bpo-36946: Fix possible signed integer overflow when handling slices. (GH-13375)
The final addition (cur += step) may overflow, so use size_t for "cur".
"cur" is always positive (even for negative steps), so it is safe to use
size_t here.
Co-Authored-By: Martin Panter <vadmium+py@gmail.com>
diff --git a/Lib/test/test_bytes.py b/Lib/test/test_bytes.py
index a091360..9502a8f 100644
--- a/Lib/test/test_bytes.py
+++ b/Lib/test/test_bytes.py
@@ -285,7 +285,7 @@
# Test extended slicing by comparing with list slicing.
L = list(range(255))
b = self.type2test(L)
- indices = (0, None, 1, 3, 19, 100, -1, -2, -31, -100)
+ indices = (0, None, 1, 3, 19, 100, sys.maxsize, -1, -2, -31, -100)
for start in indices:
for stop in indices:
# Skip step 0 (invalid)
@@ -1242,7 +1242,8 @@
self.assertLessEqual(sys.getsizeof(b), size)
def test_extended_set_del_slice(self):
- indices = (0, None, 1, 3, 19, 300, 1<<333, -1, -2, -31, -300)
+ indices = (0, None, 1, 3, 19, 300, 1<<333, sys.maxsize,
+ -1, -2, -31, -300)
for start in indices:
for stop in indices:
# Skip invalid step 0