blob: 3a71d279772a1124e930053b29e67950ebbb1e0d [file] [log] [blame]
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001//===- LoopStrengthReduce.cpp - Strength Reduce IVs in Loops --------------===//
Misha Brukmanfd939082005-04-21 23:48:37 +00002//
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +00003// The LLVM Compiler Infrastructure
4//
Chris Lattner4ee451d2007-12-29 20:36:04 +00005// This file is distributed under the University of Illinois Open Source
6// License. See LICENSE.TXT for details.
Misha Brukmanfd939082005-04-21 23:48:37 +00007//
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +00008//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
9//
Dan Gohmancec8f9d2009-05-19 20:37:36 +000010// This transformation analyzes and transforms the induction variables (and
11// computations derived from them) into forms suitable for efficient execution
12// on the target.
13//
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +000014// This pass performs a strength reduction on array references inside loops that
Dan Gohmancec8f9d2009-05-19 20:37:36 +000015// have as one or more of their components the loop induction variable, it
16// rewrites expressions to take advantage of scaled-index addressing modes
17// available on the target, and it performs a variety of other optimizations
18// related to loop induction variables.
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +000019//
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +000020//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
21
Chris Lattnerbe3e5212005-08-03 23:30:08 +000022#define DEBUG_TYPE "loop-reduce"
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +000023#include "llvm/Transforms/Scalar.h"
24#include "llvm/Constants.h"
25#include "llvm/Instructions.h"
Dan Gohmane5b01be2007-05-04 14:59:09 +000026#include "llvm/IntrinsicInst.h"
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +000027#include "llvm/Type.h"
Jeff Cohen2f3c9b72005-03-04 04:04:26 +000028#include "llvm/DerivedTypes.h"
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +000029#include "llvm/Analysis/Dominators.h"
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +000030#include "llvm/Analysis/IVUsers.h"
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +000031#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopInfo.h"
Devang Patel0f54dcb2007-03-06 21:14:09 +000032#include "llvm/Analysis/LoopPass.h"
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +000033#include "llvm/Analysis/ScalarEvolutionExpander.h"
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +000034#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/AddrModeMatcher.h"
Chris Lattnere0391be2005-08-12 22:06:11 +000035#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/BasicBlockUtils.h"
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +000036#include "llvm/Transforms/Utils/Local.h"
37#include "llvm/ADT/Statistic.h"
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +000038#include "llvm/Support/CFG.h"
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +000039#include "llvm/Support/Debug.h"
Chris Lattnera4f0b3a2006-08-27 12:54:02 +000040#include "llvm/Support/Compiler.h"
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +000041#include "llvm/Support/CommandLine.h"
Dan Gohmanafc36a92009-05-02 18:29:22 +000042#include "llvm/Support/ValueHandle.h"
Evan Chengd277f2c2006-03-13 23:14:23 +000043#include "llvm/Target/TargetLowering.h"
Jeff Cohencfb1d422005-07-30 18:22:27 +000044#include <algorithm>
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +000045using namespace llvm;
46
Dan Gohman13317bc2009-04-16 16:46:01 +000047STATISTIC(NumReduced , "Number of IV uses strength reduced");
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +000048STATISTIC(NumInserted, "Number of PHIs inserted");
49STATISTIC(NumVariable, "Number of PHIs with variable strides");
Devang Patel54153272008-08-27 17:50:18 +000050STATISTIC(NumEliminated, "Number of strides eliminated");
51STATISTIC(NumShadow, "Number of Shadow IVs optimized");
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +000052STATISTIC(NumImmSunk, "Number of common expr immediates sunk into uses");
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +000053STATISTIC(NumLoopCond, "Number of loop terminating conds optimized");
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +000054
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +000055static cl::opt<bool> EnableFullLSRMode("enable-full-lsr",
56 cl::init(false),
57 cl::Hidden);
58
Chris Lattner0e5f4992006-12-19 21:40:18 +000059namespace {
Dale Johannesendc42f482007-03-20 00:47:50 +000060
Jeff Cohenc01a5302007-03-20 20:43:18 +000061 struct BasedUser;
Dale Johannesendc42f482007-03-20 00:47:50 +000062
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +000063 /// IVInfo - This structure keeps track of one IV expression inserted during
Evan Cheng21495772006-03-18 08:03:12 +000064 /// StrengthReduceStridedIVUsers. It contains the stride, the common base, as
65 /// well as the PHI node and increment value created for rewrite.
Reid Spencer9133fe22007-02-05 23:32:05 +000066 struct VISIBILITY_HIDDEN IVExpr {
Evan Cheng21495772006-03-18 08:03:12 +000067 SCEVHandle Stride;
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +000068 SCEVHandle Base;
69 PHINode *PHI;
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +000070
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +000071 IVExpr(const SCEVHandle &stride, const SCEVHandle &base, PHINode *phi)
72 : Stride(stride), Base(base), PHI(phi) {}
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +000073 };
74
75 /// IVsOfOneStride - This structure keeps track of all IV expression inserted
76 /// during StrengthReduceStridedIVUsers for a particular stride of the IV.
Reid Spencer9133fe22007-02-05 23:32:05 +000077 struct VISIBILITY_HIDDEN IVsOfOneStride {
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +000078 std::vector<IVExpr> IVs;
79
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +000080 void addIV(const SCEVHandle &Stride, const SCEVHandle &Base, PHINode *PHI) {
81 IVs.push_back(IVExpr(Stride, Base, PHI));
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +000082 }
83 };
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +000084
Devang Patel0f54dcb2007-03-06 21:14:09 +000085 class VISIBILITY_HIDDEN LoopStrengthReduce : public LoopPass {
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +000086 IVUsers *IU;
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +000087 LoopInfo *LI;
Devang Patelb7d9dfc2007-06-07 21:42:15 +000088 DominatorTree *DT;
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +000089 ScalarEvolution *SE;
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +000090 bool Changed;
Chris Lattner7e608bb2005-08-02 02:52:02 +000091
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +000092 /// IVsByStride - Keep track of all IVs that have been inserted for a
93 /// particular stride.
94 std::map<SCEVHandle, IVsOfOneStride> IVsByStride;
95
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +000096 /// StrideNoReuse - Keep track of all the strides whose ivs cannot be
97 /// reused (nor should they be rewritten to reuse other strides).
98 SmallSet<SCEVHandle, 4> StrideNoReuse;
99
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000100 /// DeadInsts - Keep track of instructions we may have made dead, so that
101 /// we can remove them after we are done working.
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +0000102 SmallVector<WeakVH, 16> DeadInsts;
Evan Chengd277f2c2006-03-13 23:14:23 +0000103
104 /// TLI - Keep a pointer of a TargetLowering to consult for determining
105 /// transformation profitability.
106 const TargetLowering *TLI;
107
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +0000108 public:
Devang Patel19974732007-05-03 01:11:54 +0000109 static char ID; // Pass ID, replacement for typeid
Dan Gohmanc2bbfc12007-08-01 15:32:29 +0000110 explicit LoopStrengthReduce(const TargetLowering *tli = NULL) :
Dan Gohmanae73dc12008-09-04 17:05:41 +0000111 LoopPass(&ID), TLI(tli) {
Jeff Cohen2f3c9b72005-03-04 04:04:26 +0000112 }
113
Devang Patel0f54dcb2007-03-06 21:14:09 +0000114 bool runOnLoop(Loop *L, LPPassManager &LPM);
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +0000115
116 virtual void getAnalysisUsage(AnalysisUsage &AU) const {
Chris Lattneraa96ae72005-08-17 06:35:16 +0000117 // We split critical edges, so we change the CFG. However, we do update
118 // many analyses if they are around.
119 AU.addPreservedID(LoopSimplifyID);
120 AU.addPreserved<LoopInfo>();
Chris Lattneraa96ae72005-08-17 06:35:16 +0000121 AU.addPreserved<DominanceFrontier>();
122 AU.addPreserved<DominatorTree>();
123
Jeff Cohenf465db62005-02-27 19:37:07 +0000124 AU.addRequiredID(LoopSimplifyID);
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +0000125 AU.addRequired<LoopInfo>();
Devang Patelb7d9dfc2007-06-07 21:42:15 +0000126 AU.addRequired<DominatorTree>();
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000127 AU.addRequired<ScalarEvolution>();
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +0000128 AU.addPreserved<ScalarEvolution>();
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +0000129 AU.addRequired<IVUsers>();
130 AU.addPreserved<IVUsers>();
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +0000131 }
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +0000132
Dan Gohman3d81e312009-05-01 16:56:32 +0000133 private:
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +0000134 ICmpInst *ChangeCompareStride(Loop *L, ICmpInst *Cond,
135 IVStrideUse* &CondUse,
136 const SCEVHandle* &CondStride);
Evan Cheng2d850522009-05-09 01:08:24 +0000137
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +0000138 void OptimizeIndvars(Loop *L);
Dale Johannesenc1acc3f2009-05-11 17:15:42 +0000139 void OptimizeLoopCountIV(Loop *L);
Evan Cheng2d850522009-05-09 01:08:24 +0000140 void OptimizeLoopTermCond(Loop *L);
141
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +0000142 /// OptimizeShadowIV - If IV is used in a int-to-float cast
143 /// inside the loop then try to eliminate the cast opeation.
144 void OptimizeShadowIV(Loop *L);
145
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +0000146 /// OptimizeSMax - Rewrite the loop's terminating condition
147 /// if it uses an smax computation.
148 ICmpInst *OptimizeSMax(Loop *L, ICmpInst *Cond,
149 IVStrideUse* &CondUse);
150
Devang Patelc677de22008-08-13 20:31:11 +0000151 bool FindIVUserForCond(ICmpInst *Cond, IVStrideUse *&CondUse,
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +0000152 const SCEVHandle *&CondStride);
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +0000153 bool RequiresTypeConversion(const Type *Ty, const Type *NewTy);
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000154 SCEVHandle CheckForIVReuse(bool, bool, bool, const SCEVHandle&,
Dan Gohman02e4fa72007-10-22 20:40:42 +0000155 IVExpr&, const Type*,
Dale Johannesendc42f482007-03-20 00:47:50 +0000156 const std::vector<BasedUser>& UsersToProcess);
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +0000157 bool ValidScale(bool, int64_t,
158 const std::vector<BasedUser>& UsersToProcess);
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +0000159 bool ValidOffset(bool, int64_t, int64_t,
160 const std::vector<BasedUser>& UsersToProcess);
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +0000161 SCEVHandle CollectIVUsers(const SCEVHandle &Stride,
162 IVUsersOfOneStride &Uses,
163 Loop *L,
164 bool &AllUsesAreAddresses,
Dale Johannesenb0390622008-12-16 22:16:28 +0000165 bool &AllUsesAreOutsideLoop,
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +0000166 std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess);
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +0000167 bool ShouldUseFullStrengthReductionMode(
168 const std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess,
169 const Loop *L,
170 bool AllUsesAreAddresses,
171 SCEVHandle Stride);
172 void PrepareToStrengthReduceFully(
173 std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess,
174 SCEVHandle Stride,
175 SCEVHandle CommonExprs,
176 const Loop *L,
177 SCEVExpander &PreheaderRewriter);
178 void PrepareToStrengthReduceFromSmallerStride(
179 std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess,
180 Value *CommonBaseV,
181 const IVExpr &ReuseIV,
182 Instruction *PreInsertPt);
183 void PrepareToStrengthReduceWithNewPhi(
184 std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess,
185 SCEVHandle Stride,
186 SCEVHandle CommonExprs,
187 Value *CommonBaseV,
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +0000188 Instruction *IVIncInsertPt,
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +0000189 const Loop *L,
190 SCEVExpander &PreheaderRewriter);
Chris Lattner50fad702005-08-10 00:45:21 +0000191 void StrengthReduceStridedIVUsers(const SCEVHandle &Stride,
192 IVUsersOfOneStride &Uses,
Dan Gohman9f4ac312009-03-09 20:41:15 +0000193 Loop *L);
Chris Lattnera68d4ca2008-12-01 06:14:28 +0000194 void DeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions();
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +0000195 };
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +0000196}
197
Dan Gohman844731a2008-05-13 00:00:25 +0000198char LoopStrengthReduce::ID = 0;
199static RegisterPass<LoopStrengthReduce>
200X("loop-reduce", "Loop Strength Reduction");
201
Daniel Dunbar394f0442008-10-22 23:32:42 +0000202Pass *llvm::createLoopStrengthReducePass(const TargetLowering *TLI) {
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +0000203 return new LoopStrengthReduce(TLI);
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +0000204}
205
206/// DeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions - If any of the instructions is the
207/// specified set are trivially dead, delete them and see if this makes any of
208/// their operands subsequently dead.
Chris Lattnera68d4ca2008-12-01 06:14:28 +0000209void LoopStrengthReduce::DeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions() {
Chris Lattner09fb7da2008-12-01 06:27:41 +0000210 if (DeadInsts.empty()) return;
211
Chris Lattnera68d4ca2008-12-01 06:14:28 +0000212 while (!DeadInsts.empty()) {
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +0000213 Instruction *I = dyn_cast_or_null<Instruction>(DeadInsts.back());
Chris Lattnera68d4ca2008-12-01 06:14:28 +0000214 DeadInsts.pop_back();
Chris Lattner09fb7da2008-12-01 06:27:41 +0000215
216 if (I == 0 || !isInstructionTriviallyDead(I))
Chris Lattnerbfcee362008-12-01 06:11:32 +0000217 continue;
218
Chris Lattner09fb7da2008-12-01 06:27:41 +0000219 for (User::op_iterator OI = I->op_begin(), E = I->op_end(); OI != E; ++OI) {
220 if (Instruction *U = dyn_cast<Instruction>(*OI)) {
221 *OI = 0;
Chris Lattnerbfcee362008-12-01 06:11:32 +0000222 if (U->use_empty())
Chris Lattner09fb7da2008-12-01 06:27:41 +0000223 DeadInsts.push_back(U);
Bill Wendling411052b2008-11-29 03:43:04 +0000224 }
225 }
Chris Lattnerbfcee362008-12-01 06:11:32 +0000226
227 I->eraseFromParent();
228 Changed = true;
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +0000229 }
230}
231
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000232/// containsAddRecFromDifferentLoop - Determine whether expression S involves a
233/// subexpression that is an AddRec from a loop other than L. An outer loop
234/// of L is OK, but not an inner loop nor a disjoint loop.
235static bool containsAddRecFromDifferentLoop(SCEVHandle S, Loop *L) {
236 // This is very common, put it first.
237 if (isa<SCEVConstant>(S))
238 return false;
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +0000239 if (const SCEVCommutativeExpr *AE = dyn_cast<SCEVCommutativeExpr>(S)) {
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000240 for (unsigned int i=0; i< AE->getNumOperands(); i++)
241 if (containsAddRecFromDifferentLoop(AE->getOperand(i), L))
242 return true;
243 return false;
244 }
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +0000245 if (const SCEVAddRecExpr *AE = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(S)) {
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000246 if (const Loop *newLoop = AE->getLoop()) {
247 if (newLoop == L)
248 return false;
249 // if newLoop is an outer loop of L, this is OK.
250 if (!LoopInfoBase<BasicBlock>::isNotAlreadyContainedIn(L, newLoop))
251 return false;
252 }
253 return true;
254 }
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +0000255 if (const SCEVUDivExpr *DE = dyn_cast<SCEVUDivExpr>(S))
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000256 return containsAddRecFromDifferentLoop(DE->getLHS(), L) ||
257 containsAddRecFromDifferentLoop(DE->getRHS(), L);
258#if 0
259 // SCEVSDivExpr has been backed out temporarily, but will be back; we'll
260 // need this when it is.
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +0000261 if (const SCEVSDivExpr *DE = dyn_cast<SCEVSDivExpr>(S))
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000262 return containsAddRecFromDifferentLoop(DE->getLHS(), L) ||
263 containsAddRecFromDifferentLoop(DE->getRHS(), L);
264#endif
Dan Gohman84923602009-04-21 01:25:57 +0000265 if (const SCEVCastExpr *CE = dyn_cast<SCEVCastExpr>(S))
266 return containsAddRecFromDifferentLoop(CE->getOperand(), L);
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000267 return false;
268}
269
Dan Gohmanf284ce22009-02-18 00:08:39 +0000270/// isAddressUse - Returns true if the specified instruction is using the
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000271/// specified value as an address.
272static bool isAddressUse(Instruction *Inst, Value *OperandVal) {
273 bool isAddress = isa<LoadInst>(Inst);
274 if (StoreInst *SI = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(Inst)) {
275 if (SI->getOperand(1) == OperandVal)
276 isAddress = true;
277 } else if (IntrinsicInst *II = dyn_cast<IntrinsicInst>(Inst)) {
278 // Addressing modes can also be folded into prefetches and a variety
279 // of intrinsics.
280 switch (II->getIntrinsicID()) {
281 default: break;
282 case Intrinsic::prefetch:
283 case Intrinsic::x86_sse2_loadu_dq:
284 case Intrinsic::x86_sse2_loadu_pd:
285 case Intrinsic::x86_sse_loadu_ps:
286 case Intrinsic::x86_sse_storeu_ps:
287 case Intrinsic::x86_sse2_storeu_pd:
288 case Intrinsic::x86_sse2_storeu_dq:
289 case Intrinsic::x86_sse2_storel_dq:
290 if (II->getOperand(1) == OperandVal)
291 isAddress = true;
292 break;
293 }
294 }
295 return isAddress;
296}
Chris Lattner0ae33eb2005-10-03 01:04:44 +0000297
Dan Gohman21e77222009-03-09 21:01:17 +0000298/// getAccessType - Return the type of the memory being accessed.
299static const Type *getAccessType(const Instruction *Inst) {
Dan Gohmana537bf82009-05-18 16:45:28 +0000300 const Type *AccessTy = Inst->getType();
Dan Gohman21e77222009-03-09 21:01:17 +0000301 if (const StoreInst *SI = dyn_cast<StoreInst>(Inst))
Dan Gohmana537bf82009-05-18 16:45:28 +0000302 AccessTy = SI->getOperand(0)->getType();
Dan Gohman21e77222009-03-09 21:01:17 +0000303 else if (const IntrinsicInst *II = dyn_cast<IntrinsicInst>(Inst)) {
304 // Addressing modes can also be folded into prefetches and a variety
305 // of intrinsics.
306 switch (II->getIntrinsicID()) {
307 default: break;
308 case Intrinsic::x86_sse_storeu_ps:
309 case Intrinsic::x86_sse2_storeu_pd:
310 case Intrinsic::x86_sse2_storeu_dq:
311 case Intrinsic::x86_sse2_storel_dq:
Dan Gohmana537bf82009-05-18 16:45:28 +0000312 AccessTy = II->getOperand(1)->getType();
Dan Gohman21e77222009-03-09 21:01:17 +0000313 break;
314 }
315 }
Dan Gohmana537bf82009-05-18 16:45:28 +0000316 return AccessTy;
Dan Gohman21e77222009-03-09 21:01:17 +0000317}
318
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000319namespace {
320 /// BasedUser - For a particular base value, keep information about how we've
321 /// partitioned the expression so far.
322 struct BasedUser {
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000323 /// SE - The current ScalarEvolution object.
