Fix Issue #6005: Examples in the socket library documentation use sendall,
where relevant, instead send method. Patch contributed by Brian Brazil.
diff --git a/Doc/library/socketserver.rst b/Doc/library/socketserver.rst
index 252e568..62caf2b 100644
--- a/Doc/library/socketserver.rst
+++ b/Doc/library/socketserver.rst
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@
print "{} wrote:".format(self.client_address[0])
print self.data
# just send back the same data, but upper-cased
- self.request.send(self.data.upper())
+ self.request.sendall(self.data.upper())
if __name__ == "__main__":
HOST, PORT = "localhost", 9999
@@ -390,7 +390,7 @@
The difference is that the ``readline()`` call in the second handler will call
``recv()`` multiple times until it encounters a newline character, while the
single ``recv()`` call in the first handler will just return what has been sent
-from the client in one ``send()`` call.
+from the client in one ``sendall()`` call.
This is the client side::
@@ -407,7 +407,7 @@
try:
# Connect to server and send data
sock.connect((HOST, PORT))
- sock.send(data + "\n")
+ sock.sendall(data + "\n")
# Receive data from the server and shut down
received = sock.recv(1024)
@@ -505,7 +505,7 @@
data = self.request.recv(1024)
cur_thread = threading.current_thread()
response = "{}: {}".format(cur_thread.name, data)
- self.request.send(response)
+ self.request.sendall(response)
class ThreadedTCPServer(SocketServer.ThreadingMixIn, SocketServer.TCPServer):
pass
@@ -514,7 +514,7 @@
sock = socket.socket(socket.AF_INET, socket.SOCK_STREAM)
sock.connect((ip, port))
try:
- sock.send(message)
+ sock.sendall(message)
response = sock.recv(1024)
print "Received: {}".format(response)
finally: