diff --git a/docs/hazmat/primitives/asymmetric/ec.rst b/docs/hazmat/primitives/asymmetric/ec.rst
index 4b3c460..89d00c8 100644
--- a/docs/hazmat/primitives/asymmetric/ec.rst
+++ b/docs/hazmat/primitives/asymmetric/ec.rst
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 .. hazmat::
 
-Elliptic Curve Cryptography
+Elliptic curve cryptography
 ===========================
 
 .. currentmodule:: cryptography.hazmat.primitives.asymmetric.ec
@@ -126,14 +126,28 @@
 Elliptic Curves
 ---------------
 
+Elliptic curves provide equivalent security at much smaller key sizes than
+asymmetric cryptography systems such as RSA or DSA. For some operations they
+can also provide higher performance at every security level. According to NIST
+they can have as much as a `64x lower computational cost than DH`_.
+
+.. note::
+    Curves with a size of `less than 224 bits`_ should not be used. You should
+    strongly consider using curves of at least 224 bits.
+
+Generally the NIST prime field ("P") curves are significantly faster than the
+other types suggested by NIST at both signing and verifying with ECDSA.
+
+Prime fields also `minimize the number of security concerns for elliptic-curve
+cryptography`_. However there is `some concern`_ that both the prime field and
+binary field ("B") NIST curves may have been weakened during their generation.
+
+Currently `cryptograhy` only supports NIST curves, none of which are considered
+"safe" by the `SafeCurves`_ project run by Daniel J. Bernstein and Tanja Lange.
+
 All named curves are providers of
 :class:`~cryptography.hazmat.primtives.interfaces.EllipticCurve`.
 
-There is `some concern`_ that the non-Koblitz NIST curves (identified by names
-that start with "B" or "P") may have been intentionally weakened by their
-generation process.
-
-
 .. class:: SECT571K1
 
     .. versionadded:: 0.5
@@ -243,3 +257,7 @@
 .. _`FIPS 186-3`: http://csrc.nist.gov/publications/fips/fips186-3/fips_186-3.pdf
 .. _`FIPS 186-4`: http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/FIPS/NIST.FIPS.186-4.pdf
 .. _`some concern`: https://crypto.stackexchange.com/questions/10263/should-we-trust-the-nist-recommended-ecc-parameters
+.. _`less than 224 bits`: http://www.ecrypt.eu.org/documents/D.SPA.20.pdf
+.. _`64x lower computational cost than DH`: http://www.nsa.gov/business/programs/elliptic_curve.shtml
+.. _`minimize the number of security concerns for elliptic-curve cryptography`: http://cr.yp.to/ecdh/curve25519-20060209.pdf
+.. _`SafeCurves`: http://safecurves.cr.yp.to/
diff --git a/docs/spelling_wordlist.txt b/docs/spelling_wordlist.txt
index dc12349..4668cfa 100644
--- a/docs/spelling_wordlist.txt
+++ b/docs/spelling_wordlist.txt
@@ -39,6 +39,7 @@
 pseudorandom
 Schneier
 scrypt
+Tanja
 testability
 Ubuntu
 unencrypted