Reflow paragraphs in comments.
This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit
(r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment
paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read.
FYI, the script I used was:
import textwrap
import commands
import os
import sys
import re
tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1]
out = open(tmp, "w+")
with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f:
header = ""
text = ""
comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$')
special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$')
for line in f:
match = comment.match(line)
if match and not special.match(match.group(2)):
# skip intentionally short comments.
if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40:
out.write(line)
continue
if text:
text += " " + match.group(2)
else:
header = match.group(1)
text = match.group(2)
continue
if text:
filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)),
break_long_words=False)
for l in filled:
out.write(header+" "+l+'\n')
text = ""
out.write(line)
os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1])
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144
llvm-svn: 331197
diff --git a/lldb/source/Commands/CommandObjectExpression.cpp b/lldb/source/Commands/CommandObjectExpression.cpp
index fc62b39..9fe00f4 100644
--- a/lldb/source/Commands/CommandObjectExpression.cpp
+++ b/lldb/source/Commands/CommandObjectExpression.cpp
@@ -322,9 +322,9 @@
Stream *output_stream,
Stream *error_stream,
CommandReturnObject *result) {
- // Don't use m_exe_ctx as this might be called asynchronously
- // after the command object DoExecute has finished when doing
- // multi-line expression that use an input reader...
+ // Don't use m_exe_ctx as this might be called asynchronously after the
+ // command object DoExecute has finished when doing multi-line expression
+ // that use an input reader...
ExecutionContext exe_ctx(m_interpreter.GetExecutionContext());
Target *target = exe_ctx.GetTargetPtr();
@@ -363,8 +363,8 @@
if (m_command_options.top_level)
options.SetExecutionPolicy(eExecutionPolicyTopLevel);
- // If there is any chance we are going to stop and want to see
- // what went wrong with our expression, we should generate debug info
+ // If there is any chance we are going to stop and want to see what went
+ // wrong with our expression, we should generate debug info
if (!m_command_options.ignore_breakpoints ||
!m_command_options.unwind_on_error)
options.SetGenerateDebugInfo(true);
@@ -475,9 +475,8 @@
// An empty lines is used to indicate the end of input
const size_t num_lines = lines.GetSize();
if (num_lines > 0 && lines[num_lines - 1].empty()) {
- // Remove the last empty line from "lines" so it doesn't appear
- // in our resulting input and return true to indicate we are done
- // getting lines
+ // Remove the last empty line from "lines" so it doesn't appear in our
+ // resulting input and return true to indicate we are done getting lines
lines.PopBack();
return true;
}
@@ -562,19 +561,16 @@
Debugger &debugger = target->GetDebugger();
// Check if the LLDB command interpreter is sitting on top of a REPL
- // that
- // launched it...
+ // that launched it...
if (debugger.CheckTopIOHandlerTypes(
IOHandler::Type::CommandInterpreter, IOHandler::Type::REPL)) {
// the LLDB command interpreter is sitting on top of a REPL that
- // launched it,
- // so just say the command interpreter is done and fall back to the
- // existing REPL
+ // launched it, so just say the command interpreter is done and
+ // fall back to the existing REPL
m_interpreter.GetIOHandler(false)->SetIsDone(true);
} else {
// We are launching the REPL on top of the current LLDB command
- // interpreter,
- // so just push one
+ // interpreter, so just push one
bool initialize = false;
Status repl_error;
REPLSP repl_sp(target->GetREPL(
@@ -642,14 +638,12 @@
}
history.AppendString(fixed_command);
}
- // Increment statistics to record this expression evaluation
- // success.
+ // Increment statistics to record this expression evaluation success.
target->IncrementStats(StatisticKind::ExpressionSuccessful);
return true;
}
- // Increment statistics to record this expression evaluation
- // failure.
+ // Increment statistics to record this expression evaluation failure.
target->IncrementStats(StatisticKind::ExpressionFailure);
result.SetStatus(eReturnStatusFailed);
return false;