..mention in benchmark docs as well
diff --git a/docs/benchmark.rst b/docs/benchmark.rst
index 3659197..8babaa3 100644
--- a/docs/benchmark.rst
+++ b/docs/benchmark.rst
@@ -2,7 +2,10 @@
=========
The following is the result of a synthetic benchmark comparing both compilation
-time and module size of pybind11 against Boost.Python.
+time and module size of pybind11 against Boost.Python. A detailed report about a
+Boost.Python to pybind11 conversion of a real project is available here: [#f1]_.
+
+.. [#f1] http://graylab.jhu.edu/RosettaCon2016/PyRosetta-4.pdf
Setup
-----
diff --git a/docs/intro.rst b/docs/intro.rst
index 8ad8acb..40dcf35 100644
--- a/docs/intro.rst
+++ b/docs/intro.rst
@@ -73,8 +73,6 @@
of `PyRosetta`_, an enourmous Boot.Python binding project, reported a binary
size reduction of **5.4x** and compile time reduction by **5.8x**.
-.. _PyRosetta: http://graylab.jhu.edu/RosettaCon2016/PyRosetta-4.pdf
-
- When supported by the compiler, two new C++14 features (relaxed constexpr and
return value deduction) are used to precompute function signatures at compile
time, leading to smaller binaries.
@@ -82,6 +80,8 @@
- With little extra effort, C++ types can be pickled and unpickled similar to
regular Python objects.
+.. _PyRosetta: http://graylab.jhu.edu/RosettaCon2016/PyRosetta-4.pdf
+
Supported compilers
*******************