324 ScalarEvolution *SE;
325
Chris Lattnera553b0c2005-08-08 22:56:21 +0000326 /// Base - The Base value for the PHI node that needs to be inserted for
327 /// this use. As the use is processed, information gets moved from this
328 /// field to the Imm field (below). BasedUser values are sorted by this
329 /// field.
330 SCEVHandle Base;
331
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000332 /// Inst - The instruction using the induction variable.
333 Instruction *Inst;
334
Chris Lattnerec3fb632005-08-03 22:21:05 +0000335 /// OperandValToReplace - The operand value of Inst to replace with the
336 /// EmittedBase.
337 Value *OperandValToReplace;
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000338
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +0000339 /// isSigned - The stride (and thus also the Base) of this use may be in
340 /// a narrower type than the use itself (OperandValToReplace->getType()).
341 /// When this is the case, the isSigned field indicates whether the
342 /// IV expression should be signed-extended instead of zero-extended to
343 /// fit the type of the use.
344 bool isSigned;
345
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000346 /// Imm - The immediate value that should be added to the base immediately
347 /// before Inst, because it will be folded into the imm field of the
Dan Gohman33e3a362009-02-20 20:29:04 +0000348 /// instruction. This is also sometimes used for loop-variant values that
349 /// must be added inside the loop.
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000350 SCEVHandle Imm;
351
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +0000352 /// Phi - The induction variable that performs the striding that
353 /// should be used for this user.
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +0000354 PHINode *Phi;
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +0000355
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +0000356 // isUseOfPostIncrementedValue - True if this should use the
357 // post-incremented version of this IV, not the preincremented version.
358 // This can only be set in special cases, such as the terminating setcc
Chris Lattnerc6bae652005-09-12 06:04:47 +0000359 // instruction for a loop and uses outside the loop that are dominated by
360 // the loop.
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +0000361 bool isUseOfPostIncrementedValue;
Chris Lattnera553b0c2005-08-08 22:56:21 +0000362
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000363 BasedUser(IVStrideUse &IVSU, ScalarEvolution *se)
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +0000364 : SE(se), Base(IVSU.getOffset()), Inst(IVSU.getUser()),
365 OperandValToReplace(IVSU.getOperandValToReplace()),
366 isSigned(IVSU.isSigned()),
Dale Johannesen308f24d2008-12-03 22:43:56 +0000367 Imm(SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Base->getType())),
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +0000368 isUseOfPostIncrementedValue(IVSU.isUseOfPostIncrementedValue()) {}
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000369
Chris Lattner2114b272005-08-04 20:03:32 +0000370 // Once we rewrite the code to insert the new IVs we want, update the
371 // operands of Inst to use the new expression 'NewBase', with 'Imm' added
372 // to it.
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +0000373 void RewriteInstructionToUseNewBase(const SCEVHandle &NewBase,
Dan Gohmanf20d70d2008-05-15 23:26:57 +0000374 Instruction *InsertPt,
Evan Cheng0e0014d2007-10-30 23:45:15 +0000375 SCEVExpander &Rewriter, Loop *L, Pass *P,
Dan Gohman5be18e82009-05-19 02:15:55 +0000376 LoopInfo &LI,
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +0000377 SmallVectorImpl<WeakVH> &DeadInsts);
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000378
379 Value *InsertCodeForBaseAtPosition(const SCEVHandle &NewBase,
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +0000380 const Type *Ty,
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000381 SCEVExpander &Rewriter,
Dan Gohman5be18e82009-05-19 02:15:55 +0000382 Instruction *IP, Loop *L,
383 LoopInfo &LI);
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000384 void dump() const;
385 };
386}
387
388void BasedUser::dump() const {
Bill Wendlinge8156192006-12-07 01:30:32 +0000389 cerr << " Base=" << *Base;
390 cerr << " Imm=" << *Imm;
Bill Wendlinge8156192006-12-07 01:30:32 +0000391 cerr << " Inst: " << *Inst;
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000392}
393
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000394Value *BasedUser::InsertCodeForBaseAtPosition(const SCEVHandle &NewBase,
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +0000395 const Type *Ty,
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000396 SCEVExpander &Rewriter,
Dan Gohman5be18e82009-05-19 02:15:55 +0000397 Instruction *IP, Loop *L,
398 LoopInfo &LI) {
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000399 // Figure out where we *really* want to insert this code. In particular, if
400 // the user is inside of a loop that is nested inside of L, we really don't
401 // want to insert this expression before the user, we'd rather pull it out as
402 // many loops as possible.
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000403 Instruction *BaseInsertPt = IP;
404
405 // Figure out the most-nested loop that IP is in.
406 Loop *InsertLoop = LI.getLoopFor(IP->getParent());
407
408 // If InsertLoop is not L, and InsertLoop is nested inside of L, figure out
409 // the preheader of the outer-most loop where NewBase is not loop invariant.
Dale Johanneseneccdd082008-12-02 18:40:09 +0000410 if (L->contains(IP->getParent()))
411 while (InsertLoop && NewBase->isLoopInvariant(InsertLoop)) {
412 BaseInsertPt = InsertLoop->getLoopPreheader()->getTerminator();
413 InsertLoop = InsertLoop->getParentLoop();
414 }
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000415
Dan Gohman5be18e82009-05-19 02:15:55 +0000416 Value *Base = Rewriter.expandCodeFor(NewBase, 0, BaseInsertPt);
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +0000417
418 SCEVHandle NewValSCEV = SE->getUnknown(Base);
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +0000419
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000420 // If there is no immediate value, skip the next part.
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +0000421 if (!Imm->isZero()) {
422 // If we are inserting the base and imm values in the same block, make sure
423 // to adjust the IP position if insertion reused a result.
424 if (IP == BaseInsertPt)
425 IP = Rewriter.getInsertionPoint();
Chris Lattnerb47f6122007-06-06 01:23:55 +0000426
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +0000427 // Always emit the immediate (if non-zero) into the same block as the user.
428 NewValSCEV = SE->getAddExpr(NewValSCEV, Imm);
429 }
430
431 if (isSigned)
432 NewValSCEV = SE->getTruncateOrSignExtend(NewValSCEV, Ty);
433 else
434 NewValSCEV = SE->getTruncateOrZeroExtend(NewValSCEV, Ty);
435
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +0000436 return Rewriter.expandCodeFor(NewValSCEV, Ty, IP);
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000437}
438
439
Chris Lattner2114b272005-08-04 20:03:32 +0000440// Once we rewrite the code to insert the new IVs we want, update the
441// operands of Inst to use the new expression 'NewBase', with 'Imm' added
Dan Gohmanf20d70d2008-05-15 23:26:57 +0000442// to it. NewBasePt is the last instruction which contributes to the
443// value of NewBase in the case that it's a diffferent instruction from
444// the PHI that NewBase is computed from, or null otherwise.
445//
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +0000446void BasedUser::RewriteInstructionToUseNewBase(const SCEVHandle &NewBase,
Dan Gohmanf20d70d2008-05-15 23:26:57 +0000447 Instruction *NewBasePt,
Evan Cheng0e0014d2007-10-30 23:45:15 +0000448 SCEVExpander &Rewriter, Loop *L, Pass *P,
Dan Gohman5be18e82009-05-19 02:15:55 +0000449 LoopInfo &LI,
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +0000450 SmallVectorImpl<WeakVH> &DeadInsts) {
Chris Lattner2114b272005-08-04 20:03:32 +0000451 if (!isa<PHINode>(Inst)) {
Chris Lattnerc5494af2007-04-13 20:42:26 +0000452 // By default, insert code at the user instruction.
453 BasicBlock::iterator InsertPt = Inst;
454
455 // However, if the Operand is itself an instruction, the (potentially
456 // complex) inserted code may be shared by many users. Because of this, we
457 // want to emit code for the computation of the operand right before its old
458 // computation. This is usually safe, because we obviously used to use the
459 // computation when it was computed in its current block. However, in some
460 // cases (e.g. use of a post-incremented induction variable) the NewBase
461 // value will be pinned to live somewhere after the original computation.
462 // In this case, we have to back off.
Chris Lattnerf8828eb2008-12-02 04:52:26 +0000463 //
464 // If this is a use outside the loop (which means after, since it is based
465 // on a loop indvar) we use the post-incremented value, so that we don't
466 // artificially make the preinc value live out the bottom of the loop.
Dale Johannesen589bf082008-12-01 22:00:01 +0000467 if (!isUseOfPostIncrementedValue && L->contains(Inst->getParent())) {
Dan Gohmanca756ae2008-05-20 03:01:48 +0000468 if (NewBasePt && isa<PHINode>(OperandValToReplace)) {
Dan Gohmanf20d70d2008-05-15 23:26:57 +0000469 InsertPt = NewBasePt;
470 ++InsertPt;
Gabor Greif6725cb52008-06-11 21:38:51 +0000471 } else if (Instruction *OpInst
472 = dyn_cast<Instruction>(OperandValToReplace)) {
Chris Lattnerc5494af2007-04-13 20:42:26 +0000473 InsertPt = OpInst;
474 while (isa<PHINode>(InsertPt)) ++InsertPt;
475 }
476 }
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +0000477 Value *NewVal = InsertCodeForBaseAtPosition(NewBase,
478 OperandValToReplace->getType(),
Dan Gohman5be18e82009-05-19 02:15:55 +0000479 Rewriter, InsertPt, L, LI);
Chris Lattner2114b272005-08-04 20:03:32 +0000480 // Replace the use of the operand Value with the new Phi we just created.
481 Inst->replaceUsesOfWith(OperandValToReplace, NewVal);
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +0000482
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +0000483 DOUT << " Replacing with ";
Dan Gohman4a359ea2009-02-19 19:32:06 +0000484 DEBUG(WriteAsOperand(*DOUT, NewVal, /*PrintType=*/false));
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +0000485 DOUT << ", which has value " << *NewBase << " plus IMM " << *Imm << "\n";
Chris Lattner2114b272005-08-04 20:03:32 +0000486 return;
487 }
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +0000488
Chris Lattner2114b272005-08-04 20:03:32 +0000489 // PHI nodes are more complex. We have to insert one copy of the NewBase+Imm
Chris Lattnerc41e3452005-08-10 00:35:32 +0000490 // expression into each operand block that uses it. Note that PHI nodes can
491 // have multiple entries for the same predecessor. We use a map to make sure
492 // that a PHI node only has a single Value* for each predecessor (which also
493 // prevents us from inserting duplicate code in some blocks).
Evan Cheng83927722007-10-30 22:27:26 +0000494 DenseMap<BasicBlock*, Value*> InsertedCode;
Chris Lattner2114b272005-08-04 20:03:32 +0000495 PHINode *PN = cast<PHINode>(Inst);
496 for (unsigned i = 0, e = PN->getNumIncomingValues(); i != e; ++i) {
497 if (PN->getIncomingValue(i) == OperandValToReplace) {
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000498 // If the original expression is outside the loop, put the replacement
499 // code in the same place as the original expression,
500 // which need not be an immediate predecessor of this PHI. This way we
501 // need only one copy of it even if it is referenced multiple times in
502 // the PHI. We don't do this when the original expression is inside the
Dale Johannesen1de17d52009-02-09 22:14:15 +0000503 // loop because multiple copies sometimes do useful sinking of code in
504 // that case(?).
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000505 Instruction *OldLoc = dyn_cast<Instruction>(OperandValToReplace);
506 if (L->contains(OldLoc->getParent())) {
Dale Johannesen1de17d52009-02-09 22:14:15 +0000507 // If this is a critical edge, split the edge so that we do not insert
508 // the code on all predecessor/successor paths. We do this unless this
509 // is the canonical backedge for this loop, as this can make some
510 // inserted code be in an illegal position.
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000511 BasicBlock *PHIPred = PN->getIncomingBlock(i);
512 if (e != 1 && PHIPred->getTerminator()->getNumSuccessors() > 1 &&
513 (PN->getParent() != L->getHeader() || !L->contains(PHIPred))) {
Dale Johannesenf6727b02008-12-23 23:21:35 +0000514
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000515 // First step, split the critical edge.
516 SplitCriticalEdge(PHIPred, PN->getParent(), P, false);
517
518 // Next step: move the basic block. In particular, if the PHI node
519 // is outside of the loop, and PredTI is in the loop, we want to
520 // move the block to be immediately before the PHI block, not
521 // immediately after PredTI.
522 if (L->contains(PHIPred) && !L->contains(PN->getParent())) {
523 BasicBlock *NewBB = PN->getIncomingBlock(i);
524 NewBB->moveBefore(PN->getParent());
525 }
526
527 // Splitting the edge can reduce the number of PHI entries we have.
528 e = PN->getNumIncomingValues();
529 }
530 }
Chris Lattnerc41e3452005-08-10 00:35:32 +0000531 Value *&Code = InsertedCode[PN->getIncomingBlock(i)];
532 if (!Code) {
533 // Insert the code into the end of the predecessor block.
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +0000534 Instruction *InsertPt = (L->contains(OldLoc->getParent())) ?
535 PN->getIncomingBlock(i)->getTerminator() :
536 OldLoc->getParent()->getTerminator();
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +0000537 Code = InsertCodeForBaseAtPosition(NewBase, PN->getType(),
Dan Gohman5be18e82009-05-19 02:15:55 +0000538 Rewriter, InsertPt, L, LI);
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +0000539
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +0000540 DOUT << " Changing PHI use to ";
Dan Gohman4a359ea2009-02-19 19:32:06 +0000541 DEBUG(WriteAsOperand(*DOUT, Code, /*PrintType=*/false));
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +0000542 DOUT << ", which has value " << *NewBase << " plus IMM " << *Imm << "\n";
Chris Lattnerc41e3452005-08-10 00:35:32 +0000543 }
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +0000544
Chris Lattner2114b272005-08-04 20:03:32 +0000545 // Replace the use of the operand Value with the new Phi we just created.
Chris Lattnerc41e3452005-08-10 00:35:32 +0000546 PN->setIncomingValue(i, Code);
Chris Lattner2114b272005-08-04 20:03:32 +0000547 Rewriter.clear();
548 }
549 }
Evan Cheng0e0014d2007-10-30 23:45:15 +0000550
551 // PHI node might have become a constant value after SplitCriticalEdge.
Chris Lattner09fb7da2008-12-01 06:27:41 +0000552 DeadInsts.push_back(Inst);
Chris Lattner2114b272005-08-04 20:03:32 +0000553}
554
555
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000556/// fitsInAddressMode - Return true if V can be subsumed within an addressing
557/// mode, and does not need to be put in a register first.
Dan Gohmana537bf82009-05-18 16:45:28 +0000558static bool fitsInAddressMode(const SCEVHandle &V, const Type *AccessTy,
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000559 const TargetLowering *TLI, bool HasBaseReg) {
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +0000560 if (const SCEVConstant *SC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(V)) {
Evan Cheng5eef2d22007-03-12 23:27:37 +0000561 int64_t VC = SC->getValue()->getSExtValue();
Chris Lattner579633c2007-04-09 22:20:14 +0000562 if (TLI) {
563 TargetLowering::AddrMode AM;
564 AM.BaseOffs = VC;
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000565 AM.HasBaseReg = HasBaseReg;
Dan Gohmana537bf82009-05-18 16:45:28 +0000566 return TLI->isLegalAddressingMode(AM, AccessTy);
Chris Lattner579633c2007-04-09 22:20:14 +0000567 } else {
Evan Chengd277f2c2006-03-13 23:14:23 +0000568 // Defaults to PPC. PPC allows a sign-extended 16-bit immediate field.
Evan Cheng5eef2d22007-03-12 23:27:37 +0000569 return (VC > -(1 << 16) && VC < (1 << 16)-1);
Chris Lattner579633c2007-04-09 22:20:14 +0000570 }
Chris Lattner3821e472005-08-08 06:25:50 +0000571 }
Jeff Cohend29b6aa2005-07-30 18:33:25 +0000572
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +0000573 if (const SCEVUnknown *SU = dyn_cast<SCEVUnknown>(V))
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +0000574 if (GlobalValue *GV = dyn_cast<GlobalValue>(SU->getValue())) {
Dan Gohmancc2ad052009-05-01 16:29:14 +0000575 if (TLI) {
576 TargetLowering::AddrMode AM;
577 AM.BaseGV = GV;
578 AM.HasBaseReg = HasBaseReg;
Dan Gohmana537bf82009-05-18 16:45:28 +0000579 return TLI->isLegalAddressingMode(AM, AccessTy);
Dan Gohmancc2ad052009-05-01 16:29:14 +0000580 } else {
581 // Default: assume global addresses are not legal.
582 }
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +0000583 }
584
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000585 return false;
586}
587
Dale Johannesen544e0d02008-12-03 20:56:12 +0000588/// MoveLoopVariantsToImmediateField - Move any subexpressions from Val that are
Chris Lattner44b807e2005-08-08 22:32:34 +0000589/// loop varying to the Imm operand.
Dale Johannesen544e0d02008-12-03 20:56:12 +0000590static void MoveLoopVariantsToImmediateField(SCEVHandle &Val, SCEVHandle &Imm,
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +0000591 Loop *L, ScalarEvolution *SE) {
Chris Lattner44b807e2005-08-08 22:32:34 +0000592 if (Val->isLoopInvariant(L)) return; // Nothing to do.
593
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +0000594 if (const SCEVAddExpr *SAE = dyn_cast<SCEVAddExpr>(Val)) {
Chris Lattner44b807e2005-08-08 22:32:34 +0000595 std::vector<SCEVHandle> NewOps;
596 NewOps.reserve(SAE->getNumOperands());
597
598 for (unsigned i = 0; i != SAE->getNumOperands(); ++i)
599 if (!SAE->getOperand(i)->isLoopInvariant(L)) {
600 // If this is a loop-variant expression, it must stay in the immediate
601 // field of the expression.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000602 Imm = SE->getAddExpr(Imm, SAE->getOperand(i));
Chris Lattner44b807e2005-08-08 22:32:34 +0000603 } else {
604 NewOps.push_back(SAE->getOperand(i));
605 }
606
607 if (NewOps.empty())
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000608 Val = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Val->getType());
Chris Lattner44b807e2005-08-08 22:32:34 +0000609 else
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000610 Val = SE->getAddExpr(NewOps);
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +0000611 } else if (const SCEVAddRecExpr *SARE = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Val)) {
Chris Lattner44b807e2005-08-08 22:32:34 +0000612 // Try to pull immediates out of the start value of nested addrec's.
613 SCEVHandle Start = SARE->getStart();
Dale Johannesen544e0d02008-12-03 20:56:12 +0000614 MoveLoopVariantsToImmediateField(Start, Imm, L, SE);
Chris Lattner44b807e2005-08-08 22:32:34 +0000615
616 std::vector<SCEVHandle> Ops(SARE->op_begin(), SARE->op_end());
617 Ops[0] = Start;
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000618 Val = SE->getAddRecExpr(Ops, SARE->getLoop());
Chris Lattner44b807e2005-08-08 22:32:34 +0000619 } else {
620 // Otherwise, all of Val is variant, move the whole thing over.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000621 Imm = SE->getAddExpr(Imm, Val);
622 Val = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Val->getType());
Chris Lattner44b807e2005-08-08 22:32:34 +0000623 }
624}
625
626
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000627/// MoveImmediateValues - Look at Val, and pull out any additions of constants
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000628/// that can fit into the immediate field of instructions in the target.
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000629/// Accumulate these immediate values into the Imm value.
