| commit | 1285f413950910782d5439b5072ccfa14bdf80f7 | [log] [tgz] |
|---|---|---|
| author | scroggo <scroggo@chromium.org> | Wed Oct 26 13:48:03 2016 -0700 |
| committer | Commit bot <commit-bot@chromium.org> | Wed Oct 26 13:48:03 2016 -0700 |
| tree | f206f8a5097984ba33cf20df74a13009ed31f949 | |
| parent | d187af90c7a3dc945eb91a7d3ade0311d1d111f0 [diff] |
Write transparent pixels more often (SkGifCodec) Writing transparent pixels is faster than the alternative, and we can skip clearing the frame to transparent. We'll still clear if the image is incomplete. I ran ./out/Release/nanobench --images <images> --samples 100 --sourceType image --simpleCodec -v over the GIFs we have on our bots, and found an average ~13% speedup. Raw data is on sheet 2 of https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/19V-t9BfbFw5eiwBTKA1qOBkZbchjlTC5EIz6HFy-6RI/ (the sheet is named WriteTransparentPixels). GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search?issue=2436183002 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2436183002