Cleaner method naming convention
diff --git a/Lib/test/test_collections.py b/Lib/test/test_collections.py
index 0b0b029..d6cfe9b 100644
--- a/Lib/test/test_collections.py
+++ b/Lib/test/test_collections.py
@@ -25,11 +25,11 @@
self.assertRaises(ValueError, namedtuple, 'abc', 'efg g%hi') # field with non-alpha char
self.assertRaises(ValueError, namedtuple, 'abc', 'abc class') # field has keyword
self.assertRaises(ValueError, namedtuple, 'abc', '8efg 9ghi') # field starts with digit
- self.assertRaises(ValueError, namedtuple, 'abc', '__efg__ ghi') # field with double underscores
+ self.assertRaises(ValueError, namedtuple, 'abc', '_efg ghi') # field with leading underscore
self.assertRaises(ValueError, namedtuple, 'abc', 'efg efg ghi') # duplicate field
namedtuple('Point0', 'x1 y2') # Verify that numbers are allowed in names
- namedtuple('_', '_ __ ___') # Verify that underscores are allowed
+ namedtuple('_', 'a b c') # Test leading underscores in a typename
def test_instance(self):
Point = namedtuple('Point', 'x y')
@@ -46,17 +46,17 @@
self.assertEqual(repr(p), 'Point(x=11, y=22)')
self.assert_('__dict__' not in dir(p)) # verify instance has no dict
self.assert_('__weakref__' not in dir(p))
- self.assertEqual(p.__fields__, ('x', 'y')) # test __fields__ attribute
- self.assertEqual(p.__replace__(x=1), (1, 22)) # test __replace__ method
- self.assertEqual(p.__asdict__(), dict(x=11, y=22)) # test __dict__ method
+ self.assertEqual(p._fields, ('x', 'y')) # test _fields attribute
+ self.assertEqual(p._replace(x=1), (1, 22)) # test _replace method
+ self.assertEqual(p._asdict(), dict(x=11, y=22)) # test _asdict method
- # Verify that __fields__ is read-only
+ # Verify that _fields is read-only
try:
- p.__fields__ = ('F1' ,'F2')
+ p._fields = ('F1' ,'F2')
except AttributeError:
pass
else:
- self.fail('The __fields__ attribute needs to be read-only')
+ self.fail('The _fields attribute needs to be read-only')
# verify that field string can have commas
Point = namedtuple('Point', 'x, y')