chore: update generated docs (#1115)

This PR was generated using Autosynth. :rainbow:

Synth log will be available here:
https://source.cloud.google.com/results/invocations/2ed9ab0e-55b4-4ab2-aede-c95e765f7376/targets

- [x] To automatically regenerate this PR, check this box.

Source-Link: https://github.com/googleapis/discovery-artifact-manager/commit/0bed8bdae25d545e796cfcdd7a9bfffff11e69da
Source-Link: https://github.com/googleapis/synthtool/commit/c2de32114ec484aa708d32012d1fa8d75232daf5
diff --git a/docs/dyn/remotebuildexecution_v2.blobs.html b/docs/dyn/remotebuildexecution_v2.blobs.html
index 93a235f..38fd3c4 100644
--- a/docs/dyn/remotebuildexecution_v2.blobs.html
+++ b/docs/dyn/remotebuildexecution_v2.blobs.html
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@
   <code><a href="#findMissing">findMissing(instanceName, body=None, x__xgafv=None)</a></code></p>
 <p class="firstline">Determine if blobs are present in the CAS. Clients can use this API before uploading blobs to determine which ones are already present in the CAS and do not need to be uploaded again. Servers SHOULD increase the TTLs of the referenced blobs if necessary and applicable. There are no method-specific errors.</p>
 <p class="toc_element">
-  <code><a href="#getTree">getTree(instanceName, hash, sizeBytes, pageSize=None, pageToken=None, x__xgafv=None)</a></code></p>
+  <code><a href="#getTree">getTree(instanceName, hash, sizeBytes, pageToken=None, pageSize=None, x__xgafv=None)</a></code></p>
 <p class="firstline">Fetch the entire directory tree rooted at a node. This request must be targeted at a Directory stored in the ContentAddressableStorage (CAS). The server will enumerate the `Directory` tree recursively and return every node descended from the root. The GetTreeRequest.page_token parameter can be used to skip ahead in the stream (e.g. when retrying a partially completed and aborted request), by setting it to a value taken from GetTreeResponse.next_page_token of the last successfully processed GetTreeResponse). The exact traversal order is unspecified and, unless retrieving subsequent pages from an earlier request, is not guaranteed to be stable across multiple invocations of `GetTree`. If part of the tree is missing from the CAS, the server will return the portion present and omit the rest. Errors: * `NOT_FOUND`: The requested tree root is not present in the CAS.</p>
 <p class="toc_element">
   <code><a href="#getTree_next">getTree_next(previous_request, previous_response)</a></code></p>
@@ -105,8 +105,8 @@
 { # A request message for ContentAddressableStorage.BatchReadBlobs.
     &quot;digests&quot;: [ # The individual blob digests.
       { # A content digest. A digest for a given blob consists of the size of the blob and its hash. The hash algorithm to use is defined by the server. The size is considered to be an integral part of the digest and cannot be separated. That is, even if the `hash` field is correctly specified but `size_bytes` is not, the server MUST reject the request. The reason for including the size in the digest is as follows: in a great many cases, the server needs to know the size of the blob it is about to work with prior to starting an operation with it, such as flattening Merkle tree structures or streaming it to a worker. Technically, the server could implement a separate metadata store, but this results in a significantly more complicated implementation as opposed to having the client specify the size up-front (or storing the size along with the digest in every message where digests are embedded). This does mean that the API leaks some implementation details of (what we consider to be) a reasonable server implementation, but we consider this to be a worthwhile tradeoff. When a `Digest` is used to refer to a proto message, it always refers to the message in binary encoded form. To ensure consistent hashing, clients and servers MUST ensure that they serialize messages according to the following rules, even if there are alternate valid encodings for the same message: * Fields are serialized in tag order. * There are no unknown fields. * There are no duplicate fields. * Fields are serialized according to the default semantics for their type. Most protocol buffer implementations will always follow these rules when serializing, but care should be taken to avoid shortcuts. For instance, concatenating two messages to merge them may produce duplicate fields.
-        &quot;hash&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The hash. In the case of SHA-256, it will always be a lowercase hex string exactly 64 characters long.
         &quot;sizeBytes&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The size of the blob, in bytes.
+        &quot;hash&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The hash. In the case of SHA-256, it will always be a lowercase hex string exactly 64 characters long.
       },
     ],
   }
@@ -122,18 +122,18 @@
     { # A response message for ContentAddressableStorage.BatchReadBlobs.
     &quot;responses&quot;: [ # The responses to the requests.
       { # A response corresponding to a single blob that the client tried to download.
-        &quot;data&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The raw binary data.
         &quot;digest&quot;: { # A content digest. A digest for a given blob consists of the size of the blob and its hash. The hash algorithm to use is defined by the server. The size is considered to be an integral part of the digest and cannot be separated. That is, even if the `hash` field is correctly specified but `size_bytes` is not, the server MUST reject the request. The reason for including the size in the digest is as follows: in a great many cases, the server needs to know the size of the blob it is about to work with prior to starting an operation with it, such as flattening Merkle tree structures or streaming it to a worker. Technically, the server could implement a separate metadata store, but this results in a significantly more complicated implementation as opposed to having the client specify the size up-front (or storing the size along with the digest in every message where digests are embedded). This does mean that the API leaks some implementation details of (what we consider to be) a reasonable server implementation, but we consider this to be a worthwhile tradeoff. When a `Digest` is used to refer to a proto message, it always refers to the message in binary encoded form. To ensure consistent hashing, clients and servers MUST ensure that they serialize messages according to the following rules, even if there are alternate valid encodings for the same message: * Fields are serialized in tag order. * There are no unknown fields. * There are no duplicate fields. * Fields are serialized according to the default semantics for their type. Most protocol buffer implementations will always follow these rules when serializing, but care should be taken to avoid shortcuts. For instance, concatenating two messages to merge them may produce duplicate fields. # The digest to which this response corresponds.
-          &quot;hash&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The hash. In the case of SHA-256, it will always be a lowercase hex string exactly 64 characters long.
           &quot;sizeBytes&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The size of the blob, in bytes.
+          &quot;hash&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The hash. In the case of SHA-256, it will always be a lowercase hex string exactly 64 characters long.
         },
+        &quot;data&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The raw binary data.
         &quot;status&quot;: { # The `Status` type defines a logical error model that is suitable for different programming environments, including REST APIs and RPC APIs. It is used by [gRPC](https://github.com/grpc). Each `Status` message contains three pieces of data: error code, error message, and error details. You can find out more about this error model and how to work with it in the [API Design Guide](https://cloud.google.com/apis/design/errors). # The result of attempting to download that blob.
-          &quot;code&quot;: 42, # The status code, which should be an enum value of google.rpc.Code.
           &quot;details&quot;: [ # A list of messages that carry the error details. There is a common set of message types for APIs to use.
             {
               &quot;a_key&quot;: &quot;&quot;, # Properties of the object. Contains field @type with type URL.
             },
           ],
+          &quot;code&quot;: 42, # The status code, which should be an enum value of google.rpc.Code.
           &quot;message&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # A developer-facing error message, which should be in English. Any user-facing error message should be localized and sent in the google.rpc.Status.details field, or localized by the client.
         },
       },
@@ -154,8 +154,8 @@
     &quot;requests&quot;: [ # The individual upload requests.
       { # A request corresponding to a single blob that the client wants to upload.
         &quot;digest&quot;: { # A content digest. A digest for a given blob consists of the size of the blob and its hash. The hash algorithm to use is defined by the server. The size is considered to be an integral part of the digest and cannot be separated. That is, even if the `hash` field is correctly specified but `size_bytes` is not, the server MUST reject the request. The reason for including the size in the digest is as follows: in a great many cases, the server needs to know the size of the blob it is about to work with prior to starting an operation with it, such as flattening Merkle tree structures or streaming it to a worker. Technically, the server could implement a separate metadata store, but this results in a significantly more complicated implementation as opposed to having the client specify the size up-front (or storing the size along with the digest in every message where digests are embedded). This does mean that the API leaks some implementation details of (what we consider to be) a reasonable server implementation, but we consider this to be a worthwhile tradeoff. When a `Digest` is used to refer to a proto message, it always refers to the message in binary encoded form. To ensure consistent hashing, clients and servers MUST ensure that they serialize messages according to the following rules, even if there are alternate valid encodings for the same message: * Fields are serialized in tag order. * There are no unknown fields. * There are no duplicate fields. * Fields are serialized according to the default semantics for their type. Most protocol buffer implementations will always follow these rules when serializing, but care should be taken to avoid shortcuts. For instance, concatenating two messages to merge them may produce duplicate fields. # The digest of the blob. This MUST be the digest of `data`.
-          &quot;hash&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The hash. In the case of SHA-256, it will always be a lowercase hex string exactly 64 characters long.
           &quot;sizeBytes&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The size of the blob, in bytes.
+          &quot;hash&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The hash. In the case of SHA-256, it will always be a lowercase hex string exactly 64 characters long.
         },
         &quot;data&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The raw binary data.
       },
@@ -173,19 +173,19 @@
     { # A response message for ContentAddressableStorage.BatchUpdateBlobs.
     &quot;responses&quot;: [ # The responses to the requests.
       { # A response corresponding to a single blob that the client tried to upload.
+        &quot;digest&quot;: { # A content digest. A digest for a given blob consists of the size of the blob and its hash. The hash algorithm to use is defined by the server. The size is considered to be an integral part of the digest and cannot be separated. That is, even if the `hash` field is correctly specified but `size_bytes` is not, the server MUST reject the request. The reason for including the size in the digest is as follows: in a great many cases, the server needs to know the size of the blob it is about to work with prior to starting an operation with it, such as flattening Merkle tree structures or streaming it to a worker. Technically, the server could implement a separate metadata store, but this results in a significantly more complicated implementation as opposed to having the client specify the size up-front (or storing the size along with the digest in every message where digests are embedded). This does mean that the API leaks some implementation details of (what we consider to be) a reasonable server implementation, but we consider this to be a worthwhile tradeoff. When a `Digest` is used to refer to a proto message, it always refers to the message in binary encoded form. To ensure consistent hashing, clients and servers MUST ensure that they serialize messages according to the following rules, even if there are alternate valid encodings for the same message: * Fields are serialized in tag order. * There are no unknown fields. * There are no duplicate fields. * Fields are serialized according to the default semantics for their type. Most protocol buffer implementations will always follow these rules when serializing, but care should be taken to avoid shortcuts. For instance, concatenating two messages to merge them may produce duplicate fields. # The blob digest to which this response corresponds.
+          &quot;sizeBytes&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The size of the blob, in bytes.
+          &quot;hash&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The hash. In the case of SHA-256, it will always be a lowercase hex string exactly 64 characters long.
+        },
         &quot;status&quot;: { # The `Status` type defines a logical error model that is suitable for different programming environments, including REST APIs and RPC APIs. It is used by [gRPC](https://github.com/grpc). Each `Status` message contains three pieces of data: error code, error message, and error details. You can find out more about this error model and how to work with it in the [API Design Guide](https://cloud.google.com/apis/design/errors). # The result of attempting to upload that blob.
-          &quot;code&quot;: 42, # The status code, which should be an enum value of google.rpc.Code.
           &quot;details&quot;: [ # A list of messages that carry the error details. There is a common set of message types for APIs to use.
             {
               &quot;a_key&quot;: &quot;&quot;, # Properties of the object. Contains field @type with type URL.
             },
           ],
+          &quot;code&quot;: 42, # The status code, which should be an enum value of google.rpc.Code.
           &quot;message&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # A developer-facing error message, which should be in English. Any user-facing error message should be localized and sent in the google.rpc.Status.details field, or localized by the client.
         },
-        &quot;digest&quot;: { # A content digest. A digest for a given blob consists of the size of the blob and its hash. The hash algorithm to use is defined by the server. The size is considered to be an integral part of the digest and cannot be separated. That is, even if the `hash` field is correctly specified but `size_bytes` is not, the server MUST reject the request. The reason for including the size in the digest is as follows: in a great many cases, the server needs to know the size of the blob it is about to work with prior to starting an operation with it, such as flattening Merkle tree structures or streaming it to a worker. Technically, the server could implement a separate metadata store, but this results in a significantly more complicated implementation as opposed to having the client specify the size up-front (or storing the size along with the digest in every message where digests are embedded). This does mean that the API leaks some implementation details of (what we consider to be) a reasonable server implementation, but we consider this to be a worthwhile tradeoff. When a `Digest` is used to refer to a proto message, it always refers to the message in binary encoded form. To ensure consistent hashing, clients and servers MUST ensure that they serialize messages according to the following rules, even if there are alternate valid encodings for the same message: * Fields are serialized in tag order. * There are no unknown fields. * There are no duplicate fields. * Fields are serialized according to the default semantics for their type. Most protocol buffer implementations will always follow these rules when serializing, but care should be taken to avoid shortcuts. For instance, concatenating two messages to merge them may produce duplicate fields. # The blob digest to which this response corresponds.
-          &quot;hash&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The hash. In the case of SHA-256, it will always be a lowercase hex string exactly 64 characters long.
-          &quot;sizeBytes&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The size of the blob, in bytes.
-        },
       },
     ],
   }</pre>
@@ -208,8 +208,8 @@
 { # A request message for ContentAddressableStorage.FindMissingBlobs.
     &quot;blobDigests&quot;: [ # A list of the blobs to check.
       { # A content digest. A digest for a given blob consists of the size of the blob and its hash. The hash algorithm to use is defined by the server. The size is considered to be an integral part of the digest and cannot be separated. That is, even if the `hash` field is correctly specified but `size_bytes` is not, the server MUST reject the request. The reason for including the size in the digest is as follows: in a great many cases, the server needs to know the size of the blob it is about to work with prior to starting an operation with it, such as flattening Merkle tree structures or streaming it to a worker. Technically, the server could implement a separate metadata store, but this results in a significantly more complicated implementation as opposed to having the client specify the size up-front (or storing the size along with the digest in every message where digests are embedded). This does mean that the API leaks some implementation details of (what we consider to be) a reasonable server implementation, but we consider this to be a worthwhile tradeoff. When a `Digest` is used to refer to a proto message, it always refers to the message in binary encoded form. To ensure consistent hashing, clients and servers MUST ensure that they serialize messages according to the following rules, even if there are alternate valid encodings for the same message: * Fields are serialized in tag order. * There are no unknown fields. * There are no duplicate fields. * Fields are serialized according to the default semantics for their type. Most protocol buffer implementations will always follow these rules when serializing, but care should be taken to avoid shortcuts. For instance, concatenating two messages to merge them may produce duplicate fields.
-        &quot;hash&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The hash. In the case of SHA-256, it will always be a lowercase hex string exactly 64 characters long.
         &quot;sizeBytes&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The size of the blob, in bytes.
+        &quot;hash&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The hash. In the case of SHA-256, it will always be a lowercase hex string exactly 64 characters long.
       },
     ],
   }
@@ -225,23 +225,23 @@
     { # A response message for ContentAddressableStorage.FindMissingBlobs.
     &quot;missingBlobDigests&quot;: [ # A list of the blobs requested *not* present in the storage.
       { # A content digest. A digest for a given blob consists of the size of the blob and its hash. The hash algorithm to use is defined by the server. The size is considered to be an integral part of the digest and cannot be separated. That is, even if the `hash` field is correctly specified but `size_bytes` is not, the server MUST reject the request. The reason for including the size in the digest is as follows: in a great many cases, the server needs to know the size of the blob it is about to work with prior to starting an operation with it, such as flattening Merkle tree structures or streaming it to a worker. Technically, the server could implement a separate metadata store, but this results in a significantly more complicated implementation as opposed to having the client specify the size up-front (or storing the size along with the digest in every message where digests are embedded). This does mean that the API leaks some implementation details of (what we consider to be) a reasonable server implementation, but we consider this to be a worthwhile tradeoff. When a `Digest` is used to refer to a proto message, it always refers to the message in binary encoded form. To ensure consistent hashing, clients and servers MUST ensure that they serialize messages according to the following rules, even if there are alternate valid encodings for the same message: * Fields are serialized in tag order. * There are no unknown fields. * There are no duplicate fields. * Fields are serialized according to the default semantics for their type. Most protocol buffer implementations will always follow these rules when serializing, but care should be taken to avoid shortcuts. For instance, concatenating two messages to merge them may produce duplicate fields.
-        &quot;hash&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The hash. In the case of SHA-256, it will always be a lowercase hex string exactly 64 characters long.
         &quot;sizeBytes&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The size of the blob, in bytes.
+        &quot;hash&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The hash. In the case of SHA-256, it will always be a lowercase hex string exactly 64 characters long.
       },
     ],
   }</pre>
 </div>
 
 <div class="method">
-    <code class="details" id="getTree">getTree(instanceName, hash, sizeBytes, pageSize=None, pageToken=None, x__xgafv=None)</code>
+    <code class="details" id="getTree">getTree(instanceName, hash, sizeBytes, pageToken=None, pageSize=None, x__xgafv=None)</code>
   <pre>Fetch the entire directory tree rooted at a node. This request must be targeted at a Directory stored in the ContentAddressableStorage (CAS). The server will enumerate the `Directory` tree recursively and return every node descended from the root. The GetTreeRequest.page_token parameter can be used to skip ahead in the stream (e.g. when retrying a partially completed and aborted request), by setting it to a value taken from GetTreeResponse.next_page_token of the last successfully processed GetTreeResponse). The exact traversal order is unspecified and, unless retrieving subsequent pages from an earlier request, is not guaranteed to be stable across multiple invocations of `GetTree`. If part of the tree is missing from the CAS, the server will return the portion present and omit the rest. Errors: * `NOT_FOUND`: The requested tree root is not present in the CAS.
 
 Args:
   instanceName: string, The instance of the execution system to operate against. A server may support multiple instances of the execution system (with their own workers, storage, caches, etc.). The server MAY require use of this field to select between them in an implementation-defined fashion, otherwise it can be omitted. (required)
   hash: string, The hash. In the case of SHA-256, it will always be a lowercase hex string exactly 64 characters long. (required)
   sizeBytes: string, The size of the blob, in bytes. (required)
-  pageSize: integer, A maximum page size to request. If present, the server will request no more than this many items. Regardless of whether a page size is specified, the server may place its own limit on the number of items to be returned and require the client to retrieve more items using a subsequent request.
   pageToken: string, A page token, which must be a value received in a previous GetTreeResponse. If present, the server will use that token as an offset, returning only that page and the ones that succeed it.
+  pageSize: integer, A maximum page size to request. If present, the server will request no more than this many items. Regardless of whether a page size is specified, the server may place its own limit on the number of items to be returned and require the client to retrieve more items using a subsequent request.
   x__xgafv: string, V1 error format.
     Allowed values
       1 - v1 error format
@@ -251,54 +251,54 @@
   An object of the form:
 
     { # A response message for ContentAddressableStorage.GetTree.
-    &quot;nextPageToken&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # If present, signifies that there are more results which the client can retrieve by passing this as the page_token in a subsequent request. If empty, signifies that this is the last page of results.
     &quot;directories&quot;: [ # The directories descended from the requested root.
