Issue #25195: Fix a regression in mock.MagicMock
_Call is a subclass of tuple (changeset 3603bae63c13 only works
for classes) so we need to implement __ne__ ourselves.
Patch by Andrew Plummer.
diff --git a/Lib/unittest/test/testmock/testmock.py b/Lib/unittest/test/testmock/testmock.py
index 2a6069f..03c95de 100644
--- a/Lib/unittest/test/testmock/testmock.py
+++ b/Lib/unittest/test/testmock/testmock.py
@@ -304,6 +304,17 @@
# an exception. See issue 24857.
self.assertFalse(mock.call_args == "a long sequence")
+
+ def test_calls_equal_with_any(self):
+ call1 = mock.call(mock.MagicMock())
+ call2 = mock.call(mock.ANY)
+
+ # Check that equality and non-equality is consistent even when
+ # comparing with mock.ANY
+ self.assertTrue(call1 == call2)
+ self.assertFalse(call1 != call2)
+
+
def test_assert_called_with(self):
mock = Mock()
mock()
@@ -319,6 +330,12 @@
mock.assert_called_with(1, 2, 3, a='fish', b='nothing')
+ def test_assert_called_with_any(self):
+ m = MagicMock()
+ m(MagicMock())
+ m.assert_called_with(mock.ANY)
+
+
def test_assert_called_with_function_spec(self):
def f(a, b, c, d=None):
pass