ci: do not build libdrm for vc4, reedreno and etnaviv
They are using a in source tree version of the needed libdrm
functionality or are shipping all needed headers in the source tree.
Signed-off-by: Christian Gmeiner <christian.gmeiner@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Anholt <eric@anholt.net>
Part-of: <https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/merge_requests/6672>
diff --git a/.gitlab-ci.yml b/.gitlab-ci.yml
index 649f002..2f7e5ce 100644
--- a/.gitlab-ci.yml
+++ b/.gitlab-ci.yml
@@ -225,7 +225,7 @@
extends:
- .use-x86_build-base
variables:
- FDO_DISTRIBUTION_TAG: &x86_build "2020-08-13-gold"
+ FDO_DISTRIBUTION_TAG: &x86_build "2020-09-10-libdrm"
.use-x86_build:
variables:
@@ -239,7 +239,7 @@
extends:
- .use-x86_build-base
variables:
- FDO_DISTRIBUTION_TAG: &i386_build "2020-08-13-gold"
+ FDO_DISTRIBUTION_TAG: &i386_build "2020-09-10-libdrm"
.use-i386_build:
variables:
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@
extends:
- .use-x86_build-base
variables:
- FDO_DISTRIBUTION_TAG: &ppc64el_build "2020-08-13-gold"
+ FDO_DISTRIBUTION_TAG: &ppc64el_build "2020-09-10-libdrm"
.use-ppc64el_build:
variables:
@@ -267,7 +267,7 @@
extends:
- .use-x86_build-base
variables:
- FDO_DISTRIBUTION_TAG: &s390x_build "2020-08-13-gold"
+ FDO_DISTRIBUTION_TAG: &s390x_build "2020-09-10-libdrm"
.use-s390x_build:
variables:
@@ -297,7 +297,7 @@
x86_test-gl:
extends: .use-x86_test-base
variables:
- FDO_DISTRIBUTION_TAG: &x86_test-gl "2020-09-03-deqp-version"
+ FDO_DISTRIBUTION_TAG: &x86_test-gl "2020-09-10-libdrm"
# Debian 10 based x86 test image for VK
x86_test-vk:
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@
- .fdo.container-build@debian@arm64v8
- .container
variables:
- FDO_DISTRIBUTION_TAG: &arm_build "2020-08-31-deqp-version"
+ FDO_DISTRIBUTION_TAG: &arm_build "2020-09-10-libdrm"
.use-arm_build:
variables:
@@ -340,7 +340,7 @@
- .fdo.container-build@debian
- .container
variables:
- FDO_DISTRIBUTION_TAG: &arm_test-base "2020-08-13-gold"
+ FDO_DISTRIBUTION_TAG: &arm_test-base "2020-09-10-libdrm"
.use-arm_test-base:
extends: