revamped jinja2 import system. the behavior is less confusing now, but it's not backwards compatible. I like it though ;)
--HG--
branch : trunk
diff --git a/jinja2/nodes.py b/jinja2/nodes.py
index 5f3aabb..3aed350 100644
--- a/jinja2/nodes.py
+++ b/jinja2/nodes.py
@@ -263,9 +263,26 @@
class Include(Stmt):
"""A node that represents the include tag."""
+ fields = ('template',)
+
+
+class Import(Stmt):
+ """A node that represents the import tag."""
fields = ('template', 'target')
+class FromImport(Stmt):
+ """A node that represents the from import tag. It's important to not
+ pass unsafe names to the name attribute. The compiler translates the
+ attribute lookups directly into getattr calls and does *not* use the
+ subscribe callback of the interface. As exported variables may not
+ start with double underscores (which the parser asserts) this is not a
+ problem for regular Jinja code, but if this node is used in an extension
+ extra care must be taken.
+ """
+ fields = ('template', 'names')
+
+
class Trans(Stmt):
"""A node for translatable sections."""
fields = ('singular', 'plural', 'indicator', 'replacements')