blob: a344abea80d8efee84cd896ad8c9ff08c2649c50 [file] [log] [blame]
Guido van Rossum48a69b71994-05-16 09:35:22 +00001# Defines classes that provide synchronization objects. Note that use of
2# this module requires that your Python support threads.
3#
Guido van Rossuma6970581994-05-18 08:14:04 +00004# condition(lock=None) # a POSIX-like condition-variable object
5# barrier(n) # an n-thread barrier
6# event() # an event object
7# semaphore(n=1) # a semaphore object, with initial count n
8# mrsw() # a multiple-reader single-writer lock
Guido van Rossum48a69b71994-05-16 09:35:22 +00009#
10# CONDITIONS
11#
12# A condition object is created via
13# import this_module
Guido van Rossuma6970581994-05-18 08:14:04 +000014# your_condition_object = this_module.condition(lock=None)
15#
16# As explained below, a condition object has a lock associated with it,
17# used in the protocol to protect condition data. You can specify a
18# lock to use in the constructor, else the constructor will allocate
19# an anonymous lock for you. Specifying a lock explicitly can be useful
20# when more than one condition keys off the same set of shared data.
Guido van Rossum48a69b71994-05-16 09:35:22 +000021#
22# Methods:
23# .acquire()
24# acquire the lock associated with the condition
25# .release()
26# release the lock associated with the condition
27# .wait()
28# block the thread until such time as some other thread does a
29# .signal or .broadcast on the same condition, and release the
30# lock associated with the condition. The lock associated with
31# the condition MUST be in the acquired state at the time
32# .wait is invoked.
33# .signal()
34# wake up exactly one thread (if any) that previously did a .wait
35# on the condition; that thread will awaken with the lock associated
36# with the condition in the acquired state. If no threads are
37# .wait'ing, this is a nop. If more than one thread is .wait'ing on
38# the condition, any of them may be awakened.
39# .broadcast()
40# wake up all threads (if any) that are .wait'ing on the condition;
41# the threads are woken up serially, each with the lock in the
42# acquired state, so should .release() as soon as possible. If no
43# threads are .wait'ing, this is a nop.
44#
45# Note that if a thread does a .wait *while* a signal/broadcast is
Guido van Rossum846c3221994-05-17 08:34:33 +000046# in progress, it's guaranteeed to block until a subsequent
Guido van Rossum48a69b71994-05-16 09:35:22 +000047# signal/broadcast.
48#
49# Secret feature: `broadcast' actually takes an integer argument,
50# and will wake up exactly that many waiting threads (or the total
51# number waiting, if that's less). Use of this is dubious, though,
52# and probably won't be supported if this form of condition is
53# reimplemented in C.
54#
55# DIFFERENCES FROM POSIX
56#
57# + A separate mutex is not needed to guard condition data. Instead, a
58# condition object can (must) be .acquire'ed and .release'ed directly.
59# This eliminates a common error in using POSIX conditions.
60#
61# + Because of implementation difficulties, a POSIX `signal' wakes up
62# _at least_ one .wait'ing thread. Race conditions make it difficult
63# to stop that. This implementation guarantees to wake up only one,
64# but you probably shouldn't rely on that.
65#
66# PROTOCOL
67#
68# Condition objects are used to block threads until "some condition" is
69# true. E.g., a thread may wish to wait until a producer pumps out data
70# for it to consume, or a server may wish to wait until someone requests
71# its services, or perhaps a whole bunch of threads want to wait until a
72# preceding pass over the data is complete. Early models for conditions
73# relied on some other thread figuring out when a blocked thread's
74# condition was true, and made the other thread responsible both for
75# waking up the blocked thread and guaranteeing that it woke up with all
76# data in a correct state. This proved to be very delicate in practice,
77# and gave conditions a bad name in some circles.
78#
79# The POSIX model addresses these problems by making a thread responsible
80# for ensuring that its own state is correct when it wakes, and relies
81# on a rigid protocol to make this easy; so long as you stick to the
82# protocol, POSIX conditions are easy to "get right":
83#
84# A) The thread that's waiting for some arbitrarily-complex condition
85# (ACC) to become true does:
86#
87# condition.acquire()
88# while not (code to evaluate the ACC):
89# condition.wait()
90# # That blocks the thread, *and* releases the lock. When a
91# # condition.signal() happens, it will wake up some thread that
92# # did a .wait, *and* acquire the lock again before .wait
93# # returns.
94# #
95# # Because the lock is acquired at this point, the state used
96# # in evaluating the ACC is frozen, so it's safe to go back &
97# # reevaluate the ACC.
