Now FOR_LOOP is gone, loop_subscript can go too.
make -s rules :-)
diff --git a/Python/ceval.c b/Python/ceval.c
index 12397b4..7f7d37e 100644
--- a/Python/ceval.c
+++ b/Python/ceval.c
@@ -51,7 +51,6 @@
static void call_trace_protected(Py_tracefunc, PyObject *,
PyFrameObject *, int);
static void call_exc_trace(Py_tracefunc, PyObject *, PyFrameObject *);
-static PyObject *loop_subscript(PyObject *, PyObject *);
static PyObject *apply_slice(PyObject *, PyObject *, PyObject *);
static int assign_slice(PyObject *, PyObject *,
PyObject *, PyObject *);
@@ -3303,24 +3302,6 @@
#define SLICE_ERROR_MSG \
"standard sequence type does not support step size other than one"
-static PyObject *
-loop_subscript(PyObject *v, PyObject *w)
-{
- PySequenceMethods *sq = v->ob_type->tp_as_sequence;
- int i;
- if (sq == NULL || sq->sq_item == NULL) {
- PyErr_SetString(PyExc_TypeError, "loop over non-sequence");
- return NULL;
- }
- i = PyInt_AsLong(w);
- v = (*sq->sq_item)(v, i);
- if (v)
- return v;
- if (PyErr_ExceptionMatches(PyExc_IndexError))
- PyErr_Clear();
- return NULL;
-}
-
/* Extract a slice index from a PyInt or PyLong, and store in *pi.
Silently reduce values larger than INT_MAX to INT_MAX, and silently
boost values less than -INT_MAX to 0. Return 0 on error, 1 on success.