Evan Chengd277f2c2006-03-13 23:14:23 +0000630static void MoveImmediateValues(const TargetLowering *TLI,
Dan Gohmana537bf82009-05-18 16:45:28 +0000631 const Type *AccessTy,
Evan Chengd277f2c2006-03-13 23:14:23 +0000632 SCEVHandle &Val, SCEVHandle &Imm,
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000633 bool isAddress, Loop *L,
634 ScalarEvolution *SE) {
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +0000635 if (const SCEVAddExpr *SAE = dyn_cast<SCEVAddExpr>(Val)) {
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000636 std::vector<SCEVHandle> NewOps;
637 NewOps.reserve(SAE->getNumOperands());
638
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000639 for (unsigned i = 0; i != SAE->getNumOperands(); ++i) {
640 SCEVHandle NewOp = SAE->getOperand(i);
Dan Gohmana537bf82009-05-18 16:45:28 +0000641 MoveImmediateValues(TLI, AccessTy, NewOp, Imm, isAddress, L, SE);
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000642
643 if (!NewOp->isLoopInvariant(L)) {
Chris Lattner7db543f2005-08-04 19:08:16 +0000644 // If this is a loop-variant expression, it must stay in the immediate
645 // field of the expression.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000646 Imm = SE->getAddExpr(Imm, NewOp);
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000647 } else {
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000648 NewOps.push_back(NewOp);
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000649 }
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000650 }
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000651
652 if (NewOps.empty())
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000653 Val = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Val->getType());
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000654 else
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000655 Val = SE->getAddExpr(NewOps);
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000656 return;
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +0000657 } else if (const SCEVAddRecExpr *SARE = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Val)) {
Chris Lattner7a658392005-08-03 23:44:42 +0000658 // Try to pull immediates out of the start value of nested addrec's.
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000659 SCEVHandle Start = SARE->getStart();
Dan Gohmana537bf82009-05-18 16:45:28 +0000660 MoveImmediateValues(TLI, AccessTy, Start, Imm, isAddress, L, SE);
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000661
662 if (Start != SARE->getStart()) {
663 std::vector<SCEVHandle> Ops(SARE->op_begin(), SARE->op_end());
664 Ops[0] = Start;
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000665 Val = SE->getAddRecExpr(Ops, SARE->getLoop());
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000666 }
667 return;
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +0000668 } else if (const SCEVMulExpr *SME = dyn_cast<SCEVMulExpr>(Val)) {
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000669 // Transform "8 * (4 + v)" -> "32 + 8*V" if "32" fits in the immed field.
Dan Gohmana537bf82009-05-18 16:45:28 +0000670 if (isAddress &&
671 fitsInAddressMode(SME->getOperand(0), AccessTy, TLI, false) &&
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000672 SME->getNumOperands() == 2 && SME->isLoopInvariant(L)) {
673
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000674 SCEVHandle SubImm = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Val->getType());
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000675 SCEVHandle NewOp = SME->getOperand(1);
Dan Gohmana537bf82009-05-18 16:45:28 +0000676 MoveImmediateValues(TLI, AccessTy, NewOp, SubImm, isAddress, L, SE);
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000677
678 // If we extracted something out of the subexpressions, see if we can
679 // simplify this!
680 if (NewOp != SME->getOperand(1)) {
681 // Scale SubImm up by "8". If the result is a target constant, we are
682 // good.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000683 SubImm = SE->getMulExpr(SubImm, SME->getOperand(0));
Dan Gohmana537bf82009-05-18 16:45:28 +0000684 if (fitsInAddressMode(SubImm, AccessTy, TLI, false)) {
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000685 // Accumulate the immediate.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000686 Imm = SE->getAddExpr(Imm, SubImm);
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000687
688 // Update what is left of 'Val'.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000689 Val = SE->getMulExpr(SME->getOperand(0), NewOp);
Chris Lattner221fc3c2006-02-04 07:36:50 +0000690 return;
691 }
692 }
693 }
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000694 }
695
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000696 // Loop-variant expressions must stay in the immediate field of the
697 // expression.
Dan Gohmana537bf82009-05-18 16:45:28 +0000698 if ((isAddress && fitsInAddressMode(Val, AccessTy, TLI, false)) ||
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000699 !Val->isLoopInvariant(L)) {
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000700 Imm = SE->getAddExpr(Imm, Val);
701 Val = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Val->getType());
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000702 return;
Chris Lattner7a2ca562005-08-04 19:26:19 +0000703 }
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +0000704
705 // Otherwise, no immediates to move.
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +0000706}
707
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +0000708static void MoveImmediateValues(const TargetLowering *TLI,
709 Instruction *User,
710 SCEVHandle &Val, SCEVHandle &Imm,
711 bool isAddress, Loop *L,
712 ScalarEvolution *SE) {
Dan Gohmana537bf82009-05-18 16:45:28 +0000713 const Type *AccessTy = getAccessType(User);
714 MoveImmediateValues(TLI, AccessTy, Val, Imm, isAddress, L, SE);
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +0000715}
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000716
Chris Lattner7e79b382006-08-03 06:34:50 +0000717/// SeparateSubExprs - Decompose Expr into all of the subexpressions that are
718/// added together. This is used to reassociate common addition subexprs
719/// together for maximal sharing when rewriting bases.
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000720static void SeparateSubExprs(std::vector<SCEVHandle> &SubExprs,
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000721 SCEVHandle Expr,
722 ScalarEvolution *SE) {
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +0000723 if (const SCEVAddExpr *AE = dyn_cast<SCEVAddExpr>(Expr)) {
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000724 for (unsigned j = 0, e = AE->getNumOperands(); j != e; ++j)
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000725 SeparateSubExprs(SubExprs, AE->getOperand(j), SE);
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +0000726 } else if (const SCEVAddRecExpr *SARE = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(Expr)) {
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000727 SCEVHandle Zero = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Expr->getType());
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000728 if (SARE->getOperand(0) == Zero) {
729 SubExprs.push_back(Expr);
730 } else {
731 // Compute the addrec with zero as its base.
732 std::vector<SCEVHandle> Ops(SARE->op_begin(), SARE->op_end());
733 Ops[0] = Zero; // Start with zero base.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000734 SubExprs.push_back(SE->getAddRecExpr(Ops, SARE->getLoop()));
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000735
736
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000737 SeparateSubExprs(SubExprs, SARE->getOperand(0), SE);
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000738 }
Dan Gohmancfeb6a42008-06-18 16:23:07 +0000739 } else if (!Expr->isZero()) {
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000740 // Do not add zero.
741 SubExprs.push_back(Expr);
742 }
743}
744
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000745// This is logically local to the following function, but C++ says we have
746// to make it file scope.
747struct SubExprUseData { unsigned Count; bool notAllUsesAreFree; };
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000748
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000749/// RemoveCommonExpressionsFromUseBases - Look through all of the Bases of all
750/// the Uses, removing any common subexpressions, except that if all such
751/// subexpressions can be folded into an addressing mode for all uses inside
752/// the loop (this case is referred to as "free" in comments herein) we do
753/// not remove anything. This looks for things like (a+b+c) and
Chris Lattnerf8828eb2008-12-02 04:52:26 +0000754/// (a+c+d) and computes the common (a+c) subexpression. The common expression
755/// is *removed* from the Bases and returned.
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +0000756static SCEVHandle
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000757RemoveCommonExpressionsFromUseBases(std::vector<BasedUser> &Uses,
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000758 ScalarEvolution *SE, Loop *L,
759 const TargetLowering *TLI) {
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +0000760 unsigned NumUses = Uses.size();
761
Chris Lattnerf8828eb2008-12-02 04:52:26 +0000762 // Only one use? This is a very common case, so we handle it specially and
763 // cheaply.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000764 SCEVHandle Zero = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Uses[0].Base->getType());
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +0000765 SCEVHandle Result = Zero;
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000766 SCEVHandle FreeResult = Zero;
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +0000767 if (NumUses == 1) {
Chris Lattnerf8828eb2008-12-02 04:52:26 +0000768 // If the use is inside the loop, use its base, regardless of what it is:
769 // it is clearly shared across all the IV's. If the use is outside the loop
770 // (which means after it) we don't want to factor anything *into* the loop,
771 // so just use 0 as the base.
Dale Johannesen589bf082008-12-01 22:00:01 +0000772 if (L->contains(Uses[0].Inst->getParent()))
773 std::swap(Result, Uses[0].Base);
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +0000774 return Result;
775 }
776
777 // To find common subexpressions, count how many of Uses use each expression.
778 // If any subexpressions are used Uses.size() times, they are common.
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000779 // Also track whether all uses of each expression can be moved into an
780 // an addressing mode "for free"; such expressions are left within the loop.
781 // struct SubExprUseData { unsigned Count; bool notAllUsesAreFree; };
782 std::map<SCEVHandle, SubExprUseData> SubExpressionUseData;
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +0000783
Chris Lattnerd6155e92005-10-11 18:41:04 +0000784 // UniqueSubExprs - Keep track of all of the subexpressions we see in the
785 // order we see them.
786 std::vector<SCEVHandle> UniqueSubExprs;
787
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000788 std::vector<SCEVHandle> SubExprs;
Chris Lattnerf8828eb2008-12-02 04:52:26 +0000789 unsigned NumUsesInsideLoop = 0;
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000790 for (unsigned i = 0; i != NumUses; ++i) {
Chris Lattnerf8828eb2008-12-02 04:52:26 +0000791 // If the user is outside the loop, just ignore it for base computation.
792 // Since the user is outside the loop, it must be *after* the loop (if it
793 // were before, it could not be based on the loop IV). We don't want users
794 // after the loop to affect base computation of values *inside* the loop,
795 // because we can always add their offsets to the result IV after the loop
796 // is done, ensuring we get good code inside the loop.
Dale Johannesen589bf082008-12-01 22:00:01 +0000797 if (!L->contains(Uses[i].Inst->getParent()))
798 continue;
799 NumUsesInsideLoop++;
800
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000801 // If the base is zero (which is common), return zero now, there are no
802 // CSEs we can find.
803 if (Uses[i].Base == Zero) return Zero;
804
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000805 // If this use is as an address we may be able to put CSEs in the addressing
806 // mode rather than hoisting them.
807 bool isAddrUse = isAddressUse(Uses[i].Inst, Uses[i].OperandValToReplace);
Dan Gohmana537bf82009-05-18 16:45:28 +0000808 // We may need the AccessTy below, but only when isAddrUse, so compute it
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000809 // only in that case.
Dan Gohmana537bf82009-05-18 16:45:28 +0000810 const Type *AccessTy = 0;
Dan Gohman21e77222009-03-09 21:01:17 +0000811 if (isAddrUse)
Dan Gohmana537bf82009-05-18 16:45:28 +0000812 AccessTy = getAccessType(Uses[i].Inst);
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000813
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000814 // Split the expression into subexprs.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000815 SeparateSubExprs(SubExprs, Uses[i].Base, SE);
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000816 // Add one to SubExpressionUseData.Count for each subexpr present, and
817 // if the subexpr is not a valid immediate within an addressing mode use,
818 // set SubExpressionUseData.notAllUsesAreFree. We definitely want to
819 // hoist these out of the loop (if they are common to all uses).
820 for (unsigned j = 0, e = SubExprs.size(); j != e; ++j) {
821 if (++SubExpressionUseData[SubExprs[j]].Count == 1)
Chris Lattnerd6155e92005-10-11 18:41:04 +0000822 UniqueSubExprs.push_back(SubExprs[j]);
Dan Gohmana537bf82009-05-18 16:45:28 +0000823 if (!isAddrUse || !fitsInAddressMode(SubExprs[j], AccessTy, TLI, false))
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000824 SubExpressionUseData[SubExprs[j]].notAllUsesAreFree = true;
825 }
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000826 SubExprs.clear();
827 }
828
Chris Lattnerd6155e92005-10-11 18:41:04 +0000829 // Now that we know how many times each is used, build Result. Iterate over
830 // UniqueSubexprs so that we have a stable ordering.
831 for (unsigned i = 0, e = UniqueSubExprs.size(); i != e; ++i) {
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000832 std::map<SCEVHandle, SubExprUseData>::iterator I =
833 SubExpressionUseData.find(UniqueSubExprs[i]);
834 assert(I != SubExpressionUseData.end() && "Entry not found?");
835 if (I->second.Count == NumUsesInsideLoop) { // Found CSE!
836 if (I->second.notAllUsesAreFree)
837 Result = SE->getAddExpr(Result, I->first);
838 else
839 FreeResult = SE->getAddExpr(FreeResult, I->first);
840 } else
841 // Remove non-cse's from SubExpressionUseData.
842 SubExpressionUseData.erase(I);
Chris Lattnerd6155e92005-10-11 18:41:04 +0000843 }
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000844
845 if (FreeResult != Zero) {
846 // We have some subexpressions that can be subsumed into addressing
847 // modes in every use inside the loop. However, it's possible that
848 // there are so many of them that the combined FreeResult cannot
849 // be subsumed, or that the target cannot handle both a FreeResult
850 // and a Result in the same instruction (for example because it would
851 // require too many registers). Check this.
852 for (unsigned i=0; i<NumUses; ++i) {
853 if (!L->contains(Uses[i].Inst->getParent()))
854 continue;
855 // We know this is an addressing mode use; if there are any uses that
856 // are not, FreeResult would be Zero.
Dan Gohmana537bf82009-05-18 16:45:28 +0000857 const Type *AccessTy = getAccessType(Uses[i].Inst);
858 if (!fitsInAddressMode(FreeResult, AccessTy, TLI, Result!=Zero)) {
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000859 // FIXME: could split up FreeResult into pieces here, some hoisted
Dale Johannesenb0390622008-12-16 22:16:28 +0000860 // and some not. There is no obvious advantage to this.
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000861 Result = SE->getAddExpr(Result, FreeResult);
862 FreeResult = Zero;
863 break;
864 }
865 }
866 }
867
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +0000868 // If we found no CSE's, return now.
869 if (Result == Zero) return Result;
870
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000871 // If we still have a FreeResult, remove its subexpressions from
872 // SubExpressionUseData. This means they will remain in the use Bases.
873 if (FreeResult != Zero) {
874 SeparateSubExprs(SubExprs, FreeResult, SE);
875 for (unsigned j = 0, e = SubExprs.size(); j != e; ++j) {
876 std::map<SCEVHandle, SubExprUseData>::iterator I =
877 SubExpressionUseData.find(SubExprs[j]);
878 SubExpressionUseData.erase(I);
879 }
880 SubExprs.clear();
881 }
882
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +0000883 // Otherwise, remove all of the CSE's we found from each of the base values.
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000884 for (unsigned i = 0; i != NumUses; ++i) {
Dale Johannesenfb10cd42008-12-02 21:17:11 +0000885 // Uses outside the loop don't necessarily include the common base, but
886 // the final IV value coming into those uses does. Instead of trying to
887 // remove the pieces of the common base, which might not be there,
888 // subtract off the base to compensate for this.
889 if (!L->contains(Uses[i].Inst->getParent())) {
890 Uses[i].Base = SE->getMinusSCEV(Uses[i].Base, Result);
Dale Johannesen589bf082008-12-01 22:00:01 +0000891 continue;
Dale Johannesenfb10cd42008-12-02 21:17:11 +0000892 }
Dale Johannesen589bf082008-12-01 22:00:01 +0000893
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000894 // Split the expression into subexprs.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000895 SeparateSubExprs(SubExprs, Uses[i].Base, SE);
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000896
897 // Remove any common subexpressions.
898 for (unsigned j = 0, e = SubExprs.size(); j != e; ++j)
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +0000899 if (SubExpressionUseData.count(SubExprs[j])) {
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000900 SubExprs.erase(SubExprs.begin()+j);
901 --j; --e;
902 }
903
Chris Lattnerf8828eb2008-12-02 04:52:26 +0000904 // Finally, add the non-shared expressions together.
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000905 if (SubExprs.empty())
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +0000906 Uses[i].Base = Zero;
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000907 else
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +0000908 Uses[i].Base = SE->getAddExpr(SubExprs);
Chris Lattner27e51422005-08-13 07:42:01 +0000909 SubExprs.clear();
Chris Lattner934520a2005-08-13 07:27:18 +0000910 }
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +0000911
912 return Result;
913}
914
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +0000915/// ValidScale - Check whether the given Scale is valid for all loads and
Chris Lattner579633c2007-04-09 22:20:14 +0000916/// stores in UsersToProcess.
Dale Johannesendc42f482007-03-20 00:47:50 +0000917///
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +0000918bool LoopStrengthReduce::ValidScale(bool HasBaseReg, int64_t Scale,
Dale Johannesendc42f482007-03-20 00:47:50 +0000919 const std::vector<BasedUser>& UsersToProcess) {
Evan Chengd6b62a52007-12-19 23:33:23 +0000920 if (!TLI)
921 return true;
922
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +0000923 for (unsigned i = 0, e = UsersToProcess.size(); i!=e; ++i) {
Chris Lattner1ebd89e2007-04-02 06:34:44 +0000924 // If this is a load or other access, pass the type of the access in.
925 const Type *AccessTy = Type::VoidTy;
Dan Gohman21e77222009-03-09 21:01:17 +0000926 if (isAddressUse(UsersToProcess[i].Inst,
927 UsersToProcess[i].OperandValToReplace))
928 AccessTy = getAccessType(UsersToProcess[i].Inst);
Evan Cheng55e641b2008-03-19 22:02:26 +0000929 else if (isa<PHINode>(UsersToProcess[i].Inst))
930 continue;
Chris Lattner1ebd89e2007-04-02 06:34:44 +0000931
Chris Lattner579633c2007-04-09 22:20:14 +0000932 TargetLowering::AddrMode AM;
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +0000933 if (const SCEVConstant *SC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(UsersToProcess[i].Imm))
Chris Lattner579633c2007-04-09 22:20:14 +0000934 AM.BaseOffs = SC->getValue()->getSExtValue();
Dan Gohmancfeb6a42008-06-18 16:23:07 +0000935 AM.HasBaseReg = HasBaseReg || !UsersToProcess[i].Base->isZero();
Chris Lattner579633c2007-04-09 22:20:14 +0000936 AM.Scale = Scale;
937
938 // If load[imm+r*scale] is illegal, bail out.
Evan Chengd6b62a52007-12-19 23:33:23 +0000939 if (!TLI->isLegalAddressingMode(AM, AccessTy))
Dale Johannesendc42f482007-03-20 00:47:50 +0000940 return false;
Dale Johannesen8e59e162007-03-20 21:54:54 +0000941 }
Dale Johannesendc42f482007-03-20 00:47:50 +0000942 return true;
943}
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +0000944
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +0000945/// ValidOffset - Check whether the given Offset is valid for all loads and
946/// stores in UsersToProcess.
947///
948bool LoopStrengthReduce::ValidOffset(bool HasBaseReg,
949 int64_t Offset,
950 int64_t Scale,
951 const std::vector<BasedUser>& UsersToProcess) {
952 if (!TLI)
953 return true;
954
955 for (unsigned i=0, e = UsersToProcess.size(); i!=e; ++i) {
956 // If this is a load or other access, pass the type of the access in.
