| /* | 
 |  * Copyright 2011 Google Inc. | 
 |  * | 
 |  * Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be | 
 |  * found in the LICENSE file. | 
 |  */ | 
 |  | 
 | #include "SkColorPriv.h" | 
 | #include "SkXfermode.h" | 
 | #include "Test.h" | 
 |  | 
 | // our std SkAlpha255To256 | 
 | static int test_srcover0(unsigned dst, unsigned alpha) { | 
 |     return alpha + SkAlphaMul(dst, SkAlpha255To256(255 - alpha)); | 
 | } | 
 |  | 
 | // faster hack +1 | 
 | static int test_srcover1(unsigned dst, unsigned alpha) { | 
 |     return alpha + SkAlphaMul(dst, 256 - alpha); | 
 | } | 
 |  | 
 | // slower "correct" | 
 | static int test_srcover2(unsigned dst, unsigned alpha) { | 
 |     return alpha + SkMulDiv255Round(dst, 255 - alpha); | 
 | } | 
 |  | 
 | DEF_TEST(SrcOver, reporter) { | 
 |     /*  Here's the idea. Can we ensure that when we blend on top of an opaque | 
 |         dst, that the result always stay's opaque (i.e. exactly 255)? | 
 |      */ | 
 |  | 
 |     unsigned i; | 
 |     int opaqueCounter0 = 0; | 
 |     int opaqueCounter1 = 0; | 
 |     int opaqueCounter2 = 0; | 
 |     for (i = 0; i <= 255; i++) { | 
 |         unsigned result0 = test_srcover0(0xFF, i); | 
 |         unsigned result1 = test_srcover1(0xFF, i); | 
 |         unsigned result2 = test_srcover2(0xFF, i); | 
 |         opaqueCounter0 += (result0 == 0xFF); | 
 |         opaqueCounter1 += (result1 == 0xFF); | 
 |         opaqueCounter2 += (result2 == 0xFF); | 
 |     } | 
 | #if 0 | 
 |     SkDebugf("---- opaque test: [%d %d %d]\n", | 
 |              opaqueCounter0, opaqueCounter1, opaqueCounter2); | 
 | #endif | 
 |     // we acknowledge that technique0 does not always return opaque | 
 |     REPORTER_ASSERT(reporter, opaqueCounter0 == 256); | 
 |     REPORTER_ASSERT(reporter, opaqueCounter1 == 256); | 
 |     REPORTER_ASSERT(reporter, opaqueCounter2 == 256); | 
 |  | 
 |     // Now ensure that we never over/underflow a byte | 
 |     for (i = 0; i <= 255; i++) { | 
 |         for (unsigned dst = 0; dst <= 255; dst++) { | 
 |             unsigned r0 = test_srcover0(dst, i); | 
 |             unsigned r1 = test_srcover1(dst, i); | 
 |             unsigned r2 = test_srcover2(dst, i); | 
 |             unsigned max = SkMax32(dst, i); | 
 |             // ignore the known failure | 
 |             if (dst != 255) { | 
 |                 REPORTER_ASSERT(reporter, r0 <= 255 && r0 >= max); | 
 |             } | 
 |             REPORTER_ASSERT(reporter, r1 <= 255 && r1 >= max); | 
 |             REPORTER_ASSERT(reporter, r2 <= 255 && r2 >= max); | 
 |  | 
 | #if 0 | 
 |             // this shows where r1 (faster) differs from r2 (more exact) | 
 |             if (r1 != r2) { | 
 |                 SkDebugf("--- dst=%d i=%d r1=%d r2=%d exact=%g\n", | 
 |                          dst, i, r1, r2, i + dst - dst*i/255.0f); | 
 |             } | 
 | #endif | 
 |         } | 
 |     } | 
 | } |