fabs(double f) { return __builtin_fabs(f); } // a 'fabs' call
317 // disable this xform in this case, because the code generator will lower the
318 // call to fabs into inline code.
319 if (BB == &F->getEntryBlock())
320 return false;
Chris Lattner7152da32003-12-08 05:34:54 +0000321
322 // Scan backwards from the return, checking to see if there is a tail call in
323 // this block. If so, set CI to it.
324 CallInst *CI;
325 BasicBlock::iterator BBI = Ret;
326 while (1) {
327 CI = dyn_cast<CallInst>(BBI);
328 if (CI && CI->getCalledFunction() == F)
329 break;
330
331 if (BBI == BB->begin())
332 return false; // Didn't find a potential tail call.
333 --BBI;
334 }
335
Chris Lattnerce869ee2005-08-07 04:27:41 +0000336 // If this call is marked as a tail call, and if there are dynamic allocas in
337 // the function, we cannot perform this optimization.
338 if (CI->isTailCall() && CannotTailCallElimCallsMarkedTail)
339 return false;
340
Chris Lattner543d6222003-12-08 23:19:26 +0000341 // If we are introducing accumulator recursion to eliminate associative
342 // operations after the call instruction, this variable contains the initial
343 // value for the accumulator. If this value is set, we actually perform
344 // accumulator recursion elimination instead of simple tail recursion
345 // elimination.
346 Value *AccumulatorRecursionEliminationInitVal = 0;
347 Instruction *AccumulatorRecursionInstr = 0;
348
Chris Lattner7152da32003-12-08 05:34:54 +0000349 // Ok, we found a potential tail call. We can currently only transform the
350 // tail call if all of the instructions between the call and the return are
351 // movable to above the call itself, leaving the call next to the return.
352 // Check that this is the case now.
353 for (BBI = CI, ++BBI; &*BBI != Ret; ++BBI)
Chris Lattner543d6222003-12-08 23:19:26 +0000354 if (!CanMoveAboveCall(BBI, CI)) {
355 // If we can't move the instruction above the call, it might be because it
356 // is an associative operation that could be tranformed using accumulator
357 // recursion elimination. Check to see if this is the case, and if so,
358 // remember the initial accumulator value for later.
359 if ((AccumulatorRecursionEliminationInitVal =
360 CanTransformAccumulatorRecursion(BBI, CI))) {
361 // Yes, this is accumulator recursion. Remember which instruction
362 // accumulates.
363 AccumulatorRecursionInstr = BBI;
364 } else {
365 return false; // Otherwise, we cannot eliminate the tail recursion!
366 }
367 }
Chris Lattner7152da32003-12-08 05:34:54 +0000368
369 // We can only transform call/return pairs that either ignore the return value
Chris Lattnerd64152a2003-12-14 23:57:39 +0000370 // of the call and return void, ignore the value of the call and return a
371 // constant, return the value returned by the tail call, or that are being
372 // accumulator recursion variable eliminated.
Devang Patel826c4912008-03-11 17:33:32 +0000373 if (Ret->getNumOperands() == 1 && Ret->getReturnValue() != CI &&
Chris Lattner3b5f4502005-11-05 08:21:11 +0000374 !isa<UndefValue>(Ret->getReturnValue()) &&
Chris Lattnerd64152a2003-12-14 23:57:39 +0000375 AccumulatorRecursionEliminationInitVal == 0 &&
376 !getCommonReturnValue(Ret, CI))
Chris Lattner7152da32003-12-08 05:34:54 +0000377 return false;
378
379 // OK! We can transform this tail call. If this is the first one found,
380 // create the new entry block, allowing us to branch back to the old entry.
381 if (OldEntry == 0) {
382 OldEntry = &F->getEntryBlock();
Gabor Greif051a9502008-04-06 20:25:17 +0000383 BasicBlock *NewEntry = BasicBlock::Create("", F, OldEntry);
Chris Lattner6934a042007-02-11 01:23:03 +0000384 NewEntry->takeName(OldEntry);
385 OldEntry->setName("tailrecurse");
Gabor Greif051a9502008-04-06 20:25:17 +0000386 BranchInst::Create(OldEntry, NewEntry);
Misha Brukmanfd939082005-04-21 23:48:37 +0000387
Chris Lattnerce869ee2005-08-07 04:27:41 +0000388 // If this tail call is marked 'tail' and if there are any allocas in the
389 // entry block, move them up to the new entry block.
390 TailCallsAreMarkedTail = CI->isTailCall();
391 if (TailCallsAreMarkedTail)
392 // Move all fixed sized allocas from OldEntry to NewEntry.
393 for (BasicBlock::iterator OEBI = OldEntry->begin(), E = OldEntry->end(),
394 NEBI = NewEntry->begin(); OEBI != E; )
395 if (AllocaInst *AI = dyn_cast<AllocaInst>(OEBI++))
396 if (isa<ConstantInt>(AI->getArraySize()))
Chris Lattner4bc5f802005-08-08 19:11:57 +0000397 AI->moveBefore(NEBI);
Chris Lattnerce869ee2005-08-07 04:27:41 +0000398
Chris Lattner7152da32003-12-08 05:34:54 +0000399 // Now that we have created a new block, which jumps to the entry
400 // block, insert a PHI node for each argument of the function.
401 // For now, we initialize each PHI to only have the real arguments
402 // which are passed in.
403 Instruction *InsertPos = OldEntry->begin();
Chris Lattner7f78f212005-05-09 23:51:13 +0000404 for (Function::arg_iterator I = F->arg_begin(), E = F->arg_end();
405 I != E; ++I) {
Gabor Greifb1dbcd82008-05-15 10:04:30 +0000406 PHINode *PN = PHINode::Create(I->getType(),
407 I->getName() + ".tr", InsertPos);
Chris Lattner7152da32003-12-08 05:34:54 +0000408 I->replaceAllUsesWith(PN); // Everyone use the PHI node now!
409 PN->addIncoming(I, NewEntry);
410 ArgumentPHIs.push_back(PN);
411 }
412 }
Misha Brukmanfd939082005-04-21 23:48:37 +0000413
Chris Lattnerce869ee2005-08-07 04:27:41 +0000414 // If this function has self recursive calls in the tail position where some
415 // are marked tail and some are not, only transform one flavor or another. We
416 // have to choose whether we move allocas in the entry block to the new entry
417 // block or not, so we can't make a good choice for both. NOTE: We could do
418 // slightly better here in the case that the function has no entry block
419 // allocas.
420 if (TailCallsAreMarkedTail && !CI->isTailCall())
421 return false;
422
Chris Lattner7152da32003-12-08 05:34:54 +0000423 // Ok, now that we know we have a pseudo-entry block WITH all of the
424 // required PHI nodes, add entries into the PHI node for the actual
425 // parameters passed into the tail-recursive call.
426 for (unsigned i = 0, e = CI->getNumOperands()-1; i != e; ++i)
427 ArgumentPHIs[i]->addIncoming(CI->getOperand(i+1), BB);
Misha Brukmanfd939082005-04-21 23:48:37 +0000428
Chris Lattner543d6222003-12-08 23:19:26 +0000429 // If we are introducing an accumulator variable to eliminate the recursion,
430 // do so now. Note that we _know_ that no subsequent tail recursion
431 // eliminations will happen on this function because of the way the
432 // accumulator recursion predicate is set up.
433 //
434 if (AccumulatorRecursionEliminationInitVal) {
435 Instruction *AccRecInstr = AccumulatorRecursionInstr;
436 // Start by inserting a new PHI node for the accumulator.
Gabor Greif051a9502008-04-06 20:25:17 +0000437 PHINode *AccPN = PHINode::Create(AccRecInstr->getType(), "accumulator.tr",
438 OldEntry->begin());
Chris Lattner543d6222003-12-08 23:19:26 +0000439
440 // Loop over all of the predecessors of the tail recursion block. For the
441 // real entry into the function we seed the PHI with the initial value,
442 // computed earlier. For any other existing branches to this block (due to
443 // other tail recursions eliminated) the accumulator is not modified.
444 // Because we haven't added the branch in the current block to OldEntry yet,
445 // it will not show up as a predecessor.
446 for (pred_iterator PI = pred_begin(OldEntry), PE = pred_end(OldEntry);
447 PI != PE; ++PI) {
448 if (*PI == &F->getEntryBlock())
449 AccPN->addIncoming(AccumulatorRecursionEliminationInitVal, *PI);
450 else
451 AccPN->addIncoming(AccPN, *PI);
452 }
453
454 // Add an incoming argument for the current block, which is computed by our
455 // associative accumulator instruction.
456 AccPN->addIncoming(AccRecInstr, BB);
457
458 // Next, rewrite the accumulator recursion instruction so that it does not
459 // use the result of the call anymore, instead, use the PHI node we just
460 // inserted.
461 AccRecInstr->setOperand(AccRecInstr->getOperand(0) != CI, AccPN);
462
463 // Finally, rewrite any return instructions in the program to return the PHI
464 // node instead of the "initval" that they do currently. This loop will
465 // actually rewrite the return value we are destroying, but that's ok.
466 for (Function::iterator BBI = F->begin(), E = F->end(); BBI != E; ++BBI)
467 if (ReturnInst *RI = dyn_cast<ReturnInst>(BBI->getTerminator()))
468 RI->setOperand(0, AccPN);
469 ++NumAccumAdded;
470 }
471
Chris Lattner7152da32003-12-08 05:34:54 +0000472 // Now that all of the PHI nodes are in place, remove the call and
473 // ret instructions, replacing them with an unconditional branch.
Gabor Greif051a9502008-04-06 20:25:17 +0000474 BranchInst::Create(OldEntry, Ret);
Chris Lattner7152da32003-12-08 05:34:54 +0000475 BB->getInstList().erase(Ret); // Remove return.
476 BB->getInstList().erase(CI); // Remove call.
Chris Lattner543d6222003-12-08 23:19:26 +0000477 ++NumEliminated;
Chris Lattner7152da32003-12-08 05:34:54 +0000478 return true;
479}