957 const Type *AccessTy = Type::VoidTy;
958 if (isAddressUse(UsersToProcess[i].Inst,
959 UsersToProcess[i].OperandValToReplace))
960 AccessTy = getAccessType(UsersToProcess[i].Inst);
961 else if (isa<PHINode>(UsersToProcess[i].Inst))
962 continue;
963
964 TargetLowering::AddrMode AM;
965 if (const SCEVConstant *SC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(UsersToProcess[i].Imm))
966 AM.BaseOffs = SC->getValue()->getSExtValue();
967 AM.BaseOffs = (uint64_t)AM.BaseOffs + (uint64_t)Offset;
968 AM.HasBaseReg = HasBaseReg || !UsersToProcess[i].Base->isZero();
969 AM.Scale = Scale;
970
971 // If load[imm+r*scale] is illegal, bail out.
972 if (!TLI->isLegalAddressingMode(AM, AccessTy))
973 return false;
974 }
975 return true;
976}
977
Dale Johannesen1de17d52009-02-09 22:14:15 +0000978/// RequiresTypeConversion - Returns true if converting Ty1 to Ty2 is not
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +0000979/// a nop.
Evan Cheng2bd122c2007-10-26 01:56:11 +0000980bool LoopStrengthReduce::RequiresTypeConversion(const Type *Ty1,
981 const Type *Ty2) {
982 if (Ty1 == Ty2)
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +0000983 return false;
Dan Gohman9f2d6712009-05-01 17:07:43 +0000984 Ty1 = SE->getEffectiveSCEVType(Ty1);
985 Ty2 = SE->getEffectiveSCEVType(Ty2);
986 if (Ty1 == Ty2)
Dan Gohmanaf79fb52009-04-21 01:07:12 +0000987 return false;
Dale Johannesen1de17d52009-02-09 22:14:15 +0000988 if (Ty1->canLosslesslyBitCastTo(Ty2))
989 return false;
Evan Cheng2bd122c2007-10-26 01:56:11 +0000990 if (TLI && TLI->isTruncateFree(Ty1, Ty2))
991 return false;
Dale Johannesen1de17d52009-02-09 22:14:15 +0000992 return true;
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +0000993}
994
Evan Chengeb8f9e22006-03-17 19:52:23 +0000995/// CheckForIVReuse - Returns the multiple if the stride is the multiple
996/// of a previous stride and it is a legal value for the target addressing
Dan Gohman02e4fa72007-10-22 20:40:42 +0000997/// mode scale component and optional base reg. This allows the users of
998/// this stride to be rewritten as prev iv * factor. It returns 0 if no
Dale Johannesenb0390622008-12-16 22:16:28 +0000999/// reuse is possible. Factors can be negative on same targets, e.g. ARM.
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +00001000///
1001/// If all uses are outside the loop, we don't require that all multiplies
1002/// be folded into the addressing mode, nor even that the factor be constant;
1003/// a multiply (executed once) outside the loop is better than another IV
1004/// within. Well, usually.
1005SCEVHandle LoopStrengthReduce::CheckForIVReuse(bool HasBaseReg,
Evan Cheng2bd122c2007-10-26 01:56:11 +00001006 bool AllUsesAreAddresses,
Dale Johannesenb0390622008-12-16 22:16:28 +00001007 bool AllUsesAreOutsideLoop,
Dan Gohman02e4fa72007-10-22 20:40:42 +00001008 const SCEVHandle &Stride,
Dale Johannesendc42f482007-03-20 00:47:50 +00001009 IVExpr &IV, const Type *Ty,
1010 const std::vector<BasedUser>& UsersToProcess) {
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +00001011 if (StrideNoReuse.count(Stride))
1012 return SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Stride->getType());
1013
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +00001014 if (const SCEVConstant *SC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(Stride)) {
Reid Spencer502db932007-03-02 23:37:53 +00001015 int64_t SInt = SC->getValue()->getSExtValue();
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00001016 for (unsigned NewStride = 0, e = IU->StrideOrder.size();
1017 NewStride != e; ++NewStride) {
Dale Johannesenb51b4b52007-11-17 02:48:01 +00001018 std::map<SCEVHandle, IVsOfOneStride>::iterator SI =
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00001019 IVsByStride.find(IU->StrideOrder[NewStride]);
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +00001020 if (SI == IVsByStride.end() || !isa<SCEVConstant>(SI->first) ||
1021 StrideNoReuse.count(SI->first))
Dale Johannesenb51b4b52007-11-17 02:48:01 +00001022 continue;
Evan Cheng5eef2d22007-03-12 23:27:37 +00001023 int64_t SSInt = cast<SCEVConstant>(SI->first)->getValue()->getSExtValue();
Evan Cheng2bd122c2007-10-26 01:56:11 +00001024 if (SI->first != Stride &&
Dale Johannesen7b9486a2009-05-13 00:24:22 +00001025 (unsigned(abs64(SInt)) < SSInt || (SInt % SSInt) != 0))
Evan Chengeb8f9e22006-03-17 19:52:23 +00001026 continue;
Evan Cheng5eef2d22007-03-12 23:27:37 +00001027 int64_t Scale = SInt / SSInt;
Dale Johannesendc42f482007-03-20 00:47:50 +00001028 // Check that this stride is valid for all the types used for loads and
1029 // stores; if it can be used for some and not others, we might as well use
1030 // the original stride everywhere, since we have to create the IV for it
Dan Gohmanaa343312007-10-29 19:23:53 +00001031 // anyway. If the scale is 1, then we don't need to worry about folding
1032 // multiplications.
1033 if (Scale == 1 ||
1034 (AllUsesAreAddresses &&
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00001035 ValidScale(HasBaseReg, Scale, UsersToProcess))) {
1036 // Prefer to reuse an IV with a base of zero.
Evan Cheng5eef2d22007-03-12 23:27:37 +00001037 for (std::vector<IVExpr>::iterator II = SI->second.IVs.begin(),
1038 IE = SI->second.IVs.end(); II != IE; ++II)
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00001039 // Only reuse previous IV if it would not require a type conversion
1040 // and if the base difference can be folded.
Dan Gohmancfeb6a42008-06-18 16:23:07 +00001041 if (II->Base->isZero() &&
Evan Cheng2bd122c2007-10-26 01:56:11 +00001042 !RequiresTypeConversion(II->Base->getType(), Ty)) {
Evan Cheng5eef2d22007-03-12 23:27:37 +00001043 IV = *II;
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +00001044 return SE->getIntegerSCEV(Scale, Stride->getType());
Evan Cheng5eef2d22007-03-12 23:27:37 +00001045 }
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00001046 // Otherwise, settle for an IV with a foldable base.
1047 if (AllUsesAreAddresses)
1048 for (std::vector<IVExpr>::iterator II = SI->second.IVs.begin(),
1049 IE = SI->second.IVs.end(); II != IE; ++II)
1050 // Only reuse previous IV if it would not require a type conversion
1051 // and if the base difference can be folded.
1052 if (SE->getEffectiveSCEVType(II->Base->getType()) ==
1053 SE->getEffectiveSCEVType(Ty) &&
1054 isa<SCEVConstant>(II->Base)) {
1055 int64_t Base =
1056 cast<SCEVConstant>(II->Base)->getValue()->getSExtValue();
1057 if (Base > INT32_MIN && Base <= INT32_MAX &&
1058 ValidOffset(HasBaseReg, -Base * Scale,
1059 Scale, UsersToProcess)) {
1060 IV = *II;
1061 return SE->getIntegerSCEV(Scale, Stride->getType());
1062 }
1063 }
1064 }
Evan Chengeb8f9e22006-03-17 19:52:23 +00001065 }
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +00001066 } else if (AllUsesAreOutsideLoop) {
1067 // Accept nonconstant strides here; it is really really right to substitute
1068 // an existing IV if we can.
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00001069 for (unsigned NewStride = 0, e = IU->StrideOrder.size();
1070 NewStride != e; ++NewStride) {
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +00001071 std::map<SCEVHandle, IVsOfOneStride>::iterator SI =
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00001072 IVsByStride.find(IU->StrideOrder[NewStride]);
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +00001073 if (SI == IVsByStride.end() || !isa<SCEVConstant>(SI->first))
1074 continue;
1075 int64_t SSInt = cast<SCEVConstant>(SI->first)->getValue()->getSExtValue();
1076 if (SI->first != Stride && SSInt != 1)
1077 continue;
1078 for (std::vector<IVExpr>::iterator II = SI->second.IVs.begin(),
1079 IE = SI->second.IVs.end(); II != IE; ++II)
1080 // Accept nonzero base here.
1081 // Only reuse previous IV if it would not require a type conversion.
1082 if (!RequiresTypeConversion(II->Base->getType(), Ty)) {
1083 IV = *II;
1084 return Stride;
1085 }
1086 }
1087 // Special case, old IV is -1*x and this one is x. Can treat this one as
1088 // -1*old.
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00001089 for (unsigned NewStride = 0, e = IU->StrideOrder.size();
1090 NewStride != e; ++NewStride) {
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +00001091 std::map<SCEVHandle, IVsOfOneStride>::iterator SI =
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00001092 IVsByStride.find(IU->StrideOrder[NewStride]);
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +00001093 if (SI == IVsByStride.end())
1094 continue;
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +00001095 if (const SCEVMulExpr *ME = dyn_cast<SCEVMulExpr>(SI->first))
1096 if (const SCEVConstant *SC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(ME->getOperand(0)))
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +00001097 if (Stride == ME->getOperand(1) &&
1098 SC->getValue()->getSExtValue() == -1LL)
1099 for (std::vector<IVExpr>::iterator II = SI->second.IVs.begin(),
1100 IE = SI->second.IVs.end(); II != IE; ++II)
1101 // Accept nonzero base here.
1102 // Only reuse previous IV if it would not require type conversion.
1103 if (!RequiresTypeConversion(II->Base->getType(), Ty)) {
1104 IV = *II;
1105 return SE->getIntegerSCEV(-1LL, Stride->getType());
1106 }
1107 }
Evan Chengeb8f9e22006-03-17 19:52:23 +00001108 }
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +00001109 return SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Stride->getType());
Evan Chengeb8f9e22006-03-17 19:52:23 +00001110}
1111
Chris Lattner7e79b382006-08-03 06:34:50 +00001112/// PartitionByIsUseOfPostIncrementedValue - Simple boolean predicate that
1113/// returns true if Val's isUseOfPostIncrementedValue is true.
1114static bool PartitionByIsUseOfPostIncrementedValue(const BasedUser &Val) {
1115 return Val.isUseOfPostIncrementedValue;
1116}
Evan Chengeb8f9e22006-03-17 19:52:23 +00001117
Dan Gohman4a9a3e52008-04-14 18:26:16 +00001118/// isNonConstantNegative - Return true if the specified scev is negated, but
Chris Lattnerfb3e1192007-05-19 01:22:21 +00001119/// not a constant.
1120static bool isNonConstantNegative(const SCEVHandle &Expr) {
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +00001121 const SCEVMulExpr *Mul = dyn_cast<SCEVMulExpr>(Expr);
Chris Lattnerfb3e1192007-05-19 01:22:21 +00001122 if (!Mul) return false;
1123
1124 // If there is a constant factor, it will be first.
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +00001125 const SCEVConstant *SC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(Mul->getOperand(0));
Chris Lattnerfb3e1192007-05-19 01:22:21 +00001126 if (!SC) return false;
1127
1128 // Return true if the value is negative, this matches things like (-42 * V).
1129 return SC->getValue()->getValue().isNegative();
1130}
1131
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001132// CollectIVUsers - Transform our list of users and offsets to a bit more
Dan Gohman73b43b92008-06-23 22:11:52 +00001133// complex table. In this new vector, each 'BasedUser' contains 'Base', the base
1134// of the strided accesses, as well as the old information from Uses. We
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001135// progressively move information from the Base field to the Imm field, until
1136// we eventually have the full access expression to rewrite the use.
1137SCEVHandle LoopStrengthReduce::CollectIVUsers(const SCEVHandle &Stride,
1138 IVUsersOfOneStride &Uses,
1139 Loop *L,
1140 bool &AllUsesAreAddresses,
Dale Johannesenb0390622008-12-16 22:16:28 +00001141 bool &AllUsesAreOutsideLoop,
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001142 std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess) {
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00001143 // FIXME: Generalize to non-affine IV's.
1144 if (!Stride->isLoopInvariant(L))
1145 return SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Stride->getType());
1146
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +00001147 UsersToProcess.reserve(Uses.Users.size());
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00001148 for (ilist<IVStrideUse>::iterator I = Uses.Users.begin(),
1149 E = Uses.Users.end(); I != E; ++I) {
1150 UsersToProcess.push_back(BasedUser(*I, SE));
1151
Dale Johannesen67c79892008-12-03 19:25:46 +00001152 // Move any loop variant operands from the offset field to the immediate
Chris Lattnera553b0c2005-08-08 22:56:21 +00001153 // field of the use, so that we don't try to use something before it is
1154 // computed.
Dale Johannesen544e0d02008-12-03 20:56:12 +00001155 MoveLoopVariantsToImmediateField(UsersToProcess.back().Base,
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +00001156 UsersToProcess.back().Imm, L, SE);
Chris Lattnera553b0c2005-08-08 22:56:21 +00001157 assert(UsersToProcess.back().Base->isLoopInvariant(L) &&
Chris Lattner26d91f12005-08-04 22:34:05 +00001158 "Base value is not loop invariant!");
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +00001159 }
Evan Chengeb8f9e22006-03-17 19:52:23 +00001160
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001161 // We now have a whole bunch of uses of like-strided induction variables, but
1162 // they might all have different bases. We want to emit one PHI node for this
1163 // stride which we fold as many common expressions (between the IVs) into as
1164 // possible. Start by identifying the common expressions in the base values
1165 // for the strides (e.g. if we have "A+C+B" and "A+B+D" as our bases, find
1166 // "A+B"), emit it to the preheader, then remove the expression from the
1167 // UsersToProcess base values.
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +00001168 SCEVHandle CommonExprs =
Dale Johannesen203af582008-12-05 21:47:27 +00001169 RemoveCommonExpressionsFromUseBases(UsersToProcess, SE, L, TLI);
Dan Gohman02e4fa72007-10-22 20:40:42 +00001170
Chris Lattner44b807e2005-08-08 22:32:34 +00001171 // Next, figure out what we can represent in the immediate fields of
1172 // instructions. If we can represent anything there, move it to the imm
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001173 // fields of the BasedUsers. We do this so that it increases the commonality
1174 // of the remaining uses.
Evan Cheng32e4c7c2007-12-20 02:20:53 +00001175 unsigned NumPHI = 0;
Evan Chengd33cec12009-02-20 22:16:49 +00001176 bool HasAddress = false;
Chris Lattner44b807e2005-08-08 22:32:34 +00001177 for (unsigned i = 0, e = UsersToProcess.size(); i != e; ++i) {
Chris Lattner80b32b32005-08-16 00:38:11 +00001178 // If the user is not in the current loop, this means it is using the exit
1179 // value of the IV. Do not put anything in the base, make sure it's all in
1180 // the immediate field to allow as much factoring as possible.
1181 if (!L->contains(UsersToProcess[i].Inst->getParent())) {
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +00001182 UsersToProcess[i].Imm = SE->getAddExpr(UsersToProcess[i].Imm,
1183 UsersToProcess[i].Base);
Chris Lattner8385e512005-08-17 21:22:41 +00001184 UsersToProcess[i].Base =
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +00001185 SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, UsersToProcess[i].Base->getType());
Chris Lattner80b32b32005-08-16 00:38:11 +00001186 } else {
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +00001187 // Not all uses are outside the loop.
1188 AllUsesAreOutsideLoop = false;
1189
Chris Lattner80b32b32005-08-16 00:38:11 +00001190 // Addressing modes can be folded into loads and stores. Be careful that
1191 // the store is through the expression, not of the expression though.
Evan Cheng32e4c7c2007-12-20 02:20:53 +00001192 bool isPHI = false;
Evan Chengd6b62a52007-12-19 23:33:23 +00001193 bool isAddress = isAddressUse(UsersToProcess[i].Inst,
1194 UsersToProcess[i].OperandValToReplace);
1195 if (isa<PHINode>(UsersToProcess[i].Inst)) {
Evan Cheng32e4c7c2007-12-20 02:20:53 +00001196 isPHI = true;
1197 ++NumPHI;
Dan Gohman2acc7602007-05-03 23:20:33 +00001198 }
Dan Gohman02e4fa72007-10-22 20:40:42 +00001199
Evan Chengd33cec12009-02-20 22:16:49 +00001200 if (isAddress)
1201 HasAddress = true;
Dale Johannesenb0390622008-12-16 22:16:28 +00001202
Dan Gohman02e4fa72007-10-22 20:40:42 +00001203 // If this use isn't an address, then not all uses are addresses.
Evan Cheng55e641b2008-03-19 22:02:26 +00001204 if (!isAddress && !isPHI)
Dan Gohman02e4fa72007-10-22 20:40:42 +00001205 AllUsesAreAddresses = false;
Chris Lattner80b32b32005-08-16 00:38:11 +00001206
Evan Cheng1d958162007-03-13 20:34:37 +00001207 MoveImmediateValues(TLI, UsersToProcess[i].Inst, UsersToProcess[i].Base,
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +00001208 UsersToProcess[i].Imm, isAddress, L, SE);
Chris Lattner80b32b32005-08-16 00:38:11 +00001209 }
Chris Lattner44b807e2005-08-08 22:32:34 +00001210 }
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +00001211
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +00001212 // If one of the use is a PHI node and all other uses are addresses, still
Evan Cheng32e4c7c2007-12-20 02:20:53 +00001213 // allow iv reuse. Essentially we are trading one constant multiplication
1214 // for one fewer iv.
1215 if (NumPHI > 1)
1216 AllUsesAreAddresses = false;
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +00001217
Evan Chengd33cec12009-02-20 22:16:49 +00001218 // There are no in-loop address uses.
1219 if (AllUsesAreAddresses && (!HasAddress && !AllUsesAreOutsideLoop))
1220 AllUsesAreAddresses = false;
1221
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001222 return CommonExprs;
1223}
1224
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001225/// ShouldUseFullStrengthReductionMode - Test whether full strength-reduction
1226/// is valid and profitable for the given set of users of a stride. In
1227/// full strength-reduction mode, all addresses at the current stride are
1228/// strength-reduced all the way down to pointer arithmetic.
1229///
1230bool LoopStrengthReduce::ShouldUseFullStrengthReductionMode(
1231 const std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess,
1232 const Loop *L,
1233 bool AllUsesAreAddresses,
1234 SCEVHandle Stride) {
1235 if (!EnableFullLSRMode)
1236 return false;
1237
1238 // The heuristics below aim to avoid increasing register pressure, but
1239 // fully strength-reducing all the addresses increases the number of
1240 // add instructions, so don't do this when optimizing for size.
1241 // TODO: If the loop is large, the savings due to simpler addresses
1242 // may oughtweight the costs of the extra increment instructions.
1243 if (L->getHeader()->getParent()->hasFnAttr(Attribute::OptimizeForSize))
1244 return false;
1245
1246 // TODO: For now, don't do full strength reduction if there could
1247 // potentially be greater-stride multiples of the current stride
1248 // which could reuse the current stride IV.
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00001249 if (IU->StrideOrder.back() != Stride)
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001250 return false;
1251
1252 // Iterate through the uses to find conditions that automatically rule out
1253 // full-lsr mode.
