Replace find_dead_code with visit_exec_list
find_dead_code appears to be an open-coded version of visit_exec_list
that was implemented first.
diff --git a/ir_dead_code.cpp b/ir_dead_code.cpp
index a73e9ed..0cc8a26 100644
--- a/ir_dead_code.cpp
+++ b/ir_dead_code.cpp
@@ -100,15 +100,6 @@
return entry;
}
-void
-find_dead_code(exec_list *instructions, ir_dead_code_visitor *v)
-{
- foreach_iter(exec_list_iterator, iter, *instructions) {
- ir_instruction *ir = (ir_instruction *)iter.get();
-
- ir->accept(v);
- }
-}
void
ir_dead_code_visitor::visit(ir_variable *ir)
@@ -123,7 +114,7 @@
void
ir_dead_code_visitor::visit(ir_loop *ir)
{
- find_dead_code(&ir->body_instructions, this);
+ visit_exec_list(&ir->body_instructions, this);
if (ir->from)
ir->from->accept(this);
if (ir->to)
@@ -142,7 +133,7 @@
void
ir_dead_code_visitor::visit(ir_function_signature *ir)
{
- find_dead_code(&ir->body, this);
+ visit_exec_list(&ir->body, this);
}
void
@@ -263,8 +254,8 @@
{
ir->condition->accept(this);
- find_dead_code(&ir->then_instructions, this);
- find_dead_code(&ir->else_instructions, this);
+ visit_exec_list(&ir->then_instructions, this);
+ visit_exec_list(&ir->else_instructions, this);
}
/**
@@ -280,7 +271,7 @@
ir_dead_code_visitor v;
bool progress = false;
- find_dead_code(instructions, &v);
+ visit_exec_list(instructions, &v);
foreach_iter(exec_list_iterator, iter, v.variable_list) {
variable_entry *entry = (variable_entry *)iter.get();