tree a2a7b15ea279814f2b187ac3338c9abca7dc6f5f
parent 4a9426f0fa812c0f1bffa84f0dae0926607a9543
author rmistry <rmistry@google.com> 1427887184 -0700
committer Commit bot <commit-bot@chromium.org> 1427887185 -0700

Revert of Implement approx-match support in image filter saveLayer() offscreen. (patchset #27 id:510001 of https://codereview.chromium.org/1034733002/)

Reason for revert:
Looks like this change is causing layout test failures which is blocking Skia's DEPS roll into Chromium:
https://codereview.chromium.org/1050563002/
https://codereview.chromium.org/1043133005/
https://codereview.chromium.org/1048273002/

Reverting to see if this fixes the DEPS roll.

Original issue's description:
> Implement approx-match support in image filter saveLayer() offscreen.
>
> Currently, the GPU-side image filter implementation creates
> exact-match textures for the offscreen backing stores for
> saveLayer().  This is because several filters have GPU
> implementations which depend on the texture coordinates
> being 0..1.
>
> The fix is three-fold:
>
> 1) Store the actual requested size in the SkGpuDevice, so
> that when wrapping it in an SkBitmap for passing to
> filterImage(), we can give it the original size.
> 2) Fix the filters (SkMagnifierImageFilter,
> SkLightingImageFilter) whose GPU implementation depends on
> 0..1 texture coordinates.
> 3) Remove the exception for GPU-side image filters in
> SkCanvas::internalSaveLayer().
>
> For the lighting filters, there were two bugs which were
> cancelling each other out: the sobel filter matrix was
> being computed upside down, but then we'd negate the
> resulting normal. This worked fine in the exact-match case,
> but in the approx-match case we'd sample garbage along
> the edge pixels. Also, we never implemented the edge pixels
> according to spec in the GPU case. It requires a
> different fragment shader for each edge of the nine-patch,
> which meant we couldn't use asFragmentProcessor(), and had
> to implement the drawing via a filterImageGPU() override.
> In order to avoid polluting the public API, I inserted a
> new base class, SkLightingImageFilterInternal above
> Sk[Diffuse|Specular]LightingImageFilter to handle the
> implementation.
>
> N.B.: this change will cause some minor pixel diffs in the
> GPU results of the following GMs (and possibly more):
> matriximagefilter, matrixconvolution, imagefiltersscaled,
> lighting, imagemagnifier, filterfastbounds,
> complexclip_aa_Layer_invert, complexclip_aa_layer,
> complexclip_bw_layer_invert, complexclip_bw_layer.
>
> BUG=skia:3532
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/b97dafefe63ea0a1bbce8e8b209f4920983fb8b9
>
> Committed: https://skia.googlesource.com/skia/+/f5f8518fe0bbd2703e4ffc1b11ad7b4312ff7641

TBR=bsalomon@google.com,reed@chromium.org,senorblanco@chromium.org
NOPRESUBMIT=true
NOTREECHECKS=true
NOTRY=true
BUG=skia:3532

Review URL: https://codereview.chromium.org/1057443003