1254 for (unsigned i = 0, e = UsersToProcess.size(); i != e; ) {
Dan Gohman622ed672009-05-04 22:02:23 +00001255 const SCEV *Base = UsersToProcess[i].Base;
1256 const SCEV *Imm = UsersToProcess[i].Imm;
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001257 // If any users have a loop-variant component, they can't be fully
1258 // strength-reduced.
1259 if (Imm && !Imm->isLoopInvariant(L))
1260 return false;
1261 // If there are to users with the same base and the difference between
1262 // the two Imm values can't be folded into the address, full
1263 // strength reduction would increase register pressure.
1264 do {
Dan Gohman622ed672009-05-04 22:02:23 +00001265 const SCEV *CurImm = UsersToProcess[i].Imm;
Dan Gohmana04af432009-02-22 16:40:52 +00001266 if ((CurImm || Imm) && CurImm != Imm) {
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001267 if (!CurImm) CurImm = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Stride->getType());
1268 if (!Imm) Imm = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Stride->getType());
1269 const Instruction *Inst = UsersToProcess[i].Inst;
Dan Gohmana537bf82009-05-18 16:45:28 +00001270 const Type *AccessTy = getAccessType(Inst);
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001271 SCEVHandle Diff = SE->getMinusSCEV(UsersToProcess[i].Imm, Imm);
1272 if (!Diff->isZero() &&
1273 (!AllUsesAreAddresses ||
Dan Gohmana537bf82009-05-18 16:45:28 +00001274 !fitsInAddressMode(Diff, AccessTy, TLI, /*HasBaseReg=*/true)))
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001275 return false;
1276 }
1277 } while (++i != e && Base == UsersToProcess[i].Base);
1278 }
1279
1280 // If there's exactly one user in this stride, fully strength-reducing it
1281 // won't increase register pressure. If it's starting from a non-zero base,
1282 // it'll be simpler this way.
1283 if (UsersToProcess.size() == 1 && !UsersToProcess[0].Base->isZero())
1284 return true;
1285
1286 // Otherwise, if there are any users in this stride that don't require
1287 // a register for their base, full strength-reduction will increase
1288 // register pressure.
1289 for (unsigned i = 0, e = UsersToProcess.size(); i != e; ++i)
Dan Gohmanf0baa6e2009-02-20 21:05:23 +00001290 if (UsersToProcess[i].Base->isZero())
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001291 return false;
1292
1293 // Otherwise, go for it.
1294 return true;
1295}
1296
1297/// InsertAffinePhi Create and insert a PHI node for an induction variable
1298/// with the specified start and step values in the specified loop.
1299///
1300/// If NegateStride is true, the stride should be negated by using a
1301/// subtract instead of an add.
1302///
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +00001303/// Return the created phi node.
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001304///
1305static PHINode *InsertAffinePhi(SCEVHandle Start, SCEVHandle Step,
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +00001306 Instruction *IVIncInsertPt,
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001307 const Loop *L,
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +00001308 SCEVExpander &Rewriter) {
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001309 assert(Start->isLoopInvariant(L) && "New PHI start is not loop invariant!");
1310 assert(Step->isLoopInvariant(L) && "New PHI stride is not loop invariant!");
1311
1312 BasicBlock *Header = L->getHeader();
1313 BasicBlock *Preheader = L->getLoopPreheader();
Dan Gohman0daeed22009-03-09 21:14:16 +00001314 BasicBlock *LatchBlock = L->getLoopLatch();
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001315 const Type *Ty = Start->getType();
Dan Gohmanaf79fb52009-04-21 01:07:12 +00001316 Ty = Rewriter.SE.getEffectiveSCEVType(Ty);
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001317
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001318 PHINode *PN = PHINode::Create(Ty, "lsr.iv", Header->begin());
1319 PN->addIncoming(Rewriter.expandCodeFor(Start, Ty, Preheader->getTerminator()),
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001320 Preheader);
1321
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001322 // If the stride is negative, insert a sub instead of an add for the
1323 // increment.
1324 bool isNegative = isNonConstantNegative(Step);
1325 SCEVHandle IncAmount = Step;
1326 if (isNegative)
1327 IncAmount = Rewriter.SE.getNegativeSCEV(Step);
1328
1329 // Insert an add instruction right before the terminator corresponding
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +00001330 // to the back-edge or just before the only use. The location is determined
1331 // by the caller and passed in as IVIncInsertPt.
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001332 Value *StepV = Rewriter.expandCodeFor(IncAmount, Ty,
1333 Preheader->getTerminator());
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +00001334 Instruction *IncV;
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001335 if (isNegative) {
1336 IncV = BinaryOperator::CreateSub(PN, StepV, "lsr.iv.next",
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +00001337 IVIncInsertPt);
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001338 } else {
1339 IncV = BinaryOperator::CreateAdd(PN, StepV, "lsr.iv.next",
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +00001340 IVIncInsertPt);
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001341 }
1342 if (!isa<ConstantInt>(StepV)) ++NumVariable;
1343
Dan Gohman0daeed22009-03-09 21:14:16 +00001344 PN->addIncoming(IncV, LatchBlock);
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001345
1346 ++NumInserted;
1347 return PN;
1348}
1349
1350static void SortUsersToProcess(std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess) {
1351 // We want to emit code for users inside the loop first. To do this, we
1352 // rearrange BasedUser so that the entries at the end have
1353 // isUseOfPostIncrementedValue = false, because we pop off the end of the
1354 // vector (so we handle them first).
1355 std::partition(UsersToProcess.begin(), UsersToProcess.end(),
1356 PartitionByIsUseOfPostIncrementedValue);
1357
1358 // Sort this by base, so that things with the same base are handled
1359 // together. By partitioning first and stable-sorting later, we are
1360 // guaranteed that within each base we will pop off users from within the
1361 // loop before users outside of the loop with a particular base.
1362 //
1363 // We would like to use stable_sort here, but we can't. The problem is that
1364 // SCEVHandle's don't have a deterministic ordering w.r.t to each other, so
1365 // we don't have anything to do a '<' comparison on. Because we think the
1366 // number of uses is small, do a horrible bubble sort which just relies on
1367 // ==.
1368 for (unsigned i = 0, e = UsersToProcess.size(); i != e; ++i) {
1369 // Get a base value.
1370 SCEVHandle Base = UsersToProcess[i].Base;
1371
1372 // Compact everything with this base to be consecutive with this one.
1373 for (unsigned j = i+1; j != e; ++j) {
1374 if (UsersToProcess[j].Base == Base) {
1375 std::swap(UsersToProcess[i+1], UsersToProcess[j]);
1376 ++i;
1377 }
1378 }
1379 }
1380}
1381
Dan Gohman6b38e292009-02-20 21:06:57 +00001382/// PrepareToStrengthReduceFully - Prepare to fully strength-reduce
1383/// UsersToProcess, meaning lowering addresses all the way down to direct
1384/// pointer arithmetic.
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001385///
1386void
1387LoopStrengthReduce::PrepareToStrengthReduceFully(
1388 std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess,
1389 SCEVHandle Stride,
1390 SCEVHandle CommonExprs,
1391 const Loop *L,
1392 SCEVExpander &PreheaderRewriter) {
1393 DOUT << " Fully reducing all users\n";
1394
1395 // Rewrite the UsersToProcess records, creating a separate PHI for each
1396 // unique Base value.
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +00001397 Instruction *IVIncInsertPt = L->getLoopLatch()->getTerminator();
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001398 for (unsigned i = 0, e = UsersToProcess.size(); i != e; ) {
1399 // TODO: The uses are grouped by base, but not sorted. We arbitrarily
1400 // pick the first Imm value here to start with, and adjust it for the
1401 // other uses.
1402 SCEVHandle Imm = UsersToProcess[i].Imm;
1403 SCEVHandle Base = UsersToProcess[i].Base;
1404 SCEVHandle Start = SE->getAddExpr(CommonExprs, Base, Imm);
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +00001405 PHINode *Phi = InsertAffinePhi(Start, Stride, IVIncInsertPt, L,
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +00001406 PreheaderRewriter);
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001407 // Loop over all the users with the same base.
1408 do {
1409 UsersToProcess[i].Base = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Stride->getType());
1410 UsersToProcess[i].Imm = SE->getMinusSCEV(UsersToProcess[i].Imm, Imm);
1411 UsersToProcess[i].Phi = Phi;
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001412 assert(UsersToProcess[i].Imm->isLoopInvariant(L) &&
1413 "ShouldUseFullStrengthReductionMode should reject this!");
1414 } while (++i != e && Base == UsersToProcess[i].Base);
1415 }
1416}
1417
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +00001418/// FindIVIncInsertPt - Return the location to insert the increment instruction.
1419/// If the only use if a use of postinc value, (must be the loop termination
1420/// condition), then insert it just before the use.
1421static Instruction *FindIVIncInsertPt(std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess,
1422 const Loop *L) {
1423 if (UsersToProcess.size() == 1 &&
1424 UsersToProcess[0].isUseOfPostIncrementedValue &&
1425 L->contains(UsersToProcess[0].Inst->getParent()))
1426 return UsersToProcess[0].Inst;
1427 return L->getLoopLatch()->getTerminator();
1428}
1429
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001430/// PrepareToStrengthReduceWithNewPhi - Insert a new induction variable for the
1431/// given users to share.
1432///
1433void
1434LoopStrengthReduce::PrepareToStrengthReduceWithNewPhi(
1435 std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess,
1436 SCEVHandle Stride,
1437 SCEVHandle CommonExprs,
1438 Value *CommonBaseV,
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +00001439 Instruction *IVIncInsertPt,
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001440 const Loop *L,
1441 SCEVExpander &PreheaderRewriter) {
1442 DOUT << " Inserting new PHI:\n";
1443
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001444 PHINode *Phi = InsertAffinePhi(SE->getUnknown(CommonBaseV),
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +00001445 Stride, IVIncInsertPt, L,
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +00001446 PreheaderRewriter);
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001447
1448 // Remember this in case a later stride is multiple of this.
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +00001449 IVsByStride[Stride].addIV(Stride, CommonExprs, Phi);
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001450
1451 // All the users will share this new IV.
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +00001452 for (unsigned i = 0, e = UsersToProcess.size(); i != e; ++i)
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001453 UsersToProcess[i].Phi = Phi;
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001454
1455 DOUT << " IV=";
1456 DEBUG(WriteAsOperand(*DOUT, Phi, /*PrintType=*/false));
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001457 DOUT << "\n";
1458}
1459
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +00001460/// PrepareToStrengthReduceFromSmallerStride - Prepare for the given users to
1461/// reuse an induction variable with a stride that is a factor of the current
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001462/// induction variable.
1463///
1464void
1465LoopStrengthReduce::PrepareToStrengthReduceFromSmallerStride(
1466 std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess,
1467 Value *CommonBaseV,
1468 const IVExpr &ReuseIV,
1469 Instruction *PreInsertPt) {
1470 DOUT << " Rewriting in terms of existing IV of STRIDE " << *ReuseIV.Stride
1471 << " and BASE " << *ReuseIV.Base << "\n";
1472
1473 // All the users will share the reused IV.
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +00001474 for (unsigned i = 0, e = UsersToProcess.size(); i != e; ++i)
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001475 UsersToProcess[i].Phi = ReuseIV.PHI;
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001476
1477 Constant *C = dyn_cast<Constant>(CommonBaseV);
1478 if (C &&
1479 (!C->isNullValue() &&
1480 !fitsInAddressMode(SE->getUnknown(CommonBaseV), CommonBaseV->getType(),
1481 TLI, false)))
1482 // We want the common base emitted into the preheader! This is just
1483 // using cast as a copy so BitCast (no-op cast) is appropriate
1484 CommonBaseV = new BitCastInst(CommonBaseV, CommonBaseV->getType(),
1485 "commonbase", PreInsertPt);
1486}
1487
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +00001488static bool IsImmFoldedIntoAddrMode(GlobalValue *GV, int64_t Offset,
Dan Gohman53f2ae22009-03-09 21:04:19 +00001489 const Type *AccessTy,
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +00001490 std::vector<BasedUser> &UsersToProcess,
1491 const TargetLowering *TLI) {
1492 SmallVector<Instruction*, 16> AddrModeInsts;
1493 for (unsigned i = 0, e = UsersToProcess.size(); i != e; ++i) {
1494 if (UsersToProcess[i].isUseOfPostIncrementedValue)
1495 continue;
1496 ExtAddrMode AddrMode =
1497 AddressingModeMatcher::Match(UsersToProcess[i].OperandValToReplace,
Dan Gohman53f2ae22009-03-09 21:04:19 +00001498 AccessTy, UsersToProcess[i].Inst,
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +00001499 AddrModeInsts, *TLI);
1500 if (GV && GV != AddrMode.BaseGV)
1501 return false;
1502 if (Offset && !AddrMode.BaseOffs)
1503 // FIXME: How to accurate check it's immediate offset is folded.
1504 return false;
1505 AddrModeInsts.clear();
1506 }
1507 return true;
1508}
1509
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001510/// StrengthReduceStridedIVUsers - Strength reduce all of the users of a single
1511/// stride of IV. All of the users may have different starting values, and this
Dan Gohman9f4ac312009-03-09 20:41:15 +00001512/// may not be the only stride.
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001513void LoopStrengthReduce::StrengthReduceStridedIVUsers(const SCEVHandle &Stride,
1514 IVUsersOfOneStride &Uses,
Dan Gohman9f4ac312009-03-09 20:41:15 +00001515 Loop *L) {
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001516 // If all the users are moved to another stride, then there is nothing to do.
Dan Gohman30359592008-01-29 13:02:09 +00001517 if (Uses.Users.empty())
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001518 return;
1519
1520 // Keep track if every use in UsersToProcess is an address. If they all are,
1521 // we may be able to rewrite the entire collection of them in terms of a
1522 // smaller-stride IV.
1523 bool AllUsesAreAddresses = true;
1524
Dale Johannesenb0390622008-12-16 22:16:28 +00001525 // Keep track if every use of a single stride is outside the loop. If so,
1526 // we want to be more aggressive about reusing a smaller-stride IV; a
1527 // multiply outside the loop is better than another IV inside. Well, usually.
1528 bool AllUsesAreOutsideLoop = true;
1529
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001530 // Transform our list of users and offsets to a bit more complex table. In
1531 // this new vector, each 'BasedUser' contains 'Base' the base of the
1532 // strided accessas well as the old information from Uses. We progressively
1533 // move information from the Base field to the Imm field, until we eventually
1534 // have the full access expression to rewrite the use.
1535 std::vector<BasedUser> UsersToProcess;
1536 SCEVHandle CommonExprs = CollectIVUsers(Stride, Uses, L, AllUsesAreAddresses,
Dale Johannesenb0390622008-12-16 22:16:28 +00001537 AllUsesAreOutsideLoop,
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001538 UsersToProcess);
1539
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001540 // Sort the UsersToProcess array so that users with common bases are
1541 // next to each other.
1542 SortUsersToProcess(UsersToProcess);
1543
Evan Cheng5f8ebaa2007-10-25 22:45:20 +00001544 // If we managed to find some expressions in common, we'll need to carry
1545 // their value in a register and add it in for each use. This will take up
1546 // a register operand, which potentially restricts what stride values are
1547 // valid.
Dan Gohmancfeb6a42008-06-18 16:23:07 +00001548 bool HaveCommonExprs = !CommonExprs->isZero();
Chris Lattnerfe355552007-04-01 22:21:39 +00001549 const Type *ReplacedTy = CommonExprs->getType();
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001550
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +00001551 // If all uses are addresses, consider sinking the immediate part of the
1552 // common expression back into uses if they can fit in the immediate fields.
Evan Cheng3cd389d2009-02-22 07:31:19 +00001553 if (TLI && HaveCommonExprs && AllUsesAreAddresses) {
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +00001554 SCEVHandle NewCommon = CommonExprs;
1555 SCEVHandle Imm = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, ReplacedTy);
Dan Gohman3cfe6a42009-03-09 21:22:12 +00001556 MoveImmediateValues(TLI, Type::VoidTy, NewCommon, Imm, true, L, SE);
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +00001557 if (!Imm->isZero()) {
1558 bool DoSink = true;
1559
1560 // If the immediate part of the common expression is a GV, check if it's
1561 // possible to fold it into the target addressing mode.
1562 GlobalValue *GV = 0;
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +00001563 if (const SCEVUnknown *SU = dyn_cast<SCEVUnknown>(Imm))
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001564 GV = dyn_cast<GlobalValue>(SU->getValue());
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +00001565 int64_t Offset = 0;
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +00001566 if (const SCEVConstant *SC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(Imm))
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +00001567 Offset = SC->getValue()->getSExtValue();
1568 if (GV || Offset)
Dan Gohman53f2ae22009-03-09 21:04:19 +00001569 // Pass VoidTy as the AccessTy to be conservative, because
1570 // there could be multiple access types among all the uses.
1571 DoSink = IsImmFoldedIntoAddrMode(GV, Offset, Type::VoidTy,
Evan Chengd9fb7122009-02-21 02:06:47 +00001572 UsersToProcess, TLI);
1573
1574 if (DoSink) {
1575 DOUT << " Sinking " << *Imm << " back down into uses\n";
1576 for (unsigned i = 0, e = UsersToProcess.size(); i != e; ++i)
1577 UsersToProcess[i].Imm = SE->getAddExpr(UsersToProcess[i].Imm, Imm);
1578 CommonExprs = NewCommon;
1579 HaveCommonExprs = !CommonExprs->isZero();
1580 ++NumImmSunk;
1581 }
1582 }
1583 }
1584
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001585 // Now that we know what we need to do, insert the PHI node itself.
1586 //
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +00001587 DOUT << "LSR: Examining IVs of TYPE " << *ReplacedTy << " of STRIDE "
1588 << *Stride << ":\n"
1589 << " Common base: " << *CommonExprs << "\n";
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +00001590
Dan Gohman5be18e82009-05-19 02:15:55 +00001591 SCEVExpander Rewriter(*SE);
1592 SCEVExpander PreheaderRewriter(*SE);
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001593
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001594 BasicBlock *Preheader = L->getLoopPreheader();
1595 Instruction *PreInsertPt = Preheader->getTerminator();
Chris Lattner12b50412005-09-12 17:11:27 +00001596 BasicBlock *LatchBlock = L->getLoopLatch();
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +00001597 Instruction *IVIncInsertPt = LatchBlock->getTerminator();
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +00001598
Dan Gohmanaf79fb52009-04-21 01:07:12 +00001599 Value *CommonBaseV = Constant::getNullValue(ReplacedTy);
Evan Chengeb8f9e22006-03-17 19:52:23 +00001600
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001601 SCEVHandle RewriteFactor = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, ReplacedTy);
1602 IVExpr ReuseIV(SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Type::Int32Ty),
1603 SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, Type::Int32Ty),
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +00001604 0);
Evan Chengeb8f9e22006-03-17 19:52:23 +00001605
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001606 /// Choose a strength-reduction strategy and prepare for it by creating
1607 /// the necessary PHIs and adjusting the bookkeeping.
1608 if (ShouldUseFullStrengthReductionMode(UsersToProcess, L,
1609 AllUsesAreAddresses, Stride)) {
1610 PrepareToStrengthReduceFully(UsersToProcess, Stride, CommonExprs, L,
1611 PreheaderRewriter);
Evan Chengeb8f9e22006-03-17 19:52:23 +00001612 } else {
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001613 // Emit the initial base value into the loop preheader.