       { # A `Directory` represents a directory node in a file tree, containing zero or more children FileNodes, DirectoryNodes and SymlinkNodes. Each `Node` contains its name in the directory, either the digest of its content (either a file blob or a `Directory` proto) or a symlink target, as well as possibly some metadata about the file or directory. In order to ensure that two equivalent directory trees hash to the same value, the following restrictions MUST be obeyed when constructing a a `Directory`: * Every child in the directory must have a path of exactly one segment. Multiple levels of directory hierarchy may not be collapsed. * Each child in the directory must have a unique path segment (file name). Note that while the API itself is case-sensitive, the environment where the Action is executed may or may not be case-sensitive. That is, it is legal to call the API with a Directory that has both &quot;Foo&quot; and &quot;foo&quot; as children, but the Action may be rejected by the remote system upon execution. * The files, directories and symlinks in the directory must each be sorted in lexicographical order by path. The path strings must be sorted by code point, equivalently, by UTF-8 bytes. * The NodeProperties of files, directories, and symlinks must be sorted in lexicographical order by property name. A `Directory` that obeys the restrictions is said to be in canonical form. As an example, the following could be used for a file named `bar` and a directory named `foo` with an executable file named `baz` (hashes shortened for readability): ```json // (Directory proto) { files: [ { name: &quot;bar&quot;, digest: { hash: &quot;4a73bc9d03...&quot;, size: 65534 }, node_properties: [ { &quot;name&quot;: &quot;MTime&quot;, &quot;value&quot;: &quot;2017-01-15T01:30:15.01Z&quot; } ] } ], directories: [ { name: &quot;foo&quot;, digest: { hash: &quot;4cf2eda940...&quot;, size: 43 } } ] } // (Directory proto with hash &quot;4cf2eda940...&quot; and size 43) { files: [ { name: &quot;baz&quot;, digest: { hash: &quot;b2c941073e...&quot;, size: 1294, }, is_executable: true } ] } ```
+        &quot;nodeProperties&quot;: [ # The node properties of the Directory.
+          { # A single property for FileNodes, DirectoryNodes, and SymlinkNodes. The server is responsible for specifying the property `name`s that it accepts. If permitted by the server, the same `name` may occur multiple times.
+            &quot;name&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The property name.
+            &quot;value&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The property value.
+          },
+        ],
         &quot;directories&quot;: [ # The subdirectories in the directory.
           { # A `DirectoryNode` represents a child of a Directory which is itself a `Directory` and its associated metadata.
-            &quot;name&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The name of the directory.
             &quot;digest&quot;: { # A content digest. A digest for a given blob consists of the size of the blob and its hash. The hash algorithm to use is defined by the server. The size is considered to be an integral part of the digest and cannot be separated. That is, even if the `hash` field is correctly specified but `size_bytes` is not, the server MUST reject the request. The reason for including the size in the digest is as follows: in a great many cases, the server needs to know the size of the blob it is about to work with prior to starting an operation with it, such as flattening Merkle tree structures or streaming it to a worker. Technically, the server could implement a separate metadata store, but this results in a significantly more complicated implementation as opposed to having the client specify the size up-front (or storing the size along with the digest in every message where digests are embedded). This does mean that the API leaks some implementation details of (what we consider to be) a reasonable server implementation, but we consider this to be a worthwhile tradeoff. When a `Digest` is used to refer to a proto message, it always refers to the message in binary encoded form. To ensure consistent hashing, clients and servers MUST ensure that they serialize messages according to the following rules, even if there are alternate valid encodings for the same message: * Fields are serialized in tag order. * There are no unknown fields. * There are no duplicate fields. * Fields are serialized according to the default semantics for their type. Most protocol buffer implementations will always follow these rules when serializing, but care should be taken to avoid shortcuts. For instance, concatenating two messages to merge them may produce duplicate fields. # The digest of the Directory object represented. See Digest for information about how to take the digest of a proto message.
-              &quot;hash&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The hash. In the case of SHA-256, it will always be a lowercase hex string exactly 64 characters long.
               &quot;sizeBytes&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The size of the blob, in bytes.
+              &quot;hash&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The hash. In the case of SHA-256, it will always be a lowercase hex string exactly 64 characters long.
             },
+            &quot;name&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The name of the directory.
