| commit | 4ff08df15a8042cdb4fc90a82e1044847d0de300 | [log] [tgz] |
|---|---|---|
| author | msarett <msarett@google.com> | Mon Aug 22 14:58:56 2016 -0700 |
| committer | Commit bot <commit-bot@chromium.org> | Mon Aug 22 14:58:56 2016 -0700 |
| tree | cd47887749df6dfbd439c7170be0b65278250565 | |
| parent | dcb406c29d72842684e67e746ddf7fe0b9a597db [diff] |
More robust check for sRGB gamma tables This is in response to a UMA showing that 5% dst gammas are unidentified tables. We want to see if some of these tables should be marked as sRGB. https://uma.googleplex.com/p/chrome/histograms?endDate=latest&dayCount=1&histograms=Blink.ColorSpace.Destination&fixupData=true&showMax=true&filters=isofficial%2Ceq%2CTrue&implicitFilters=isofficial This check is not fast. If we find that it doesn't help us recognize sRGB curves, we should delete it. BUG=skia:5656 GOLD_TRYBOT_URL= https://gold.skia.org/search?issue=2263233003 Review-Url: https://codereview.chromium.org/2263233003