diff --git a/Lib/random.py b/Lib/random.py
index ae2d434..b80f1a1 100644
--- a/Lib/random.py
+++ b/Lib/random.py
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@
             raise ValueError, "empty range for randrange()"
 
         if n >= maxwidth:
-            return istart + self._randbelow(n)
+            return istart + istep*self._randbelow(n)
         return istart + istep*int(self.random() * n)
 
     def randint(self, a, b):
diff --git a/Lib/test/test_random.py b/Lib/test/test_random.py
index bba4c7c..6c32635 100644
--- a/Lib/test/test_random.py
+++ b/Lib/test/test_random.py
@@ -439,6 +439,14 @@
             self.assertEqual(k, numbits)        # note the stronger assertion
             self.assert_(2**k > n > 2**(k-1))   # note the stronger assertion
 
+    def test_randrange_bug_1590891(self):
+        start = 1000000000000
+        stop = -100000000000000000000
+        step = -200
+        x = self.gen.randrange(start, stop, step)
+        self.assert_(stop < x <= start)
+        self.assertEqual((x+stop)%step, 0)
+
 _gammacoeff = (0.9999999999995183, 676.5203681218835, -1259.139216722289,
               771.3234287757674,  -176.6150291498386, 12.50734324009056,
               -0.1385710331296526, 0.9934937113930748e-05, 0.1659470187408462e-06)
diff --git a/Misc/NEWS b/Misc/NEWS
index c1a5052..93e9d0a 100644
--- a/Misc/NEWS
+++ b/Misc/NEWS
@@ -12,6 +12,8 @@
 Core and builtins
 -----------------
 
+- Bug #1590891: random.randrange don't return correct value for big number
+
 - Bug #1456209: In some obscure cases it was possible for a class with a
   custom ``__eq__()`` method to confuse set internals when class instances
   were used as a set's elements and the ``__eq__()`` method mutated the set.