minor setup.py updates
diff --git a/setup.py b/setup.py
index e9bc3c3..5213ee3 100644
--- a/setup.py
+++ b/setup.py
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
'include/pybind11/pytypes.h',
'include/pybind11/stl.h',
'include/pybind11/stl_bind.h',
- 'include/pybind11/typeid.h',
+ 'include/pybind11/typeid.h'
],
classifiers=[
'Development Status :: 5 - Production/Stable',
@@ -46,18 +46,19 @@
'Programming Language :: Python :: 3.3',
'Programming Language :: Python :: 3.4',
'Programming Language :: Python :: 3.5',
- 'License :: OSI Approved :: BSD License',
+ 'Programming Language :: Python :: 3.6',
+ 'License :: OSI Approved :: BSD License'
],
keywords='C++11, Python bindings',
- long_description="""pybind11 is a lightweight header library that exposes
-C++ types in Python and vice versa, mainly to create Python bindings of
+ long_description="""pybind11 is a lightweight header-only library that
+exposes C++ types in Python and vice versa, mainly to create Python bindings of
existing C++ code. Its goals and syntax are similar to the excellent
-Boost.Python library by David Abrahams: to minimize boilerplate code in
-traditional extension modules by inferring type information using compile-time
+Boost.Python by David Abrahams: to minimize boilerplate code in traditional
+extension modules by inferring type information using compile-time
introspection.
-The main issue with Boost.Python-and the reason for creating such a similar
-project-is Boost. Boost is an enormously large and complex suite of utility
+The main issue with Boost.Python—and the reason for creating such a similar
+project—is Boost. Boost is an enormously large and complex suite of utility
libraries that works with almost every C++ compiler in existence. This
compatibility has its cost: arcane template tricks and workarounds are
necessary to support the oldest and buggiest of compiler specimens. Now that
@@ -66,9 +67,9 @@
Think of this library as a tiny self-contained version of Boost.Python with
everything stripped away that isn't relevant for binding generation. Without
-comments, the core header files only require ~2.5K lines of code and depend on
-Python (2.7 or 3.x) and the C++ standard library. This compact implementation
-was possible thanks to some of the new C++11 language features (specifically:
-tuples, lambda functions and variadic templates). Since its creation, this
-library has grown beyond Boost.Python in many ways, leading to dramatically
-simpler binding code in many common situations.""")
+comments, the core header files only require ~4K lines of code and depend on
+Python (2.7 or 3.x, or PyPy2.7 >= 5.7) and the C++ standard library. This
+compact implementation was possible thanks to some of the new C++11 language
+features (specifically: tuples, lambda functions and variadic templates). Since
+its creation, this library has grown beyond Boost.Python in many ways, leading
+to dramatically simpler binding code in many common situations.""")