Stop using LOG macros in favor of RTC_ prefixed macros.
This CL has been generated with the following script:
for m in PLOG \
LOG_TAG \
LOG_GLEM \
LOG_GLE_EX \
LOG_GLE \
LAST_SYSTEM_ERROR \
LOG_ERRNO_EX \
LOG_ERRNO \
LOG_ERR_EX \
LOG_ERR \
LOG_V \
LOG_F \
LOG_T_F \
LOG_E \
LOG_T \
LOG_CHECK_LEVEL_V \
LOG_CHECK_LEVEL \
LOG
do
git grep -l $m | xargs sed -i "s,\b$m\b,RTC_$m,g"
done
git checkout rtc_base/logging.h
git cl format
Bug: webrtc:8452
Change-Id: I1a53ef3e0a5ef6e244e62b2e012b864914784600
Reviewed-on: https://webrtc-review.googlesource.com/21325
Reviewed-by: Niels Moller <nisse@webrtc.org>
Reviewed-by: Karl Wiberg <kwiberg@webrtc.org>
Commit-Queue: Mirko Bonadei <mbonadei@webrtc.org>
Cr-Commit-Position: refs/heads/master@{#20617}diff --git a/media/sctp/sctptransport_unittest.cc b/media/sctp/sctptransport_unittest.cc
index 92f7cbb..32e439a 100644
--- a/media/sctp/sctptransport_unittest.cc
+++ b/media/sctp/sctptransport_unittest.cc
@@ -150,11 +150,12 @@
bool asymmetric = false;
fake_dtls1_->SetDestination(fake_dtls2_.get(), asymmetric);
- LOG(LS_VERBOSE) << "Transport setup ----------------------------- ";
+ RTC_LOG(LS_VERBOSE) << "Transport setup ----------------------------- ";
AddStream(1);
AddStream(2);
- LOG(LS_VERBOSE) << "Connect the transports -----------------------------";
+ RTC_LOG(LS_VERBOSE)
+ << "Connect the transports -----------------------------";
// Both transports need to have started (with matching ports) for an
// association to be formed.
transport1_->Start(port1, port2);
@@ -397,34 +398,34 @@
SetupConnectedTransportsWithTwoStreams();
SendDataResult result;
- LOG(LS_VERBOSE)
+ RTC_LOG(LS_VERBOSE)
<< "transport1 sending: 'hello?' -----------------------------";
ASSERT_TRUE(SendData(transport1(), 1, "hello?", &result));
EXPECT_EQ(SDR_SUCCESS, result);
EXPECT_TRUE_WAIT(ReceivedData(receiver2(), 1, "hello?"), kDefaultTimeout);
- LOG(LS_VERBOSE) << "recv2.received=" << receiver2()->received()
- << ", recv2.last_params.sid="
- << receiver2()->last_params().sid
- << ", recv2.last_params.timestamp="
- << receiver2()->last_params().timestamp
- << ", recv2.last_params.seq_num="
- << receiver2()->last_params().seq_num
- << ", recv2.last_data=" << receiver2()->last_data();
+ RTC_LOG(LS_VERBOSE) << "recv2.received=" << receiver2()->received()
+ << ", recv2.last_params.sid="
+ << receiver2()->last_params().sid
+ << ", recv2.last_params.timestamp="
+ << receiver2()->last_params().timestamp
+ << ", recv2.last_params.seq_num="
+ << receiver2()->last_params().seq_num
+ << ", recv2.last_data=" << receiver2()->last_data();
- LOG(LS_VERBOSE)
+ RTC_LOG(LS_VERBOSE)
<< "transport2 sending: 'hi transport1' -----------------------------";
ASSERT_TRUE(SendData(transport2(), 2, "hi transport1", &result));
EXPECT_EQ(SDR_SUCCESS, result);
EXPECT_TRUE_WAIT(ReceivedData(receiver1(), 2, "hi transport1"),
kDefaultTimeout);
- LOG(LS_VERBOSE) << "recv1.received=" << receiver1()->received()
- << ", recv1.last_params.sid="
- << receiver1()->last_params().sid
- << ", recv1.last_params.timestamp="
- << receiver1()->last_params().timestamp
- << ", recv1.last_params.seq_num="
- << receiver1()->last_params().seq_num
- << ", recv1.last_data=" << receiver1()->last_data();
+ RTC_LOG(LS_VERBOSE) << "recv1.received=" << receiver1()->received()
+ << ", recv1.last_params.sid="
+ << receiver1()->last_params().sid
+ << ", recv1.last_params.timestamp="
+ << receiver1()->last_params().timestamp
+ << ", recv1.last_params.seq_num="
+ << receiver1()->last_params().seq_num
+ << ", recv1.last_data=" << receiver1()->last_data();
}
// Sends a lot of large messages at once and verifies SDR_BLOCK is returned.