libc
Welcome! If you are reading this document, it means you are interested in contributing to the libc
crate.
Want to use an API which currently isn't bound in libc
? It's quite easy to add one!
The internal structure of this crate is designed to minimize the number of #[cfg]
attributes in order to easily be able to add new items which apply to all platforms in the future. As a result, the crate is organized hierarchically based on platform. Each module has a number of #[cfg]
'd children, but only one is ever actually compiled. Each module then reexports all the contents of its children.
This means that for each platform that libc supports, the path from a leaf module to the root will contain all bindings for the platform in question. Consequently, this indicates where an API should be added! Adding an API at a particular level in the hierarchy means that it is supported on all the child platforms of that level. For example, when adding a Unix API it should be added to src/unix/mod.rs
, but when adding a Linux-only API it should be added to src/unix/linux_like/linux/mod.rs
.
If you're not 100% sure at what level of the hierarchy an API should be added at, fear not! This crate has CI support which tests any binding against all platforms supported, so you'll see failures if an API is added at the wrong level or has different signatures across platforms.
New symbol(s) (i.e. functions, constants etc.) should also be added to the symbols list(s) found in the libc-test/semver
directory. These lists keep track of what symbols are public in the libc crate and ensures they remain available between changes to the crate. If the new symbol(s) are available on all supported Unixes it should be added to unix.txt
list1, otherwise they should be added to the OS specific list(s).
With that in mind, the steps for adding a new API are:
1: Note that this list has nothing to do with any Unix or Posix standard, it's just a list shared between all OSs that declare #[cfg(unix)]
.
We have two automated tests running on GitHub Actions:
cd libc-test && cargo test
skip_*()
functions in build.rs
if you really need a workaround.rustc ci/style.rs && ./style src
Sometimes an upstream adds a breaking change to their API e.g. removing outdated items, changing the type signature, etc. And we probably should follow that change to build the libc
crate successfully. It's annoying to do the equivalent of semver-major versioning for each such change. Instead, we mark the item as deprecated and do the actual change after a certain period. The steps are:
#[deprecated(since = "", note="")]
attribute to the item.since
field should have a next version of libc
(e.g., if the current version is 0.2.1
, it should be 0.2.2
).note
field should have a reason to deprecate and a tracking issue to call for comments (e.g., "We consider removing this as the upstream removed it. If you're using it, please comment on #XXX").Now that you've done the amazing job of landing your new API or your new platform in this crate, the next step is to get that sweet, sweet usage from crates.io! The only next step is to bump the version of libc and then publish it. If you'd like to get a release out ASAP you can follow these steps:
Cargo.toml
and libc-test/Cargo.toml
.