Implement semantic checking for template arguments that correspond to
pointer-to-member-data non-type template parameters. Also, get
consistent about what it means to returned a bool from
CheckTemplateArgument.
llvm-svn: 64305
diff --git a/clang/test/SemaTemplate/temp_arg_template.cpp b/clang/test/SemaTemplate/temp_arg_template.cpp
index 3e8e6f2..e1b9bb4 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaTemplate/temp_arg_template.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaTemplate/temp_arg_template.cpp
@@ -35,7 +35,8 @@
// FIXME: we're right to provide an error message, but it should say
// that we need a class template. We won't get this right until name
// lookup of 'f' returns a TemplateDecl.
-A<f> *a9; // expected-error{{template argument for template template parameter must be a template}}
+A<f> *a9; // expected-error{{template argument for template template parameter must be a template}} \
+ // expected-error{{unqualified-id}}
// FIXME: The code below is ill-formed, because of the evil digraph '<:'.
// We should provide a much better error message than we currently do.