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001614 CommonBaseV = PreheaderRewriter.expandCodeFor(CommonExprs, ReplacedTy,
1615 PreInsertPt);
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +00001616
Dale Johannesenc1acc3f2009-05-11 17:15:42 +00001617 // If all uses are addresses, check if it is possible to reuse an IV. The
1618 // new IV must have a stride that is a multiple of the old stride; the
1619 // multiple must be a number that can be encoded in the scale field of the
1620 // target addressing mode; and we must have a valid instruction after this
1621 // substitution, including the immediate field, if any.
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001622 RewriteFactor = CheckForIVReuse(HaveCommonExprs, AllUsesAreAddresses,
1623 AllUsesAreOutsideLoop,
Dan Gohmanbb5b49c2009-03-09 21:19:58 +00001624 Stride, ReuseIV, ReplacedTy,
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001625 UsersToProcess);
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +00001626 if (!RewriteFactor->isZero())
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001627 PrepareToStrengthReduceFromSmallerStride(UsersToProcess, CommonBaseV,
1628 ReuseIV, PreInsertPt);
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +00001629 else {
1630 IVIncInsertPt = FindIVIncInsertPt(UsersToProcess, L);
1631 PrepareToStrengthReduceWithNewPhi(UsersToProcess, Stride, CommonExprs,
1632 CommonBaseV, IVIncInsertPt,
1633 L, PreheaderRewriter);
1634 }
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +00001635 }
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001636
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001637 // Process all the users now, replacing their strided uses with
1638 // strength-reduced forms. This outer loop handles all bases, the inner
Chris Lattner7e79b382006-08-03 06:34:50 +00001639 // loop handles all users of a particular base.
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +00001640 while (!UsersToProcess.empty()) {
Chris Lattner7b445c52005-10-11 18:30:57 +00001641 SCEVHandle Base = UsersToProcess.back().Base;
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +00001642 Instruction *Inst = UsersToProcess.back().Inst;
Chris Lattnerbe3e5212005-08-03 23:30:08 +00001643
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001644 // Emit the code for Base into the preheader.
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001645 Value *BaseV = 0;
1646 if (!Base->isZero()) {
Dan Gohman5be18e82009-05-19 02:15:55 +00001647 BaseV = PreheaderRewriter.expandCodeFor(Base, 0, PreInsertPt);
Chris Lattner7d8ed8a2007-05-11 22:40:34 +00001648
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001649 DOUT << " INSERTING code for BASE = " << *Base << ":";
1650 if (BaseV->hasName())
1651 DOUT << " Result value name = %" << BaseV->getNameStr();
1652 DOUT << "\n";
Chris Lattner7d8ed8a2007-05-11 22:40:34 +00001653
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001654 // If BaseV is a non-zero constant, make sure that it gets inserted into
1655 // the preheader, instead of being forward substituted into the uses. We
1656 // do this by forcing a BitCast (noop cast) to be inserted into the
1657 // preheader in this case.
1658 if (!fitsInAddressMode(Base, getAccessType(Inst), TLI, false)) {
Reid Spencer3da59db2006-11-27 01:05:10 +00001659 // We want this constant emitted into the preheader! This is just
1660 // using cast as a copy so BitCast (no-op cast) is appropriate
1661 BaseV = new BitCastInst(BaseV, BaseV->getType(), "preheaderinsert",
Dan Gohman4a9a3e52008-04-14 18:26:16 +00001662 PreInsertPt);
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001663 }
Chris Lattner7e79b382006-08-03 06:34:50 +00001664 }
1665
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +00001666 // Emit the code to add the immediate offset to the Phi value, just before
Chris Lattner2351aba2005-08-03 22:51:21 +00001667 // the instructions that we identified as using this stride and base.
Chris Lattner7b445c52005-10-11 18:30:57 +00001668 do {
Chris Lattner7e79b382006-08-03 06:34:50 +00001669 // FIXME: Use emitted users to emit other users.
Chris Lattner7b445c52005-10-11 18:30:57 +00001670 BasedUser &User = UsersToProcess.back();
Jeff Cohend29b6aa2005-07-30 18:33:25 +00001671
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +00001672 DOUT << " Examining ";
1673 if (User.isUseOfPostIncrementedValue)
1674 DOUT << "postinc";
1675 else
1676 DOUT << "preinc";
1677 DOUT << " use ";
Dan Gohman4a359ea2009-02-19 19:32:06 +00001678 DEBUG(WriteAsOperand(*DOUT, UsersToProcess.back().OperandValToReplace,
1679 /*PrintType=*/false));
Dale Johannesen22523ad2009-04-29 22:57:20 +00001680 DOUT << " in Inst: " << *(User.Inst);
Dan Gohman2f09f512009-02-19 19:23:27 +00001681
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001682 // If this instruction wants to use the post-incremented value, move it
1683 // after the post-inc and use its value instead of the PHI.
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001684 Value *RewriteOp = User.Phi;
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001685 if (User.isUseOfPostIncrementedValue) {
Dan Gohman9d100862009-03-09 22:04:01 +00001686 RewriteOp = User.Phi->getIncomingValueForBlock(LatchBlock);
Chris Lattnerc6bae652005-09-12 06:04:47 +00001687 // If this user is in the loop, make sure it is the last thing in the
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +00001688 // loop to ensure it is dominated by the increment. In case it's the
1689 // only use of the iv, the increment instruction is already before the
1690 // use.
1691 if (L->contains(User.Inst->getParent()) && User.Inst != IVIncInsertPt)
1692 User.Inst->moveBefore(IVIncInsertPt);
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001693 }
Evan Cheng86c75d32006-06-09 00:12:42 +00001694
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +00001695 SCEVHandle RewriteExpr = SE->getUnknown(RewriteOp);
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001696
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00001697 if (SE->getEffectiveSCEVType(RewriteOp->getType()) !=
1698 SE->getEffectiveSCEVType(ReplacedTy)) {
Dan Gohmanaf79fb52009-04-21 01:07:12 +00001699 assert(SE->getTypeSizeInBits(RewriteOp->getType()) >
1700 SE->getTypeSizeInBits(ReplacedTy) &&
Dan Gohmane616bf32009-04-16 15:47:35 +00001701 "Unexpected widening cast!");
1702 RewriteExpr = SE->getTruncateExpr(RewriteExpr, ReplacedTy);
1703 }
1704
Dale Johannesenb0390622008-12-16 22:16:28 +00001705 // If we had to insert new instructions for RewriteOp, we have to
Dan Gohmanf20d70d2008-05-15 23:26:57 +00001706 // consider that they may not have been able to end up immediately
1707 // next to RewriteOp, because non-PHI instructions may never precede
1708 // PHI instructions in a block. In this case, remember where the last
Dan Gohmanca756ae2008-05-20 03:01:48 +00001709 // instruction was inserted so that if we're replacing a different
1710 // PHI node, we can use the later point to expand the final
1711 // RewriteExpr.
Dan Gohmanf20d70d2008-05-15 23:26:57 +00001712 Instruction *NewBasePt = dyn_cast<Instruction>(RewriteOp);
Dan Gohmanc17e0cf2009-02-20 04:17:46 +00001713 if (RewriteOp == User.Phi) NewBasePt = 0;
Dan Gohmanf20d70d2008-05-15 23:26:57 +00001714
Chris Lattner2351aba2005-08-03 22:51:21 +00001715 // Clear the SCEVExpander's expression map so that we are guaranteed
1716 // to have the code emitted where we expect it.
1717 Rewriter.clear();
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +00001718
1719 // If we are reusing the iv, then it must be multiplied by a constant
Dale Johannesen1de17d52009-02-09 22:14:15 +00001720 // factor to take advantage of the addressing mode scale component.
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001721 if (!RewriteFactor->isZero()) {
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +00001722 // If we're reusing an IV with a nonzero base (currently this happens
1723 // only when all reuses are outside the loop) subtract that base here.
1724 // The base has been used to initialize the PHI node but we don't want
1725 // it here.
Dale Johannesen1de17d52009-02-09 22:14:15 +00001726 if (!ReuseIV.Base->isZero()) {
1727 SCEVHandle typedBase = ReuseIV.Base;
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00001728 if (SE->getEffectiveSCEVType(RewriteExpr->getType()) !=
1729 SE->getEffectiveSCEVType(ReuseIV.Base->getType())) {
Dale Johannesen1de17d52009-02-09 22:14:15 +00001730 // It's possible the original IV is a larger type than the new IV,
1731 // in which case we have to truncate the Base. We checked in
1732 // RequiresTypeConversion that this is valid.
Dan Gohmanaf79fb52009-04-21 01:07:12 +00001733 assert(SE->getTypeSizeInBits(RewriteExpr->getType()) <
1734 SE->getTypeSizeInBits(ReuseIV.Base->getType()) &&
Dan Gohman84fc33e2009-04-16 22:35:57 +00001735 "Unexpected lengthening conversion!");
Dale Johannesen1de17d52009-02-09 22:14:15 +00001736 typedBase = SE->getTruncateExpr(ReuseIV.Base,
1737 RewriteExpr->getType());
1738 }
1739 RewriteExpr = SE->getMinusSCEV(RewriteExpr, typedBase);
1740 }
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +00001741
1742 // Multiply old variable, with base removed, by new scale factor.
1743 RewriteExpr = SE->getMulExpr(RewriteFactor,
Evan Cheng83927722007-10-30 22:27:26 +00001744 RewriteExpr);
Evan Chengeb8f9e22006-03-17 19:52:23 +00001745
1746 // The common base is emitted in the loop preheader. But since we
1747 // are reusing an IV, it has not been used to initialize the PHI node.
1748 // Add it to the expression used to rewrite the uses.
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +00001749 // When this use is outside the loop, we earlier subtracted the
1750 // common base, and are adding it back here. Use the same expression
1751 // as before, rather than CommonBaseV, so DAGCombiner will zap it.
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001752 if (!CommonExprs->isZero()) {
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +00001753 if (L->contains(User.Inst->getParent()))
1754 RewriteExpr = SE->getAddExpr(RewriteExpr,
Dale Johannesenb0390622008-12-16 22:16:28 +00001755 SE->getUnknown(CommonBaseV));
Dale Johannesen2f46bb82009-01-14 02:35:31 +00001756 else
1757 RewriteExpr = SE->getAddExpr(RewriteExpr, CommonExprs);
1758 }
Evan Chengeb8f9e22006-03-17 19:52:23 +00001759 }
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +00001760
Chris Lattner2114b272005-08-04 20:03:32 +00001761 // Now that we know what we need to do, insert code before User for the
1762 // immediate and any loop-variant expressions.
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001763 if (BaseV)
Chris Lattner1bbae0c2005-08-09 00:18:09 +00001764 // Add BaseV to the PHI value if needed.
Dan Gohman246b2562007-10-22 18:31:58 +00001765 RewriteExpr = SE->getAddExpr(RewriteExpr, SE->getUnknown(BaseV));
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +00001766
Dan Gohmanf20d70d2008-05-15 23:26:57 +00001767 User.RewriteInstructionToUseNewBase(RewriteExpr, NewBasePt,
Dan Gohman5be18e82009-05-19 02:15:55 +00001768 Rewriter, L, this, *LI,
Evan Cheng0e0014d2007-10-30 23:45:15 +00001769 DeadInsts);
Jeff Cohend29b6aa2005-07-30 18:33:25 +00001770
Chris Lattnera68d4ca2008-12-01 06:14:28 +00001771 // Mark old value we replaced as possibly dead, so that it is eliminated
Chris Lattner2351aba2005-08-03 22:51:21 +00001772 // if we just replaced the last use of that value.
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00001773 DeadInsts.push_back(User.OperandValToReplace);
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +00001774
Chris Lattner7b445c52005-10-11 18:30:57 +00001775 UsersToProcess.pop_back();
Chris Lattner2351aba2005-08-03 22:51:21 +00001776 ++NumReduced;
Chris Lattner7b445c52005-10-11 18:30:57 +00001777
Chris Lattner7e79b382006-08-03 06:34:50 +00001778 // If there are any more users to process with the same base, process them
1779 // now. We sorted by base above, so we just have to check the last elt.
Chris Lattner7b445c52005-10-11 18:30:57 +00001780 } while (!UsersToProcess.empty() && UsersToProcess.back().Base == Base);
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +00001781 // TODO: Next, find out which base index is the most common, pull it out.
1782 }
1783
1784 // IMPORTANT TODO: Figure out how to partition the IV's with this stride, but
1785 // different starting values, into different PHIs.
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +00001786}
1787
Devang Patelc677de22008-08-13 20:31:11 +00001788/// FindIVUserForCond - If Cond has an operand that is an expression of an IV,
Chris Lattneraed01d12007-04-03 05:11:24 +00001789/// set the IV user and stride information and return true, otherwise return
1790/// false.
Devang Patelc677de22008-08-13 20:31:11 +00001791bool LoopStrengthReduce::FindIVUserForCond(ICmpInst *Cond, IVStrideUse *&CondUse,
Chris Lattneraed01d12007-04-03 05:11:24 +00001792 const SCEVHandle *&CondStride) {
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00001793 for (unsigned Stride = 0, e = IU->StrideOrder.size();
1794 Stride != e && !CondUse; ++Stride) {
1795 std::map<SCEVHandle, IVUsersOfOneStride *>::iterator SI =
1796 IU->IVUsesByStride.find(IU->StrideOrder[Stride]);
1797 assert(SI != IU->IVUsesByStride.end() && "Stride doesn't exist!");
1798
1799 for (ilist<IVStrideUse>::iterator UI = SI->second->Users.begin(),
1800 E = SI->second->Users.end(); UI != E; ++UI)
1801 if (UI->getUser() == Cond) {
Chris Lattneraed01d12007-04-03 05:11:24 +00001802 // NOTE: we could handle setcc instructions with multiple uses here, but
1803 // InstCombine does it as well for simple uses, it's not clear that it
1804 // occurs enough in real life to handle.
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00001805 CondUse = UI;
Chris Lattneraed01d12007-04-03 05:11:24 +00001806 CondStride = &SI->first;
1807 return true;
1808 }
1809 }
1810 return false;
1811}
1812
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00001813namespace {
1814 // Constant strides come first which in turns are sorted by their absolute
1815 // values. If absolute values are the same, then positive strides comes first.
1816 // e.g.
1817 // 4, -1, X, 1, 2 ==> 1, -1, 2, 4, X
1818 struct StrideCompare {
Dan Gohmanaf79fb52009-04-21 01:07:12 +00001819 const ScalarEvolution *SE;
1820 explicit StrideCompare(const ScalarEvolution *se) : SE(se) {}
Dan Gohman2d1be872009-04-16 03:18:22 +00001821
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00001822 bool operator()(const SCEVHandle &LHS, const SCEVHandle &RHS) {
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +00001823 const SCEVConstant *LHSC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(LHS);
1824 const SCEVConstant *RHSC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(RHS);
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00001825 if (LHSC && RHSC) {
1826 int64_t LV = LHSC->getValue()->getSExtValue();
1827 int64_t RV = RHSC->getValue()->getSExtValue();
1828 uint64_t ALV = (LV < 0) ? -LV : LV;
1829 uint64_t ARV = (RV < 0) ? -RV : RV;
Dan Gohmanbc511722009-02-13 00:26:43 +00001830 if (ALV == ARV) {
1831 if (LV != RV)
1832 return LV > RV;
1833 } else {
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00001834 return ALV < ARV;
Dan Gohmanbc511722009-02-13 00:26:43 +00001835 }
1836
1837 // If it's the same value but different type, sort by bit width so
1838 // that we emit larger induction variables before smaller
1839 // ones, letting the smaller be re-written in terms of larger ones.
Dan Gohmanaf79fb52009-04-21 01:07:12 +00001840 return SE->getTypeSizeInBits(RHS->getType()) <
1841 SE->getTypeSizeInBits(LHS->getType());
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00001842 }
Dan Gohmanbc511722009-02-13 00:26:43 +00001843 return LHSC && !RHSC;
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00001844 }
1845 };
1846}
1847
1848/// ChangeCompareStride - If a loop termination compare instruction is the
1849/// only use of its stride, and the compaison is against a constant value,
1850/// try eliminate the stride by moving the compare instruction to another
1851/// stride and change its constant operand accordingly. e.g.
1852///
1853/// loop:
1854/// ...
1855/// v1 = v1 + 3
1856/// v2 = v2 + 1
1857/// if (v2 < 10) goto loop
1858/// =>
1859/// loop:
1860/// ...
1861/// v1 = v1 + 3
1862/// if (v1 < 30) goto loop
1863ICmpInst *LoopStrengthReduce::ChangeCompareStride(Loop *L, ICmpInst *Cond,
Evan Cheng0e0014d2007-10-30 23:45:15 +00001864 IVStrideUse* &CondUse,
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00001865 const SCEVHandle* &CondStride) {
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00001866 // If there's only one stride in the loop, there's nothing to do here.
1867 if (IU->StrideOrder.size() < 2)
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00001868 return Cond;
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00001869 // If there are other users of the condition's stride, don't bother
1870 // trying to change the condition because the stride will still
1871 // remain.
1872 std::map<SCEVHandle, IVUsersOfOneStride *>::iterator I =
1873 IU->IVUsesByStride.find(*CondStride);
1874 if (I == IU->IVUsesByStride.end() ||
1875 I->second->Users.size() != 1)
1876 return Cond;
1877 // Only handle constant strides for now.
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00001878 const SCEVConstant *SC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(*CondStride);
1879 if (!SC) return Cond;
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00001880
1881 ICmpInst::Predicate Predicate = Cond->getPredicate();
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00001882 int64_t CmpSSInt = SC->getValue()->getSExtValue();
Dan Gohmanaf79fb52009-04-21 01:07:12 +00001883 unsigned BitWidth = SE->getTypeSizeInBits((*CondStride)->getType());
Evan Cheng168a66b2007-10-26 23:08:19 +00001884 uint64_t SignBit = 1ULL << (BitWidth-1);
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00001885 const Type *CmpTy = Cond->getOperand(0)->getType();
Evan Cheng168a66b2007-10-26 23:08:19 +00001886 const Type *NewCmpTy = NULL;
Dan Gohmanaf79fb52009-04-21 01:07:12 +00001887 unsigned TyBits = SE->getTypeSizeInBits(CmpTy);
Evan Chengaf62c092007-10-29 22:07:18 +00001888 unsigned NewTyBits = 0;
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00001889 SCEVHandle *NewStride = NULL;
Dan Gohmanff518c82009-02-20 21:27:23 +00001890 Value *NewCmpLHS = NULL;
1891 Value *NewCmpRHS = NULL;
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00001892 int64_t Scale = 1;
Dan Gohmanaf79fb52009-04-21 01:07:12 +00001893 SCEVHandle NewOffset = SE->getIntegerSCEV(0, CmpTy);
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00001894
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00001895 if (ConstantInt *C = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Cond->getOperand(1))) {
1896 int64_t CmpVal = C->getValue().getSExtValue();
Evan Cheng168a66b2007-10-26 23:08:19 +00001897
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00001898 // Check stride constant and the comparision constant signs to detect
1899 // overflow.
1900 if ((CmpVal & SignBit) != (CmpSSInt & SignBit))
1901 return Cond;
Evan Cheng168a66b2007-10-26 23:08:19 +00001902
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00001903 // Look for a suitable stride / iv as replacement.