98#
99# # At this point, ACC is true, and the thread has the condition
100# # locked.
101# # So code here can safely muck with the shared state that
102# # went into evaluating the ACC -- if it wants to.
103# # When done mucking with the shared state, do
104# condition.release()
105#
106# B) Threads that are mucking with shared state that may affect the
107# ACC do:
108#
109# condition.acquire()
110# # muck with shared state
111# condition.release()
112# if it's possible that ACC is true now:
113# condition.signal() # or .broadcast()
114#
115# Note: You may prefer to put the "if" clause before the release().
116# That's fine, but do note that anyone waiting on the signal will
117# stay blocked until the release() is done (since acquiring the
118# condition is part of what .wait() does before it returns).
119#
120# TRICK OF THE TRADE
121#
122# With simpler forms of conditions, it can be impossible to know when
123# a thread that's supposed to do a .wait has actually done it. But
124# because this form of condition releases a lock as _part_ of doing a
125# wait, the state of that lock can be used to guarantee it.
126#
127# E.g., suppose thread A spawns thread B and later wants to wait for B to
128# complete:
129#
130# In A: In B:
131#
132# B_done = condition() ... do work ...
133# B_done.acquire() B_done.acquire(); B_done.release()
134# spawn B B_done.signal()
135# ... some time later ... ... and B exits ...
136# B_done.wait()
137#
138# Because B_done was in the acquire'd state at the time B was spawned,
139# B's attempt to acquire B_done can't succeed until A has done its
140# B_done.wait() (which releases B_done). So B's B_done.signal() is
141# guaranteed to be seen by the .wait(). Without the lock trick, B
142# may signal before A .waits, and then A would wait forever.
143#
144# BARRIERS
145#
146# A barrier object is created via
147# import this_module
148# your_barrier = this_module.barrier(num_threads)
149#
150# Methods:
151# .enter()
152# the thread blocks until num_threads threads in all have done
153# .enter(). Then the num_threads threads that .enter'ed resume,
154# and the barrier resets to capture the next num_threads threads
155# that .enter it.
156#
157# EVENTS
158#
159# An event object is created via
160# import this_module
161# your_event = this_module.event()
162#
163# An event has two states, `posted' and `cleared'. An event is
164# created in the cleared state.
165#
166# Methods:
167#
168# .post()
169# Put the event in the posted state, and resume all threads
170# .wait'ing on the event (if any).
171#
172# .clear()
173# Put the event in the cleared state.
174#
175# .is_posted()
176# Returns 0 if the event is in the cleared state, or 1 if the event
177# is in the posted state.
178#
179# .wait()
180# If the event is in the posted state, returns immediately.
181# If the event is in the cleared state, blocks the calling thread
182# until the event is .post'ed by another thread.
183#
184# Note that an event, once posted, remains posted until explicitly
185# cleared. Relative to conditions, this is both the strength & weakness
186# of events. It's a strength because the .post'ing thread doesn't have to
187# worry about whether the threads it's trying to communicate with have
188# already done a .wait (a condition .signal is seen only by threads that
189# do a .wait _prior_ to the .signal; a .signal does not persist). But
190# it's a weakness because .clear'ing an event is error-prone: it's easy
191# to mistakenly .clear an event before all the threads you intended to
192# see the event get around to .wait'ing on it. But so long as you don't
193# need to .clear an event, events are easy to use safely.
194#
Guido van Rossum846c3221994-05-17 08:34:33 +0000195# SEMAPHORES
196#
197# A semaphore object is created via
198# import this_module
199# your_semaphore = this_module.semaphore(count=1)
200#
201# A semaphore has an integer count associated with it. The initial value
202# of the count is specified by the optional argument (which defaults to
203# 1) passed to the semaphore constructor.
204#
205# Methods:
206#
207# .p()
208# If the semaphore's count is greater than 0, decrements the count
209# by 1 and returns.
210# Else if the semaphore's count is 0, blocks the calling thread
211# until a subsequent .v() increases the count. When that happens,
212# the count will be decremented by 1 and the calling thread resumed.
213#
214# .v()
215# Increments the semaphore's count by 1, and wakes up a thread (if
216# any) blocked by a .p(). It's an (detected) error for a .v() to
217# increase the semaphore's count to a value larger than the initial
218# count.
Guido van Rossuma6970581994-05-18 08:14:04 +0000219#
220# MULTIPLE-READER SINGLE-WRITER LOCKS
221#
222# A mrsw lock is created via
223# import this_module
224# your_mrsw_lock = this_module.mrsw()
225#
226# This kind of lock is often useful with complex shared data structures.
