Merged revisions 59488-59511 via svnmerge from
svn+ssh://pythondev@svn.python.org/python/trunk

........
  r59489 | christian.heimes | 2007-12-14 03:33:57 +0100 (Fri, 14 Dec 2007) | 1 line

  Silence a warning about an unsed variable in debug builds
........
  r59490 | christian.heimes | 2007-12-14 03:35:23 +0100 (Fri, 14 Dec 2007) | 2 lines

  Fixed bug #1620: New @spam.getter property syntax modifies the property in place.
  I added also the feature that a @prop.getter decorator does not overwrite the doc string of the property if it was given as an argument to property().
........
  r59491 | raymond.hettinger | 2007-12-14 03:49:47 +0100 (Fri, 14 Dec 2007) | 1 line

  Cleaner method naming convention
........
  r59492 | christian.heimes | 2007-12-14 04:02:34 +0100 (Fri, 14 Dec 2007) | 1 line

  Fixed a warning in _codecs_iso2022.c and some non C89 conform // comments.
........
  r59493 | christian.heimes | 2007-12-14 05:38:13 +0100 (Fri, 14 Dec 2007) | 1 line

  Fixed warning in ssl module
........
  r59500 | raymond.hettinger | 2007-12-14 19:08:20 +0100 (Fri, 14 Dec 2007) | 1 line

  Add line spacing for readability
........
  r59501 | raymond.hettinger | 2007-12-14 19:12:21 +0100 (Fri, 14 Dec 2007) | 3 lines

  Update method names for named tuples.
........
  r59503 | georg.brandl | 2007-12-14 20:03:36 +0100 (Fri, 14 Dec 2007) | 3 lines

  Add a section about nested listcomps to the tutorial.
  Thanks to Ian Bruntlett and Robert Lehmann.
........
  r59504 | raymond.hettinger | 2007-12-14 20:19:59 +0100 (Fri, 14 Dec 2007) | 1 line

  Faster and simpler _replace() method
........
  r59505 | raymond.hettinger | 2007-12-14 22:51:50 +0100 (Fri, 14 Dec 2007) | 1 line

  Add usage note
........
  r59507 | andrew.kuchling | 2007-12-14 23:41:18 +0100 (Fri, 14 Dec 2007) | 1 line

  Remove warning about URL
........
  r59510 | andrew.kuchling | 2007-12-14 23:52:36 +0100 (Fri, 14 Dec 2007) | 1 line

  Bump the version number, and make a few small edits
........
  r59511 | christian.heimes | 2007-12-15 00:42:36 +0100 (Sat, 15 Dec 2007) | 2 lines

  Fixed bug #1628
  The detection now works on Unix with Makefile, Makefile with VPATH and on Windows.
........
diff --git a/Lib/test/test_collections.py b/Lib/test/test_collections.py
index 45b4082..5a4029d 100644
--- a/Lib/test/test_collections.py
+++ b/Lib/test/test_collections.py
@@ -28,11 +28,11 @@
         self.assertRaises(ValueError, namedtuple, 'abc', 'efg g%hi')       # field with non-alpha char
         self.assertRaises(ValueError, namedtuple, 'abc', 'abc class')      # field has keyword
         self.assertRaises(ValueError, namedtuple, 'abc', '8efg 9ghi')      # field starts with digit
-        self.assertRaises(ValueError, namedtuple, 'abc', '__efg__ ghi')    # field with double underscores
+        self.assertRaises(ValueError, namedtuple, 'abc', '_efg ghi')       # field with leading underscore
         self.assertRaises(ValueError, namedtuple, 'abc', 'efg efg ghi')    # duplicate field
 
         namedtuple('Point0', 'x1 y2')   # Verify that numbers are allowed in names
-        namedtuple('_', '_ __ ___')     # Verify that underscores are allowed
+        namedtuple('_', 'a b c')        # Test leading underscores in a typename
 
     def test_instance(self):
         Point = namedtuple('Point', 'x y')
@@ -49,17 +49,17 @@
         self.assertEqual(repr(p), 'Point(x=11, y=22)')
         self.assert_('__dict__' not in dir(p))                              # verify instance has no dict
         self.assert_('__weakref__' not in dir(p))
-        self.assertEqual(p.__fields__, ('x', 'y'))                          # test __fields__ attribute
-        self.assertEqual(p.__replace__(x=1), (1, 22))                       # test __replace__ method
-        self.assertEqual(p.__asdict__(), dict(x=11, y=22))                  # test __dict__ method
+        self.assertEqual(p._fields, ('x', 'y'))                             # test _fields attribute
+        self.assertEqual(p._replace(x=1), (1, 22))                          # test _replace method
+        self.assertEqual(p._asdict(), dict(x=11, y=22))                     # test _asdict method
 
