X86: loosen an overly aggressive MachO assertion
We would assert that the FP setup CFI used esp/rsp always. This held up in
practice when the code was generated from IR. However, with the integrated
assembler, it is possible to have the input be user specified assembly. In such
a case, we cannot assume that the function implementation has a compact unwind
representation. Loosen the assertion into a check and bail if we cannot
represent the frame pointer in the compact unwinding.
Addresses PR30453!
llvm-svn: 281986
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/MCTargetDesc/X86AsmBackend.cpp b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/MCTargetDesc/X86AsmBackend.cpp
index 524b48b..1bde4bc 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Target/X86/MCTargetDesc/X86AsmBackend.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Target/X86/MCTargetDesc/X86AsmBackend.cpp
@@ -546,8 +546,12 @@
// .cfi_def_cfa_register %rbp
//
HasFP = true;
- assert(MRI.getLLVMRegNum(Inst.getRegister(), true) ==
- (Is64Bit ? X86::RBP : X86::EBP) && "Invalid frame pointer!");
+
+ // If the frame pointer is other than esp/rsp, we do not have a way to
+ // generate a compact unwinding representation, so bail out.
+ if (MRI.getLLVMRegNum(Inst.getRegister(), true) !=
+ (Is64Bit ? X86::RBP : X86::EBP))
+ return 0;
// Reset the counts.
memset(SavedRegs, 0, sizeof(SavedRegs));