Update the code to better reflect recommended style:
Use != instead of <> since <> is documented as "obsolescent".
Use "is" and "is not" when comparing with None or type objects.
diff --git a/Lib/test/test_unpack.py b/Lib/test/test_unpack.py
index 25b94e9..b913b9e 100644
--- a/Lib/test/test_unpack.py
+++ b/Lib/test/test_unpack.py
@@ -16,35 +16,35 @@
if verbose:
print 'unpack tuple'
a, b, c = t
-if a <> 1 or b <> 2 or c <> 3:
+if a != 1 or b != 2 or c != 3:
raise TestFailed
# unpack list
if verbose:
print 'unpack list'
a, b, c = l
-if a <> 4 or b <> 5 or c <> 6:
+if a != 4 or b != 5 or c != 6:
raise TestFailed
# unpack implied tuple
if verbose:
print 'unpack implied tuple'
a, b, c = 7, 8, 9
-if a <> 7 or b <> 8 or c <> 9:
+if a != 7 or b != 8 or c != 9:
raise TestFailed
# unpack string... fun!
if verbose:
print 'unpack string'
a, b, c = 'one'
-if a <> 'o' or b <> 'n' or c <> 'e':
+if a != 'o' or b != 'n' or c != 'e':
raise TestFailed
# unpack generic sequence
if verbose:
print 'unpack sequence'
a, b, c = Seq()
-if a <> 0 or b <> 1 or c <> 2:
+if a != 0 or b != 1 or c != 2:
raise TestFailed
# single element unpacking, with extra syntax
@@ -53,10 +53,10 @@
st = (99,)
sl = [100]
a, = st
-if a <> 99:
+if a != 99:
raise TestFailed
b, = sl
-if b <> 100:
+if b != 100:
raise TestFailed
# now for some failures