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00001904 for (unsigned i = 0, e = IU->StrideOrder.size(); i != e; ++i) {
1905 std::map<SCEVHandle, IVUsersOfOneStride *>::iterator SI =
1906 IU->IVUsesByStride.find(IU->StrideOrder[i]);
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00001907 if (!isa<SCEVConstant>(SI->first))
Dan Gohmanff518c82009-02-20 21:27:23 +00001908 continue;
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00001909 int64_t SSInt = cast<SCEVConstant>(SI->first)->getValue()->getSExtValue();
Dan Gohmanc7749b72009-04-27 20:35:32 +00001910 if (SSInt == CmpSSInt ||
Dale Johannesen7b9486a2009-05-13 00:24:22 +00001911 abs64(SSInt) < abs64(CmpSSInt) ||
Dan Gohmanc7749b72009-04-27 20:35:32 +00001912 (SSInt % CmpSSInt) != 0)
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00001913 continue;
1914
1915 Scale = SSInt / CmpSSInt;
1916 int64_t NewCmpVal = CmpVal * Scale;
David Greenee19c8402009-05-06 17:39:26 +00001917 APInt Mul = APInt(BitWidth*2, CmpVal, true);
1918 Mul = Mul * APInt(BitWidth*2, Scale, true);
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00001919 // Check for overflow.
Evan Chengee08da82009-05-06 18:00:56 +00001920 if (!Mul.isSignedIntN(BitWidth))
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00001921 continue;
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00001922 // Check for overflow in the stride's type too.
1923 if (!Mul.isSignedIntN(SE->getTypeSizeInBits(SI->first->getType())))
1924 continue;
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00001925
1926 // Watch out for overflow.
1927 if (ICmpInst::isSignedPredicate(Predicate) &&
1928 (CmpVal & SignBit) != (NewCmpVal & SignBit))
1929 continue;
1930
1931 if (NewCmpVal == CmpVal)
1932 continue;
1933 // Pick the best iv to use trying to avoid a cast.
1934 NewCmpLHS = NULL;
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00001935 for (ilist<IVStrideUse>::iterator UI = SI->second->Users.begin(),
1936 E = SI->second->Users.end(); UI != E; ++UI) {
1937 Value *Op = UI->getOperandValToReplace();
1938
1939 // If the IVStrideUse implies a cast, check for an actual cast which
1940 // can be used to find the original IV expression.
1941 if (SE->getEffectiveSCEVType(Op->getType()) !=
1942 SE->getEffectiveSCEVType(SI->first->getType())) {
1943 CastInst *CI = dyn_cast<CastInst>(Op);
1944 // If it's not a simple cast, it's complicated.
1945 if (!CI)
1946 continue;
1947 // If it's a cast from a type other than the stride type,
1948 // it's complicated.
1949 if (CI->getOperand(0)->getType() != SI->first->getType())
1950 continue;
1951 // Ok, we found the IV expression in the stride's type.
1952 Op = CI->getOperand(0);
1953 }
1954
1955 NewCmpLHS = Op;
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00001956 if (NewCmpLHS->getType() == CmpTy)
1957 break;
1958 }
1959 if (!NewCmpLHS)
1960 continue;
1961
1962 NewCmpTy = NewCmpLHS->getType();
Dan Gohmanaf79fb52009-04-21 01:07:12 +00001963 NewTyBits = SE->getTypeSizeInBits(NewCmpTy);
1964 const Type *NewCmpIntTy = IntegerType::get(NewTyBits);
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00001965 if (RequiresTypeConversion(NewCmpTy, CmpTy)) {
1966 // Check if it is possible to rewrite it using
1967 // an iv / stride of a smaller integer type.
Dan Gohman65e05b62009-04-16 16:49:48 +00001968 unsigned Bits = NewTyBits;
1969 if (ICmpInst::isSignedPredicate(Predicate))
1970 --Bits;
1971 uint64_t Mask = (1ULL << Bits) - 1;
1972 if (((uint64_t)NewCmpVal & Mask) != (uint64_t)NewCmpVal)
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00001973 continue;
1974 }
1975
1976 // Don't rewrite if use offset is non-constant and the new type is
1977 // of a different type.
1978 // FIXME: too conservative?
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00001979 if (NewTyBits != TyBits && !isa<SCEVConstant>(CondUse->getOffset()))
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00001980 continue;
1981
1982 bool AllUsesAreAddresses = true;
1983 bool AllUsesAreOutsideLoop = true;
1984 std::vector<BasedUser> UsersToProcess;
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00001985 SCEVHandle CommonExprs = CollectIVUsers(SI->first, *SI->second, L,
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00001986 AllUsesAreAddresses,
1987 AllUsesAreOutsideLoop,
1988 UsersToProcess);
1989 // Avoid rewriting the compare instruction with an iv of new stride
1990 // if it's likely the new stride uses will be rewritten using the
1991 // stride of the compare instruction.
1992 if (AllUsesAreAddresses &&
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +00001993 ValidScale(!CommonExprs->isZero(), Scale, UsersToProcess))
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00001994 continue;
1995
1996 // If scale is negative, use swapped predicate unless it's testing
1997 // for equality.
1998 if (Scale < 0 && !Cond->isEquality())
1999 Predicate = ICmpInst::getSwappedPredicate(Predicate);
2000
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00002001 NewStride = &IU->StrideOrder[i];
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00002002 if (!isa<PointerType>(NewCmpTy))
2003 NewCmpRHS = ConstantInt::get(NewCmpTy, NewCmpVal);
2004 else {
Dan Gohmanaf79fb52009-04-21 01:07:12 +00002005 ConstantInt *CI = ConstantInt::get(NewCmpIntTy, NewCmpVal);
Dan Gohman798d3922009-04-16 15:48:38 +00002006 NewCmpRHS = ConstantExpr::getIntToPtr(CI, NewCmpTy);
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00002007 }
2008 NewOffset = TyBits == NewTyBits
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00002009 ? SE->getMulExpr(CondUse->getOffset(),
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00002010 SE->getConstant(ConstantInt::get(CmpTy, Scale)))
Dan Gohmanaf79fb52009-04-21 01:07:12 +00002011 : SE->getConstant(ConstantInt::get(NewCmpIntTy,
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00002012 cast<SCEVConstant>(CondUse->getOffset())->getValue()
2013 ->getSExtValue()*Scale));
Dan Gohmanc34fea32009-02-24 01:58:00 +00002014 break;
Dan Gohmanff518c82009-02-20 21:27:23 +00002015 }
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00002016 }
2017
Dan Gohman9b93dd12008-06-16 22:34:15 +00002018 // Forgo this transformation if it the increment happens to be
2019 // unfortunately positioned after the condition, and the condition
2020 // has multiple uses which prevent it from being moved immediately
2021 // before the branch. See
2022 // test/Transforms/LoopStrengthReduce/change-compare-stride-trickiness-*.ll
2023 // for an example of this situation.
Devang Pateld16aba22008-08-13 02:05:14 +00002024 if (!Cond->hasOneUse()) {
Dan Gohman9b93dd12008-06-16 22:34:15 +00002025 for (BasicBlock::iterator I = Cond, E = Cond->getParent()->end();
2026 I != E; ++I)
Dan Gohmanff518c82009-02-20 21:27:23 +00002027 if (I == NewCmpLHS)
Dan Gohman9b93dd12008-06-16 22:34:15 +00002028 return Cond;
Devang Pateld16aba22008-08-13 02:05:14 +00002029 }
Dan Gohman9b93dd12008-06-16 22:34:15 +00002030
Dan Gohmanff518c82009-02-20 21:27:23 +00002031 if (NewCmpRHS) {
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00002032 // Create a new compare instruction using new stride / iv.
2033 ICmpInst *OldCond = Cond;
Evan Cheng168a66b2007-10-26 23:08:19 +00002034 // Insert new compare instruction.
Dan Gohmanff518c82009-02-20 21:27:23 +00002035 Cond = new ICmpInst(Predicate, NewCmpLHS, NewCmpRHS,
Dan Gohmane562b172008-06-13 21:43:41 +00002036 L->getHeader()->getName() + ".termcond",
2037 OldCond);
Evan Cheng168a66b2007-10-26 23:08:19 +00002038
2039 // Remove the old compare instruction. The old indvar is probably dead too.
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00002040 DeadInsts.push_back(CondUse->getOperandValToReplace());
Dan Gohman010ee2d2008-05-21 00:54:12 +00002041 OldCond->replaceAllUsesWith(Cond);
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00002042 OldCond->eraseFromParent();
Evan Cheng168a66b2007-10-26 23:08:19 +00002043
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00002044 IU->IVUsesByStride[*NewStride]->addUser(NewOffset, Cond, NewCmpLHS, false);
2045 CondUse = &IU->IVUsesByStride[*NewStride]->Users.back();
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00002046 CondStride = NewStride;
2047 ++NumEliminated;
Dan Gohmanafc36a92009-05-02 18:29:22 +00002048 Changed = true;
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00002049 }
2050
2051 return Cond;
2052}
2053
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +00002054/// OptimizeSMax - Rewrite the loop's terminating condition if it uses
2055/// an smax computation.
2056///
2057/// This is a narrow solution to a specific, but acute, problem. For loops
2058/// like this:
2059///
2060/// i = 0;
2061/// do {
2062/// p[i] = 0.0;
2063/// } while (++i < n);
2064///
2065/// where the comparison is signed, the trip count isn't just 'n', because
2066/// 'n' could be negative. And unfortunately this can come up even for loops
2067/// where the user didn't use a C do-while loop. For example, seemingly
2068/// well-behaved top-test loops will commonly be lowered like this:
2069//
2070/// if (n > 0) {
2071/// i = 0;
2072/// do {
2073/// p[i] = 0.0;
2074/// } while (++i < n);
2075/// }
2076///
2077/// and then it's possible for subsequent optimization to obscure the if
2078/// test in such a way that indvars can't find it.
2079///
2080/// When indvars can't find the if test in loops like this, it creates a
2081/// signed-max expression, which allows it to give the loop a canonical
2082/// induction variable:
2083///
2084/// i = 0;
2085/// smax = n < 1 ? 1 : n;
2086/// do {
2087/// p[i] = 0.0;
2088/// } while (++i != smax);
2089///
2090/// Canonical induction variables are necessary because the loop passes
2091/// are designed around them. The most obvious example of this is the
2092/// LoopInfo analysis, which doesn't remember trip count values. It
2093/// expects to be able to rediscover the trip count each time it is
2094/// needed, and it does this using a simple analyis that only succeeds if
2095/// the loop has a canonical induction variable.
2096///
2097/// However, when it comes time to generate code, the maximum operation
2098/// can be quite costly, especially if it's inside of an outer loop.
2099///
2100/// This function solves this problem by detecting this type of loop and
2101/// rewriting their conditions from ICMP_NE back to ICMP_SLT, and deleting
2102/// the instructions for the maximum computation.
2103///
2104ICmpInst *LoopStrengthReduce::OptimizeSMax(Loop *L, ICmpInst *Cond,
2105 IVStrideUse* &CondUse) {
2106 // Check that the loop matches the pattern we're looking for.
2107 if (Cond->getPredicate() != CmpInst::ICMP_EQ &&
2108 Cond->getPredicate() != CmpInst::ICMP_NE)
2109 return Cond;
2110
2111 SelectInst *Sel = dyn_cast<SelectInst>(Cond->getOperand(1));
2112 if (!Sel || !Sel->hasOneUse()) return Cond;
2113
Dan Gohman46bdfb02009-02-24 18:55:53 +00002114 SCEVHandle BackedgeTakenCount = SE->getBackedgeTakenCount(L);
2115 if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(BackedgeTakenCount))
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +00002116 return Cond;
Dan Gohman46bdfb02009-02-24 18:55:53 +00002117 SCEVHandle One = SE->getIntegerSCEV(1, BackedgeTakenCount->getType());
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +00002118
Dan Gohman46bdfb02009-02-24 18:55:53 +00002119 // Add one to the backedge-taken count to get the trip count.
2120 SCEVHandle IterationCount = SE->getAddExpr(BackedgeTakenCount, One);
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +00002121
2122 // Check for a max calculation that matches the pattern.
Dan Gohman35738ac2009-05-04 22:30:44 +00002123 const SCEVSMaxExpr *SMax = dyn_cast<SCEVSMaxExpr>(IterationCount);
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +00002124 if (!SMax || SMax != SE->getSCEV(Sel)) return Cond;
2125
2126 SCEVHandle SMaxLHS = SMax->getOperand(0);
2127 SCEVHandle SMaxRHS = SMax->getOperand(1);
2128 if (!SMaxLHS || SMaxLHS != One) return Cond;
2129
2130 // Check the relevant induction variable for conformance to
2131 // the pattern.
2132 SCEVHandle IV = SE->getSCEV(Cond->getOperand(0));
Dan Gohman890f92b2009-04-18 17:56:28 +00002133 const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(IV);
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +00002134 if (!AR || !AR->isAffine() ||
2135 AR->getStart() != One ||
2136 AR->getStepRecurrence(*SE) != One)
2137 return Cond;
2138
Dan Gohmanbc10b8c2009-03-04 20:49:01 +00002139 assert(AR->getLoop() == L &&
2140 "Loop condition operand is an addrec in a different loop!");
2141
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +00002142 // Check the right operand of the select, and remember it, as it will
2143 // be used in the new comparison instruction.
2144 Value *NewRHS = 0;
2145 if (SE->getSCEV(Sel->getOperand(1)) == SMaxRHS)
2146 NewRHS = Sel->getOperand(1);
2147 else if (SE->getSCEV(Sel->getOperand(2)) == SMaxRHS)
2148 NewRHS = Sel->getOperand(2);
2149 if (!NewRHS) return Cond;
2150
2151 // Ok, everything looks ok to change the condition into an SLT or SGE and
2152 // delete the max calculation.
2153 ICmpInst *NewCond =
2154 new ICmpInst(Cond->getPredicate() == CmpInst::ICMP_NE ?
2155 CmpInst::ICMP_SLT :
2156 CmpInst::ICMP_SGE,
2157 Cond->getOperand(0), NewRHS, "scmp", Cond);
2158
2159 // Delete the max calculation instructions.
2160 Cond->replaceAllUsesWith(NewCond);
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00002161 CondUse->setUser(NewCond);
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +00002162 Instruction *Cmp = cast<Instruction>(Sel->getOperand(0));
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00002163 Cond->eraseFromParent();
Dan Gohman586b7b72008-10-01 02:02:03 +00002164 Sel->eraseFromParent();
Dan Gohman35738ac2009-05-04 22:30:44 +00002165 if (Cmp->use_empty())
Dan Gohman586b7b72008-10-01 02:02:03 +00002166 Cmp->eraseFromParent();
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +00002167 return NewCond;
2168}
2169
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +00002170/// OptimizeShadowIV - If IV is used in a int-to-float cast
2171/// inside the loop then try to eliminate the cast opeation.
2172void LoopStrengthReduce::OptimizeShadowIV(Loop *L) {
2173
Dan Gohman46bdfb02009-02-24 18:55:53 +00002174 SCEVHandle BackedgeTakenCount = SE->getBackedgeTakenCount(L);
2175 if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(BackedgeTakenCount))
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +00002176 return;
2177
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00002178 for (unsigned Stride = 0, e = IU->StrideOrder.size(); Stride != e;
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +00002179 ++Stride) {
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00002180 std::map<SCEVHandle, IVUsersOfOneStride *>::iterator SI =
2181 IU->IVUsesByStride.find(IU->StrideOrder[Stride]);
2182 assert(SI != IU->IVUsesByStride.end() && "Stride doesn't exist!");
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +00002183 if (!isa<SCEVConstant>(SI->first))
2184 continue;
2185
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00002186 for (ilist<IVStrideUse>::iterator UI = SI->second->Users.begin(),
2187 E = SI->second->Users.end(); UI != E; /* empty */) {
2188 ilist<IVStrideUse>::iterator CandidateUI = UI;
Devang Patel54153272008-08-27 17:50:18 +00002189 ++UI;
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00002190 Instruction *ShadowUse = CandidateUI->getUser();
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +00002191 const Type *DestTy = NULL;
2192
2193 /* If shadow use is a int->float cast then insert a second IV
Devang Patel54153272008-08-27 17:50:18 +00002194 to eliminate this cast.
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +00002195
2196 for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; ++i)
2197 foo((double)i);
2198
Devang Patel54153272008-08-27 17:50:18 +00002199 is transformed into
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +00002200
2201 double d = 0.0;
2202 for (unsigned i = 0; i < n; ++i, ++d)
2203 foo(d);
2204 */
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00002205 if (UIToFPInst *UCast = dyn_cast<UIToFPInst>(CandidateUI->getUser()))
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +00002206 DestTy = UCast->getDestTy();
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00002207 else if (SIToFPInst *SCast = dyn_cast<SIToFPInst>(CandidateUI->getUser()))
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +00002208 DestTy = SCast->getDestTy();
Devang Patel18bb2782008-08-27 20:55:23 +00002209 if (!DestTy) continue;
2210
2211 if (TLI) {
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +00002212 // If target does not support DestTy natively then do not apply
2213 // this transformation.
Devang Patel18bb2782008-08-27 20:55:23 +00002214 MVT DVT = TLI->getValueType(DestTy);
2215 if (!TLI->isTypeLegal(DVT)) continue;
2216 }
2217
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +00002218 PHINode *PH = dyn_cast<PHINode>(ShadowUse->getOperand(0));
2219 if (!PH) continue;
2220 if (PH->getNumIncomingValues() != 2) continue;
2221
2222 const Type *SrcTy = PH->getType();
2223 int Mantissa = DestTy->getFPMantissaWidth();
2224 if (Mantissa == -1) continue;
Dan Gohmanaf79fb52009-04-21 01:07:12 +00002225 if ((int)SE->getTypeSizeInBits(SrcTy) > Mantissa)
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +00002226 continue;
2227
2228 unsigned Entry, Latch;
2229 if (PH->getIncomingBlock(0) == L->getLoopPreheader()) {
2230 Entry = 0;
2231 Latch = 1;
2232 } else {
2233 Entry = 1;
2234 Latch = 0;
2235 }
2236
2237 ConstantInt *Init = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(PH->getIncomingValue(Entry));
2238 if (!Init) continue;
2239 ConstantFP *NewInit = ConstantFP::get(DestTy, Init->getZExtValue());
2240
2241 BinaryOperator *Incr =
2242 dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(PH->getIncomingValue(Latch));
2243 if (!Incr) continue;
2244 if (Incr->getOpcode() != Instruction::Add
2245 && Incr->getOpcode() != Instruction::Sub)
2246 continue;
2247
2248 /* Initialize new IV, double d = 0.0 in above example. */
2249 ConstantInt *C = NULL;
2250 if (Incr->getOperand(0) == PH)
2251 C = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Incr->getOperand(1));
2252 else if (Incr->getOperand(1) == PH)
2253 C = dyn_cast<ConstantInt>(Incr->getOperand(0));
2254 else
2255 continue;
2256
2257 if (!C) continue;
2258
2259 /* Add new PHINode. */
2260 PHINode *NewPH = PHINode::Create(DestTy, "IV.S.", PH);
2261
Devang Patel54153272008-08-27 17:50:18 +00002262 /* create new increment. '++d' in above example. */
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +00002263 ConstantFP *CFP = ConstantFP::get(DestTy, C->getZExtValue());
2264 BinaryOperator *NewIncr =
2265 BinaryOperator::Create(Incr->getOpcode(),
2266 NewPH, CFP, "IV.S.next.", Incr);
2267
2268 NewPH->addIncoming(NewInit, PH->getIncomingBlock(Entry));
2269 NewPH->addIncoming(NewIncr, PH->getIncomingBlock(Latch));
2270
2271 /* Remove cast operation */
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +00002272 ShadowUse->replaceAllUsesWith(NewPH);
2273 ShadowUse->eraseFromParent();
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +00002274 NumShadow++;
2275 break;
2276 }
2277 }
2278}
2279
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002280// OptimizeIndvars - Now that IVUsesByStride is set up with all of the indvar
2281// uses in the loop, look to see if we can eliminate some, in favor of using
2282// common indvars for the different uses.