           },
         ],
         &quot;symlinks&quot;: [ # The symlinks in the directory.
           { # A `SymlinkNode` represents a symbolic link.
             &quot;nodeProperties&quot;: [ # The node properties of the SymlinkNode.
               { # A single property for FileNodes, DirectoryNodes, and SymlinkNodes. The server is responsible for specifying the property `name`s that it accepts. If permitted by the server, the same `name` may occur multiple times.
-                &quot;value&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The property value.
                 &quot;name&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The property name.
+                &quot;value&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The property value.
               },
             ],
-            &quot;name&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The name of the symlink.
             &quot;target&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The target path of the symlink. The path separator is a forward slash `/`. The target path can be relative to the parent directory of the symlink or it can be an absolute path starting with `/`. Support for absolute paths can be checked using the Capabilities API. The canonical form forbids the substrings `/./` and `//` in the target path. `..` components are allowed anywhere in the target path.
-          },
-        ],
-        &quot;nodeProperties&quot;: [ # The node properties of the Directory.
-          { # A single property for FileNodes, DirectoryNodes, and SymlinkNodes. The server is responsible for specifying the property `name`s that it accepts. If permitted by the server, the same `name` may occur multiple times.
-            &quot;value&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The property value.
-            &quot;name&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The property name.
+            &quot;name&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The name of the symlink.
           },
         ],
         &quot;files&quot;: [ # The files in the directory.
           { # A `FileNode` represents a single file and associated metadata.
             &quot;digest&quot;: { # A content digest. A digest for a given blob consists of the size of the blob and its hash. The hash algorithm to use is defined by the server. The size is considered to be an integral part of the digest and cannot be separated. That is, even if the `hash` field is correctly specified but `size_bytes` is not, the server MUST reject the request. The reason for including the size in the digest is as follows: in a great many cases, the server needs to know the size of the blob it is about to work with prior to starting an operation with it, such as flattening Merkle tree structures or streaming it to a worker. Technically, the server could implement a separate metadata store, but this results in a significantly more complicated implementation as opposed to having the client specify the size up-front (or storing the size along with the digest in every message where digests are embedded). This does mean that the API leaks some implementation details of (what we consider to be) a reasonable server implementation, but we consider this to be a worthwhile tradeoff. When a `Digest` is used to refer to a proto message, it always refers to the message in binary encoded form. To ensure consistent hashing, clients and servers MUST ensure that they serialize messages according to the following rules, even if there are alternate valid encodings for the same message: * Fields are serialized in tag order. * There are no unknown fields. * There are no duplicate fields. * Fields are serialized according to the default semantics for their type. Most protocol buffer implementations will always follow these rules when serializing, but care should be taken to avoid shortcuts. For instance, concatenating two messages to merge them may produce duplicate fields. # The digest of the file&#x27;s content.
-              &quot;hash&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The hash. In the case of SHA-256, it will always be a lowercase hex string exactly 64 characters long.
               &quot;sizeBytes&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The size of the blob, in bytes.
+              &quot;hash&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The hash. In the case of SHA-256, it will always be a lowercase hex string exactly 64 characters long.
             },
-            &quot;isExecutable&quot;: True or False, # True if file is executable, false otherwise.
             &quot;name&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The name of the file.
             &quot;nodeProperties&quot;: [ # The node properties of the FileNode.
               { # A single property for FileNodes, DirectoryNodes, and SymlinkNodes. The server is responsible for specifying the property `name`s that it accepts. If permitted by the server, the same `name` may occur multiple times.
-                &quot;value&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The property value.
                 &quot;name&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The property name.
+                &quot;value&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # The property value.
               },
             ],
+            &quot;isExecutable&quot;: True or False, # True if file is executable, false otherwise.
           },
         ],
       },
     ],
+    &quot;nextPageToken&quot;: &quot;A String&quot;, # If present, signifies that there are more results which the client can retrieve by passing this as the page_token in a subsequent request. If empty, signifies that this is the last page of results.
   }</pre>
 </div>