fix markup nits
diff --git a/Doc/lib/libdoctest.tex b/Doc/lib/libdoctest.tex
index 253d6b4..2a33047 100644
--- a/Doc/lib/libdoctest.tex
+++ b/Doc/lib/libdoctest.tex
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@
\end{verbatim}
If you want to test the module as the main module, you don't need to
-pass M to \function{testmod}; in this case, it will test the current
+pass M to \function{testmod()}; in this case, it will test the current
module.
Then running the module as a script causes the examples in the docstrings
@@ -176,11 +176,12 @@
and a detailed report of all examples tried is printed to \code{stdout},
along with assorted summaries at the end.
-You can force verbose mode by passing \code{verbose=1} to testmod, or
+You can force verbose mode by passing \code{verbose=1} to
+\function{testmod()}, or
prohibit it by passing \code{verbose=0}. In either of those cases,
-\code{sys.argv} is not examined by testmod.
+\code{sys.argv} is not examined by \function{testmod()}.
-In any case, testmod returns a 2-tuple of ints \code{(\var{f},
+In any case, \function{testmod()} returns a 2-tuple of ints \code{(\var{f},
\var{t})}, where \var{f} is the number of docstring examples that
failed and \var{t} is the total number of docstring examples
attempted.
@@ -210,8 +211,8 @@
\subsection{What's the Execution Context?}
-By default, each time testmod finds a docstring to test, it uses a
-\emph{copy} of \module{M}'s globals, so that running tests on a module
+By default, each time \function{testmod()} finds a docstring to test, it uses
+a \emph{copy} of \module{M}'s globals, so that running tests on a module
doesn't change the module's real globals, and so that one test in
\module{M} can't leave behind crumbs that accidentally allow another test
to work. This means examples can freely use any names defined at top-level
@@ -400,21 +401,20 @@
\end{verbatim}
\item WYSIWYG isn't always the case, starting in Python 2.3. The
- string form of boolean results changed from \code{"0"} and
- \code{"1"} to \code{"False"} and \code{"True"} in Python 2.3.
+ string form of boolean results changed from \code{'0'} and
+ \code{'1'} to \code{'False'} and \code{'True'} in Python 2.3.
This makes it clumsy to write a doctest showing boolean results that
passes under multiple versions of Python. In Python 2.3, by default,
and as a special case, if an expected output block consists solely
- of \code{"0"} and the actual output block consists solely of
- \code{"False"}, that's accepted as an exact match, and similarly for
- \code{"1"} versus \code{"True"}. This behavior can be turned off by
+ of \code{'0'} and the actual output block consists solely of
+ \code{'False'}, that's accepted as an exact match, and similarly for
+ \code{'1'} versus \code{'True'}. This behavior can be turned off by
passing the new (in 2.3) module constant
\constant{DONT_ACCEPT_TRUE_FOR_1} as the value of \function{testmod()}'s
new (in 2.3) optional \var{optionflags} argument. Some years after
the integer spellings of booleans are history, this hack will
probably be removed again.
-
\end{enumerate}