227# The object lets any number of "readers" proceed, so long as no thread
228# wishes to "write". When a (one or more) thread declares its intention
229# to "write" (e.g., to update a shared structure), all current readers
230# are allowed to finish, and then a writer gets exclusive access; all
231# other readers & writers are blocked until the current writer completes.
232# Finally, if some thread is waiting to write and another is waiting to
233# read, the writer takes precedence.
234#
235# Methods:
236#
237# .read_in()
238# If no thread is writing or waiting to write, returns immediately.
239# Else blocks until no thread is writing or waiting to write. So
240# long as some thread has completed a .read_in but not a .read_out,
241# writers are blocked.
242#
243# .read_out()
244# Use sometime after a .read_in to declare that the thread is done
245# reading. When all threads complete reading, a writer can proceed.
246#
247# .write_in()
248# If no thread is writing (has completed a .write_in, but hasn't yet
249# done a .write_out) or reading (similarly), returns immediately.
250# Else blocks the calling thread, and threads waiting to read, until
251# the current writer completes writing or all the current readers
252# complete reading; if then more than one thread is waiting to
253# write, one of them is allowed to proceed, but which one is not
254# specified.
255#
256# .write_out()
257# Use sometime after a .write_in to declare that the thread is done
258# writing. Then if some other thread is waiting to write, it's
259# allowed to proceed. Else all threads (if any) waiting to read are
260# allowed to proceed.
Guido van Rossum6910f421994-10-08 19:07:57 +0000261#
262# .write_to_read()
263# Use instead of a .write_in to declare that the thread is done
264# writing but wants to continue reading without other writers
265# intervening. If there are other threads waiting to write, they
266# are allowed to proceed only if the current thread calls
267# .read_out; threads waiting to read are only allowed to proceed
Ezio Melotti1e87da12011-10-19 10:39:35 +0300268# if there are no threads waiting to write. (This is a
Guido van Rossum6910f421994-10-08 19:07:57 +0000269# weakness of the interface!)
Guido van Rossum48a69b71994-05-16 09:35:22 +0000270
271import thread
272
273class condition:
Guido van Rossuma6970581994-05-18 08:14:04 +0000274 def __init__(self, lock=None):
Guido van Rossum48a69b71994-05-16 09:35:22 +0000275 # the lock actually used by .acquire() and .release()
Guido van Rossuma6970581994-05-18 08:14:04 +0000276 if lock is None:
277 self.mutex = thread.allocate_lock()
278 else:
279 if hasattr(lock, 'acquire') and \
280 hasattr(lock, 'release'):
281 self.mutex = lock
282 else:
283 raise TypeError, 'condition constructor requires ' \
284 'a lock argument'
Guido van Rossum48a69b71994-05-16 09:35:22 +0000285
286 # lock used to block threads until a signal
287 self.checkout = thread.allocate_lock()
288 self.checkout.acquire()
289
290 # internal critical-section lock, & the data it protects
291 self.idlock = thread.allocate_lock()
292 self.id = 0
293 self.waiting = 0 # num waiters subject to current release
294 self.pending = 0 # num waiters awaiting next signal
295 self.torelease = 0 # num waiters to release
296 self.releasing = 0 # 1 iff release is in progress
297
298 def acquire(self):
299 self.mutex.acquire()
300
301 def release(self):
302 self.mutex.release()
303
304 def wait(self):
305 mutex, checkout, idlock = self.mutex, self.checkout, self.idlock
306 if not mutex.locked():
307 raise ValueError, \
308 "condition must be .acquire'd when .wait() invoked"
309
310 idlock.acquire()
311 myid = self.id
312 self.pending = self.pending + 1
313 idlock.release()
314
315 mutex.release()
316
317 while 1:
318 checkout.acquire(); idlock.acquire()
319 if myid < self.id:
320 break
321 checkout.release(); idlock.release()
322
323 self.waiting = self.waiting - 1
324 self.torelease = self.torelease - 1
325 if self.torelease:
326 checkout.release()
327 else:
328 self.releasing = 0
329 if self.waiting == self.pending == 0:
330 self.id = 0
331 idlock.release()
332 mutex.acquire()
333
334 def signal(self):
335 self.broadcast(1)
336
337 def broadcast(self, num = -1):
338 if num < -1:
Walter Dörwald70a6b492004-02-12 17:35:32 +0000339 raise ValueError, '.broadcast called with num %r' % (num,)
Guido van Rossum48a69b71994-05-16 09:35:22 +0000340 if num == 0:
