Re-land r9059 with empty cityhash.gyp, instead of deleted cityhash.gyp
R=rmistry@google.com
Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/15060008/
git-svn-id: http://skia.googlecode.com/svn/trunk@9064 2bbb7eff-a529-9590-31e7-b0007b416f81
diff --git a/tests/ChecksumTest.cpp b/tests/ChecksumTest.cpp
index 81e7ef3..ee33d32 100644
--- a/tests/ChecksumTest.cpp
+++ b/tests/ChecksumTest.cpp
@@ -8,7 +8,6 @@
#include "Test.h"
#include "SkChecksum.h"
-#include "SkCityHash.h"
// Word size that is large enough to hold results of any checksum type.
typedef uint64_t checksum_result;
@@ -25,9 +24,7 @@
}
private:
enum Algorithm {
- kSkChecksum,
- kSkCityHash32,
- kSkCityHash64
+ kSkChecksum
};
// Call Compute(data, size) on the appropriate checksum algorithm,
@@ -41,10 +38,6 @@
REPORTER_ASSERT_MESSAGE(fReporter, SkIsAlign4(size),
"test data size is not 32-bit aligned");
return SkChecksum::Compute(reinterpret_cast<const uint32_t *>(data), size);
- case kSkCityHash32:
- return SkCityHash::Compute32(data, size);
- case kSkCityHash64:
- return SkCityHash::Compute64(data, size);
default:
SkString message("fWhichAlgorithm has unknown value ");
message.appendf("%d", fWhichAlgorithm);
@@ -108,31 +101,11 @@
// Test self-consistency of checksum algorithms.
fWhichAlgorithm = kSkChecksum;
TestChecksumSelfConsistency(128);
- fWhichAlgorithm = kSkCityHash32;
- TestChecksumSelfConsistency(128);
- fWhichAlgorithm = kSkCityHash64;
- TestChecksumSelfConsistency(128);
// Test checksum results that should be consistent across
// versions and platforms.
fWhichAlgorithm = kSkChecksum;
REPORTER_ASSERT(fReporter, ComputeChecksum(NULL, 0) == 0);
- fWhichAlgorithm = kSkCityHash32;
- REPORTER_ASSERT(fReporter, ComputeChecksum(NULL, 0) == 0xdc56d17a);
- REPORTER_ASSERT(fReporter, GetTestDataChecksum(4) == 0x616e1132);
- REPORTER_ASSERT(fReporter, GetTestDataChecksum(8) == 0xeb0fd2d6);
- REPORTER_ASSERT(fReporter, GetTestDataChecksum(128) == 0x5321e430);
- REPORTER_ASSERT(fReporter, GetTestDataChecksum(132) == 0x924a10e4);
- REPORTER_ASSERT(fReporter, GetTestDataChecksum(256) == 0xd4de9dc9);
- REPORTER_ASSERT(fReporter, GetTestDataChecksum(260) == 0xecf0325d);
- fWhichAlgorithm = kSkCityHash64;
- REPORTER_ASSERT(fReporter, ComputeChecksum(NULL, 0) == 0x9ae16a3b2f90404fULL);
- REPORTER_ASSERT(fReporter, GetTestDataChecksum(4) == 0x82bffd898958e540ULL);
- REPORTER_ASSERT(fReporter, GetTestDataChecksum(8) == 0xad5a13e1e8e93b98ULL);
- REPORTER_ASSERT(fReporter, GetTestDataChecksum(128) == 0x10b153630af1f395ULL);
- REPORTER_ASSERT(fReporter, GetTestDataChecksum(132) == 0x7db71dc4adcc6647ULL);
- REPORTER_ASSERT(fReporter, GetTestDataChecksum(256) == 0xeee763519b91b010ULL);
- REPORTER_ASSERT(fReporter, GetTestDataChecksum(260) == 0x2fe19e0b2239bc23ULL);
// TODO: note the weakness exposed by these collisions...
// We need to improve the SkChecksum algorithm.