Use sk_sp with GrXferProcessor and use a static factory to handle the nullptr==srcover case.
Bug: skia:
Change-Id: I9c07069fc2aae24fc2884c18939e3a649afc27e7
Reviewed-on: https://skia-review.googlesource.com/11282
Reviewed-by: Greg Daniel <egdaniel@google.com>
Commit-Queue: Brian Salomon <bsalomon@google.com>
diff --git a/src/gpu/effects/GrCoverageSetOpXP.cpp b/src/gpu/effects/GrCoverageSetOpXP.cpp
index 4d4b00a..5b54308 100644
--- a/src/gpu/effects/GrCoverageSetOpXP.cpp
+++ b/src/gpu/effects/GrCoverageSetOpXP.cpp
@@ -18,12 +18,11 @@
class CoverageSetOpXP : public GrXferProcessor {
public:
- static GrXferProcessor* Create(SkRegion::Op regionOp, bool invertCoverage) {
- return new CoverageSetOpXP(regionOp, invertCoverage);
+ CoverageSetOpXP(SkRegion::Op regionOp, bool invertCoverage)
+ : fRegionOp(regionOp), fInvertCoverage(invertCoverage) {
+ this->initClassID<CoverageSetOpXP>();
}
- ~CoverageSetOpXP() override;
-
const char* name() const override { return "Coverage Set Op"; }
GrGLSLXferProcessor* createGLSLInstance() const override;
@@ -31,7 +30,6 @@
bool invertCoverage() const { return fInvertCoverage; }
private:
- CoverageSetOpXP(SkRegion::Op regionOp, bool fInvertCoverage);
void onGetGLSLProcessorKey(const GrShaderCaps& caps, GrProcessorKeyBuilder* b) const override;
@@ -83,15 +81,6 @@
///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
-CoverageSetOpXP::CoverageSetOpXP(SkRegion::Op regionOp, bool invertCoverage)
- : fRegionOp(regionOp)
- , fInvertCoverage(invertCoverage) {
- this->initClassID<CoverageSetOpXP>();
-}
-
-CoverageSetOpXP::~CoverageSetOpXP() {
-}
-
void CoverageSetOpXP::onGetGLSLProcessorKey(const GrShaderCaps& caps,
GrProcessorKeyBuilder* b) const {
GLCoverageSetOpXP::GenKey(*this, caps, b);
@@ -218,10 +207,10 @@
return nullptr;
}
-GrXferProcessor* GrCoverageSetOpXPFactory::onCreateXferProcessor(const GrCaps& caps,
- const GrProcessorAnalysisColor&,
- GrProcessorAnalysisCoverage,
- bool hasMixedSamples) const {
+sk_sp<GrXferProcessor> GrCoverageSetOpXPFactory::makeXferProcessor(const GrProcessorAnalysisColor&,
+ GrProcessorAnalysisCoverage,
+ bool hasMixedSamples,
+ const GrCaps& caps) const {
// We don't support inverting coverage with mixed samples. We don't expect to ever want this in
// the future, however we could at some point make this work using an inverted coverage
// modulation table. Note that an inverted table still won't work if there are coverage procs.
@@ -230,7 +219,7 @@
return nullptr;
}
- return CoverageSetOpXP::Create(fRegionOp, fInvertCoverage);
+ return sk_sp<GrXferProcessor>(new CoverageSetOpXP(fRegionOp, fInvertCoverage));
}
GR_DEFINE_XP_FACTORY_TEST(GrCoverageSetOpXPFactory);
@@ -239,6 +228,6 @@
const GrXPFactory* GrCoverageSetOpXPFactory::TestGet(GrProcessorTestData* d) {
SkRegion::Op regionOp = SkRegion::Op(d->fRandom->nextULessThan(SkRegion::kLastOp + 1));
bool invertCoverage = !d->fRenderTargetContext->hasMixedSamples() && d->fRandom->nextBool();
- return GrCoverageSetOpXPFactory::Get(regionOp, invertCoverage);
+ return new GrCoverageSetOpXPFactory(regionOp, invertCoverage);
}
#endif