[3.7] Fix misleading mentions of tp_size in comments. (GH-9136)
Many type object initializations labeled a field "tp_size" in the
comment, but the name of that field is tp_basicsize..
(cherry picked from commit 0e0bc4e221f592f305d335faf5f8046484eb9238)
Co-authored-by: Peter Eisentraut <peter@eisentraut.org>
diff --git a/Modules/sha256module.c b/Modules/sha256module.c
index e4cb328..3599eaf 100644
--- a/Modules/sha256module.c
+++ b/Modules/sha256module.c
@@ -529,7 +529,7 @@
static PyTypeObject SHA224type = {
PyVarObject_HEAD_INIT(NULL, 0)
"_sha256.sha224", /*tp_name*/
- sizeof(SHAobject), /*tp_size*/
+ sizeof(SHAobject), /*tp_basicsize*/
0, /*tp_itemsize*/
/* methods */
SHA_dealloc, /*tp_dealloc*/
@@ -563,7 +563,7 @@
static PyTypeObject SHA256type = {
PyVarObject_HEAD_INIT(NULL, 0)
"_sha256.sha256", /*tp_name*/
- sizeof(SHAobject), /*tp_size*/
+ sizeof(SHAobject), /*tp_basicsize*/
0, /*tp_itemsize*/
/* methods */
SHA_dealloc, /*tp_dealloc*/