Fix misleading mentions of tp_size in comments (GH-9093)
Many type object initializations labeled a field "tp_size" in the
comment, but the name of that field is tp_basicsize.
diff --git a/Modules/ossaudiodev.c b/Modules/ossaudiodev.c
index 58ee71f..150a14e 100644
--- a/Modules/ossaudiodev.c
+++ b/Modules/ossaudiodev.c
@@ -964,7 +964,7 @@
static PyTypeObject OSSAudioType = {
PyVarObject_HEAD_INIT(&PyType_Type, 0)
"ossaudiodev.oss_audio_device", /*tp_name*/
- sizeof(oss_audio_t), /*tp_size*/
+ sizeof(oss_audio_t), /*tp_basicsize*/
0, /*tp_itemsize*/
/* methods */
(destructor)oss_dealloc, /*tp_dealloc*/
@@ -996,7 +996,7 @@
static PyTypeObject OSSMixerType = {
PyVarObject_HEAD_INIT(&PyType_Type, 0)
"ossaudiodev.oss_mixer_device", /*tp_name*/
- sizeof(oss_mixer_t), /*tp_size*/
+ sizeof(oss_mixer_t), /*tp_basicsize*/
0, /*tp_itemsize*/
/* methods */
(destructor)oss_mixer_dealloc, /*tp_dealloc*/