Reflow paragraphs in comments.
This is intended as a clean up after the big clang-format commit
(r280751), which unfortunately resulted in many of the comment
paragraphs in LLDB being very hard to read.
FYI, the script I used was:
import textwrap
import commands
import os
import sys
import re
tmp = "%s.tmp"%sys.argv[1]
out = open(tmp, "w+")
with open(sys.argv[1], "r") as f:
header = ""
text = ""
comment = re.compile(r'^( *//) ([^ ].*)$')
special = re.compile(r'^((([A-Z]+[: ])|([0-9]+ )).*)|(.*;)$')
for line in f:
match = comment.match(line)
if match and not special.match(match.group(2)):
# skip intentionally short comments.
if not text and len(match.group(2)) < 40:
out.write(line)
continue
if text:
text += " " + match.group(2)
else:
header = match.group(1)
text = match.group(2)
continue
if text:
filled = textwrap.wrap(text, width=(78-len(header)),
break_long_words=False)
for l in filled:
out.write(header+" "+l+'\n')
text = ""
out.write(line)
os.rename(tmp, sys.argv[1])
Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D46144
llvm-svn: 331197
diff --git a/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/Linux/SingleStepCheck.cpp b/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/Linux/SingleStepCheck.cpp
index 251cb4b..c57a2da 100644
--- a/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/Linux/SingleStepCheck.cpp
+++ b/lldb/source/Plugins/Process/Linux/SingleStepCheck.cpp
@@ -59,9 +59,9 @@
bool WorkaroundNeeded() {
// We shall spawn a child, and use it to verify the debug capabilities of the
- // cpu. We shall iterate through the cpus, bind the child to each one in turn,
- // and verify that single-stepping works on that cpu. A workaround is needed
- // if we find at least one broken cpu.
+ // cpu. We shall iterate through the cpus, bind the child to each one in
+ // turn, and verify that single-stepping works on that cpu. A workaround is
+ // needed if we find at least one broken cpu.
Log *log = ProcessPOSIXLog::GetLogIfAllCategoriesSet(POSIX_LOG_THREAD);
::pid_t child_pid = fork();