-        # Verify that __fields__ is read-only
+        # Verify that _fields is read-only
         try:
-            p.__fields__ = ('F1' ,'F2')
+            p._fields = ('F1' ,'F2')
         except AttributeError:
             pass
         else:
-            self.fail('The __fields__ attribute needs to be read-only')
+            self.fail('The _fields attribute needs to be read-only')
 
         # verify that field string can have commas
         Point = namedtuple('Point', 'x, y')
diff --git a/Lib/test/test_property.py b/Lib/test/test_property.py
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..4b6e20c
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Lib/test/test_property.py
@@ -0,0 +1,98 @@
+# Test case for property
+# more tests are in test_descr
+
+import unittest
+from test.test_support import run_unittest
+
+class PropertyBase(Exception):
+    pass
+
+class PropertyGet(PropertyBase):
+    pass
+
+class PropertySet(PropertyBase):
+    pass
+
+class PropertyDel(PropertyBase):
+    pass
+
+class BaseClass(object):
+    def __init__(self):
+        self._spam = 5
+
+    @property
+    def spam(self):
+        """BaseClass.getter"""
+        return self._spam
+
+    @spam.setter
+    def spam(self, value):
+        self._spam = value
+
+    @spam.deleter
+    def spam(self):
+        del self._spam
+
+class SubClass(BaseClass):
+
+    @BaseClass.spam.getter
+    def spam(self):
+        """SubClass.getter"""
+        raise PropertyGet(self._spam)
+
+    @spam.setter
+    def spam(self, value):
+        raise PropertySet(self._spam)
+
+    @spam.deleter
+    def spam(self):
+        raise PropertyDel(self._spam)
+
+class PropertyDocBase(object):
+    _spam = 1
+    def _get_spam(self):
+        return self._spam
+    spam = property(_get_spam, doc="spam spam spam")
+
+class PropertyDocSub(PropertyDocBase):
+    @PropertyDocBase.spam.getter
+    def spam(self):
+        """The decorator does not use this doc string"""
+        return self._spam
+
+class PropertyTests(unittest.TestCase):
+    def test_property_decorator_baseclass(self):
+        # see #1620
+        base = BaseClass()
+        self.assertEqual(base.spam, 5)
+        self.assertEqual(base._spam, 5)
+        base.spam = 10
+        self.assertEqual(base.spam, 10)
+        self.assertEqual(base._spam, 10)
+        delattr(base, "spam")
+        self.assert_(not hasattr(base, "spam"))
+        self.assert_(not hasattr(base, "_spam"))
+        base.spam = 20
+        self.assertEqual(base.spam, 20)
+        self.assertEqual(base._spam, 20)
+        self.assertEqual(base.__class__.spam.__doc__, "BaseClass.getter")
+
+    def test_property_decorator_subclass(self):
+        # see #1620
+        sub = SubClass()
+        self.assertRaises(PropertyGet, getattr, sub, "spam")
+        self.assertRaises(PropertySet, setattr, sub, "spam", None)
+        self.assertRaises(PropertyDel, delattr, sub, "spam")
+        self.assertEqual(sub.__class__.spam.__doc__, "SubClass.getter")
+
+    def test_property_decorator_doc(self):
+        base = PropertyDocBase()
+        sub = PropertyDocSub()
+        self.assertEqual(base.__class__.spam.__doc__, "spam spam spam")
+        self.assertEqual(sub.__class__.spam.__doc__, "spam spam spam")
+
+def test_main():
+    run_unittest(PropertyTests)
+
+if __name__ == '__main__':
+    test_main()