2283void LoopStrengthReduce::OptimizeIndvars(Loop *L) {
2284 // TODO: implement optzns here.
2285
Devang Patela0b39092008-08-26 17:57:54 +00002286 OptimizeShadowIV(L);
Evan Cheng2d850522009-05-09 01:08:24 +00002287}
2288
2289/// OptimizeLoopTermCond - Change loop terminating condition to use the
2290/// postinc iv when possible.
2291void LoopStrengthReduce::OptimizeLoopTermCond(Loop *L) {
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002292 // Finally, get the terminating condition for the loop if possible. If we
2293 // can, we want to change it to use a post-incremented version of its
Chris Lattner98d98112006-03-24 07:14:34 +00002294 // induction variable, to allow coalescing the live ranges for the IV into
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002295 // one register value.
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +00002296 BasicBlock *LatchBlock = L->getLoopLatch();
2297 BasicBlock *ExitBlock = L->getExitingBlock();
2298 if (!ExitBlock)
2299 // Multiple exits, just look at the exit in the latch block if there is one.
2300 ExitBlock = LatchBlock;
2301 BranchInst *TermBr = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(ExitBlock->getTerminator());
2302 if (!TermBr)
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002303 return;
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +00002304 if (TermBr->isUnconditional() || !isa<ICmpInst>(TermBr->getCondition()))
2305 return;
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002306
2307 // Search IVUsesByStride to find Cond's IVUse if there is one.
2308 IVStrideUse *CondUse = 0;
Chris Lattner50fad702005-08-10 00:45:21 +00002309 const SCEVHandle *CondStride = 0;
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +00002310 ICmpInst *Cond = cast<ICmpInst>(TermBr->getCondition());
Devang Patelc677de22008-08-13 20:31:11 +00002311 if (!FindIVUserForCond(Cond, CondUse, CondStride))
Chris Lattneraed01d12007-04-03 05:11:24 +00002312 return; // setcc doesn't use the IV.
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00002313
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +00002314 if (ExitBlock != LatchBlock) {
2315 if (!Cond->hasOneUse())
2316 // See below, we don't want the condition to be cloned.
2317 return;
2318
2319 // If exiting block is the latch block, we know it's safe and profitable to
2320 // transform the icmp to use post-inc iv. Otherwise do so only if it would
2321 // not reuse another iv and its iv would be reused by other uses. We are
2322 // optimizing for the case where the icmp is the only use of the iv.
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00002323 IVUsersOfOneStride &StrideUses = *IU->IVUsesByStride[*CondStride];
2324 for (ilist<IVStrideUse>::iterator I = StrideUses.Users.begin(),
2325 E = StrideUses.Users.end(); I != E; ++I) {
2326 if (I->getUser() == Cond)
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +00002327 continue;
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00002328 if (!I->isUseOfPostIncrementedValue())
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +00002329 return;
2330 }
2331
2332 // FIXME: This is expensive, and worse still ChangeCompareStride does a
2333 // similar check. Can we perform all the icmp related transformations after
2334 // StrengthReduceStridedIVUsers?
2335 if (const SCEVConstant *SC = dyn_cast<SCEVConstant>(*CondStride)) {
2336 int64_t SInt = SC->getValue()->getSExtValue();
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00002337 for (unsigned NewStride = 0, ee = IU->StrideOrder.size(); NewStride != ee;
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +00002338 ++NewStride) {
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00002339 std::map<SCEVHandle, IVUsersOfOneStride *>::iterator SI =
2340 IU->IVUsesByStride.find(IU->StrideOrder[NewStride]);
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +00002341 if (!isa<SCEVConstant>(SI->first) || SI->first == *CondStride)
2342 continue;
2343 int64_t SSInt =
2344 cast<SCEVConstant>(SI->first)->getValue()->getSExtValue();
2345 if (SSInt == SInt)
2346 return; // This can definitely be reused.
Dale Johannesen7b9486a2009-05-13 00:24:22 +00002347 if (unsigned(abs64(SSInt)) < SInt || (SSInt % SInt) != 0)
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +00002348 continue;
2349 int64_t Scale = SSInt / SInt;
2350 bool AllUsesAreAddresses = true;
2351 bool AllUsesAreOutsideLoop = true;
2352 std::vector<BasedUser> UsersToProcess;
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00002353 SCEVHandle CommonExprs = CollectIVUsers(SI->first, *SI->second, L,
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +00002354 AllUsesAreAddresses,
2355 AllUsesAreOutsideLoop,
2356 UsersToProcess);
2357 // Avoid rewriting the compare instruction with an iv of new stride
2358 // if it's likely the new stride uses will be rewritten using the
2359 // stride of the compare instruction.
2360 if (AllUsesAreAddresses &&
2361 ValidScale(!CommonExprs->isZero(), Scale, UsersToProcess))
2362 return;
2363 }
2364 }
2365
2366 StrideNoReuse.insert(*CondStride);
2367 }
2368
Dan Gohmanad7321f2008-09-15 21:22:06 +00002369 // If the trip count is computed in terms of an smax (due to ScalarEvolution
2370 // being unable to find a sufficient guard, for example), change the loop
2371 // comparison to use SLT instead of NE.
2372 Cond = OptimizeSMax(L, Cond, CondUse);
2373
Evan Chengcdf43b12007-10-25 09:11:16 +00002374 // If possible, change stride and operands of the compare instruction to
2375 // eliminate one stride.
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +00002376 if (ExitBlock == LatchBlock)
2377 Cond = ChangeCompareStride(L, Cond, CondUse, CondStride);
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002378
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002379 // It's possible for the setcc instruction to be anywhere in the loop, and
2380 // possible for it to have multiple users. If it is not immediately before
2381 // the latch block branch, move it.
2382 if (&*++BasicBlock::iterator(Cond) != (Instruction*)TermBr) {
2383 if (Cond->hasOneUse()) { // Condition has a single use, just move it.
2384 Cond->moveBefore(TermBr);
2385 } else {
2386 // Otherwise, clone the terminating condition and insert into the loopend.
Reid Spencere4d87aa2006-12-23 06:05:41 +00002387 Cond = cast<ICmpInst>(Cond->clone());
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002388 Cond->setName(L->getHeader()->getName() + ".termcond");
2389 LatchBlock->getInstList().insert(TermBr, Cond);
2390
2391 // Clone the IVUse, as the old use still exists!
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00002392 IU->IVUsesByStride[*CondStride]->addUser(CondUse->getOffset(), Cond,
2393 CondUse->getOperandValToReplace(),
2394 false);
2395 CondUse = &IU->IVUsesByStride[*CondStride]->Users.back();
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002396 }
2397 }
2398
2399 // If we get to here, we know that we can transform the setcc instruction to
Chris Lattner98d98112006-03-24 07:14:34 +00002400 // use the post-incremented version of the IV, allowing us to coalesce the
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002401 // live ranges for the IV correctly.
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00002402 CondUse->setOffset(SE->getMinusSCEV(CondUse->getOffset(), *CondStride));
2403 CondUse->setIsUseOfPostIncrementedValue(true);
Evan Cheng1ce75dc2008-07-07 19:51:32 +00002404 Changed = true;
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +00002405
2406 ++NumLoopCond;
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002407}
Nate Begeman16997482005-07-30 00:15:07 +00002408
Dale Johannesenc1acc3f2009-05-11 17:15:42 +00002409// OptimizeLoopCountIV - If, after all sharing of IVs, the IV used for deciding
2410// when to exit the loop is used only for that purpose, try to rearrange things
2411// so it counts down to a test against zero.
2412void LoopStrengthReduce::OptimizeLoopCountIV(Loop *L) {
2413
2414 // If the number of times the loop is executed isn't computable, give up.
2415 SCEVHandle BackedgeTakenCount = SE->getBackedgeTakenCount(L);
2416 if (isa<SCEVCouldNotCompute>(BackedgeTakenCount))
2417 return;
2418
2419 // Get the terminating condition for the loop if possible (this isn't
2420 // necessarily in the latch, or a block that's a predecessor of the header).
2421 SmallVector<BasicBlock*, 8> ExitBlocks;
2422 L->getExitBlocks(ExitBlocks);
2423 if (ExitBlocks.size() != 1) return;
2424
2425 // Okay, there is one exit block. Try to find the condition that causes the
2426 // loop to be exited.
2427 BasicBlock *ExitBlock = ExitBlocks[0];
2428
2429 BasicBlock *ExitingBlock = 0;
2430 for (pred_iterator PI = pred_begin(ExitBlock), E = pred_end(ExitBlock);
2431 PI != E; ++PI)
2432 if (L->contains(*PI)) {
2433 if (ExitingBlock == 0)
2434 ExitingBlock = *PI;
2435 else
2436 return; // More than one block exiting!
2437 }
2438 assert(ExitingBlock && "No exits from loop, something is broken!");
2439
2440 // Okay, we've computed the exiting block. See what condition causes us to
2441 // exit.
2442 //
2443 // FIXME: we should be able to handle switch instructions (with a single exit)
2444 BranchInst *TermBr = dyn_cast<BranchInst>(ExitingBlock->getTerminator());
2445 if (TermBr == 0) return;
2446 assert(TermBr->isConditional() && "If unconditional, it can't be in loop!");
2447 if (!isa<ICmpInst>(TermBr->getCondition()))
2448 return;
2449 ICmpInst *Cond = cast<ICmpInst>(TermBr->getCondition());
2450
2451 // Handle only tests for equality for the moment, and only stride 1.
2452 if (Cond->getPredicate() != CmpInst::ICMP_EQ)
2453 return;
2454 SCEVHandle IV = SE->getSCEV(Cond->getOperand(0));
2455 const SCEVAddRecExpr *AR = dyn_cast<SCEVAddRecExpr>(IV);
2456 SCEVHandle One = SE->getIntegerSCEV(1, BackedgeTakenCount->getType());
2457 if (!AR || !AR->isAffine() || AR->getStepRecurrence(*SE) != One)
2458 return;
2459
2460 // Make sure the IV is only used for counting. Value may be preinc or
2461 // postinc; 2 uses in either case.
2462 if (!Cond->getOperand(0)->hasNUses(2))
2463 return;
2464 PHINode *phi = dyn_cast<PHINode>(Cond->getOperand(0));
2465 Instruction *incr;
2466 if (phi && phi->getParent()==L->getHeader()) {
2467 // value tested is preinc. Find the increment.
2468 // A CmpInst is not a BinaryOperator; we depend on this.
2469 Instruction::use_iterator UI = phi->use_begin();
2470 incr = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(UI);
2471 if (!incr)
2472 incr = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(++UI);
2473 // 1 use for postinc value, the phi. Unnecessarily conservative?
2474 if (!incr || !incr->hasOneUse() || incr->getOpcode()!=Instruction::Add)
2475 return;
2476 } else {
2477 // Value tested is postinc. Find the phi node.
2478 incr = dyn_cast<BinaryOperator>(Cond->getOperand(0));
2479 if (!incr || incr->getOpcode()!=Instruction::Add)
2480 return;
2481
2482 Instruction::use_iterator UI = Cond->getOperand(0)->use_begin();
2483 phi = dyn_cast<PHINode>(UI);
2484 if (!phi)
2485 phi = dyn_cast<PHINode>(++UI);
2486 // 1 use for preinc value, the increment.
2487 if (!phi || phi->getParent()!=L->getHeader() || !phi->hasOneUse())
2488 return;
2489 }
2490
2491 // Replace the increment with a decrement.
2492 BinaryOperator *decr =
2493 BinaryOperator::Create(Instruction::Sub, incr->getOperand(0),
2494 incr->getOperand(1), "tmp", incr);
2495 incr->replaceAllUsesWith(decr);
2496 incr->eraseFromParent();
2497
2498 // Substitute endval-startval for the original startval, and 0 for the
2499 // original endval. Since we're only testing for equality this is OK even
2500 // if the computation wraps around.
2501 BasicBlock *Preheader = L->getLoopPreheader();
2502 Instruction *PreInsertPt = Preheader->getTerminator();
2503 int inBlock = L->contains(phi->getIncomingBlock(0)) ? 1 : 0;
2504 Value *startVal = phi->getIncomingValue(inBlock);
2505 Value *endVal = Cond->getOperand(1);
2506 // FIXME check for case where both are constant
2507 ConstantInt* Zero = ConstantInt::get(Cond->getOperand(1)->getType(), 0);
2508 BinaryOperator *NewStartVal =
2509 BinaryOperator::Create(Instruction::Sub, endVal, startVal,
2510 "tmp", PreInsertPt);
2511 phi->setIncomingValue(inBlock, NewStartVal);
2512 Cond->setOperand(1, Zero);
2513
2514 Changed = true;
2515}
2516
Devang Patel0f54dcb2007-03-06 21:14:09 +00002517bool LoopStrengthReduce::runOnLoop(Loop *L, LPPassManager &LPM) {
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +00002518
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00002519 IU = &getAnalysis<IVUsers>();
Devang Patel0f54dcb2007-03-06 21:14:09 +00002520 LI = &getAnalysis<LoopInfo>();
Devang Patelb7d9dfc2007-06-07 21:42:15 +00002521 DT = &getAnalysis<DominatorTree>();
Devang Patel0f54dcb2007-03-06 21:14:09 +00002522 SE = &getAnalysis<ScalarEvolution>();
Dan Gohman3fea6432008-07-14 17:55:01 +00002523 Changed = false;
Devang Patel0f54dcb2007-03-06 21:14:09 +00002524
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00002525 if (!IU->IVUsesByStride.empty()) {
Dan Gohman80b0f8c2009-03-09 20:34:59 +00002526#ifndef NDEBUG
2527 DOUT << "\nLSR on \"" << L->getHeader()->getParent()->getNameStart()
2528 << "\" ";
2529 DEBUG(L->dump());
2530#endif
2531
Dan Gohmanf7912df2009-03-09 20:46:50 +00002532 // Sort the StrideOrder so we process larger strides first.
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00002533 std::stable_sort(IU->StrideOrder.begin(), IU->StrideOrder.end(),
2534 StrideCompare(SE));
Dan Gohmanf7912df2009-03-09 20:46:50 +00002535
Evan Cheng1ce75dc2008-07-07 19:51:32 +00002536 // Optimize induction variables. Some indvar uses can be transformed to use
2537 // strides that will be needed for other purposes. A common example of this
2538 // is the exit test for the loop, which can often be rewritten to use the
2539 // computation of some other indvar to decide when to terminate the loop.
2540 OptimizeIndvars(L);
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002541
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +00002542 // Change loop terminating condition to use the postinc iv when possible
2543 // and optimize loop terminating compare. FIXME: Move this after
2544 // StrengthReduceStridedIVUsers?
2545 OptimizeLoopTermCond(L);
2546
Dan Gohmance174f82009-05-05 23:02:38 +00002547 // FIXME: We can shrink overlarge IV's here. e.g. if the code has
Dan Gohman4221ae82009-05-05 22:59:55 +00002548 // computation in i64 values and the target doesn't support i64, demote
2549 // the computation to 32-bit if safe.
Chris Lattner010de252005-08-08 05:28:22 +00002550
Evan Cheng1ce75dc2008-07-07 19:51:32 +00002551 // FIXME: Attempt to reuse values across multiple IV's. In particular, we
2552 // could have something like "for(i) { foo(i*8); bar(i*16) }", which should
2553 // be codegened as "for (j = 0;; j+=8) { foo(j); bar(j+j); }" on X86/PPC.
2554 // Need to be careful that IV's are all the same type. Only works for
2555 // intptr_t indvars.
Misha Brukmanfd939082005-04-21 23:48:37 +00002556
Evan Cheng1ce75dc2008-07-07 19:51:32 +00002557 // IVsByStride keeps IVs for one particular loop.
2558 assert(IVsByStride.empty() && "Stale entries in IVsByStride?");
Evan Chengd1d6b5c2006-03-16 21:53:05 +00002559
Evan Cheng1ce75dc2008-07-07 19:51:32 +00002560 // Note: this processes each stride/type pair individually. All users
2561 // passed into StrengthReduceStridedIVUsers have the same type AND stride.
2562 // Also, note that we iterate over IVUsesByStride indirectly by using
2563 // StrideOrder. This extra layer of indirection makes the ordering of
2564 // strides deterministic - not dependent on map order.
Dan Gohman81db61a2009-05-12 02:17:14 +00002565 for (unsigned Stride = 0, e = IU->StrideOrder.size();
2566 Stride != e; ++Stride) {
2567 std::map<SCEVHandle, IVUsersOfOneStride *>::iterator SI =
2568 IU->IVUsesByStride.find(IU->StrideOrder[Stride]);
2569 assert(SI != IU->IVUsesByStride.end() && "Stride doesn't exist!");
2570 // FIXME: Generalize to non-affine IV's.
2571 if (!SI->first->isLoopInvariant(L))
2572 continue;
2573 StrengthReduceStridedIVUsers(SI->first, *SI->second, L);
Evan Cheng1ce75dc2008-07-07 19:51:32 +00002574 }
Chris Lattner7305ae22005-10-09 06:20:55 +00002575 }
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +00002576
Dale Johannesenc1acc3f2009-05-11 17:15:42 +00002577 // After all sharing is done, see if we can adjust the loop to test against
2578 // zero instead of counting up to a maximum. This is usually faster.
2579 OptimizeLoopCountIV(L);
2580
Dan Gohman010ee2d2008-05-21 00:54:12 +00002581 // We're done analyzing this loop; release all the state we built up for it.
Dan Gohman010ee2d2008-05-21 00:54:12 +00002582 IVsByStride.clear();
Evan Cheng5792f512009-05-11 22:33:01 +00002583 StrideNoReuse.clear();
Dan Gohman010ee2d2008-05-21 00:54:12 +00002584
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +00002585 // Clean up after ourselves
Dan Gohmanafc36a92009-05-02 18:29:22 +00002586 if (!DeadInsts.empty())
Chris Lattnera68d4ca2008-12-01 06:14:28 +00002587 DeleteTriviallyDeadInstructions();
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +00002588
Dan Gohmanafc36a92009-05-02 18:29:22 +00002589 // At this point, it is worth checking to see if any recurrence PHIs are also
Dan Gohman35738ac2009-05-04 22:30:44 +00002590 // dead, so that we can remove them as well.
2591 DeleteDeadPHIs(L->getHeader());
Dan Gohmanafc36a92009-05-02 18:29:22 +00002592
Evan Cheng1ce75dc2008-07-07 19:51:32 +00002593 return Changed;
Nate Begemaneaa13852004-10-18 21:08:22 +00002594}