Improved ignore-backoff handling
Allow a non-epidited ignore-backoff op to pass through
an expidited backed off op.
To do this, I first refactored the complicated if statement:
if (best == null
|| ((bestSyncableIsUnknownAndNotARetry == syncableIsUnknownAndNotARetry)
? (best.expedited == op.expedited
? opRunTime < bestRunTime
: op.expedited)
: syncableIsUnknownAndNotARetry)) {
best = op;
bestSyncableIsUnknownAndNotARetry = syncableIsUnknownAndNotARetry;
bestRunTime = opRunTime;
}
Into a more readable:
boolean setBest = false;
if (best == null) {
setBest = true;
} else if (bestSyncableIsUnknownAndNotARetry == syncableIsUnknownAndNotARetry) {
if (best.expedited == op.expedited) {
if (opRunTime < bestRunTime) {
// if both have same level, earlier time wins
setBest = true;
}
} else {
if (op.expedited) {
setBest = true;
}
}
} else {
if (syncableIsUnknownAndNotARetry) {
setBest = true;
}
}
if (setBest) {
best = op;
bestSyncableIsUnknownAndNotARetry = syncableIsUnknownAndNotARetry;
bestRunTime = opRunTime;
}
The refactoring was all done automatically with IntelliJ to avoid human error
in the conversion.
After verifying this code still behaved as expected including the error
condition in the bug, I added handling for the cases when a non-expidited op
may override an expedited op if certain conditions occur, specificaly, if the
expidited op is backed off and the non-expidited op is not.
Finally, refactored to make it testable and added tests and logging.
Bug: 3128963
Change-Id: I131cbcec6073ea5fe425f6b5aa88ca56c02b6598
2 files changed