bpo-42528: Improve the docs of most Py*_Check{,Exact} API calls (GH-23602)
I think that none of these API calls can fail, but only few of them are
documented as such. Add the sentence "This function always succeeds" (which is
the same already used e.g. by PyNumber_Check) to all of them.diff --git a/Doc/c-api/set.rst b/Doc/c-api/set.rst
index 879f394..84f34e7 100644
--- a/Doc/c-api/set.rst
+++ b/Doc/c-api/set.rst
@@ -53,28 +53,29 @@
.. c:function:: int PySet_Check(PyObject *p)
Return true if *p* is a :class:`set` object or an instance of a subtype.
+ This function always succeeds.
.. c:function:: int PyFrozenSet_Check(PyObject *p)
Return true if *p* is a :class:`frozenset` object or an instance of a
- subtype.
+ subtype. This function always succeeds.
.. c:function:: int PyAnySet_Check(PyObject *p)
Return true if *p* is a :class:`set` object, a :class:`frozenset` object, or an
- instance of a subtype.
+ instance of a subtype. This function always succeeds.
.. c:function:: int PyAnySet_CheckExact(PyObject *p)
Return true if *p* is a :class:`set` object or a :class:`frozenset` object but
- not an instance of a subtype.
+ not an instance of a subtype. This function always succeeds.
.. c:function:: int PyFrozenSet_CheckExact(PyObject *p)
Return true if *p* is a :class:`frozenset` object but not an instance of a
- subtype.
+ subtype. This function always succeeds.
.. c:function:: PyObject* PySet_New(PyObject *iterable)