Clarify concatenation behaviour of immutable strings, and remove explicit
mention of the CPython optimization hack.
diff --git a/Doc/faq/programming.rst b/Doc/faq/programming.rst
index d1a3daf..f157a94 100644
--- a/Doc/faq/programming.rst
+++ b/Doc/faq/programming.rst
@@ -989,6 +989,32 @@
See the :ref:`unicode-howto`.
+What is the most efficient way to concatenate many strings together?
+--------------------------------------------------------------------
+
+:class:`str` and :class:`bytes` objects are immutable, therefore concatenating
+many strings together is inefficient as each concatenation creates a new
+object. In the general case, the total runtime cost is quadratic in the
+total string length.
+
+To accumulate many :class:`str` objects, the recommended idiom is to place
+them into a list and call :meth:`str.join` at the end::
+
+ chunks = []
+ for s in my_strings:
+ chunks.append(s)
+ result = ''.join(chunks)
+
+(another reasonably efficient idiom is to use :class:`io.StringIO`)
+
+To accumulate many :class:`bytes` objects, the recommended idiom is to extend
+a :class:`bytearray` object using in-place concatenation (the ``+=`` operator)::
+
+ result = bytearray()
+ for b in my_bytes_objects:
+ result += b
+
+
Sequences (Tuples/Lists)
========================