[SimplifyCFG] Add final missing implications to isImpliedTrueByMatchingCmp.

Summary: eq imply [u|s]ge and [u|s]le are true.

Remove redundant logic by implementing isImpliedFalseByMatchingCmp(Pred1, Pred2)
as isImpliedTrueByMatchingCmp(Pred1, getInversePredicate(Pred2)).

llvm-svn: 267177
diff --git a/llvm/lib/IR/Instructions.cpp b/llvm/lib/IR/Instructions.cpp
index 13e5821..8ad9c07 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/IR/Instructions.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/IR/Instructions.cpp
@@ -3562,6 +3562,10 @@
   switch (Pred1) {
   default:
     break;
+  case ICMP_EQ:
+    // A == B implies A >=u B, A <=u B, A >=u B, and A <=u B are true.
+    return Pred2 == ICMP_UGE || Pred2 == ICMP_ULE || Pred2 == ICMP_SGE ||
+           Pred2 == ICMP_SLE;
   case ICMP_UGT: // A >u B implies A != B and A >=u B are true.
     return Pred2 == ICMP_NE || Pred2 == ICMP_UGE;
   case ICMP_ULT: // A <u B implies A != B and A <=u B are true.
@@ -3575,38 +3579,7 @@
 }
 
 bool CmpInst::isImpliedFalseByMatchingCmp(Predicate Pred1, Predicate Pred2) {
-  // If an inverted Pred1 matches Pred2, we can infer the second condition is
-  // false.
-  if (getInversePredicate(Pred1) == Pred2)
-    return true;
-
-  // If a swapped Pred1 matches Pred2, we can infer the second condition is
-  // false in many cases.
-  if (getSwappedPredicate(Pred1) == Pred2) {
-    switch (Pred1) {
-    default:
-      break;
-    case ICMP_UGT: // A >u B implies A <u B is false.
-    case ICMP_ULT: // A <u B implies A >u B is false.
-    case ICMP_SGT: // A >s B implies A <s B is false.
-    case ICMP_SLT: // A <s B implies A >s B is false.
-      return true;
-    }
-  }
-  // A == B implies A > B and A < B are false.
-  if (Pred1 == ICMP_EQ && isFalseWhenEqual(Pred2))
-    return true;
-
-  switch (Pred1) {
-  default:
-    break;
-  case ICMP_UGT: // A >u B implies A == B is false.
-  case ICMP_ULT: // A <u B implies A == B is false.
-  case ICMP_SGT: // A >s B implies A == B is false.
-  case ICMP_SLT: // A <s B implies A == B is false.
-    return Pred2 == ICMP_EQ;
-  }
-  return false;
+  return isImpliedTrueByMatchingCmp(Pred1, getInversePredicate(Pred2));
 }
 
 //===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//