341 return
342 self.idlock.acquire()
343 if self.pending:
344 self.waiting = self.waiting + self.pending
345 self.pending = 0
346 self.id = self.id + 1
347 if num == -1:
348 self.torelease = self.waiting
349 else:
350 self.torelease = min( self.waiting,
351 self.torelease + num )
352 if self.torelease and not self.releasing:
353 self.releasing = 1
354 self.checkout.release()
355 self.idlock.release()
356
357class barrier:
358 def __init__(self, n):
359 self.n = n
360 self.togo = n
361 self.full = condition()
362
363 def enter(self):
364 full = self.full
365 full.acquire()
366 self.togo = self.togo - 1
367 if self.togo:
368 full.wait()
369 else:
370 self.togo = self.n
371 full.broadcast()
372 full.release()
373
374class event:
375 def __init__(self):
376 self.state = 0
377 self.posted = condition()
378
379 def post(self):
380 self.posted.acquire()
381 self.state = 1
382 self.posted.broadcast()
383 self.posted.release()
384
385 def clear(self):
386 self.posted.acquire()
387 self.state = 0
388 self.posted.release()
389
390 def is_posted(self):
391 self.posted.acquire()
392 answer = self.state
393 self.posted.release()
394 return answer
395
396 def wait(self):
397 self.posted.acquire()
Guido van Rossum846c3221994-05-17 08:34:33 +0000398 if not self.state:
Guido van Rossum48a69b71994-05-16 09:35:22 +0000399 self.posted.wait()
400 self.posted.release()
401
Guido van Rossum846c3221994-05-17 08:34:33 +0000402class semaphore:
403 def __init__(self, count=1):
404 if count <= 0:
405 raise ValueError, 'semaphore count %d; must be >= 1' % count
406 self.count = count
407 self.maxcount = count
408 self.nonzero = condition()
409
410 def p(self):
411 self.nonzero.acquire()
412 while self.count == 0:
413 self.nonzero.wait()
414 self.count = self.count - 1
415 self.nonzero.release()
416
417 def v(self):
418 self.nonzero.acquire()
419 if self.count == self.maxcount:
420 raise ValueError, '.v() tried to raise semaphore count above ' \
Fred Drake09659fb2004-05-12 03:15:07 +0000421 'initial value %r' % self.maxcount
Guido van Rossum846c3221994-05-17 08:34:33 +0000422 self.count = self.count + 1
423 self.nonzero.signal()
424 self.nonzero.release()
425
Guido van Rossuma6970581994-05-18 08:14:04 +0000426class mrsw:
427 def __init__(self):
428 # critical-section lock & the data it protects
429 self.rwOK = thread.allocate_lock()
430 self.nr = 0 # number readers actively reading (not just waiting)
431 self.nw = 0 # number writers either waiting to write or writing
432 self.writing = 0 # 1 iff some thread is writing
433
434 # conditions
435 self.readOK = condition(self.rwOK) # OK to unblock readers
436 self.writeOK = condition(self.rwOK) # OK to unblock writers
437
438 def read_in(self):
439 self.rwOK.acquire()
440 while self.nw:
441 self.readOK.wait()
442 self.nr = self.nr + 1
443 self.rwOK.release()
444
445 def read_out(self):
446 self.rwOK.acquire()
447 if self.nr <= 0:
448 raise ValueError, \
449 '.read_out() invoked without an active reader'
450 self.nr = self.nr - 1
451 if self.nr == 0:
452 self.writeOK.signal()
453 self.rwOK.release()
454
455 def write_in(self):
456 self.rwOK.acquire()
457 self.nw = self.nw + 1
458 while self.writing or self.nr:
459 self.writeOK.wait()
460 self.writing = 1
461 self.rwOK.release()
462
463 def write_out(self):
464 self.rwOK.acquire()
465 if not self.writing:
466 raise ValueError, \
467 '.write_out() invoked without an active writer'
468 self.writing = 0
469 self.nw = self.nw - 1
470 if self.nw:
471 self.writeOK.signal()
472 else:
473 self.readOK.broadcast()
474 self.rwOK.release()
475
Guido van Rossum6910f421994-10-08 19:07:57 +0000476 def write_to_read(self):
Guido van Rossum4117e541998-09-14 16:44:15 +0000477 self.rwOK.acquire()
478 if not self.writing:
479 raise ValueError, \
480 '.write_to_read() invoked without an active writer'
481 self.writing = 0
482 self.nw = self.nw - 1
483 self.nr = self.nr + 1
484 if not self.nw:
485 self.readOK.broadcast()
486 self.rwOK.release()
Guido van Rossum6910f421994-10-08 19:07:57 +0000487
Guido van Rossum48a69b71994-05-16 09:35:22 +0000488# The rest of the file is a test case, that runs a number of parallelized
489# quicksorts in parallel. If it works, you'll get about 600 lines of
490# tracing output, with a line like
491# test passed! 209 threads created in all
492# as the last line. The content and order of preceding lines will
493# vary across runs.
