Resolution of bug #997368, "strftime() backward compatibility".
Specifically, time.strftime() no longer accepts a 0 in the yday position of a
time tuple, since that can crash some platform strftime() implementations.
parsedate_tz(): Change the return value to return 1 in the yday position.
Update tests in test_rfc822.py and test_email.py
diff --git a/Lib/email/_parseaddr.py b/Lib/email/_parseaddr.py
index 167eb3f..4a31aff 100644
--- a/Lib/email/_parseaddr.py
+++ b/Lib/email/_parseaddr.py
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@
else:
tzsign = 1
tzoffset = tzsign * ( (tzoffset/100)*3600 + (tzoffset % 100)*60)
- tuple = (yy, mm, dd, thh, tmm, tss, 0, 0, 0, tzoffset)
+ tuple = (yy, mm, dd, thh, tmm, tss, 0, 1, 0, tzoffset)
return tuple
diff --git a/Lib/email/test/test_email.py b/Lib/email/test/test_email.py
index 1749102..4479fb2 100644
--- a/Lib/email/test/test_email.py
+++ b/Lib/email/test/test_email.py
@@ -2098,12 +2098,12 @@
def test_parsedate_no_dayofweek(self):
eq = self.assertEqual
eq(Utils.parsedate_tz('25 Feb 2003 13:47:26 -0800'),
- (2003, 2, 25, 13, 47, 26, 0, 0, 0, -28800))
+ (2003, 2, 25, 13, 47, 26, 0, 1, 0, -28800))
def test_parsedate_compact_no_dayofweek(self):
eq = self.assertEqual
eq(Utils.parsedate_tz('5 Feb 2003 13:47:26 -0800'),
- (2003, 2, 5, 13, 47, 26, 0, 0, 0, -28800))
+ (2003, 2, 5, 13, 47, 26, 0, 1, 0, -28800))
def test_parseaddr_empty(self):
self.assertEqual(Utils.parseaddr('<>'), ('', ''))