494
495def _new_thread(func, *args):
496 global TID
497 tid.acquire(); id = TID = TID+1; tid.release()
498 io.acquire(); alive.append(id); \
499 print 'starting thread', id, '--', len(alive), 'alive'; \
500 io.release()
501 thread.start_new_thread( func, (id,) + args )
502
503def _qsort(tid, a, l, r, finished):
504 # sort a[l:r]; post finished when done
505 io.acquire(); print 'thread', tid, 'qsort', l, r; io.release()
506 if r-l > 1:
507 pivot = a[l]
508 j = l+1 # make a[l:j] <= pivot, and a[j:r] > pivot
509 for i in range(j, r):
510 if a[i] <= pivot:
511 a[j], a[i] = a[i], a[j]
512 j = j + 1
513 a[l], a[j-1] = a[j-1], pivot
514
515 l_subarray_sorted = event()
516 r_subarray_sorted = event()
517 _new_thread(_qsort, a, l, j-1, l_subarray_sorted)
518 _new_thread(_qsort, a, j, r, r_subarray_sorted)
519 l_subarray_sorted.wait()
520 r_subarray_sorted.wait()
521
522 io.acquire(); print 'thread', tid, 'qsort done'; \
523 alive.remove(tid); io.release()
524 finished.post()
525
526def _randarray(tid, a, finished):
527 io.acquire(); print 'thread', tid, 'randomizing array'; \
528 io.release()
529 for i in range(1, len(a)):
530 wh.acquire(); j = randint(0,i); wh.release()
531 a[i], a[j] = a[j], a[i]
532 io.acquire(); print 'thread', tid, 'randomizing done'; \
533 alive.remove(tid); io.release()
534 finished.post()
535
536def _check_sort(a):
537 if a != range(len(a)):
538 raise ValueError, ('a not sorted', a)
539
540def _run_one_sort(tid, a, bar, done):
541 # randomize a, and quicksort it
542 # for variety, all the threads running this enter a barrier
543 # at the end, and post `done' after the barrier exits
544 io.acquire(); print 'thread', tid, 'randomizing', a; \
545 io.release()
546 finished = event()
547 _new_thread(_randarray, a, finished)
548 finished.wait()
549
550 io.acquire(); print 'thread', tid, 'sorting', a; io.release()
551 finished.clear()
552 _new_thread(_qsort, a, 0, len(a), finished)
553 finished.wait()
554 _check_sort(a)
555
556 io.acquire(); print 'thread', tid, 'entering barrier'; \
557 io.release()
558 bar.enter()
559 io.acquire(); print 'thread', tid, 'leaving barrier'; \
560 io.release()
561 io.acquire(); alive.remove(tid); io.release()
562 bar.enter() # make sure they've all removed themselves from alive
563 ## before 'done' is posted
564 bar.enter() # just to be cruel
565 done.post()
566
567def test():
568 global TID, tid, io, wh, randint, alive
Guido van Rossum6c3a2cb1998-05-20 17:13:01 +0000569 import random
570 randint = random.randint
Guido van Rossum48a69b71994-05-16 09:35:22 +0000571
572 TID = 0 # thread ID (1, 2, ...)
573 tid = thread.allocate_lock() # for changing TID
574 io = thread.allocate_lock() # for printing, and 'alive'
Guido van Rossum6c3a2cb1998-05-20 17:13:01 +0000575 wh = thread.allocate_lock() # for calls to random
Guido van Rossum48a69b71994-05-16 09:35:22 +0000576 alive = [] # IDs of active threads
577
578 NSORTS = 5
579 arrays = []
580 for i in range(NSORTS):
581 arrays.append( range( (i+1)*10 ) )
582
583 bar = barrier(NSORTS)
584 finished = event()
585 for i in range(NSORTS):
586 _new_thread(_run_one_sort, arrays[i], bar, finished)
587 finished.wait()
588
589 print 'all threads done, and checking results ...'
590 if alive:
591 raise ValueError, ('threads still alive at end', alive)
592 for i in range(NSORTS):
593 a = arrays[i]
594 if len(a) != (i+1)*10:
595 raise ValueError, ('length of array', i, 'screwed up')
596 _check_sort(a)
597
598 print 'test passed!', TID, 'threads created in all'
599
600if __name__ == '__main__':
601 test()
602
603# end of module